PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1307
   |
Posted - 2014.04.03 22:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Do anything you want to anyone's eve assets. In game, say anything you want within the EULA/TOS. Out of game, Trollish Blog/EN24/TMC/various forum posts are ok.
Repeated humiliation sessions over voice comms or other third party programs are not ok. The line in the sand was drawn pretty fcking clearly; a lot of people just refuse to see it.
And honestly, there aren't many people in the Eve community that sink so low as to warrant a ban by these standards. In fact, I only know of one such case. |
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1309
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 03:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Do anything you want to anyone's eve assets. In game, say anything you want within the EULA/TOS. Out of game, Trollish Blog/EN24/TMC/various forum posts are ok.
Repeated humiliation sessions over voice comms or other third party programs are not ok. The line in the sand was drawn pretty fcking clearly; a lot of people just refuse to see it.
And honestly, there aren't many people in the Eve community that sink so low as to warrant a ban by these standards. In fact, I only know of one such case. Glad its clear to you. Oh, btw, it was only one session. Until that day, E1 hadn't met the guy.
Right, there was only ever one session of the "bonus" room. 
It's not like there were any previous bonus room related "incidents" of allegedly inappropriate behavior that ended up spilling into the forums. And none of those incidents involved former CCP dudes and E1's former alliance leaders.
No, nothing like that ever happened, and E1's behavior was absolutely spotless before the single incident in question. There were no peanut butter pictures, no pictures of individuals "exposing" themselves due to in-game transactions, etc. etc. No, none of that happened, at all.
Look, there was a case to be made that E1 didn't strictly break any of the rules of the game. Some of us made that case in the relevant threadnaught. CCP, the final arbiter, decided that E1's repeated behavior transgressed too far. E1 was banned, a precedent set by CCP. Deal with it. Wasn't the first time CCP changed the rules on us: remember the dude that got banned for editing the eve wiki to scam supers?
You can disagree with any of the above decisions, but it's moronic to say that CCP's stance is anything less than transparent. Don't demonstrate a repeat pattern of humiliating players out of game in an eve-related context. Simple. |