https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333839&find=unread

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333839&find=unread

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

plus 1 for role playing your little hearts out.

Good news. Goonswarm has just announced Freightercide.

Good job creating content so CCP doesn't have to.

Are you new here?

It isnt up to CCP to create content. Infact, developer-created content is why other games have kungfu pandas.

But then, maybe some people WANT 500 new all-identical missions to be added

I for one cant get enough of bringing that rock from over there to here for +50 xp and collecting 5000 orc knobs

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

Although well done doing what people should have been doing in the first place and forcing highsex players to adapt to what they should have been adapting to in the first place,

and all it took was a real life sadist being banned from the game.

The only issue I got with it all is why they claim to be doing it. They want to remove someone from CSM, in my eyes thats blackmail. Killing people so that they will agree with doing what you want for something thats not technically in game.

Beat dat straw hard yo!

The only issue I got with it all is why they claim to be doing it. They want to remove someone from CSM, in my eyes thats blackmail. Killing people so that they will agree with doing what you want for something thats not technically in game.

However, when you see it in a certain way the one most beneficial from this are NullSec alliances that could encourage a chunk of the pilot population to move from HighSec to potentially LowSec or even NullSec.

Although, the current constant input of war declarations towards new corporations, or simply new players, and those who prefer to play within HighSec risks to break the game apart.

Worst case scenario, everyone quits, game dies... but that's far fetched lol.

I for one cant get enough of bringing that rock from over there to here for +50 xp and collecting 5000 orc knobs

Best case scenario, people learn how to fly safely and not take pointless risks, which is, I believe, the best reason for keeping the mechanisms in High Sec as loose as they are.

Well this is not about the mechanics of hi-sec but about the new CODE war dec on high sec to force people to vote they way they want.
I don't want hi-sec to change, I love it just the way it is. But It kinda annoys me when someone is trying to influence the CMS by blackmailing people in the game. "Do as we say or we will blow you up."
Well with this and the Goons freighter hunt that will just make my profit a little better if they are successful that is.

Im not following your logic. If the Nullies are so violent, why would this convince anyone that Low/Null are safer (though Low IS safer when you fly safe and know what you are doing, it isnt as profitable).

In a broad viewing yes, but I feel if anything risks to break "the game" (presuming you mean industry in High, correct me if Ive picked that up wrong) its the fact that High Sec CEOs on the whole are having difficulty in knowing how to deal with the Wardecs effectively, and also a lot of new players having to set up their own corps, which are easily decced and destroyed, rather than powerful Highsec Alliances taking in new members. Of course, righteous paranoia and fear of AWOX is partially to blame, but there are plenty of ways to mitiagte that too.

I'm starting to feel emotionally unraveled so I may cancel my high sec accounts for the duration?

Well this is not about the mechanics of hi-sec but about the new CODE war dec on high sec to force people to vote they way they want.
I don't want hi-sec to change, I love it just the way it is. But It kinda annoys me when someone is trying to influence the CMS by blackmailing people in the game. "Do as we say or we will blow you up."
Well with this and the Goons freighter hunt that will just make my profit a little better if they are successful that is.

It isn't hard for them to drop by with the message that NullSec alliances can offer better protection, so indirectly they could be using third-party corporations to instigate a constant sense of danger for those that reside in HighSec. They can easily profit from the flocks of people that would simply join their ranks to empower their political intrigues with other alliances in NullSec.

Exactly my point; by causing difficulty to HighSec corporations, and new pilots they are basically destroying HighSec, and that's where a lot of people keep their alts to generate a revenue stream to support their main objectives. Therefore, it is quite a nice turn of events that HighSec is becoming less and less secure due to the LowSec alliances basically ravaging HighSec through war declarations. However, if you have any clear ideas on how to improve the situation then it is for the best that you publicly share these ideas as many HighSec corporations, and alliances are facing grave difficulties.

Oh so you mean the same shiat that goes on in high sec every day will just keep continue happening.

/yawn

Wake me up when you actually do something spectacular. Ganking happens everyday in EVE. Writing GD posts that 'things' are happening that happens everyday isn't really doing anything but wasting oxygen.

QUIT WASTING OXYGEN.

STFU AND GTFO.

I'm in this as well - Killing as many people in highsec as I can.

I started ganking as a response to the constant nerfs on ganking and wardecs, now stepping it up after the Erotica 1 farce.

More than just the "same shite, different day" is going on here. There may well be even MORE ganking going on now, as rational-thinking people protest the unequal treatments given to E1 and Sohkar, both of whom are equally guilty of violating the TOS. I know I'm going to be bringing my suicide ganking alt out of retirement, and I'll be sending each victim an evemail informing them that their death was my way of protesting what I perceive to be an injustice, an unequal application of the rules. I plan on highly encouraging my corp members to engage in all manner of griefing and underhandedness in protest as well.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333839&find=unread

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

More than just the "same shite, different day" is going on here. There may well be even MORE ganking going on now, as rational-thinking people protest the unequal treatments given to E1 and Sohkar, both of whom are equally guilty of violating the TOS. I know I'm going to be bringing my suicide ganking alt out of retirement, and I'll be sending each victim an evemail informing them that their death was my way of protesting what I perceive to be an injustice, an unequal application of the rules. I plan on highly encouraging my corp members to engage in all manner of griefing and underhandedness in protest as well.

I was of the opinion that your posts were in agreement with mine until this

Youve pretty much torpedoed your own argument with this pile of tears, sorry

blah blah blah silly little boys shouting about a code no body has heard of or cares about. no one cares that you are wardeccing hisec (lol your arrogance is only exceeded by your ignorance).


plus 1 for role playing your little hearts out.

its hisecs fault ero1 got banned for being a horrible person?, your ranting and postulating just marks you our as a drama queen. we all know that you are using ero1s ban to justify being horrible to a player base who had nothing to do with it.

bring it on sunshine, best your ever going to do is die and take 1 other person with you.

your little role playing group has no power other than that which is given to you. i am going to enjoy watching you fail a lot.

Who gives a **** if Erotica is a horrible person, he didnt really do anything wrong and they other guy could have quit TS at any time.

Wut

To harm highsec one must reduce the profitability of highsec production, to reduce the profitability of highsec production one must eliminate demand for highsec produced goods, and in order to do that would require something that goes against the very foundation of the game....

If you wish to truly wage war on high sec, don't pvp. If their is no pvp their is no loss of goods, prices will plummet as items stack up in the hubs, which will cause production to faulter, which will cause a surplus in minerals, which will drive down the value of ores, which will make mining less profitable.

Ganking more will help highsec, it will only create further demand for goods which will fuel production which will increase demand for minerals which will drive up the value of ore. If you really want to hurt highsec you have to hurt it's economy, and the only way to do that is to stop participating in and inhibit gameplay that the highsec economy is based on.

I'm pretty sure he is referencing a straw man argument.

I don't see where I've been inconsistent in my posts. In what way have I contradicted myself?

LOL you disgusting RP Faggots.

Cry moar please, my tear cup runneth short.

You havent.

You are protesting the application of the rules.

Therefore, you dont accept the rules of this game.

You misunderstand completely. I am protesting that the rules are NOT being applied. It's (an even more egregious, imo) violation of the TOS to make threats of real-life bodily harm and murder against another player, as it is to make racial slurs. Nevertheless, Sokhar gets a free pass and suffers no consequences for breaking the rules, yet E1 gets permabanned for breaking the rules.

If you ban one, you have to ban the other, or you're not accepting and applying the rules of the game. See the difference? I dont care that E1 got banned, I care that he did and the other guy (who imo committed the more severe "crime") did not.

See my sig.

You misunderstand completely. I am protesting that the rules are NOT being applied. It's (an even more egregious, imo) violation of the TOS to make threats of real-life bodily harm and murder against another player, as it is to make racial slurs. Nevertheless, Sokhar gets a free pass and suffers no consequences for breaking the rules, yet E1 gets permabanned for breaking the rules.

If you ban one, you have to ban the other, or you're not accepting and applying the rules of the game. See the difference? I dont care that E1 got banned, I care that he did and the other guy (who imo committed the more severe "crime") did not.

See my sig.

It's all about NullSec politics, clearly. However, when you see it in a certain way the one most beneficial from this are NullSec alliances that could encourage a chunk of the pilot population to move from HighSec to potentially LowSec or even NullSec. Although, the current constant input of war declarations towards new corporations, or simply new players, and those who prefer to play within HighSec risks to break the game apart.

No, you're just being a douche now. We get it.

You think that if you did as you believe they want that they wouldn't blow up unguarded freighters?

Really?

I am not sure if you read my post or just made something up to respond to.
The only thing that I am complaining about is that they have posted the reason that they are doing it to get a guy away from CSM. Them blowing up freighters or the like don't concern me the least. Its the IRL blackmail attitude that annoys me.
Its not "Give us iskis or we will kill you." Its "Vote as we want you to IRL or we will harass you in game until you do as we say." You might claim that its not harassment but the fact remains that they are using the game to get their will through IRL. Thats the only thing that annoys me about this.

As for them or the goons killing miners and freighters?
That just increases my profits so I don't mind that the slightest.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333839&find=unread

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

Yes, Im saying that its obviously not the reason, its a topical thing to attach it to for more publicity and they would be doing it whether E1 existed or not. Im not commenting on whether you mind ships being blown up, Im commenting that you actually believe that this is somehow politically motivated and I disagree.

I'm starting to feel emotionally unraveled so I may cancel my high sec accounts for the duration?

It is not enough to fight the war, we must also fight the Infowar. Ripard "Big Sis" Teg think he can take your freedom in the name of security, but he will finds he ends up getting neither.

The highsec corp I infiltrated and euthanized last night was told "Ripard Teg sends his regards".

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333839&find=unread

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

Gankers \ Scammers \ Rapists Tears are best tears.

keep it coming guys... keep it coming.

So, as I understand it an alliance who's primary play style is suicide ganking has now declared that they're going to be suicide ganking, as opposed to last week when they were just suicide ganking?


Uh...

well .... you know ... its better than just suicide ganking

So, as I understand it an alliance who's primary play style is suicide ganking has now declared that they're going to be suicide ganking, as opposed to last week when they were just suicide ganking?


Uh...

Untill the day comes that the code Muppets try to gank cribba in the veldnought. I will continue to take little or no notice of them.

LOL you disgusting RP Faggots.

Cry moar please, my tear cup runneth short.

... creating content ...

I'll never understand why so many of you share this common delusion that ganking newbs and miners is considered "creating content".

I think so many of you just see a phrase being used often and just repeat it, thinking you sound smart. Kinda like the word 'sociopath' on these boards.

Why are miners so special that they can't be shoy?

I'll never understand why so many of you share this common delusion that ganking newbs and miners is considered "creating content".

Are we supposed to care? They are just a few of easily controlled puppets. Won't have any impact on 98% of people in highsec. All they go after are poorly fit miners.

You can shoot miners all you want, you aren't creating anything. You are playing a game the way it is meant to be played. The content is already there, created by CCP. You had NOTHING to do with its creation.

While most MMOs concentrate on developing linear content, EVE Online follows a systems-based design which allows for sandbox gameplay and player agency

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333839&find=unread

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333839&find=unread

Thought I would pass this along. War has been declared on Highsec for what happened to Ero1 and the events of Ripard Teg.

Griefer tears, best tears.

To harm highsec one must reduce the profitability of highsec production, to reduce the profitability of highsec production one must eliminate demand for highsec produced goods, and in order to do that would require something that goes against the very foundation of the game....

If you wish to truly wage war on high sec, don't pvp. If their is no pvp their is no loss of goods, prices will plummet as items stack up in the hubs, which will cause production to faulter, which will cause a surplus in minerals, which will drive down the value of ores, which will make mining less profitable.

Ganking more will help highsec, it will only create further demand for goods which will fuel production which will increase demand for minerals which will drive up the value of ore. If you really want to hurt highsec you have to hurt it's economy, and the only way to do that is to stop participating in and inhibit gameplay that the highsec economy is based on.

Thats why we cover it with some roleplaying sauce m8! Truth is, pretty much everything you do in the sandbox is creating content. Even mining out a belt is, since you will be forcing other players that want to mine to relocate.

So Ero acted like a jerk and got smacked by CCP for his behaviour, so it is the fault if hi-sec in general?

Jeez, no wonder I will not live in null full time.

You are aware of the ridiculous irony in your last comment right? "We're going to gank miners because they are mining the ore that might have been mined by other miners who are 'forced to relocate' after they discover that these miners have mined the ore"

And BTW drop the pretense of trying to stop botting. You know well that you don't give a woot whether the people you gank are botters or not. The truth is there are far fewer bots in the game than some players claim.

Where exactly does Null come into this?

Many of them also have an over inflated sense of their own importance.

So Ero acted like a jerk and got smacked by CCP for his behaviour, so it is the fault if hi-sec in general?

Jeez, no wonder I will not live in null, lo sec full time.

The Code - dear me

You probably should lay off the cool-aid. Suicide gank all you like, but please don't taint this honorable profession by making it sound like gankers do it in support of a terrible human being like Erotica 1.

So essentially:

I'm throwing a tantrum until I get my way.

Typical