| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Shizuken wrote:Xuixien wrote: You said it was against the EULA. You were asked to quote it. You made an excuse not to, and are now saying "well it's up to CCP's interpretation".
Just wanting to make sure I have this straight.
Quote:
Suspension and Ban Policy
Though we have made every effort to anticipate all the possible circumstances we may encounter as caretakers of the persistent world of EVE Online, there issues may arise that we had not foreseen.
...
Therefore, this document should not been seen as all-inclusive, but rather to give our players a general idea of the guidelines we follow in dealing with these or similar cases.
...
3. HARASSMENT - Severe offences may result in an immediate ban without warning; however, warnings may be given for first time offenses, followed by account suspensions of varying degree and ultimately a permanent ban if a player:
a. Is abusive, obscene, offensive, sexually explicit, ethnically or racially offensive, or threatening to another player or an official EVE Online representative. b. Uses role-playing as an excuse for violating the guidelines regarding fair play with others.
There is your justification. As I said in another thread, it takes no mental or semantic gymnastics to fit everything Erotica1 did in that box. There is nothing arbitrary or vague about a ban stemming from the behavior being discussed here. I don't get it. "Is abusive, obscene, offensive, sexually explicit, ethnically or racially offensive, or threatening to another player or an official EVE Online representative." would hint that the victim is up for account action because he dinged every single one of those definitions during his rants. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Note, that none of what happens on TS3 is actually being "entered into the System", ie, the EVE Client or the EVE forums or anything related to EVE. Agreed. If Erotica is found to be breaking rules thanks to the content of the TS conversation, then so is Sohkar. Ultimately, I don't think any rules have been broken, though I'm not denying the Erotica and friends were being jerks. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Word is CCP is actively investigating the incident.
Permabans for E1 and Co. Source? Because as far as anyone can tell, no rules have been broken. (Wishful thinking is not a source) |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rob Kashuken wrote:Tor Norman wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Word is CCP is actively investigating the incident.
Permabans for E1 and Co. Source? Because as far as anyone can tell, no rules have been broken. (Wishful thinking is not a source) EULA: Quote:CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill Bolded for emphasis A rule doesn't necessarily have to be broken. And PR media writing about CCP encouraging online bullying would certainly be harmful to CCP's reputation. Edit: Mucked up quote tags. So, the appropriate reaction here is to give Ero a warning and amend the rules such that scamming for material benefit (eg ISK) is fine, but scamming for emotional distress (eg, even if you own 100% of a player's possessions, you continue to torment them) isn't allowed.
Not sure how effectively CCP could police such a rule but that seems like a reasonable course of action to me.
Permabans would be a pretty poor decision on CCP's part and that EULA quote does nothing to suggest otherwise. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:I can see Erotica being banned I can't see him being banned. Precisely because the damage of the confidence that CCP's customers have in them would be far, far worse for the company than anything Erotica has ever done or could do. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
Shizuken wrote:Tor Norman wrote: "Is abusive, obscene, offensive, sexually explicit, ethnically or racially offensive, or threatening to another player or an official EVE Online representative." would hint that the victim is up for account action because he dinged every single one of those definitions during his rants, not Erotica. Erotica1 clearly targeted the guy and kept him coming back by constantly promising to give him his stuff back. He kept the guy online and baited him into the actions he took with the purpose of eliciting the frustrated and over the top rant. It was intentional. He also violated wiretap statutes in nearly every state by recording the guy without consent. In many US states that is felony by the way. And engaging in criminal activity within the game is a bannable offense. So he trolled someone. How is this to be policed effectively?
I am under the understanding that Ero always gets consent to broadcast the conversations. Just checked, after the first minute Ero clearly states that the conversation is being recorded and refers to an earlier conversation regarding the matter. It seems he didn't miss that important point this time. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:KnowUsByTheDead wrote: Facts I applaud your effort to inject facts and reason into this thread. The sheeple have their ears plugged and eyes covered and their minds are set. Their cries are being heard by some small news sources already. Now, Ero1 will be used as a scapegoat, and CCP will ban him with little to no actual investigation, and Ripard will sit back with a smug look of superiority upon his face knowing he has abused his power as a member of CSM. His blog will gain followers, Eve will gain subs due to the publicity, and the bar will be lowered. Soon, the trolls of GD will be banned for "harassment and torture" by saying "INB4 the lock", and anything in Local chats other than "gf" will lead to account suspensions. Gankers and scammers will be permabanned, arenas will be set up for "PvP", we will shave off the sharp corners, round the edges, and pad the hard areas, replace the sand with non-toxic biodegradable playground sand-like materials, and the pandaverse will be complete. The NeX better start putting in pajamas and hot cocoa, because here comes the softer side of CCP, Pillow Fights Online. I want this to happen, purely because I want to refer to EVE as the pandaverse. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:00:00 -
[8] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Tor Norman wrote:stoicfaux wrote:I can see Erotica being banned I can't see him being banned. Precisely because the damage of the confidence that CCP's customers have in them would be far, far worse for the company than anything Erotica has ever done or could do. I disagree - I can see him being banned. He has crossed a line and it is not going to be healthy for EVE's reputation. EVE is known as a harsh game where you can be scammed and stolen from. This is as it should be. But the disgusting behavior from both sides of that recording went too far. I wouldn't be at all surprised if both Erotica1 and the contestant were banned. Because people tease each other? Seriously? Everyone everywhere should be banned from every game ever made and that ever will be made, apparently.
You know what's worse for your reputation? Banning players that haven't broken any rules without warning. Just how much confidence do you think CCP's customers will have that their accounts will remain unmolested? What if I respond to a gank victim's cries of desparation with a "lol"? Should I be banned for that? Because it could've hurt someone's feelings?
In a game where the players are expected to define their own morality, I think that arbitrarily actioning someone's account because they've elected to subscribe to the wrong morals is a particularly bad move. Both in terms of customer confidence and the sandbox nature of EVE. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 00:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
For those of you just joining us and are a little confused where this threadnaught came from, allow me to explain the cycle of arguments that have been repeating until now.
Erotica 1 is mean and should be permabanned. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. He's forfeiting his space cash because he got scammed. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash.
As of this writing, the cyclical argument has entered its 206th iteration. So far, nobody seems to have caught on. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 01:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
My eyes! |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
32
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 11:14:00 -
[11] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:So no CCP involvement or opinion of this type of behaviour originating in or taking place in their game? Well I might have some incentive for you, I forwarded all these links and audio files to the ESRB for review of your Teen rating. Perhaps a Mature rating will be more suitable, though will no doubt limit your player base potential. CCP, get control of this. Not sure if that'll help. The guy that fell for the scam was an adult. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
32
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 11:28:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:You appear to have something personal against scamming. What did you lose? The local chat in every trade hub system..... Something wrong with your block feature? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 11:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote: This was a scam that turned into something that no one deserves to be subjected to. All the other sementics (he could walk away, etc.) is academic to me, erotica was wrong, his action repugnant by any standards (even the lose eve moral norm) and it should not be tolerated.
PinkPanter wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kyperion wrote: They would not need to ban anyone if they would stop catering to the lowest moral fiber of humanity
You do know this is a game right? None of these pixels are real. Scamming is a cornerstone of EVE and isnt going away. Perhaps you should join another space MMO that does ban these things. Why are you talking about scamming here? Who gives a **** if somebody lost pixels. This thing is about some psycho going way too ******* far and intentionally humiliating it's victim by using a leverage and false promises and then going public with it.
Tor Norman wrote:For those of you just joining us and are a little confused where this threadnaught came from, allow me to explain the cycle of arguments that have been repeating until now.
Erotica 1 is mean and should be permabanned. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. He's forfeiting his space cash because he got scammed. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash.
As of this writing, the cyclical argument has entered its 206th iteration. So far, nobody seems to have caught on. Reposting for great justice. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 11:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
lollerwaffle wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Malcolm from Marketing wrote:Setting up a charade with a neutral alt to give that impression is fallacy on your part im afraid. If you set up a charade with a neutral alt, who does the voice in the recording? Erotica 1 is very obviously an accomplished voice actor, in addition to being a paedophile, rapist, torturer etc. Don't forget he sets fire to goats and eats babies. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
37
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
LordOfDespair wrote:baltec1 wrote:Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " "CCP, you should ban this person because I do not like them despite the fact that they have done nothing against the rules" "Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things. Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't? It's not a matter of whether Erotica 1's actions are right or wrong. It's a matter of how "ban people I don't like" can be turned against anyone, including you. Unless someone can present an argument that defines a legitimate reason to ban Erotica 1 that doesn't also adversely affect other players, nothing can be done about it. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:09:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Now that I've sobered up I've realised how dumb this thread is & most of the people in it. Would anyone like to join Goonwaffe? Sure. Please direct me to the nearest recruitment officer. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:11:00 -
[17] - Quote
LordOfDespair wrote:Tor NormanIt's not a matter of whether Erotica 1's actions are right or wrong. It's a matter of how "ban people I don't like" can be turned against [i wrote:anyone[/i], including you. Unless someone can present an argument that defines a legitimate reason to ban Erotica 1 that doesn't also adversely affect other players, nothing can be done about it. It isn't "ban players that I don't like". It is "ban players whos only purpose is to glorify bullying others". So "ban players that I don't like". Got it. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
42
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
LordOfDespair wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Ok, lets go there.
What is your problem with "internet bullies"? Which btw is a stupid term as I don't see how you bully someone over something you can turn off at will.
but anyways, please tell us how internet bullies are the scourge of the universe, then tell us where they touched you,
You can just walk away from verbal harrassment IRL. Does that make it any less? People verbally harassing you IRL can follow you. |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:28:00 -
[19] - Quote
LordOfDespair wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Strawman...
You keep using this word as if you think you know what it means.
Could you tell us please? And also, provide an example. Thanks. Just so that we know how we should be arguing with you from now on. Google it and educate yourself pleb. Keep saying it because that's all people are doing. He doesn't want the definition of the term, he wants your definition of it. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:40:00 -
[20] - Quote
The problem is you cannot ban a player simply because people don't like him. There needs to be a breach of the game's rules. If there's sufficient agreement that the rules are inadequate for dealing with a new situation, such as the bonus room, then the rules need to be updated as appropriate.
Problem: If a change to the rules is indeed necessary, what rules can be introduced that effectively ban "bonus room" scams without negatively impacting other areas of the game? In order for any change to be effective, the problem must be adequately defined.
This is a major hurdle that those who want Erotica 1 banned must face and unfortunately, "I don't like him" is not an acceptable definition of the problem. Nor is "I don't like that behaviour". Whatexact event is occuring in the bonus room that can be singled out and defined as a EULA breaking acivity? WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:49:00 -
[21] - Quote
Druthlen wrote:Torturing a person in TS is not a playstyle. Its just sick.
Tor Norman wrote:For those of you just joining us and are a little confused where this threadnaught came from, allow me to explain the cycle of arguments that have been repeating until now.
Erotica 1 is mean and should be permabanned. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. He's forfeiting his space cash because he got scammed. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash.
As of this writing, the cyclical argument has entered its 206th iteration. So far, nobody seems to have caught on. Iteration number 266. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Really ppl are supporting this ? All the in game scamming, pvp and what ever is fine, using Eve to pull someone out of the game so you can bully them isn't.
Even id they avoided the EULA and such this reflectts poorly on the Eve community and saying he did nothing wrong in game so it's fine is laughable. They used Eve to put him in the situation.
Send this to all the gaming sites BBC etc and see what the general response is.
Its not about Eve its about being a decent human being.
Tal
"His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose." WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:57:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kaius Fero wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:...
A cop can put a gun to your head, sure.
Ero didn't put a gun to Sokhar's head, doesn't wear a badge and doesn't carry state-sanctioned authority that Sokhar was bound to obey. A drug dealer will also not draw a gun in order to force you to buy his ****. So space money is narcotics, now? WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Tor Norman wrote:Kaius Fero wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:...
A cop can put a gun to your head, sure.
Ero didn't put a gun to Sokhar's head, doesn't wear a badge and doesn't carry state-sanctioned authority that Sokhar was bound to obey. A drug dealer will also not draw a gun in order to force you to buy his ****. So space money is narcotics, now? Lol of course not, however if your space pixels and space money mean nothing to you, just give away everything you have to the some random guy and start over again. After, it just a bunch if pixels My space pixels mean something to me, so I don't want to just give them away. That doesn't mean I'm addicted to them. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Tor Norman wrote:My space pixels mean something to me, so I don't want to just give them away. That doesn't mean I'm addicted to them. but they are just space pixels so what is the big deal There isn't one. Hence why calls to have Erotica 1 banned are unjustified. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:18:00 -
[26] - Quote
LordOfDespair wrote:Tor Norman wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Tor Norman wrote:My space pixels mean something to me, so I don't want to just give them away. That doesn't mean I'm addicted to them. but they are just space pixels so what is the big deal There isn't one. Hence why calls to have Erotica 1 banned are unjustified. The pixels aren't the issue numbnuts.
Tor Norman wrote:For those of you just joining us and are a little confused where this threadnaught came from, allow me to explain the cycle of arguments that have been repeating until now.
Erotica 1 is mean and should be permabanned. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. He's forfeiting his space cash because he got scammed. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash.
As of this writing, the cyclical argument has entered its 206th iteration. So far, nobody seems to have caught on. Iteration 269. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Like if you are a Vegan and you walk into a McDonalds, it's not their responsibility to stop serving beef, t;s your responsibility to leave because you don't like people serving you beef. "Beef" WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:30:00 -
[28] - Quote
Big Lynx wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
The game rating is irrelvent. If you are a child or incompetent you shouldn't be playing it.
Tell me please, which specific competence do I need for mining veldspar? Mining permit. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:50:00 -
[29] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Tor Norman wrote:Talon SilverHawk wrote:Really ppl are supporting this ? All the in game scamming, pvp and what ever is fine, using Eve to pull someone out of the game so you can bully them isn't.
Even id they avoided the EULA and such this reflectts poorly on the Eve community and saying he did nothing wrong in game so it's fine is laughable. They used Eve to put him in the situation.
Send this to all the gaming sites BBC etc and see what the general response is.
Its not about Eve its about being a decent human being.
Tal
"His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose." Its not about the mark its about treating someone like that to get a laugh, you just can't justify it. Implying that Erotica 1's actions require justification. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:56:00 -
[30] - Quote
Boomtown Jones wrote:Nobody who takes this issue seriously should still be posting in this thread, it's all just feeding the trolls. Send your thoughts to the devs and be done with it.
As a general rule if an argument on the internet does not make any sense it is often not worth responding to it. Isn't that kinda what we're doing? The forum has been heavily moderated on this issue except for this threadnaught. It's abundantly clear they're giving us a wide berth to allow us to vent our concerns and get as honest an opinion from the community as possible.
Frankly, I think this is an incredibly smart move on their part. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 23:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Coffee Rock wrote: Ban him, those involved in the bonus room crap, and all alt accounts.
Ban him for what, exactly? Before you answer that, I think I can predict the next step.
Tor Norman wrote:For those of you just joining us and are a little confused where this threadnaught came from, allow me to explain the cycle of arguments that have been repeating until now.
Erotica 1 is mean and should be permabanned. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. He's forfeiting his space cash because he got scammed. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash.
As of this writing, the cyclical argument has entered its 206th iteration. So far, nobody seems to have caught on. Iteration 330. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 23:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
Coffee Rocks wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Coffee Rock wrote: Ban him, those involved in the bonus room crap, and all alt accounts.
Ban him for what, exactly? God, you are an incessant troll. I'm almost impressed only because I cannot figure out WHEN you sleep or work.  You read my first comment on this which laid out the reasons - i know you did, b/c you trolled then  . I put my reasons there. If you need to see it again without scrolling all that way, go to my blog post. I copy/pasted my forum post there. That's it for me. o/ "It's not about the scam. You want to humiliate them. Poke them. Toy with them. Make them cry."
Aside from the cyclic argument this quote belongs to, I like how Coffee concludes that those guilty of these sins should be banned.
Anyone else worried how such a decision from CCP would pretty much lead to the ban of quite literally every EVE Online player? WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
74
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 23:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Can anyone tell me what the problem is? Why are people so outraged and angry?
Erotica offered to quadruple his space-game monies if he gave her it all Sokhar wanted to take the deal, gave her all his space-game monies Erotica asked him to read articles and sing songs to get the payout Sokhar played along for a while, then got sick and raged
To me, thats an utterly trivial string of events - it's nonsense, a wasted couple of hours, and a setback in a video game.
Why on gods green earth are people acting like Erotica bullied him, tortured him, broke in-game rules, broke real life laws, or anything else.
Please, I really would like an explanation - and not just a regurgitation of the sensationalist claptrap Ripard Teg spewed on his blog for page hits / to demonise a competing csm candidate.
I'll wait 331 iterations pages into this thread and I too, am still waiting for an explanation better than "I think it was mean". WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 00:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:To be honest, "I think it was mean" is a perfectly acceptable reason. I don't. Based on the fact "I think it was mean" would result in quite literally every player being bannable from the game should that ever be an acceptable reason.
Quote:You know why? Well obviously not and if you haven't figured it out by now, you never will know. Actually I don't know why. I don't know what reason is so important that a catchall term that could be used to kick any player out of the game should be acceptable.
I have disagreed with you. It's not because I have an IQ < 80. It's not because I'm some sort of troll. It's not because I'm some psychopath unable to experience human emotion. It's because your suggestion would have a devastating impact on the game. Your suggestion fails to adequately define why Erotica 1's actions are bannable, but making people sing in TS like NoHo are fine. E1 can be banned, but other scammers are fine. E1 can be banned, but taunting the victim after beating them is OK. E1 can be banned, but asking people to read web sites is dandy.
I am yet to see a description of E1's activities than can legitimately lead to his ban, or at least deligitimize "bonus room" style scams that won't adversely affect other players. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 00:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
You couldn't be more vague if you tried. What exactly has Erotica 1 said or done that constitutes bullying?
Let's get the obvious next step out of the way. No, I'm not deliberately being dense. No, I'm not being stupid. No, I'm asking you to jump through loopholes.
There's no need to throw insults my way. I'm just asking you to tell me, under no uncertain terms exactly what Erotica has done wrong. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 00:40:00 -
[36] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Show me someone who's kept up with this thread and I'll show you someone who hasn't slept in three days. I've long since given up on drinking coffee. I'm now running a drip directly into my veins. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
77
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Chibs Telford wrote:First, "it's not torture because he could leave at any time.' Despite several posts and references to case studies in which roughly 8 out of 10 people in similar situations could not bring themselves to walk away from a situation they knew to be untenable, you still insist on defending this position? (look up "Prior Investment Trap" or read Scott Plous - the Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making Investment Traps) Arguements that it wasn't turture because he wasn't hung from the ceiling or had fingers removed are equally ludicrous. The type or degree of torture does not define torture, merely its severity.
Tor Norman wrote:For those of you just joining us and are a little confused where this threadnaught came from, allow me to explain the cycle of arguments that have been repeating until now.
Erotica 1 is mean and should be permabanned. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. He's forfeiting his space cash because he got scammed. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash.
As of this writing, the cyclical argument has entered its 206th iteration. So far, nobody seems to have caught on. 338 WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
78
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:29:00 -
[38] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Tor Norman wrote:Erotica 1 is mean and should be permabanned. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. He's forfeiting his space cash because he got scammed. Scamming people isn't against the game's rules. We're not discussing the scams, they're fine. We don't like the way he tortures his mark for hours. His mark can leave the conversation at any time they choose. But if he leaves, he forfeits all his space cash. If the mark leaves, they forfeit hope and dignity. They forfeit hope. They forfeit dignity when they fly into a hysterical rant.
Quote:They've already forfeited their space cash and assets within the first few minutes of The Bonus Room. The rest of the time in the bonus room is just Erotica 1 and his minions stripping the mark of dignity while leading them on with the promise of hope. So people that mock those they have defeated should be banned. I can see that working out really well. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
78
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Forget having to log in and go look for PVP now...I can get a full dose of tears, screaming, insults, and badly worded arguments just coming to this thread.
Toss in some hazing by master ship-fitting experts and there we go, op success. this thread is too addicting i am forced to stay in it and not stop poasting and ITT I have learned that that is literally torture, I can't press x and i'm forced to keep checking it!! damn you riptard, damn you.. he should be permaband. Time for another threadnaught for such despicable behaviour. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:55:00 -
[40] - Quote
Cha'ka Khan wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Cha'ka Khan wrote:DUDE!!!!!!!!! HOW MUCH CRACK DO YOU SMOKE? There is NO issue here. dude lost his **** being stupid. GET THE **** OVER IT ALREADY!!!!!!! Dopeys getting mad. Dont smash your desk, now. I am not mad. Just extremely disappointed in the supreme stupidity of yourself and the people that are blindly listening to you. He's trolling you and he's succeeding. Check the little yellow triangle next to his name and then click "hide posts". Your sanity will thank you for it. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:57:00 -
[41] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Cha'ka Khan wrote:Can i claim that he is torturing me because his lack of intelligence hurts me physically?  You can leave this thread at any time with no consequence to yourself. You can block other posters so you never have to read their hurtful words. If you are experiencing trauma as a result of reading this thread, you have only yourself to blame. Nono. This is torture that he cannot possibly escape from. We must ban everyone in this thread that has said something stupid.
Confirming that 471 people are about to be banned (according to http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/332182-1) WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:00:00 -
[42] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Tor Norman wrote:Cha'ka Khan wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Cha'ka Khan wrote:DUDE!!!!!!!!! HOW MUCH CRACK DO YOU SMOKE? There is NO issue here. dude lost his **** being stupid. GET THE **** OVER IT ALREADY!!!!!!! Dopeys getting mad. Dont smash your desk, now. I am not mad. Just extremely disappointed in the supreme stupidity of yourself and the people that are blindly listening to you. He's trolling you and he's succeeding. Check the little yellow triangle next to his name and then click "hide posts". Your sanity will thank you for it. I hid his posts hours ago. :) Pfft. I hid them when this thread was only a thousand posts long. That was the point when he stopped arguing and just went full on troll. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Cha'ka Khan wrote:Yeah I know he is....  Poor Dopey. Always the last to catch on. No doubt your associates mock you behind your back and will awox you oncenyouve finally got something worth taking. I feel that Cha'ka is being victimized here. Can I please get a space lawyer or psychological specialist over here? Man Down.  We need James Dunstan! (http://f.kulfoto.com/pic/0001/0052/hVBK951528.jpg) WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:20:00 -
[44] - Quote
Brusanan wrote:If anyone wants to help pod Erotica 1, get to Jita. We will be advertising the podding fleet in Jita local. FINALLY! An appropriate response to a problem a player has with another player. WTF did I just read? |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 09:47:00 -
[45] - Quote
Agata Matahari wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Once again, whether its now okay or not with the victim the line was crossed and cannot be uncrossed. If you're drink driving and don't kill anyone does that make it okay? No.
How much they paid him to be "okay with it" if they did, which is very highly likely given their questionable eithics is irrelevant.
This thread-naught, the multiple blogs, the posts on MMORPG, Massively and the rest slamming EVE, CCP, the player base is damage and the potential harm that it COULD HAVE CAUSED is the main issue.
As an aside I found it pretty amusing that someone... can't say who seems to have gone around and posted on sites that its suddenly okay, the victim is not upset, that the person who reported it is the evil one and oh yeah, could you please lock and delete these now... lol damn, you are one of the very few here who hits the essential point here amongst 400 different posters. (about 50 Erotica1 alts not included) Really? We're standing under the "what could have happened" banner?
I think we should remove permanent ship loss. After all, such events are emotionally distressing and you never know what might happen if a person gets upset. The potential harm that could be caused is the main issue. They'd be vicariously liable!
Totally ridiculous! There is a thing called personal responsibility and frankly I'm worried so few people think it applies to them. Nothing we do in this game can have a bearing on real life events, with the exceptions being directly goading others into doing something irreversible and destructive. CCP already have and do enforce rules on this matter. WTF did I just read? |
| |
|