|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 06:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why do you ******* devs feel the need to change anything about Gallente. We spend years training these ships because we like what they do and you change them to be "new and exciting?" **** you. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 07:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Anhenka wrote:Gila changes make me sad.
Forcing ships into ultra specific niche is just awful.
I mean, Gila was an excellent ship in many situation before. It was a decent small gang ship, excellent in WH's for clearing certain sites, was a poor mans Ishtar for someone unable to fly them yet in Ishtar gangs.
And now... Ew. Medium drones are incredibly poor PvP above a few people, It can't field a single heavy or sentry drone, and not even a full flight of smalls, and those would be unbonused.
Will be easily kited to death by a t1 frigate able to outrun slow mediums, and a 500% bonus to drone HP won't save them if a cruiser sized hull decides to pop drones. 4x the health of paper is still paper. And when one pops, you lose the vast majority of your dps.
Just ew. Bleeeh. Need to go sell my WH site fit Gila to people who don't read dev blogs before summer hits.
I honestly don't know what you have against the Guristas ships...
THIS
Pull your head out of your assholes, devs. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 07:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Imiarr Timshae wrote:Well I will simply never use my gila again. Edit : I don't ever use my gila it's so bad already. I guess I'll just continue to never use my gila. Good work as ever  (SARCASM) Edit : Concerns over Gila 1. Far less damage 2. Inability to use sentry drones. 3. Removal of all shield tanking sentry ships (cruiser class) from the game. 4. Massive lack of adaptability. 5. Un-bonused light drones. In short - You have nerfed the gila, which was admittedly already one of the worst pirate cruisers.
How have these concerns not been addressed in 40+ pages.
Is there anyone who actually use a gila who wants these ridiculous changes that make Guristas have extreme niche application? |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
26
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Can we get more people to explain to these ******** devs that Guristas doesn't need to be "new and exciting", being that they are the only shield-tanked missile/drone ships in the game.
Take "new and exciting" to the ships that don't take 2-3 years to fully train for. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
26
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Laiannah Sahireen wrote:There are a ton of opportunities here now that Amarr and Caldari drones are getting love, the fact that medium drones will be faster in general and the fact that it will be able to use RLMLs will a hefty damage bonus to wreck frigates. I think thus sums it up nicely. Whether this holds for the Rattlesnake remains to be seenGǪ I'll be ecstatic with just the missile damage bonus.
You must be pretty stupid to only be looking at the miniscule upsides to these changes. The Guristas had great versatility before these changes and now they are being forced into extremely niche roles.
|

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
26
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Laiannah Sahireen wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:Arthur Aihaken wrote:Laiannah Sahireen wrote:There are a ton of opportunities here now that Amarr and Caldari drones are getting love, the fact that medium drones will be faster in general and the fact that it will be able to use RLMLs will a hefty damage bonus to wreck frigates. I think thus sums it up nicely. Whether this holds for the Rattlesnake remains to be seenGǪ I'll be ecstatic with just the missile damage bonus. You must be pretty stupid to only be looking at the miniscule upsides to these changes. The Guristas had great versatility before these changes and now they are being forced into extremely niche roles. No, they were inferior versions of the gallente T1 and T2 drone boats but with shields instead of armour.
So wrong and so dumb. Senty+cruise MJD rattlesnake far better and more versatile at doing lvl 4 missions than any gallente T2.
I guess it is unreasonable to expect the plebs to know how to play. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
26
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:You must be pretty stupid to only be looking at the miniscule upsides to these changes. The Guristas had great versatility before these changes and now they are being forced into extremely niche roles. And another idiot joins the block list...
I see you can't really argue so you just ignore it. Haven't you spammed this thread enough with your extremely narrow minded perspective? |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
27
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Laiannah Sahireen wrote: No, they were inferior versions of the gallente T1 and T2 drone boats but with shields instead of armour.
You should really go back and actually read some of my posts and those of others. If you think these changes force the Gila and RS into 'niche' roles, then it's because you lack the skill and imagination to do great things with them. That's your problem, not the devs who you are so quick to insult.
Try improving yourself before spewing petty hatred at the devs and crying on the forums.
Fabulous Rod wrote:Laiannah Sahireen wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:
You must be pretty stupid to only be looking at the miniscule upsides to these changes. The Guristas had great versatility before these changes and now they are being forced into extremely niche roles.
No, they were inferior versions of the gallente T1 and T2 drone boats but with shields instead of armour. So wrong and so dumb. Senty+cruise MJD rattlesnake far better and more versatile at doing lvl 4 missions than any gallente T2. I guess it is unreasonable to expect the plebs to know how to play.
Way to misquote me and still look like a moron. I said T1 and T2 hulls.
But wait, you're right - nobody uses the dominix for missions, silly me.[/quote]
I have a sentry dominix too, idiot. Way to not understand that T2 > T1 and therefore T1 is irrelevant.
You must have some serious mental retardation to not recognize the fact that the Rattlesnake is losing all its versatility if this trend o changes for Guristas continues.
I just saved you some embarassment by not quoting the entirety of your moronic post. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
27
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:And no, I'm not blocking you because you share a different viewpoint. I'm blocking you because you can't make it without behaving like a child.
I see you are one of those childish morons who only claims they block someone to make that person somehow feel rejected by you, as if anyone really cares what your dumb-ass thinks.
Now get back to your basement before you clown yourself deeper into that dunce corner you dug for yourself. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
27
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Laiannah Sahireen wrote: No, they were inferior versions of the gallente T1 and T2 drone boats but with shields instead of armour.
You should really go back and actually read some of my posts and those of others. If you think these changes force the Gila and RS into 'niche' roles, then it's because you lack the skill and imagination to do great things with them. That's your problem, not the devs who you are so quick to insult.
Try improving yourself before spewing petty hatred at the devs and crying on the forums.
Laiannah Sahireen wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:
You must be pretty stupid to only be looking at the miniscule upsides to these changes. The Guristas had great versatility before these changes and now they are being forced into extremely niche roles.
No, they were inferior versions of the gallente T1 and T2 drone boats but with shields instead of armour.
So wrong and so dumb. Senty+cruise MJD rattlesnake far better and more versatile at doing lvl 4 missions than any gallente T2.
I guess it is unreasonable to expect the plebs to know how to play.[/quote]
Way to misquote me and still look like a moron. I said T1 and T2 hulls.
But wait, you're right - nobody uses the dominix for missions, silly me.[/quote]
I have a sentry dominix too, idiot. Way to not understand that T2 > T1 and therefore T1 is irrelevant.
You must have some serious mental retardation to not recognize the fact that the Rattlesnake is losing all its versatility if this trend o changes for Guristas continues.
I just saved you some embarassment by not quoting the entirety of your moronic post.[/quote] |
|

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
27
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:40:00 -
[11] - Quote
Laiannah Sahireen wrote:
Lol. Contradictory much?
T2: More specialised, not necessarily better. Do you really think that everybody who flies a T1 battleship is only doing so because they can't fly a maurauder or black ops?
You have got to be a 1/10 troll. Although I can't rule out that you might actually be stupid enough to think a t1 can compete with a Rattlesnake in level 4 missions. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
28
|
Posted - 2014.04.12 16:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:Endo Saissore wrote:Most of the changes are exciting but I'm seeing a problem with the overall theme. Aren't pirate ships suppose to be more versatile than tech 2 ships? As it stands I know the phantasm will definitely have an afterburner, the Gila will definitely be using medium drones, and the Cynabal will definitely be using autocannons as opposed to artillery fit. The ships haven't even hit SiSi and their fitting options are being squandered :/ that's not the useful kind of versatility, unless you're talking about mobile depots. well they are trying too give them all a uniqueness .. like the serpentis.. at the end of the day you already have Navy for what you want .. these are navy with a twist ... we want uniqueness would be nice if we got unique models too go with them ..
Thats what doesn't make sense. The guristas are ALREADY unique, being the only shield-tanked missile and drone boats in the game.
We didn't spend 3 years maxing out the skills to fly a rattlesnake for you incompetent devs to change them to be "new and exciting".
Please, pull your head out of your assholes before you make a lot of people angry.
|

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
28
|
Posted - 2014.04.12 17:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote: CCP Rise quote in another thread - "for those who don't like it there are alternatives"
If this is for real, that is disgusting. We spend 3 years maxing out skills to play a ship how we want to play it and now you force us into an extremely niche playstyle that many Gila/Rattlesnake have no interest in?
**** you, incompetent devs. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
28
|
Posted - 2014.04.12 17:16:00 -
[14] - Quote
gascanu wrote:CCP Rise wrote:I'm back!
Gila:
Medium drone powerhouse (remember the Medium Drone buff in the above linked Dev Blog)
We expect a lot of feedback here,I'll do my best to answer questions as they come, but the basic thinking is that this is new and interesting, very powerful, and frees it from overlap with the Ishtar (which simply does sentries better)
Look forward to hearing from you o/ Hey Rise, if this is your best, i'm sorry but i think you must try harder; maibe i missed it, but i didn't see any answer from you regarding gila, and there are allot of concerns and allot of players saying that this "reballance" will cripple and already inferior ship; so, can we have some thoughts?
Apparently the plan is to just going to ignore all the outcry over the Gila and Guristas and push it through in leu of some ridiculous, uncompromising vision on the part of some ******* who doesn't understand the game and is ignorant of all the people he is shitting on.
The only people who think these changes to Guristas are interesting or exciting are the people who aren't going to be flying them. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
28
|
Posted - 2014.04.12 17:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:
Apparently the plan is to just going to ignore all the outcry over the Gila and Guristas and push it through in leu of some ridiculous, uncompromising vision on the part of some ******* who doesn't understand the game and is ignorant all the people he is shitting on.
The only people who think these changes to Guristas are interesting or exciting are the people who aren't going to be flying them.
if all goes as planned, they'll listen to your outcry, then decide that it's stupid and disregard it. your complaints are meant to actually be valid if they're to have an effect.
tell me why i'm wrong instead of just making stupid, baseless statements. you are like a child getting angry because you are too dumb to form a proper argument. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 17:36:00 -
[16] - Quote
There is no good reason to change Gurstas so drastically. Many Guristas pilots trained to use sentries for a Snake and that is what we want to use.
Be a responsible dev instead of an negligent ******* and create "new and exciting" ships instead of shitting on your players and drastically changing old ones, please. You people clearly don't even understand your own game.
Look at all of the valid complaints over your horrible idea and do the right thing. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 19:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
Hasril Pux wrote: No one seems to be complaining about the loss of the 50% range bonus on missiles. Neither am I, that has always seemed like an unnecessary bonus on these ships that didn't fit with any of my uses for them.
Don't say no one is complaining about it. The velocity bonus greatly helps to in torpedo fits and shortens the time between target switches for cruise missiles.
If these ships need balance, fine. But why unnecessarily take things away from them and gimp so severely(20 drone bandwidth) ? We chose to fly these ships because of their high versatility. The only people who like these changes are people who don't fly Guristas. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 19:54:00 -
[18] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:Hasril Pux wrote: No one seems to be complaining about the loss of the 50% range bonus on missiles. Neither am I, that has always seemed like an unnecessary bonus on these ships that didn't fit with any of my uses for them.
Don't say no one is complaining about it. The velocity bonus greatly helps to in torpedo fits and shortens the time between target switches for cruise missiles. If these ships need balance, fine. But why unnecessarily take things away from them and gimp so severely(20 drone bandwidth) ? We chose to fly these ships because of their high versatility. The only people who like these changes are people who don't fly Guristas. damage-bonused cruise will probably .
try not to talk out of your *******. Thanks. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 20:59:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kitty Bear wrote:KaDa en Bauldry wrote:
Super-sentries might be interesting though...
oh no. they can't give the snake a bonus to sentries, because then it would overlap with the dominix so the snake will get 2 super heavy drones because that doesn't overshadow other ship lines that logic was the Dev's btw not mine, on why the gila got 2 mediums - because Ishtar and people don't understand why it's such a stupid, ******, fuckwit change
Exactly. The only commonality between Guristas and Gallente are the use of drones. The use of missiles, shield-tanking, the hull, stats and maneuverability are all typical of Caldari. The overlap argument seems without much merit considering all these difference to Gallente.
Why are Guristas current use of drones not considered an acceptable level overlap when Guristas are supposed to be a mix of Gallente and Caldari?
Make new ships if you want to create super niche application weird drone ships that nobody would really fly. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 21:17:00 -
[20] - Quote
Why not improve the shields and close range missile damage instead of specializing Guristas into medium and heavy drones that nobody wants to use? Nobody could be angry with you for that.
If you are going to force us into specialized drones, the drones need the ability to teleport instantly back to the drone bay. |
|

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 06:26:00 -
[21] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Vinyl 41 wrote:not sure if the code can support this change but why not limit gurista ships to just 2 hardcapped drones launched I've got a better ideaGǪ Since the Gurista ships now grant a Gallente missile bonus, let's just drop the drones and make these missile boats. Give them another 2 launchers and a +50% missile velocity role bonus. I would then welcome our new Gurista overlords...
you know this thread wouldn't be half as long if you would refrain from posting your mind vomit every few minutes.
Get a life. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 06:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vinyl 41 wrote:not sure if the code can support this change but why not limit gurista ships to just 2 hardcapped drones launched ie worm - 2 lights gila - 2 lights or 2 meds rattler - 2 lights or 2 meds or 2 heavys wouldn't that fix most of the complains ?
not even close. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
32
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 07:00:00 -
[23] - Quote
Hasril Pux wrote:To those of you who keep saying a drone boat that can use all the drones is overlapping the Ishtar (that includes you DEVs), I say a drone boat that can use all the drones does not an overlap make.
It's a drone boat, a Guristas, missile slinging brick ****house of a shield-tanking drone boat. It should be able to use all the drones just as effectively as any other drone boat.
Just because a Vigilant uses medium hybrid turrets, that doesn't mean it "overlaps" the Deimos, and so we should give it one gun that does 1000% more damage to make it different.
Subtle differences in ships are difference enough for me. I never called for anyone to change the Ishtar because it's too close in capability to the Gila, even though it's often considered "superior." How would you like to see the Ishtar lose access to sentry drones and full flights of... anything?
Why should I have to roll over and be either forced into a different role or told to 'please consider another option, thanks!' other than my favorite ship.
correct. The overlap argument is completely ridiculous. The only similarity between Guristas and Gallente are the use of drones. Missiles, shield-tanking, the hull, stats and maneuverability are all typical of Caldari. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
39
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 01:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:A "worldbeater" is bad and wrong. A ship that can handle anything you throw at it is bad and wrong. Having no significant drawbacks to go along with benefits is bad and wrong. If you have even a tiny bit of balancing sense, you should already understand this without having to be told.
The Guristas ships are gaining a significant strength. This strength requires a proportional weakness. For the Gila, that weakness includes four unbonused light drones. No. Your balance concept, is over simplistic, lazy and just plain wrong.  you may believe it, but apply a little real thought to the issue, and you may realise that. One neat little soundbite does not make for a valid concept, It does not allow one to cease to think and wave away realities. No matter how often or loudly it is spoken.
This. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
39
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 02:03:00 -
[25] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Sgt EVE wrote:on the whole, I rate all changes as comprehensible except the vigilant nerf.
it is now the first ship with too little powergrid in order to fit the other version of the appropriate weaponsystem.
let-¦s do some math:
ashimmu and vigilant both have 5H,4M,6L ashimmu have 16,2% more PG than the vigilant
max. fittable PG for the H-slots: Ashimmu: 3x heavy beam laser II + 2x medium nos/neut 3x 248 + 2x 200 = 1144 Vigiant: 5x 250mm railgun II 5x 208 = 1040
ashimmu only needs 10% more PG than Vigilant if you take Meta 4 nos/neut with no negativ effect the ashimmu needs only 4% more PG
in other words ... the ashimmu have min.12,2% more PG to fit for tank but already have 18% more base armor HP than the vigilant
CCP Rise please explain that to me !!! Like I have said multiple times. The Vigilant which is already a an expensive ship to fit properly is also very rarely flown. All they are doing it making it less worth while to fly. So it will be less seen then it already is. CCP Rise has not responded and I doubt they will reserve it. So much for so called balancing.
Is not so much about balance as it is about unnecessarily changing things so that they are more different than other ships. Because it is apparently a game breaking issue when something other than Gallente has 50% bonus damage and HP to all its drones. Its just not as neato as totally revamping a high SP demanding ship that people have spent years training into, ya know? 
|
|
|
|