|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1541
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
2
Just because CCP banned someone doesnt mean CCP failed the community. The fact that CCP had to ban someone in this manner means we as a community failed ourselves. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1546
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP was going to have to draw a line at some point, we all know it. Im just glad we beat the stereotype and the line was drawn BEFORE someone killed themselves, not after it.
The banning of Erotica 1 will not usher in an age of opression onto EVE, it will just serve as a reminder that there IS a limit and hopefully it will not be pushed any further in the future. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1547
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 23:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gilbaron wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Gilbaron wrote:How are we supposed to know when someone looses emotional control? When you pull someone out of the game for the specific reason of humiliating him while skirting the rules, you can be pretty sure that at some point he will lose emotional control. Else you are just bad at what you do. Mr Epeen  So, whenever vince draken runs a fleet on TeamSpeak and calls me a niggercunt I can scream cybermobbing and ask ccp to ban him? Or when progod screams for more logi, can I get the guys who don't switch banned for causing progods blood pressure to rise exponentially?
If you genuinly cannot tell the difference between that and what was going on in these bonus rooms, I suggest you go take a long hard look in the mirror.
Making petty arguments like that makes it obvious that you are arguing for the sake of arguing and are not taking the discussion seriously. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1550
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 20:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
This thread stopped being cool 20 pages ago! BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1551
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 22:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nothing has changed, let this threadnaught die.
The vocal minority that thinks this is a big deal will lose interest in a few days. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1552
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 22:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:KuroVolt wrote:Nothing has changed, let this threadnaught die.
The vocal minority that thinks this is a big deal will lose interest in a few days. I've held interest in this topic for over 4 years. Why would I lose interest in the next few days?
You must be a time traveling wizard then as I am reffering to this particular event.
Trust me, nothing has changed, you people have been crying for over 50+ pages about absolutely nothing and its starting to get sad.
Just let the threadnaught die, give it a week and then come back and complain that the game just doesnt feel the same anymore.
Im not coming back to this topic unless I find something really witty to say. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |
|
|
|