I do agree with the idea as it would mean more htfu in wspace. Wspace people can make a lot of isk and the space does not have local. It should be mysterious and unknown. I do understand people position to farm in peace but i do not understand your spirit of wspace.

I am sorely disappointed by the post you just made...

If anyone wants to know the second somebody rolls into you, it's not different from people wanting to stay local in k-space, so they can POS up their carrier the second they get a +1 neutral in local..

Yes it would promote ganking. And that is bad because? ...

Ganking a farming fleet of anyone who has a clue about W-Space is really hard. Most of the time it's just bad people or carebears that get ganked in sleeper sites though.

Those who have a clue about how to farm properly can do it safely with impunity (except prepared log-on traps). Bubbles, pickets, extreme site running speed (10-15 minutes) and the fact that a new inbound signature most likely does not have a full fleet assembled and ready the second it spawns - makes it almost safe. If you just do marauders, MJD out.

For the most part, W-Space PvP is this:

a) Consensual PvP. This is mostly between the larger entities. One comes and says "Wanna play?" and then both brawl and have a good time.
b) Log-on traps. Just look at Quantum Explosion's killboard.
c) Sieges (basically an extension of Log-On traps). Happen kind of rarely - probably least desirable for all parties involved.
d) Ganking farming fleets.

This is a result because nobody "roams" with fleets in W-Space like nullsec people do. FIghts don't escalate at POSes or SOV structures. These instances above summarize W-Space pvp pretty much. The proposed change would make d) more viable against people who are almost immune to it.

For those who are already bad it wouldn't make a difference, since they seem to be bad enough that we can catch them on a regular basis.

Not only can C5 and C6 groups roll their statics to other C5+s more reliably in one go but also with about half the number of accounts involved compared to a typical lower class WH static. While C5+ groups with lower class static GÇ£shouldGÇ¥ have the numbers to abuse the proposed mechanic to their advantage, who chain rolls lower class WH statics for PvP anyways? Way to painful, way too few targets!
It is needless to say that most lower class WH groups donGÇÖt have the numbers to roll in one go on a daily basis. Most of their PvP (from my experience) comes from their chain or people trying to crush connection a WH or do something else foolish.

Alternatively in C5/6 space make it so the next incoming wormhole spawns on grid with the most recently escalated site (or random selection if theres more than one recently escalated) would make things a bit interesting hehe.

that's a popular sentiment, that things should have a counter, and it's also a very rock-paper-scissors view of things. Instead of asking "what's the counter?" and expecting that one exists, a more flexible approach would be to ask "what's the most effective response?" ...and in the case of wormholes, considering the ISK bait that is placed in them, and the absence of local intel, I think they have always been a clear, simple case of CCP asking if you would fancy a multi-billion ISK game of Marco Polo.

"those rocks were never meant to fit through the openings of the system,