|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 56 post(s) |
H3llHound
Koshaku Gentlemen's Agreement
15
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 15:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Kitty Bear wrote:Squelch wrote:Soz if this has already been mentioned, but where you mention the new R.A.M requirements (in your example, you'll need 60 R.A.M where you needed 1 before), that will effectivley de-value any current stocks of R.A.M by a huge amount (example, 60 times less valuable).
Will existing stocks be multiplied to compensate, or is this something that players with R.A.M stocks will just have to deal with?
Additionally, will existing sources of R.A.M items have their drop quantities increased? but won't it make them more valuable by increasing demand ? sorry if it's a basic question, but I don't really get involved in the industrial side of eve. except as a consumer of end products.
One RAM now will become 100 RAM after the patch. The RAM BPOs will output 100RAM instead of one like now with the same min requirements. Market orders will prolly be multiplied by 100 while the asking price per RAM is divided by 100.
I hope they decrease the RAM volume in a similar fashion. |
H3llHound
Koshaku Gentlemen's Agreement
15
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 15:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Squelch wrote:H3llHound wrote: One RAM now will become 100 RAM after the patch.
Where did you see this? The only thing I see in the Devblog is: Multiply number of R.AM. and R.Db. given for each run of their respective blueprint by 100. Multiply all R.A.M. and R.Db. job requirements by 100, then further multiply that number by the old damage per run percentage.That doesn't mention existing stocks.
CCP did the same when they changed the polymer stuff recently so I am only deducing from what they did do already to what they will do. |
H3llHound
Koshaku Gentlemen's Agreement
15
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 16:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Devs, have you considered that reducing the copy time on T2 BPOs can lead to a big value decrease to invention?
Right now Invention has the plus of making huge volumes to make good profits by using ten lines. Lets say T2 Ammo: WIth one T2 BPO i can only run one assembly line but have the bonus of decreased time per cycle and reduced materials. With Invention I need more time, use more materials but can run 10 assembly lines at the same time.
Now with enough time a T2 BPO owner could come to a point where he also has 10 assembly lines running with his T2 BPCs from his researched T2 BPO, thus having a huge adventage over those who run invention. |
H3llHound
Koshaku Gentlemen's Agreement
22
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 08:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:On T2 BPOs, please don't reduce copy times here without a real balancing effect for invention. The status quo is ok but changing copy times would make it worse. Inventors would benefit far more than T2 BPO owners from reduced copy times.
How exactly would Inventors benefit from reduced ->T2 BPO<- copy times?
T1 BPOs I understand but not T2. |
|
|
|