|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 25 post(s) |

Fred0
|
Posted - 2006.05.09 14:57:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Fred0 on 09/05/2006 14:57:59 Well wtf, your post didn't say if you wanted sole ownership, contested status or anything. And seriously to two days in come and spout this crap on the forums is just amazing for someone who's been in the game as long as you. Not even SA request map changes based on monday to tuesday. If the map was based on two day invasions there wouldn't be 15-20 days between each version.
Get the bloody sovereignity over and done with and I'm sure you don't even have to post to be acknowledged. I know that's what happened for us anyway.
EDIT: I know it's not my business either but when it gets retarded enough everybody has an obligation to stand up and say sod off. ---
|

Fred0
|
Posted - 2006.05.28 21:02:00 -
[2]
Incidentally, where have those rules gone? There used to be a listing for how it worked in npc and conq station regions separately.
Personally I think it's pretty retarded to get acknowledged on the map with a statement of intention as both ASCN and now BOB has tried in a conq station region. Just take it over and there will be no doubt. ---
|

Fred0
|
Posted - 2006.06.02 06:43:00 -
[3]
Err, map hasn't been updated as far as I can see. Both querious and Tribute are clearly wrong now.
|

Fred0
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.13 11:04:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Graalum D2 should certainly be on the warzone list, if bringing a fleet and a dozen+ dreads doesn't earn an addition to the warmarker, than i don't know what does. Plenty of A-w have been involved as well, but they seem to be CDC residents and not really very potent to say the least. I will agree that Ratel doesn't deserve to be on any warmarker at this point, i don't think they have been involved in any major activities.
my thought is eu4ia, cdc, pure, d2 vs rk, smash, kos
I know this is not an arguing thread but anyway. Sometimes the retardation has to be stopped before Josh finds his way here. To the best of my knowledge Josh always try to have the map depicting the ones with a territorial claim to the area. A few times that means leaving out friends who help out because they have no territorial interest.
SMASH and Roadkill are going totally overboard with their "everyone we shoot and find in geminate should be included on the map on the E-R side" approach. It's silly really. You are on the ******* map already as contesting an area, why do you even bother with anything else, except ofcourse if the purpose is a massive ego boosting pr campaign.
|

Fred0
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.19 21:25:00 -
[5]
Josh, have a look at this: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=446943
We haven't actually gone for alot of pos there yet though so dunno if you even want to mark it up.
|

Fred0
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.01.05 14:40:00 -
[6]
Originally by: QwaarJet Razor had a thread that they claimed one of the new regions. I don't see that in the map.....maybe they don't claim it anymore.
We do claim it, together with you, D2 and IRON and I've (and Therem) alerted Josh to the fact that it's a razor claim to the top 4 constellations where we've also pointed out which constellations belong to RULE and what constellation belongs to TRE. All these claims are uncontested atm but I think Josh is taking a cautious approach to the new regions only recognising the ones with outposts up or a covering pos network or something like that.
|

Fred0
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 21:05:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Fred0 on 23/01/2007 21:04:43 Disregard apple boy. We've made our claims and we definitely have no interest to post about Venal. Please Apple boy, please.
|
|
|
|