| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 32 post(s) |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
Goonswarm Federation
425
   |
Posted - 2014.04.28 14:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:
We're hoping to have a 3 month history, we still need to do some performance testing on this.
But even without that functionality this is great news, I don't understand why that wasn't a big flashing thing in the devblog as I bet a lot of people are going to love it.
Agreed on this; this is a major usability change, and more people should know about it. I recommend amending the devblog to contain the information.
This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
Goonswarm Federation
428
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 16:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
^^ e: f; b :argh:
LHA Tarawa wrote:And here we see WHY we will no longer be able to use BPOs that are safely locked down in corp hanger to research and manufacture at POS.
"The installation gets picked automatically when you select a blueprint. It will select the installation where the blueprint is located and use a default location for inputs."
So make one less click, like "select location", they choose a game breaking short-cut of the BPO has to be at the location... non-lcoked down.
So, we have to create high sec alt corps for protect our BPOs, then produce copies and ship them to null sec.... just becasue CCP didn't what to add a "pick location" to the new UI screen.
ARG!
No. The removal of remote BPO copying was to make you have to actually endure risk to enjoy the benefits of POS research. It wasn't a mechanical workaround.
This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
Goonswarm Federation
428
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 16:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:
That's not why, but it is a nice side effect.
So, what is the why? You dislike corps being able to make BPOs available for all players to sue, without risk of theft, because they are locked down in corproate hanger? There is some "fun" aspect of the game that comes from us grinding out copies in 1-man alt-coprs to protect BPOs from corporate theft? Was there really a meeting where someone said "Let's destroy BPO lockdow!" and someone else replied "YEAH!! It will make the game WAY more fun if industrialists have to create one-man alt corps to create copies to protect their BPOs from corp theft!" Seriously?
You can still lock down BPOs and use the infinitely available copy slots at a station to do exactly what you're doing now.
Alternatively, you should just not get into a situation where theft is a possibility. This may involve vetting potential recruits beyond the "paid attention to your ad in Recruitment."
This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
Goonswarm Federation
428
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 16:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Industrialists do NOT accept risk.
No, you mean YOU don't accept risk. You should be prepared to be outcompeted by those who do.
This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
| |
|