| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Irsam Samri
Delusions of Granduer
47
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hey, been playing Eve on and off for a few years. I like the game in theory, it is just hard for me to find good fights, I find fights, just not goodfights. I would rather lose a substantial amount of isk in a close battle that taught me something than get on an even bigger killmail via a gatecamp.
off grid boosting is the crux for me. My 4 accounts are expiring. No you cant have my stuff I'll be back when its removed |

Tyrendian Biohazard
Ubiquitous Hurt Exodus.
271
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Irsam Samri wrote:Hey, been playing Eve on and off for a few years. I like the game in theory, it is just hard for me to find good fights, I find fights, just not goodfights. I would rather lose a substantial amount of isk in a close battle that taught me something than get on an even bigger killmail via a gatecamp.
off grid boosting is the crux for me. My 4 accounts are expiring. No you cant have my stuff I'll be back when its removed
1) Where are you trying to find fights. I don't have too much of a problem.
2) Bye! My twitch stream to help new players: http://www.twitch.tv/biohazrd51
|

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
4355
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Buh bye!
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
186
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Can I have your stuff? |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3313
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
What?
Oh my, a C3 network is outside my viewing range in a space ship game?
Ohnoes, best unsub till they change the game to be ******** *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1051
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
This is the best way to vote, not CSM. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
635
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
laters Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17728
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Stuff, can I take care of it for you?
|

Revman Zim
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
238
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:43:00 -
[9] - Quote
I am sure the loss of your 4 accounts will cause CCP to redirect ALL of their development efforts to make you happy.
Make sure you buy the HD stream of FANFEST so that you can see the official announcement.
Pompous ass. |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1101
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
While I always respect people who are prepared to take action over there gripes rather than just whine in the forum, in this case I don't see any problem at all with off-grid boosts.
So in this case, it might be more productive to stay and whine rather than leave. There seem to be a lot of people in W&T who whine about it.
In the end though, I hope it's futile. If anyone is prepared to put in all that training time and effort on an alt, they deserve the benefit that results.
If you aren't prepared to do it, then that's your own limiting choice. You should wear the consequence of thst choice, not someone else. . -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
3403
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
I feel like starting a new boosting account to negate OP's departure. |

Eric D'Red
The Imperial LansDrahd LOADED-DICE
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:49:00 -
[12] - Quote
We always send guys to take out the off-grid booster. They are usually juicy kills! |

Lucy Cooper
Exiter Corp Li3 Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:53:00 -
[13] - Quote
Let me have your boosting ships till you come back.. you know so i can let you know when to come back  |

Jarvin Spoo
Clandestine Management Group SiNTaX err0r
21
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
Quick simple question.....
I have read through some of the 'Off-Grid Boosting' topics on the forums and could not find the answer.
For those of you that are for it - Is there any other benefit to do this other than just 'getting the booster ship/pilot out of harms way while a fight is happening'?
And for those of you that are against it - Is there any other argument against it other than 'Its not fair that a ship can participate in the fight (via boosting) and not be at risk?
I'm honestly trying to figure out what all the divisiveness on this is and why CCP has not stepped in yet.
Thanks in advance - |

Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
7485
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:05:00 -
[15] - Quote
Your Stoofs, i can Haz?
I like Bacon. Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!! |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3313
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jarvin Spoo wrote:
For those of you that are for it - Is there any other benefit to do this other than just 'getting the booster ship/pilot out of harms way while a fight is happening'?
Why would your Command and Control ship/bunker/armoured vehicle be placed at the front where it is in danger? Why would what it does mean it would have to be in line-of-sight with the enemy?
Jarvin Spoo wrote:
I'm honestly trying to figure out what all the divisiveness on this is and why CCP has not stepped in yet.
Working as nintendoed? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1105
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:12:00 -
[17] - Quote
Jarvin Spoo wrote:For those of you that are for it - Is there any other benefit to do this other than just 'getting the booster ship/pilot out of harms way while a fight is happening'? Like logistics and ewar, it's a force multiplier, allowing smaller fleets and lone pilots the opportunity to take on larger opponents.
However, if you bring it on grid, it will be primaried and killed as quickly as possible. That will favour blop tactics. Blop wins.
Thats the best reason I believe they should stay off grid. They aren't safe (though can be very, very difficult to scan down), but at least a blop can't just hit them and then, having their own booster, wipeout the rest of the opponent.
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
186
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Tollen Gallen wrote:Your Stoofs, i can Haz?
I like Bacon. Wow a new pic!
And still the cutest looking one of them all! |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
12010
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:21:00 -
[19] - Quote
Are you SURE that they had OGB? Because youre not providing any proof...
Without proof, this is just another "Everyone worse than me is a noob, everyone better than me is a Haxxor and should DIAF" thread.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Belt Scout
121
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
Next he's going to ask fr drugs to be taken out of the game.
Here's a suggestion. If you have 4 accounts, why don't you have your own OGB helping you out? Just keep it on a second monitor and warp it to another bookmark when you can afford to shut it off for a few seconds.
. EVE's only legitimate ISK halving service. I have 50Billion to not give away. It's easy for you to double my money. Just send me some isk, has to be 100Mil or higher, and I will send you back half. I can't lose. One guaranteed winner every round. Do it now. |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
208
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
Why aren't one of your possible 12 characters an off grid booster? .
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20561
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:41:00 -
[22] - Quote
Belt Scout wrote:Here's a suggestion. If you have 4 accounts, why don't you have your own OGB helping you out? Just keep it on a second monitor and warp it to another bookmark when you can afford to shut it off for a few seconds. GǪin fact, let's get down to the main detail here: why do you have 4 accounts? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Irsam Samri
Delusions of Granduer
47
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
I'm not angry. off grid boosting isn't the end all be all that would fix Eve for me, but it's a big issue that would result in a revamped and rejuvenated experience. Sometimes I fight people without OGB and sometimes with. The argument that combat ships would be the primary target is laughable since they have some of the strongest tanks in the game sub capital ships.
I can actually empathize with the 200+ man fleets, in those cases, yes your OGB would be primary. I guess I can only speak for small gang and solo |

KnowUsByTheDead
Krypteia Operations CODE.
1255
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
I understand that you are leaving.
Obligatory stuffz post.
But, seriously...
I need your stuffz.
I am stuffz broke.
I also would like your corp.
That would be solid.
And if you could just pay the PLEX fee and transfer the characters over, that would be pretty awesome, too.
Alternatively, I know a guy, who can get in touch with this one dude, that is cousin to this other guy, who could probably arrange for a "Leaving EvE: Bonus Round Blowout." It could be great fun.

  
Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4713
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Jarvin Spoo wrote:For those of you that are for it - Is there any other benefit to do this other than just 'getting the booster ship/pilot out of harms way while a fight is happening'? Like logistics and ewar, it's a force multiplier, allowing smaller fleets and lone pilots the opportunity to take on larger opponents. However, if you bring it on grid, it will be primaried and killed as quickly as possible. That will favour blop tactics. Blop wins. Thats the best reason I believe they should stay off grid. They aren't safe (though can be very, very difficult to scan down), but at least a blop can't just hit them and then wipeout the rest of the opponent.
We can conclude then that any change against OGB will also require some nerf to BLOPS dropping.
All around I think it would be a good thing to end OGB and nerf the crap out of BLOPS drops.
OGB is proof that when one thing that's OP is left to stand too long, another thing that's OP will be found to counter it, and then to speak of removing one without addressing the other is seen as a kind of heresy.
Bring back DEEEEP Space! |

Irsam Samri
Delusions of Granduer
47
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:48:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Belt Scout wrote:Here's a suggestion. If you have 4 accounts, why don't you have your own OGB helping you out? Just keep it on a second monitor and warp it to another bookmark when you can afford to shut it off for a few seconds. GǪin fact, let's get down to the main detail here: why do you have 4 accounts?
I have 2 active at the moment, but I have 2 others that are inactive. When I have all 4 going, I fight on one and farm FW plexes with warp stabs for the others. This is antoher issue that desperately needs to be fixed, but if I can pull in 50 mil an hour semi-afk even WHILE being chased, why would I not do this? |

Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar E.A.R.T.H. Federation
394
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
Justifying OGB is like admitting you can't win without it. Why not push for OGRR while you are at it?
|

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
739
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:58:00 -
[28] - Quote
I have an OGB that has everything but FC 5.
I'm 100% for the removal of offgrid boosting.
You unsub so I don't have to.
Thx op
Not today spaghetti. |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1109
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 19:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Irsam Samri wrote:I can actually empathize with the 200+ man fleets, in those cases, yes your OGB would be primary. I guess I can only speak for small gang and solo In small gang and lone pvp pilot, if you bring links on-grid, how many fights are you going to get?
Any opponent that comes to fight you, or that stays to fight you is only going to do so because they already know they can win. They will bring bigger fleets and/or bigger ships to kill you. Either way, you lose as a small gang or lone pilot. Fewer fights and at losing odds. . -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |

Muestereate
Minions LLC
287
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 19:04:00 -
[30] - Quote
Back in the day, you know, before they dumbed down scanning so you barely need a launcher? we would go out and actually try to find these guys, you know, then shoot them. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20561
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 19:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
Also, why not just hunt down the boosting ships and kill them? It really comes down to the question of, what would it actually achieve (for small fleets) if the ship is on-grid? If you can't beat the other guy while they're boosted, what makes you think that you'll be able to just because the booster is there too? If you are in a position where you'd be able to kill them, you can already do so. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1345
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 19:05:00 -
[32] - Quote
Irsam Samri wrote:...and farm FW plexes with warp stabs for the others. And nothing of value was lost.
Just for you, I hope they leave OGB just the way it is for another four years.
Hell, I don't even want your stuff now. Just leave, don't let the door hit you on the way out. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3318
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 19:09:00 -
[33] - Quote
Val'Dore wrote:Justifying OGB is like admitting you can't win without it. Why not push for OGRR while you are at it?
Because OGB makes sense within the type of scifi EvE is
OGRR would not
Saying its unjust and should be removed is like saying that NORAD should be on top of a tower in Germany and not under ground 10,000 miles from any warfront. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1109
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 19:27:00 -
[34] - Quote
Val'Dore wrote:Justifying OGB is like admitting you can't win without it. Why not push for OGRR while you are at it? I don't believe that's the case.
Since joining the game 9 months ago I've had access to links when in fleet. We also take logistics. There are only a couple of guys in our regular fleets that have boosting alts, so we have links about 50% of the time on weekend roams. We still win without the links present.
The links though gives us a lot more flexibility. Some slots can be switched out from defensive mods to ewar and/or we can take on opponents with more confidence even if they are larger or in more powerful ships. We often fly frigates in FW areas, but will engage cruiser fleets when we have links for example (we often die then too, but we have fun).
For us, its not a compensation for anything. Its about flexibility and more freedom to engage different targets that we wouldn't otherwise. . -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
3411
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:13:00 -
[35] - Quote
So you think OGB is stupid, and CCP should change it to OGB instead.
People really need to use an abbreviation better than "OGB".
OGB = Off-grid boosting OGB = On-grid boosting
These threads are already painful enough to read. |

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
3016
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
While we're at it, let's just get rid of logi altogether. So us unsociable and/or lazy and/or can't-be-arsed-to-commit-to-group-stuff guys can maybe solo pvp. "Were [sic] not your monkey and so what?"-á -The Sex Pistols (2006) |

Serene Repose
1238
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:22:00 -
[37] - Quote
Irsam Samri wrote:My 4 accounts are expiring. No you cant have my stuff I'll be back when its removed Which will be never, judging by CCP's rate of admitting they've made horrendous errors in judgment.
I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-á |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1023
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:22:00 -
[38] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Val'Dore wrote:Justifying OGB is like admitting you can't win without it. Why not push for OGRR while you are at it? Because OGB makes sense within the type of scifi EvE is OGRR would not Saying its unjust and should be removed is like saying that NORAD should be on top of a tower in Germany and not under ground 10,000 miles from any warfront.
Because everything in EVE behave like in reality right? Why are projectiles from guns able to travel over 200 km withing a single second? How can my secure container hold more than it's own volume within itself?
It's not about what it's like in reality it's about balance. Why is a ship having an influence in combat not on the line of fire like all other ship having an effect on that same fight? It's just as stupid as the drone boat hiding behind a POS shield. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1242
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:Which will be never, judging by CCP's rate of admitting they've made horrendous errors in judgment.
Both you & the Op have obviously missed CCP saying for the last two years they would like to remove Off Grid Boosting. And that they are doing investigations into making it happen without melting down the servers like Incarna melted GPU's. So Op, you are quitting over one of the silliest things around, since CCP are already doing what you want, it's just going to take them some time.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3345
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:29:00 -
[40] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote: Because everything in EVE behave like in reality right? Why are projectiles from guns able to travel over 200 km withing a single second? How can my secure container hold more than it's own volume within itself?
It's not about what it's like in reality it's about balance. Why is a ship having an influence in combat not on the line of fire like all other ship having an effect on that same fight? It's just as stupid as the drone boat hiding behind a POS shield.
Ok, I admit, I cocked it by making a real world comparision, I apologise.
But why would ANY of this mean it suddenly makes sense to put a Command and Control Unit at the front in a battle?
Its just a terrible idea, there is no reason why it should be this way.
Either match it with your own, or hunt it down and kill it. What is wrong with that? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
7486
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Tollen Gallen wrote:Your Stoofs, i can Haz?
I like Bacon. Wow a new pic! And still the cutest looking one of them all! 
Yeah yours needs work 
I like Haggis. Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!! |

Muestereate
Minions LLC
288
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Val'Dore wrote:Justifying OGB is like admitting you can't win without it. Why not push for OGRR while you are at it? I don't believe that's the case. Since joining the game 9 months ago I've had access to links when in fleet. We also take logistics. There are only a couple of guys in our regular fleets that have boosting alts, so we have links about 50% of the time on weekend roams. We still win without the links present. The links though gives us a lot more flexibility. Some slots can be switched out from defensive mods to ewar and/or we can take on opponents with more confidence even if they are larger or in more powerful ships. We often fly frigates in FW areas, but will engage cruiser fleets when we have links for example (we often die then too, but we have fun). For us, its not a compensation for anything. Its about flexibility and more freedom to engage different targets that we wouldn't otherwise.
This too, it can also compensate a bit for low skill, ewar is like that too. Even though its defensive its force multiplier and flexibility benefits can increase the engagement envelope and allow more fights.
It does not have to be solely used in the baited element of surprise role. Its element of surprise is considerably negated nowadays. There was a time when logi was like this too and people didn't know its capabilities. After it became common knowledge they became targets.
Which reminds me, I'll repeat myself and say OGB's should be hunted. |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1023
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:35:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote: Because everything in EVE behave like in reality right? Why are projectiles from guns able to travel over 200 km withing a single second? How can my secure container hold more than it's own volume within itself?
It's not about what it's like in reality it's about balance. Why is a ship having an influence in combat not on the line of fire like all other ship having an effect on that same fight? It's just as stupid as the drone boat hiding behind a POS shield.
Ok, I admit, I cocked it by making a real world comparision, I apologise. But why would ANY of this mean it suddenly makes sense to put a Command and Control Unit at the front in a battle? Its just a terrible idea, there is no reason why it should be this way. Either match it with your own, or hunt it down and kill it. What is wrong with that?
The fact that it's not on grid where the fight is happeneing is what is wrong. Your command unit in the sense of current IRL NORAD would be the off-grid prober giving a warpin on the enemy logi group by using it's own version of surveillance satellite (combat probes) to direct you in a strategic way. All the bonus we get out of boosters currently are more tactic which would be the equivalent of the "on the field" platoon leader directing his troop to to be more efficient on the field.
At least that what it look like from my point of view... |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1053
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:39:00 -
[44] - Quote
On-Grid only is worse than the way it is right now.. |

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
704
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:54:00 -
[45] - Quote
Irsam Samri wrote:Hey, been playing Eve on and off for a few years....
Hey, i've been playing eve almost daily for 5 years, please leave the hunt-the-booster mini-game alone. "Awesome warp-in on that sleipnir bro." Aww yih.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3346
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:56:00 -
[46] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote: Because everything in EVE behave like in reality right? Why are projectiles from guns able to travel over 200 km withing a single second? How can my secure container hold more than it's own volume within itself?
It's not about what it's like in reality it's about balance. Why is a ship having an influence in combat not on the line of fire like all other ship having an effect on that same fight? It's just as stupid as the drone boat hiding behind a POS shield.
Ok, I admit, I cocked it by making a real world comparision, I apologise. But why would ANY of this mean it suddenly makes sense to put a Command and Control Unit at the front in a battle? Its just a terrible idea, there is no reason why it should be this way. Either match it with your own, or hunt it down and kill it. What is wrong with that? The fact that it's not on grid where the fight is happeneing is what is wrong. Your command unit in the sense of current IRL NORAD would be the off-grid prober giving a warpin on the enemy logi group by using it's own version of surveillance satellite (combat probes) to direct you in a strategic way. All the bonus we get out of boosters currently are more tactic which would be the equivalent of the "on the field" platoon leader directing his troop to to be more efficient on the field. At least that what it look like from my point of view... Fair enough but Im looking at it like a CandC ship in a fleet of.... um..... ah well more real world examples from us both so lets just stop here. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
1162
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:56:00 -
[47] - Quote
Irsam Samri wrote:Hey, been playing Eve on and off for a few years. I like the game in theory, it is just hard for me to find good fights, I find fights, just not goodfights. I would rather lose a substantial amount of isk in a close battle that taught me something than get on an even bigger killmail via a gatecamp.
off grid boosting is the crux for me. My 4 accounts are expiring. No you cant have my stuff I'll be back when its removed
Should have trained one of those characters for an off-grid booster...
If you've really played that many years, you should have figured out that PvP is not EvE's primary focus.
EvE is a meta-game, you win by bringing more ships, better ships, better boosts, better pilots, and by having better intel. Either you're properly prepared for the combat at hand, or your KB is red....
CCP: "We know what's best for the game, so you can't have any options....." |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
992
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:56:00 -
[48] - Quote
Just have to add I made it quite a ways through the NEO, always flying the command ship, and without checking to be sure I think I was the last ship killed (When we lost) and I pretty sure we killed the opponents Command ship last or near to last when we won. So if they are so OP and in need of change why do they have so little impact on target priority when they are in actual use?
Or more simply put; Quit using Command links as an excuse to fail at EVE.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Black Panpher
Ganja Inc
1563
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:56:00 -
[49] - Quote
WTB perfect OGB! |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
992
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
Black Panpher wrote:WTB perfect OGB! Wait till they screw it up and I will sell you mine, probably be a fire sale on Character Bazaar and OGB toons will be selling for Singularity price 100isk 
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20581
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:06:00 -
[51] - Quote
Black Panpher wrote:WTB perfect OGB! 15 days left to CS VGǪ  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Hevymetal
POT Corp Semper Ardens Alliance
244
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:13:00 -
[52] - Quote
Sorry to see you go o/
Of all the things in this game to complain and quit over OGB is personally down near the bottom of my list.
Now POSes in need of desperate updates ............ |

Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
298
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:31:00 -
[53] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote: Because everything in EVE behave like in reality right? Why are projectiles from guns able to travel over 200 km withing a single second? How can my secure container hold more than it's own volume within itself?
It's not about what it's like in reality it's about balance. Why is a ship having an influence in combat not on the line of fire like all other ship having an effect on that same fight? It's just as stupid as the drone boat hiding behind a POS shield.
Ok, I admit, I cocked it by making a real world comparision, I apologise. But why would ANY of this mean it suddenly makes sense to put a Command and Control Unit at the front in a battle? Its just a terrible idea, there is no reason why it should be this way. Either match it with your own, or hunt it down and kill it. What is wrong with that? The fact that it's not on grid where the fight is happeneing is what is wrong. Your command unit in the sense of current IRL NORAD would be the off-grid prober giving a warpin on the enemy logi group by using it's own version of surveillance satellite (combat probes) to direct you in a strategic way. All the bonus we get out of boosters currently are more tactic which would be the equivalent of the "on the field" platoon leader directing his troop to to be more efficient on the field. At least that what it look like from my point of view...
Armoured warfare as a boost makes no sense at all and the rest amount to using the command ship as a glorified multithread multicore CPU processor, which in a game where we can instantly communicate over 200+ lightyears, and if you have contact details into another dimension points more to the why would you want to be on field?
While I can understand if the gripe of an Off grid booster was about the booster being behind a POS shield (not sure if they can still do that or if CCP got around to it) you have every opportunity to probe down the command ship, lock it down and either scare it or force your opponent onto defensive measures. If you cannot do this then I would assume that you are not fighting against an even force and that their boosts are cutting your battle mercifully short.]
While this isn't F&I the only thing I would suggest to CCP to make warfare links a "siege" mode so that the ship itself is stuck in space while using their links. This would mean that FCs would have to be concious of the positioning of the command ships and be ready to pull forces to defend them off grid. This also means that people who are fast on their probes have a chance to catch out command ships.
By command I mean any ship with a warefare link.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20582
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:56:00 -
[54] - Quote
Super spikinator wrote:While I can understand if the gripe of an Off grid booster was about the booster being behind a POS shield (not sure if they can still do that or if CCP got around to it) you have every opportunity to probe down the command ship, lock it down and either scare it or force your opponent onto defensive measures. If you cannot do this then I would assume that you are not fighting against an even force and that their boosts are cutting your battle mercifully short. They got around to that in Odyssey.
Quote:While this isn't F&I the only thing I would suggest to CCP to make warfare links a "siege" mode so that the ship itself is stuck in space while using their links. Meh. This already mostly the case. Sure, they can try to evade probes by MWDing off grid, but if they try to relocate to evade capture in any meaningful way, they already lose all boosting capabilities.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar E.A.R.T.H. Federation
395
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 23:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Val'Dore wrote:Justifying OGB is like admitting you can't win without it. Why not push for OGRR while you are at it? Because OGB makes sense within the type of scifi EvE is
It doesn't matter. If we went with that qualification, we could justify all sorts of fun destroying mechanics.
How about this then, let there be a deployable (!) that will jam OGB on the grid entirely. Make it 300 m3 and last 60 mins. To use boosting, you would either have to destroy it or bring the booster to the grid.
Just because CCP hasn't figured out how to kill OGB without a mountain of code, doesn't mean it should be kept in the game. There is a reason there are immensely powerful ships able to fit ganglinks, and it isn't so they can OGB.
|

Garandras
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
162
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 01:15:00 -
[56] - Quote
i think it if was easier to scan down the booster that would change things a fair bit
it wouldn't effect 1v1 combat, but would make a difference in people willing to risk their alt |

Adrie Atticus
Unicorn Love Hurts
63
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 08:00:00 -
[57] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:I feel like starting a new boosting account to negate OP's departure.
I'll do worse and activate a miner. |

Yarda Black
Epidemic. Nulli Secunda
121
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 08:11:00 -
[58] - Quote
Atleast 2 replies in this thread solved the entire issue:
Probes
The safest way to boost now is near a POS. But CCP changed combatboosting to work outside POS shields only.
And yes, a POS can shoot you And yes, a booster may slide back in the shields And yes, very few people can probe properly these days And yes, very few gangs and fleets bring probers
So... practise probing and bring a probeship if you want a chance at killing off-grid boosters
|

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1119
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 08:14:00 -
[59] - Quote
Quote:So... practise probing and bring a probeship if you want a chance at killing off-grid boosters
Exactly. Don't rely on CCP to solve your problems. Take responsibility for the situation you find yourself in and deal with it. . -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15044
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 08:52:00 -
[60] - Quote
Garandras wrote:i think it if was easier to scan down the booster that would change things a fair bit
it wouldn't effect 1v1 combat, but would make a difference in people willing to risk their alt
It's already ridiculously easy to probe down safespot off-grid boosters.
Most off grid boosting is either just outside a POS or within docking radius Here is my CSM9 endorsement list - vote for diversity of expertise : Ali Aras-á Mangala Solaris-á Mike Azariah-á Steve Ronuken James Arget-á Xander Phoena-á Sugar Kyle-á corbexx-á mynnna-á progodlegend-á Psychotic Monk-á Jayne Fillion
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15044
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 08:53:00 -
[61] - Quote
Val'Dore wrote:
Just because CCP hasn't figured out how to kill OGB without a mountain of code, doesn't mean it should be kept in the game...
To the contrary; it's just about the only reason they're still in game.
Here is my CSM9 endorsement list - vote for diversity of expertise : Ali Aras-á Mangala Solaris-á Mike Azariah-á Steve Ronuken James Arget-á Xander Phoena-á Sugar Kyle-á corbexx-á mynnna-á progodlegend-á Psychotic Monk-á Jayne Fillion
|

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
736
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 09:05:00 -
[62] - Quote
OGB has been there quite long time and game is still running so it can not be game braking feature at all.
It was there 2006 when i started. |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
339
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 10:13:00 -
[63] - Quote
If you have 4 accounts, why isn't one boosting you?!
Seriously though, people complain and moan about OGBs, but you should keep in mind it takes almost a year to train it to a level where you can do that properly, not to mention you need to sub 2 accounts.
If they removed that and all the OGBs instead started rocking around as Falcon alts, would you whine about that instead? It's just simple math, 2 players > 1 player. Use your 4 accounts and go kill the OGB or get your own trained up.
Stop complaining. |

Bunnie Hop
548
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 10:41:00 -
[64] - Quote
My youngest often holds her breath to try to get what she wants too, it doesn't work for her either.... |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
643
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 10:46:00 -
[65] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:My youngest often holds her breath to try to get what she wants too, it doesn't work for her either....  Mine pretends he's the cat, cos the cat doesn't give a ****. hmm, somewhat less applicable. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

BrundleMeth
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
104
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 10:53:00 -
[66] - Quote
Well I'm unsubbing until he comes back....
No not really...
CCP should have a new rule. Every nub mumbling "Can I have your stuff" like a begging goof should be perma banned...from everything... |

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
1558
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 11:19:00 -
[67] - Quote
Rare Serious Post by Garamonde.... please read. I don't go completely dead-serious very often.
Off-Grid Boosts make PERFECT sense and must ALWAYS be kept in the game. As long as your "commander" alt is in-system and has to be decloaked, it is already balanced and realistic. If you're pissed about the other fleet having OGB, then there are two solutions to this:
1. Bring your own OGB, and even the score. 2. Probe down their OGB, and send a detachment to kill it. Those ships are usually unarmed, so it won't take much. Plus, the rest of his fleet will warp to the booster, and you can still fight on THAT grid after the boost alt dies.
There is at least one account, per PvP corp that is a dedicated booster alt. CCP would lose a lot of income by nixing OGB.... it would make a lot of accounts worthless.
I will probably return to my normal constructive troll ways, immediately following this post. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
1558
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 11:22:00 -
[68] - Quote
BrundleMeth wrote:Well I'm unsubbing until he comes back....
No not really...
CCP should have a new rule. Every nub mumbling "Can I have your stuff" like a begging goof should be perma banned...from everything...
It's actually mostly us bittervets that do that. And you know what? sometimes they actually do give us their stuff when we say it. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar E.A.R.T.H. Federation
395
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 12:00:00 -
[69] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Val'Dore wrote:
Just because CCP hasn't figured out how to kill OGB without a mountain of code, doesn't mean it should be kept in the game...
To the contrary; it's just about the only reason they're still in game.
And here I was thinking Joe Biden didn't play EvE.
|

Balshem Rozenzweig
Akademia Milicyjna The North is Coming
44
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 13:07:00 -
[70] - Quote
Super spikinator wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote: Because everything in EVE behave like in reality right? Why are projectiles from guns able to travel over 200 km withing a single second? How can my secure container hold more than it's own volume within itself?
It's not about what it's like in reality it's about balance. Why is a ship having an influence in combat not on the line of fire like all other ship having an effect on that same fight? It's just as stupid as the drone boat hiding behind a POS shield.
Ok, I admit, I cocked it by making a real world comparision, I apologise. But why would ANY of this mean it suddenly makes sense to put a Command and Control Unit at the front in a battle? Its just a terrible idea, there is no reason why it should be this way. Either match it with your own, or hunt it down and kill it. What is wrong with that? The fact that it's not on grid where the fight is happeneing is what is wrong. Your command unit in the sense of current IRL NORAD would be the off-grid prober giving a warpin on the enemy logi group by using it's own version of surveillance satellite (combat probes) to direct you in a strategic way. All the bonus we get out of boosters currently are more tactic which would be the equivalent of the "on the field" platoon leader directing his troop to to be more efficient on the field. At least that what it look like from my point of view... Armoured warfare as a boost makes no sense at all and the rest amount to using the command ship as a glorified multithread multicore CPU processor, which in a game where we can instantly communicate over 200+ lightyears, and if you have contact details into another dimension points more to the why would you want to be on field? While I can understand if the gripe of an Off grid booster was about the booster being behind a POS shield (not sure if they can still do that or if CCP got around to it) you have every opportunity to probe down the command ship, lock it down and either scare it or force your opponent onto defensive measures. If you cannot do this then I would assume that you are not fighting against an even force and that their boosts are cutting your battle mercifully short.] While this isn't F&I the only thing I would suggest to CCP to make warfare links a "siege" mode so that the ship itself is stuck in space while using their links. This would mean that FCs would have to be concious of the positioning of the command ships and be ready to pull forces to defend them off grid. This also means that people who are fast on their probes have a chance to catch out command ships. By command I mean any ship with a warefare link.
The answer to this is called docking. Sure - the guy lost his links for the 10 seconds you're there, but you already had to divert resources and peoples' time to do it.
This is what all the "whining" about links comes down to - the mechanic is tedious. You need to put a lot of effort to verify if the links are in systems, not to mention who has them. The KB also doesn't show them. Recently an incursus slaughtered my corax, and it shouldn't happen. But hey - the guy has a perfect kill. I had to jump way back to my home system and reship. Then I just went into completely oposite direction. Waiting for a fight, and warping there and back cost me 30 minutes I got nothing from.
Blobs/gangs? I would have warped away from any target I couldn't kill fast enough to make the acceleration gate give me enough time. Sure - I could have failed, but at least I would get some experience from the fight. The little thing called local would have told me if blob/gang were there.
Link are pretty much futile engagement and wasted time. And this is why I come to forums to "cry".
off or on grid links are a secondary issue to me. I want them as obvious as blob so I can avoid them the same way I can avoid blob. Let's leave boosters to their epic duels of who can multitask better. I'm fine with that, really.
I could maybe even go with links being forced to be within certain AU radius at the beginning of the fight.
Seriously - everything is better than the current almost no risk + auto win mechanic. If I'm allowed to avoid them in a reasonably time-efficient way - I'm cool with that. If I check the dudes KB and see he's usually linked to hell - hey, I jump elsewhere.
(as for links allowing you to beat multiple people - they shouldn't. Numbers and ships' quality should be the indicator when you choose your combat. Not fear of cloaked alt in a loki.) Singature Radius 48 m |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1813
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:32:00 -
[71] - Quote
My booster alt has all the specialist skills trained to 4 now. God how I love her. "You're a d-bag. But you're a caring d-bag." -- Sindel Pellion
***** Psychotic Monk and DJ FunkyBacon for CSM ***** |

Big Lynx
The Gun Runners
373
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:37:00 -
[72] - Quote
Am I too late to has stuffz?!?  |

Hal Safon
Morior Invictus.
7
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:57:00 -
[73] - Quote
CCP has repeatedly nerfed off-grid boosting and it is really not a problem anymore.
Off-grid boosts in cloaky t3's are no longer as powerful as command ships, they are no longer invulernable to being scanned out, and they can no longer safely boost inside a POS.
What more do you want? If you want sweet revenge against boosters, train up some scanning skills and go hunting. Then you can LOL when you kill a 500 million isk booster (more if u get the pod) while the booster is tabbed away on another character.
CCP has made sensible changes to reign in off-grid bosting and I feel that boosting is currently pretty well balanced.
|

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
182
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:06:00 -
[74] - Quote
Add in sov and I'm there. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |