| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Daimos Bellurdan
   |
Posted - 2006.05.20 15:00:00 -
[61]
Edited by: Daimos Bellurdan on 20/05/2006 15:00:41
Edited by: Daimos Bellurdan on 20/05/2006 15:00:22
So you say if someone has 5 stabs then use 3 scramblers ?
All in all the wcs in fleet combats are ok. (interdictors, massive tackling, one volley kills etc)
The problem in 1on1s is this (no gang, no interdictor, just a simple 1on1):
If I fight someone who has 5 stabs I cannot win without having 3 scrams. Even then I will also not necessarily win because I have a gimped setup too.
If I have three scrams I cannot win against someone who has no stabs, 1 scram and 2 jammers.
With 3 scrams I just gimp my setup as the enemy does with stabs. Main difference: More stabs help my survivability. More scrams just take away my versatility while not helping with survivability.
http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0014046/drath_daimos.gif
Signature too large, please ensure it is 400*120 pixels or less - Udat |
Jenny Spitfire
|
Posted - 2006.05.20 17:10:00 -
[62]
We have EWAR drones like NOS drones. Can we have warp scrambling drones please?
----------------
RecruitMe@NOINT!
|
FooB2
|
Posted - 2006.05.20 17:28:00 -
[63]
qft
Pre-Nerfed Tactics - yes, we are just plain nasty boys. |
Krulla
|
Posted - 2006.05.20 17:30:00 -
[64]
WHY WON'T THE PAIN STOP!
Everytime you post a WCS whine, god kills a kitten. A cute, fluffy, adorble kitten.
Tarkin > Omfg, frigs are such bs.
Red 5 > lolol, lern 2 play plz noob
SIG HIJACK!!11 RAWRR!!1- IMMY
|
Ereph Valkyrja
|
Posted - 2006.05.20 17:33:00 -
[65]
 Originally by: Daimos Bellurdan
Edited by: Daimos Bellurdan on 20/05/2006 15:00:41
Edited by: Daimos Bellurdan on 20/05/2006 15:00:22
So you say if someone has 5 stabs then use 3 scramblers ?
All in all the wcs in fleet combats are ok. (interdictors, massive tackling, one volley kills etc)
The problem in 1on1s is this (no gang, no interdictor, just a simple 1on1):
If I fight someone who has 5 stabs I cannot win without having 3 scrams. Even then I will also not necessarily win because I have a gimped setup too.
If I have three scrams I cannot win against someone who has no stabs, 1 scram and 2 jammers.
With 3 scrams I just gimp my setup as the enemy does with stabs. Main difference: More stabs help my survivability. More scrams just take away my versatility while not helping with survivability.
OHMYGOD! You need to adjust your setup to beat your opponent's setup?! THAT IS SO WRONG! You can't pwn all comers with the same setup?! WHAT A ****TY GAME!
And why must a killmail = victory?
|
Krulla
|
Posted - 2006.05.20 17:33:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Ereph Valkyrja
Originally by: Daimos Bellurdan
Edited by: Daimos Bellurdan on 20/05/2006 15:00:41
Edited by: Daimos Bellurdan on 20/05/2006 15:00:22
So you say if someone has 5 stabs then use 3 scramblers ?
All in all the wcs in fleet combats are ok. (interdictors, massive tackling, one volley kills etc)
The problem in 1on1s is this (no gang, no interdictor, just a simple 1on1):
If I fight someone who has 5 stabs I cannot win without having 3 scrams. Even then I will also not necessarily win because I have a gimped setup too.
If I have three scrams I cannot win against someone who has no stabs, 1 scram and 2 jammers.
With 3 scrams I just gimp my setup as the enemy does with stabs. Main difference: More stabs help my survivability. More scrams just take away my versatility while not helping with survivability.
OHMYGOD! You need to adjust your setup to beat your opponent's setup?! THAT IS SO WRONG! You can't pwn all comers with the same setup?! WHAT A ****TY GAME!
And why must a killmail = victory?
Silly alt. That was me.
Tarkin > Omfg, frigs are such bs.
Red 5 > lolol, lern 2 play plz noob
SIG HIJACK!!11 RAWRR!!1- IMMY
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |