|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3132
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bloodmyst Ranwar wrote:As long as Erotica isn't getting away with this without consequences. I am a happy camper.
Even more happier that it is now very crystal clear to everyone that what occurred is not tolerated by CCP.
Thank you very much CCP, faith restored.
CCP Falcon wrote:
As always, CCP will not discuss specific cases of policy enforcement.
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3132
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
All I know is, I'm not buckling up for another few hundred pages of mouth frothing qq'ing. Thank you, CCP, for stating what we already knew and 100% support. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3138
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Regis Solo wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:All I know is, I'm not buckling up for another few hundred pages of mouth frothing qq'ing. Thank you, CCP, for stating what we already knew and 100% support. Yes a CCP cave in to the power block
Call it what you want. They're not going to satisfy your craving for Ero's blood because it's against their policy to discuss the details of specific cases. They NEVER EVER EVER EVER do it and anyone that's filed a petition against anyone knows this. You don't get to know what happens, no one does. It'll probably become public knowledge soon enough IF Ero or sohkar get a ban out of this but, it won't be CCP telling you because they never will and never have. That's their policy, and no one gets special circumstances. Deal with it and move on. If you're going to quit over this policy, then do so. I assure you it will be a minority of you actually qq'ing. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3138
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: Call it what you want. They're not going to satisfy your craving for Ero's blood because it's against their policy to discuss the details of specific cases. They NEVER EVER EVER EVER do it and anyone that's filed a petition against anyone knows this. You don't get to know what happens, no one does. It'll probably become public knowledge soon enough IF Ero or sohkar get a ban out of this but, it won't be CCP telling you because they never will and never have. That's their policy, and no one gets special circumstances. Deal with it and move on. If you're going to quit over this policy, then do so. I assure you it will be a minority of you actually qq'ing.
Except for Mittens. That was speshul.
Was it CCP who announced his ban, or was it Mittens himself?
EDIT: It looks like you're right, and the special circumstance was the fact that he was CSM Chair and a public figure. No such special circumstances have occurred here, however. Ero may be running for CSM but he hasn't been voted in yet. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3138
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Regis Solo wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Regis Solo wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:All I know is, I'm not buckling up for another few hundred pages of mouth frothing qq'ing. Thank you, CCP, for stating what we already knew and 100% support. Yes a CCP cave in to the power block Call it what you want. They're not going to satisfy your craving for Ero's blood because it's against their policy to discuss the details of specific cases. They NEVER EVER EVER EVER do it and anyone that's filed a petition against anyone knows this. You don't get to know what happens, no one does. It'll probably become public knowledge soon enough IF Ero or sohkar get a ban out of this but, it won't be CCP telling you because they never will and never have. That's their policy, and no one gets special circumstances. Deal with it and move on. If you're going to quit over this policy, then do so. I assure you it will be a minority of you actually qq'ing. I'm not quitting asshat
Reported for personal attack. I reckon the ISD's will be watching this thread closely this time. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3138
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: Call it what you want. They're not going to satisfy your craving for Ero's blood because it's against their policy to discuss the details of specific cases. They NEVER EVER EVER EVER do it and anyone that's filed a petition against anyone knows this. You don't get to know what happens, no one does. It'll probably become public knowledge soon enough IF Ero or sohkar get a ban out of this but, it won't be CCP telling you because they never will and never have. That's their policy, and no one gets special circumstances. Deal with it and move on. If you're going to quit over this policy, then do so. I assure you it will be a minority of you actually qq'ing.
Except for Mittens. That was speshul. Was it CCP who announced his ban, or was it Mittens himself? CCP did. They made it amazingly clear that it was a one-time ever thing, too.
Yeah, I noticed, I just looked up the dev blogs explaining it again. It looks like it was due to his very public nature and the fact that he was in a particularly public position as CSM Chair. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3140
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote:Danalee wrote:How much for PinkPanter? D.  tree fiddy
SWEET!! Only half an hour till four twenty then?  You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3140
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Regis Solo wrote:
Maybe you should refrain from asking me to leave the game.
I never asked you to leave the game. I said, and you can read the exact words above, "If you're going to quit..."
"If you're going to quit" =/= "Please quit" You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3140
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bloodmyst Ranwar wrote:
Likewise.
You'll have to demonstrate where I made one first. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3140
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Regis Solo wrote:
Whatever
I remember when we were kids, that was my little sister's go-to word whenever she threw a tantrum cuz she didn't get her way. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
|

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3140
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
PinkPanter wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
That's your right and good luck to you, but it's down right silly to quit a game because some dude who wasn't you lost some virtual things to a trickster type then made a fool of himself trying to get his stuff back. No one died here (despite the threats) and the so called victim is cool with everything.
If this sort of thing gets to you then you decision to be a denizen of the internet in any form might be kind of suspect. Life is harsh.
I'm quitting because CCP didn't do nothing here really.
You don't know that for sure, though, because it's against their policy to discuss the details of specific cases, so they won't tell you either way. If you quit now, you're doing it without knowing for sure what CCP will do or have done. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3143
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Firstly, that thread is locked. The moderation has been done. Secondly, I don't think you understand the definition of a personal attack. That was merely a witty method of addressing your demonstrable mouth-frothing blood lust for Ero. Maybe if you consider it a personal attack it's because of that little voice inside your head called a 'guilty conscience'. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3143
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:Kristalll wrote:Chopper Rollins wrote:Kristalll wrote:Shill blurt Keep on shillin Imma link this thread when some poor critter temporarily off his meds gets taken to a TS channel and hazed to the point of homicide. And it would be his fault for not taking his meds as he was ordered by his physician. CRAZY PEOPLE ARE CRAZY how do we have anything to do with that? Rather than argue the point with your relentlessly disingenuous and tasteless self, i would simply advise you that everything you post will be viewed in that post-meltdown light. Maybe once you've goaded someone to end themselves, without that being the aim of course, just a bit of fun, maybe then you can comfort yourself with some version of victim blaming. Or maybe the guilt will eat you down to the bone.
For there to be victim blaming, there first has to be a victim.
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3143
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:44:00 -
[14] - Quote
PinkPanter wrote:
And you might be absolutely right thing is it's always like that :) I make games myself and while I'm not a supercorp I use every single input I can get to make people enjoy it. I answer questions as they are asked. Clear, because it's simple and leaves no room for speculation and in this case we all kinda needed that. Scammers so they can go on hard on people and those noobs that will fall for it. As of now it's exactly like it was before and only thing that will change is people will not post recorded **** back :)
The choices you make for you are entirely your prerogative. Good luck in your future endeavours. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3152
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:51:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Ok, so the discussion about morality is over then Im assuming?
This is just after shocks and talking about the EULA, right? I thought you wrote 'shots' instead of 'shocks' there for a second. And because of that, I did three shots of Johnny Blue Label. I really shouldn't be shooting Blue Label, it's too damn expensive for that. Excuse me while I get a proper glass for it. Aftershocks is a brand of shot-liquer here so thats doubly confusing lol
I believe, in all honesty, if everyone right now could sit down and have a drink together, and avoid getting into a punch up over who gets to take Riot Girl home, I reckon we'd all have a great time, Ero supporters, dissenters, and neutrals alike. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3153
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:00:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:
I believe, in all honesty, if everyone right now could sit down and have a drink together, and avoid getting into a punch up over who gets to take Riot Girl home, I reckon we'd all have a great time, Ero supporters, dissenters, and neutrals alike.
Good point. All I have is one of these little gag bottles of wine I got for valentines day. Bottoms up! I'm so very scared right now.....
I would have a drink with any eve player any day of the week. Even the Russian clown that aggressed me solo in his Cynabal yesterday, which I was beating, only to jump two frickin armour RR boats in to save him and kill my less-than-a-day-old PVP Ferox with only a Pilgrim kill to it's name, then lose my 1.7bil pod because I clicked something wrong on the selected item box, causing it to minimise and lose the warp button just at the moment it was needed the most.
He might fight dirty, he might have cost me 1.7bil, but I'd still drink with him. I'd still have a drink with the guy that called me an arsehat. I'd still have a drink with the Goonswarm 'recruiter' from last year that liberated half a billion from my wallet and two billion in BPOs from my possession.
I'd drink with all you sociopathic spreadsheet pedants.
I can't wait to go to fanfest next year. Every time I think about it my heart skips a beat.
No, wait.....
No, I've just had too much to drink, never mind. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3153
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
Bloodmyst Ranwar wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: I always enjoy vexatious reporting. It reminds me of the dozens of vexatious threats of litigation I receive on a daily basis.
Yet, after all this time you still haven't stopped, looked in the mirror and wondered, why? Time for some personal development perhaps?
I know exactly why. Because writing an article calling a homeopath a quack, and demonstrably so, makes them feel letigious. Don't need to look in a mirror to figure that out.
Don't worry, I'd still have a drink with you too. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3160
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:05:00 -
[18] - Quote
OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE wrote:I DON'T THINK THAT EROTICAL WILL BE BANNED BECAUSE THAT WOULD OPEN BIGGER CAN OF WHUPASS THAN ANYTHING YOU CAN EVER IMAGINED. THIS LITTLE BITCHFORKING EPISODE BY RIPARD TEGS'S LITTLE MINIONS WILL BE A DROP IN THE OCAEN COMPARED TO TAKING AWAY EROTICA1LS GAME TIME.
There's always one  You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3160
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE wrote:EROTICAL Sounds hot Tell me more about CAN EAT MORE edit: Is this some sort of after-assed falseflag or something?
CAN'T YOU TELL HE'S TRYING TO BITCHFORK HERE??? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3160
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE wrote:PLAESE THIS IS A SERIOUS DISCUSSION AND AGREE WITH STEVE ABOUT EVERYONE SITTING DOWN FOR A DRINK TOEGETHER. WHAT I TRY TO SAY IS THIS ANNOUNCEMENT PROBABLY TO ME JUST SAY CARRY ON PLAY EVE BUT IF YOU WANT TO DO SCAMS AND STUFF DON'T GO ON TEAMSPAENK AND ADD THE SOUND TO A VIRTUAL CLOUD IF THAT MAKES SENSE I THINK AT ALL SAID IT DOES.
Did you just call me Steve? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
|

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3162
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
Bloodmyst Ranwar wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Bloodmyst Ranwar wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: I always enjoy vexatious reporting. It reminds me of the dozens of vexatious threats of litigation I receive on a daily basis.
Yet, after all this time you still haven't stopped, looked in the mirror and wondered, why? Time for some personal development perhaps? I know exactly why. Because writing an article calling a homeopath a quack, and demonstrably so, makes them feel letigious. Don't need to look in a mirror to figure that out. Don't worry, I'd still have a drink with you too. Likewise, I have always enjoyed a good ole' debate. Some kind of satisfaction is to be had breaking down ones argument, though I prefer strong arguments over the weaker ones. Otherwise, where is the challenge? Agree to disagree I say!
I said I'd have a drink with you. Never said I think you'd amount to anything on an academic stage. Intellectual dishonesty forbids you from the pleasure of being taken seriously. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3163
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
Marcia en Welle wrote:Now it becomes clear that we are dealing with a 12 year old. Wait until you are a bit older and you might look back and understand what I said.
That's not clear at all. Do you have a copy of this person's birth certificate? Maturity isn't defined by physical age, not is it defined by someone else's opinion, and nor is it attached with a tag identifying how or why it matters or is relevant. I've been quite immature in many places on this thread, and I'm proud that for thirty years old, I haven't lost my ability to act like a child at times. I don't agree with almost anything PinkPanter has said over the last few days, and I've argued strongly against it on many occasions, but I defend her right to be immature, and to have and express her opinion, even if it's an emotionally charged and therefore irrelevant and biased one. What I don't defend are either of you just bickering for its own sake. You're just as bad as each other in that regard. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3163
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:29:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE wrote: EROTICAL EROTICA1LS WTF is wrong here? Why did I get a boner reading these words? I need a cold shower now.
He got my name wrong earlier. Called me Steve.
CLEARLY my name is Kenny Loggins. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3163
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:31:00 -
[24] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:I said I'd have a drink with you. I would gladly have a drink and a laugh with any other participant of the threadnaught, including Erotica1, except you. No way, no how.
Your loss. Pretty sure Ero will be drinking with me as well though so.... looks like you have a dilemma on your hands. Maybe you should stop taking things so personally. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3163
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:37:00 -
[25] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Your loss. I dont think so.
That's because you don't know what you're missing out on. In your case, ignorance really is bliss.
You know, even though you've stated you'd refuse to drink with me, I'd still let you. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3163
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:41:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tyburn Stannis wrote:Oh great, another imminent threadnaught of people too busy waving placards to understand two basic principles of online games.
CCP will never make a definitive list of what is or is not harassment, griefing, exploits etc... because a) every case is different, and b) don't ever lock yourself into arbitrary precedents.
CCP will never tell you what actions they have or have not taken against any particular pilot, corporation, alliance, account or player. Confidentiality. It's a thing.
Good few folks round here need to the keyboard down and step away from the internet...
It's sunny outside. See ya.
o/
Not here it's not. The sun went down five hours ago. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3164
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:That's because you don't know what you're missing out on I know exactly. I dont drink or associate with a person like you. I wouldnt even give you the time of day. Thats that.
But you don't know me, so you don't know what you're missing out on.
I would certainly rather get to know you before making judgements on what 'type' of person you are. Isn't that the rational way to form judgements? Or is jumping to conclusions the preferred course of action here? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3164
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:51:00 -
[28] - Quote
tasman devil wrote:Good Talk
Now... what happens to our two lovebirds?
Namely: Erotica1 - who has committed harassment of bannable to life proportions Sohkar - who -although enraged beyond measure at that point- posted life threats on the voice chat
So what now? To punish them both (Ero1 - life ban, Soh - 30 days ban) would be a hard but justifiable course of action.
CCP Falcon wrote:
As always, CCP will not discuss specific cases of policy enforcement. However, if you have any questions regarding this statement, please feel free to pose them in this thread, and we will respond to the best of our ability.
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3164
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:54:00 -
[29] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:It's like I've said before, the so called good guy/freedom fighter types (Salvos, Ripard, ect ect) in EVE are the real problem, not the Erotica1s Who I choose to drink with, is my business. And doesn't make me a "bad" guy, no matter how you twist it. But gf for making me respond.
Who you choose to drink with is not what he was talking about. Still not reading anything I see. Nothing's changed. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3169
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:09:00 -
[30] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:No, what makes you a bad guy is encouraging real life violence, and for trivialising real human suffering.
hope this helps :) Seeing as none of it is true, it is not helpful at all :)
Salvos, don't make me link posts you've made that you can't conveniently edit. Oh, woops, too late.
What was it you said?
"If someone roundhouse kicked Erotica1, I would laugh and applaud :)"
And I'm going to link that every time you deny stating you would take pleasure from harm coming to Ero and inciting violence. I now have it bookmarked.
Stop lying, and people won't call you a liar. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
|

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3169
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:14:00 -
[31] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:And I'm going to link that every time you deny stating you would take pleasure from harm coming to Ero and inciting violence. I now have it bookmarked. Nowhere there does it say I would take pleasure from harm coming to Erotica1, nor have I incited violence anywhere. You can imply it all you want. Doesn't change the above.
Laughing indicates pleasure. People don't laugh if they haven't experienced pleasure to some degree. You said you'd laugh and applaud. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3171
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:24:00 -
[32] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The gankers I respect are the ones who will take the time, after the fact, to explain to the victim why they got blown up, and how they can defend themselves in future. I view them as performing an educational service.
So no ganking without explaining to your target why and how to prevent it. And in the rare cases where your target needs some time before he/she realizes how he/she feels about the ordeal it's harrasment. Can you, just to be as clear as possible, state which timeperiod you have in mind between the act of ganking/scamming/asking to sing songs and the discovery of the target that his/her feelings have been hurt? D. 
This, exactly this. Every single gank I've performed, I've tried to explain to the player how to avoid it in future. Some of them just get emotionally out of control and don't care, they just want to rage. So where is the line? And if CCP does ban Ero, will they qualify that line to him? I'm listening to the recording myself and this is VERY analogous to a few of my own experiences of gank victims I've invited onto coms and tried to calmly explain why they lost their ship. At what point in that person's rage is it me harassing them? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3171
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:30:00 -
[33] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:H aVo K wrote:But the question of what you're laughing and clapping at, and why, speaks directly to your moral fibre. I would be laughing at and applauding the vindication of the abused on their abuser. If you abuse people in an out of game context, and they exact retribution, from my perspective, you had it coming. My "moral fibre" on this matter is very clear cut and distinct. Does not mean I incentivise or enjoy any suffering resulting from it.
Why is violence acceptable and entertaining retribution to you? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3171
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Regis Solo wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:All I know is, I'm not buckling up for another few hundred pages of mouth frothing qq'ing. Thank you, CCP, for stating what we already knew and 100% support. Yes a CCP cave in to the power block Call it what you want. They're not going to satisfy your craving for Ero's blood because it's against their policy to discuss the details of specific cases. They NEVER EVER EVER EVER do it and anyone that's filed a petition against anyone knows this. You don't get to know what happens, no one does. It'll probably become public knowledge soon enough IF Ero or sohkar get a ban out of this but, it won't be CCP telling you because they never will and never have. That's their policy, and no one gets special circumstances. Deal with it and move on. If you're going to quit over this policy, then do so. I assure you it will be a minority of you actually qq'ing. Never ever? Seems the failed lawyer's slap on the wrist was made public. CCP simply wants this issue to quietly die, and by pumping out double-speak, and then shutting up about it, who knows what they did or did not do. If erotica1 or his cohorts show up again, soon, we will know that CCP considers sociopaths an important part of their subscription base. If that char does not show up again, well, all we know is could be he lying low, or could be simply using new chars to do the same thing as before, or they actually did banhammer him. But without comment from CCP, nothing can be certain, and the kind of behaviour exhibited by the psycho will continue in Eve.
I already ceded to a correction from someone with more than twice your mental capacity, and determined the reason why. The same reason doesn't apply here, and your reasoning doesn't apply anywhere. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3174
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:44:00 -
[35] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Regis Solo wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:All I know is, I'm not buckling up for another few hundred pages of mouth frothing qq'ing. Thank you, CCP, for stating what we already knew and 100% support. Yes a CCP cave in to the power block Call it what you want. They're not going to satisfy your craving for Ero's blood because it's against their policy to discuss the details of specific cases. They NEVER EVER EVER EVER do it and anyone that's filed a petition against anyone knows this. You don't get to know what happens, no one does. It'll probably become public knowledge soon enough IF Ero or sohkar get a ban out of this but, it won't be CCP telling you because they never will and never have. That's their policy, and no one gets special circumstances. Deal with it and move on. If you're going to quit over this policy, then do so. I assure you it will be a minority of you actually qq'ing. Never ever? Seems the failed lawyer's slap on the wrist was made public. CCP simply wants this issue to quietly die, and by pumping out double-speak, and then shutting up about it, who knows what they did or did not do. If erotica1 or his cohorts show up again, soon, we will know that CCP considers sociopaths an important part of their subscription base. If that char does not show up again, well, all we know is could be he lying low, or could be simply using new chars to do the same thing as before, or they actually did banhammer him. But without comment from CCP, nothing can be certain, and the kind of behaviour exhibited by the psycho will continue in Eve.
Somewhere, a moderator has deleted my reply to this, perhaps mistaking it for a personal attack, so I'll reword it. Someone already corrected me on this, and the reason that decision was made public. The same reason doesn't apply here, and you bias is obvious.
For the moderator who deleted my post, please be consistent. Don't tell me Dinsdale's comments above aren't a personal attack on The Mittani. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3175
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:54:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Korhaka Mirunas wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:what an utterly terrible response. Guess its time to GTFO.
There is no way this will ever stop unless scamming is banned, people will just hide it better. Dont think I can associate myself with a company or community that endorses this type of behavior. If you find EVE Online to be too hardcore for your tastes, I would like to suggest you try something like hello kitty online. If scamming was banned, that would also bring about banning of suicide ganking, piracy and similar activities, or even completely disabling PvP. you know what F*UCK YOU
Well. That escalated quickly. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3179
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:
Why did you change your post? look at all the worms that are now coming out? its patheric and sad. As soon as CCP make an announcement, you retards start coming out defending what people have done. Sad really really sad. Youre lowlife scum.
CCP made their announcement. It's the thread you're commenting on right now. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3186
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:01:00 -
[38] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:I have refrained from public comment on this issue because of all the ongoing CSM/CCP consultations, but now that CCP has issued their statement, I feel it is only appropriate to give my perspective.
Lying, cheating, general douchebaggery and the harvesting of tears are all part of the "sandbox" that is the game of EVE Online.
But that said, all of us have a responsibility to recognize when a fellow player is starting to lose emotional control -- when things stop being a game -- and respond in a humane manner. And deliberately trying to induce and deepen that loss of control is reprehensible conduct that should shock and dismay the vast majority of the community.
So the tl/dr for me is: Feel free be a douchebag inside the sandbox, but if you kick the sand outside of the sandbox, don't be surprised if CCP kicks you out of the sandbox as well.
Stuff like losing your sh*t on comms and bitching out the people in your fleet is not something I would worry about. Nor is making people sing for their ship.
But if you make someone sing for their ship and then sadistically wratchet up the psychological pressure until they are a total wreck, then you're a real-life scumbag, and I won't shed a tear if CCP decides they no longer care to do business with you. Trebor, is freedom of speech inviolate or are you one of those that believes in 'hate speech'? You see, for many of us we see freedoms like free speech and sandbox as absolute. Free speech laws were created to protect impolite speech, not polite speech. You cannot hamper freedom of speech with pansied 'hate speech' laws or equivocations that neuter it, without the cost of infringing on the base freedom itself. Selfsame, who the frack are you to say how Erotica1 should play his game? I say his game, because the bonus round was very much IN GAME. At it's core Sohkar willingly took part in a bonus round on Teamspeak (and hung in there) in the context of EvE meta gameplay, in pursuit of moar EvE assets (or their recovery). That is IN GAME Trebor.He was not negotiating for frequent flyer miles, or losing his blob because he couldn't solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he lost his blob while metagaming for EvE ISK/assets! In game. Now remember, you said 'douchebaggery in-game 'OK', and 'douchebaggery out-of-game NOT OK', but I insist Sohkar's bonus round was very much in game. tldr; Let's cut to the chase, you don't *like* what Erotica1 did and like all liberal pansies before you who selfsame invented 'hate speech' laws to infringe on freedom of speech laws when your feelings got hurt, you would see the EvE sandbox continue to crumble over time with little nerfs here and there... Well I reject that, I reject you, so will shoot another innocent carebear in the face (in game of course) in your honor. That is MY EvE. +1 added to the Kill-It-Forward queue, and may GOD have mercy on your soul. F
You forever inspire me, sir. Consider me at your service should your quest to kill it forward ever require the aid.
Screw it, I'm just gonna start doing this myself as well. Love the style. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3186
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Mag's wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Its like its designed by 30yr old virgins at their annual treehouse meeting. Its just.... ********. You must have much knowledge in this regard. Yeah, I've known some wizards in my time. The Bonus Room design is pretty much exactly the kind of thing decades of sexual frustration as a man-child results in 
The assumption that virginity = sexual frustration. You've never heard of asexuality, have you. A person's sexual activity has nothing to do with the ideas they have and it's really just a swipe to try to make other people feel as bad as you do. It's prescriptive retaliation, nothing more. You've failed at every turn, and every assertion you've made here, Salvos. And now you're trying to make people feel bad for being virgins. Do you have any self respect? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3189
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Not enough edge brah. Try harder.
What's an 'edge brah'? Is it one of those new hipster trends? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
|

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3190
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:21:00 -
[41] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Do you have any self respect? I have plenty. Thanks! Are you a wizard? You seem to be taking this very personally. I think the Bonus Room design is pants-on-head ********. I think its designers are obviously an elite and select group of 30lvl wizards. Thats my opinion. If you don't like it, too bad!
It's not what I think of your opinion that matters. It's that your 'opinion' is delivered with such vitriol. It's obviously intended as an attempt to cause butthurt. What makes you think someone being a 'wizard' (whatever the hell that means) would be cause to feel butthurt? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3190
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:26:00 -
[42] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Anslo wrote: Not enough edge brah. Try harder.
What's an 'edge brah'? Is it one of those new hipster trends? Come back to Bleak Lands and i'll tell you. Haven't seen you since you ran from system as soon as I showed up in local.
Ran from? I was only there chasing a Stabber that was trying to get away because he failed to kite me, gave the pilot a 'good fight' in local after finishing him off in my Worm, and then you raged at me. Didn't even know you were there til you spoke up and told me to get lost after I was nothing but polite to you. I had no reason to stick around after killing the Stabber, and I didn't expect you'd be able to put up enough of a fight to stick around for one so, I didn't. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3190
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:28:00 -
[43] - Quote
Helena Russell Makanen wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: I have yet to see Erotica1 tell us he'd have a good laugh and someone being assaulted. He is a sadistic sociopath, of course he would.
That's an assumption based on an presumed but not demonstrable premise. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3240
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 13:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
Falcon locked a thread of mine that he claimed was ranting and a 'quitting' thread. While it's true I am leaving, the purpose of the thread was to highlight CCP's inconsistencies in player moderation. Falcon could have locked it for any number of reasons, but the main one he chose, ranting, indicates to me that CCP are unhappy about their player base being informed of this inconsistency. Which essentially amounts to censorship, but it technically isn't until they remove the link in the locked thread. In any case, here it is again:
http://remielpollardlives.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/temporary-close.html You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3240
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 13:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
GrowlingMadScientist wrote:Oh the delicious sociopath tears in this thread. 
I see you enjoy tears. Welcome, fellow sociopath. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3243
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:03:00 -
[46] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Falcon locked a thread of mine that he claimed was ranting and a 'quitting' thread. While it's true I am leaving, the purpose of the thread was to highlight CCP's inconsistencies in player moderation. Falcon could have locked it for any number of reasons, but the main one he chose, ranting, indicates to me that CCP are unhappy about their player base being informed of this inconsistency. Is it ranting to put them in the spotlight when they have done such? Which essentially amounts to censorship, but it technically isn't until they remove the link in the locked thread. Disputing Dev actions is against forum rules. He gave you three valid reasons, among which that your thread got locked because "I'm Leaving" threads belong in OPE. Keep digging yourself deeper.
Digging? Dude, I unsubbed. There's nothing they can do that I haven't done to myself. The reasons were not valid, any fool can see, they're just trying to save face. I actually like Falcon, but credit where credit is due. Same where it's not. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3245
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:06:00 -
[47] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Falcon locked a thread of mine that he claimed was ranting and a 'quitting' thread. While it's true I am leaving, the purpose of the thread was to highlight CCP's inconsistencies in player moderation. Falcon could have locked it for any number of reasons, but the main one he chose, ranting, indicates to me that CCP are unhappy about their player base being informed of this inconsistency. Is it ranting to put them in the spotlight when they have done such? Which essentially amounts to censorship, but it technically isn't until they remove the link in the locked thread. Disputing Dev actions is against forum rules. He gave you three valid reasons, among which that your thread got locked because "I'm Leaving" threads belong in OPE. Keep digging yourself deeper. Digging? Dude, I unsubbed. There's nothing they can do that I haven't done to myself. The reasons were not valid, any fool can see, they're just trying to save face. I actually like Falcon, but credit where credit is due. Same where it's not. Yeah I dislike Pollard but he has a point. Someone dox'd the guy. Like, what the ****? What the actual ****? Do they operate in lowsec?
I provided the names of the specific toons owned by the person that doxed me on my blog post at http://remielpollardlives.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/temporary-close.html
When our wardec against them had ended, they were operating in Gallente highsec around Cistuvaert somewhere.
Have at it, Hoss. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3245
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:10:00 -
[48] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Falcon locked a thread of mine that he claimed was ranting and a 'quitting' thread. While it's true I am leaving, the purpose of the thread was to highlight CCP's inconsistencies in player moderation. Falcon could have locked it for any number of reasons, but the main one he chose, ranting, indicates to me that CCP are unhappy about their player base being informed of this inconsistency. Is it ranting to put them in the spotlight when they have done such? Which essentially amounts to censorship, but it technically isn't until they remove the link in the locked thread. Disputing Dev actions is against forum rules. He gave you three valid reasons, among which that your thread got locked because "I'm Leaving" threads belong in OPE. Keep digging yourself deeper. Digging? Dude, I unsubbed. There's nothing they can do that I haven't done to myself. The reasons were not valid, any fool can see, they're just trying to save face. I actually like Falcon, but credit where credit is due. Same where it's not. He gave you three valid reasons. Then you broke forum rules again by disputing his action here. Why are you deliberately breaking rules?
For one, I'm not breaking the rules. For another, no valid reason was provided. I was providing information to the playerbase and highlighting CCP's inconsistency. Finally, given that CCP is practicing double standards now, what rules? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3245
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:14:00 -
[49] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:For one, I'm not breaking the rules. For another, no valid reason was provided. I was providing information to the playerbase and highlighting CCP's inconsistency. Finally, given that CCP is practicing double standards now, what rules? Where did CCP say that Erotica 1 was banned because of the TS recordings?
They didn't, they never do. But given the publicity, this was bound to become public knowledge whether they announced it or not. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3245
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:16:00 -
[50] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ctrl-C + Ctrl-V = leet debating skills
Keep ignoring everything but the voices in your head, Salvos, and you'll never, ever be a real boy. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
|

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3247
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:17:00 -
[51] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:For one, I'm not breaking the rules. For another, no valid reason was provided. I was providing information to the playerbase and highlighting CCP's inconsistency. Finally, given that CCP is practicing double standards now, what rules? Where did CCP say that Erotica 1 was banned because of the TS recordings? They didn't, they never do. But given the publicity, this was bound to become public knowledge whether they announced it or not. Where did Erotica 1 say he got banned because of the TS recordings?
Why do idiots repeat questions they already have answers to? You and Salvos, together, might actually make half a brain cell. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3247
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:21:00 -
[52] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote: Does that mean you don't actually know why Erotica 1 got banned? If you do, feel free to link a post (here or on minerbumping.com) by him stating why he got banned.
He got banned because CCP was reacting to the carebear morality patrol instead of actually moderating. Moderating =/= reacting. If they were moderating, none of this would have happened. At this stage, it's all on CCP. If they were going to ban him over the sohkar incident, they should have done it a month ago when it actually happened.
/thread You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3247
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:24:00 -
[53] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:He got banned because CCP was reacting to the carebear morality patrol instead of actually moderating Proof and citation needed.
Naturally, you ignored the part of my post that mattered. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3248
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:27:00 -
[54] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:He got banned because CCP was reacting to the carebear morality patrol instead of actually moderating Proof and citation needed. Naturally, you ignored the part of my post that mattered. You have not proved why Erotica1 was banned, anywhere. None of your posts have provided any such evidence or proof.
If he was going to be banned over the sohkar incident, why now instead of when it was first made public knowledge in February? That's the part that matters, Salvos, the part you are selectively ignoring. As you so often do with reasoning that tramples your 'intellect'. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3248
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:34:00 -
[55] - Quote
Do you know what deductive reasoning is? No?
Then you didn't slam dunk ****.
You're right, I can't prove it.
But what's the alternative explanation? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3248
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:36:00 -
[56] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Rekt.
Leave as you said you would, while you have even a single shred of dignity or credibility left.
Whelp, I asked you a question.
What's the alternative explanation?
Also, I said I'm leaving EVE, yes, and I won't be logging in again. Never said anything about the forums. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3248
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:37:00 -
[57] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:If he was going to be banned over the sohkar incident, why now instead of when it was first made public knowledge in February? That's the part that matters, Salvos, the part you are selectively ignoring. As you so often do with reasoning that tramples your 'intellect'. Do you have evidence that CCP had knowledge of this incident back in february? Do you have evidence that CCP didn't do anything prior to the announcement yesterday? Could it be that CCP asked the opinions of the CSM prior to acting?
It was made a matter of public record on minerbumping.com and posted to these very forums back in February to mixed reactions. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3248
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:40:00 -
[58] - Quote
Darkopus wrote:...sociopaths of this game...
Define 'sociopath' because we can sit here and question each other's psychological states all day long but neither of us are psychologists so neither of us would know sweet **** all about it. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3248
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:41:00 -
[59] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Do you have evidence that CCP had knowledge of this incident back in february? Do you have evidence that CCP didn't do anything prior to the announcement yesterday? Could it be that CCP asked the opinions of the CSM prior to acting? It was made a matter of public record on minerbumping.com and posted to these very forums back in February to mixed reactions. I take that as a "No" then. Case closed.
You have an unusual method of subjective validation. The way you so blatantly change a 'yes' to a 'no' to satisfy your bias is astonishing. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3248
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:45:00 -
[60] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Do you have evidence that CCP had knowledge of this incident back in february? Do you have evidence that CCP didn't do anything prior to the announcement yesterday? Could it be that CCP asked the opinions of the CSM prior to acting? It was made a matter of public record on minerbumping.com and posted to these very forums back in February to mixed reactions. I take that as a "No" then. Case closed. You have an unusual method of subjective validation. The way you so blatantly change a 'yes' to a 'no' to satisfy your bias is astonishing. You didn't provide any evidence that CCP didn't do anything prior to the announcement. And I fail to see how a post on some random minerbumping forum constitue evidence that CCP had knowledge of this incident.
Failure to see could also indicate blindness. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
|

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3254
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:02:00 -
[61] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Onyx Nyx wrote:I have been told truly terrible things in local whenever I have been flying a falcon or something else that attracts rage. The unkind words directed at me has caused me great distress, tears, nightmares, sleep deprivation and even thoughts of suicide.
With this official statement from CCP, can I fully expect CCP to punish these evildoers? Because I am about to go test that in practice by ganking some miner and see much they care about the rules of society afterwards. Well you might get banned for stupidity because look at your sig. Whining like a ***** when you have that sig just puts you first in line at the ban wagon. Mr Epeen 
You used to be cool, man. What happened? You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
|
|
|