Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3358
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 22:24:00 -
[31] - Quote
Don't listen to all the people saying, "it doesn't matter, don't vote". People listening to that tooth-gnashing whiny nonsense is precisely why it might not matter. Self fulfilling prophecy and all that.
If you give a damn and don't vote for a candidate with your interests in mind, then you are the one who doesn't matter.
Vote, it takes minutes, and it might bear fruit that will help you for all your game lifetime. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
6994
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 22:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
I'm voting for Mizhir!
I like Bacon. Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Carmen Electra - You are also on my block list. |
Tetsel
Heretic Army Heretic Initiative
117
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 11:50:00 -
[33] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:There is this presumption that electing someone from lowsec or with a lowsec focus is going to get anything done for lowsec.
The CSM doesn't work that way. What genuine CSM initiatives have actually born fruit in the last 3 years?
Every candidate promises a mile long list of reforms and ideas, and 99% of them will never see the light of day.
Elect the person you think is most deserving of free trips to Iceland and is most likely to call out CCP on being mentally ******** when they act so.
The idea is not voting for a candidate that will take some "initiative" for LS or makes some promises, but somebody that know enought how LS works, to give good feedback to CCP or warn them if CCP comes up with a terrible idea. (See last year Greyscale ideas about gate sentry guns) Loyal servent to Mother Amamake. @EVE_Tetsel |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
500
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:54:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Tetsel wrote:I think the fact that the vote will be sealed by 0.0 voters, close all discussion about a serious LS candidate to be efficient, if elected, in the CSM. Pretty much, and CCP hates LS anyway so there is that to deal with too. I'm sure it's not hate, more a distrust / dislike issue look back to all the updates for the last Two years.
list all the changes impacting lowsec.
tldr; CCP hates lowsec |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
2432
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:00:00 -
[35] - Quote
Vote for MTU!
MTU has proven to deliver the goods time and time again!
MTU can be with you on every roam!
MTU doesnt get angry when under attack!
MTU even deploys where no POS dares to tread!
A Vote For MTU Is A Vote For Yourself! *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
500
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:07:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Inxentas Ultramar wrote:Mario Putzo you are making a ton of sense bud. Besides, I don't think LS needs a lot of CSM attention to be honest.
While some mechanics are obviously not perfect, it allows for the loose gameplay style most of LS cowboys crave. Lowsec is in quite a good spot at the moment with FW and Clone rat spawns as income sources. I even know a guy that mines insane amounts of ice without getting caught. People are having fun in LS as far as I can judge, together with wspace I think it actually functions somewhat as intended: at least well enough for people not to complain all the time, but to keep playing the game! LS imho is close to being the most balanced and pure portion of this game. Apart from the little resource flip I would do, it is in a decent place. L5 missions provide really good reward for their risk, mining provides moderate reward for risk. POS and POCO rewards are lacking imo however. As far as combat drivers, FW is obviously huge, but outside of that it is kind of lacking, an increase in "reason" is needed for nonFW groups imo, and again making POCO/POS conflict more rewarding could lead to an uptick in wars and such, which is always healthy for the game. The nice thing about LS is that it gets bleed through for changes in both HS and NS so it keeps it in a relevant space. Some love to nonFW income generation/conflict drivers though, that is essential imo and about the only real lacking element presently in LS. Having the highend planet/moon material from NS flipped into LS would do this, as well as help solve some issues in NS I believe. agreed, the only thing wrong regarding lowsec is not by itself, directly related to lowsec.
the problem is the risk vs reward of lowsec.
it is more risky than both low and null, yet bring less income than those two.
this would be okish if we could really control things SOV style, but it is not.
i you add to this the fact that low cannot defend himself agaisnt null, because of supers not able to be built / acuired by lowsec in number sufficent to actually even stand a chance, low is doomed from the start.
what i would like to see:
1- a rebalance of the risk/reward (could be achieve via point 3) 2- rebalance of supers in low, either by actually allowing low to build them, or making them unable to use any fighting module / drones in low 3- some kind of "sov", not as far as null indeed, but living in an area and controling it should bring some advantages, like maybe reduced pos consumption, slightly delayed sentry aggro, a slight increase in sig spawn / rat spawn / rewards on rats / better ore spawn. of course, to keep it inline, the low bonus should be, at best, 50% of what is possible in null regarding those topics, and some null advantage shall remain in null, like managing docking rights for example
point 3 would only apply to non FW systems (some of them / all ?) |
Rex Steal
Hedion University Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vote for whomever you like. It doesn't make any difference anymore the voting is rigged to support those that have the isk to buy there way in from the larger alliances or corporations. As well CCP seems too make changes without consideration...see nerfing missions and + 100 too multi boxing. |
TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
504
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:14:00 -
[38] - Quote
How does one find a list of candidates and their ideals? My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things! |
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
520
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
Scroll down the forums a bit, theres a section under the Assembly Hall marked CSM Campaigns. Every serious candidate has got a thread there for their platform and answering questions. Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin
you're welcome |
Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2747
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 20:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Some love to nonFW income generation/conflict drivers though, that is essential imo and about the only real lacking element presently in LS. Having the highend planet/moon material from NS flipped into LS would do this, as well as help solve some issues in NS I believe. Yes, yes, move everything into lowsec, we've heard it. The best you could hope for if they did that is a massive blob coming and jacking your systems. Low sec should not be the be all and end all of the game, no matter how much you wish it was. Lol this guy, LS the be all end all of the game hue hue hue! "Don't take my gooo man!, its for your own good!" So apart from the hordes of NS descending upon LS for moons (which will just get flipped again anyway) is there any other reason why this would be bad? Or do you legitimately think you can contest lowsec system in the same way you do NS systems? Erm, yes, I think that null blobs would overpower LS corps if they wanted to.
And the reason is because LS already has enough stuff for the inherent difficulty of the space. It's mid way between high and NPC null. I know I know you'll swear its the most skill intensive and crazily difficult places in the game, but that's only because few people properly set up there, so you're just small splinter groups of people attacking each other. If they suddenly made lowsec more profitable than null, organised groups would simply move in and dominate the income streams. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
|
Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
1218
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 15:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
Lucas has a point here guys, null groups coming to lowsec to claim each and every space asset is already an issue (see: power projection). This "locust trek" as we have dubbed it, is already a problem insurmountable by the smaller groups that typically fight over LS celestials. The most expensive moons in most LS systems already belong to large null entities that will simply titan-bridge a blob on field if needed. This is not something we should encourage. |
Signal11th
Northern Coalition.
1335
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 16:16:00 -
[42] - Quote
Whoever you thinks deserves a nice trip to Iceland, apart from that pretty pointless voting for any of them. Powered by-áreaTh-áFilter V1.23 "All posts by this pilot are personal held views and not representitive of-áany-ácorp or alliance I am currently a member of. Like I'd give a-ásh*t anyway. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |