| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

HeXxploiT
Little Red X
22
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 22:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Anyone taking advantage of blood in the water? I saw a T2 shield boost amp go for 12bil this morning and I just missed it as someone had a quicker internet connection.
You want to get rich? Well this is how it's done. Take a chance, play both sides against the middle and reap the rewards.
Anyone else playing the T2 BPO crazyness? It ain't real money folks. Big risks=big gains. Little risk=run of the mill daytrader. |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
70
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 07:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
skys fallin bro, get out while you can, mayday, the end is near. |

Cavalira
The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple
338
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 09:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Not sure what you're trying to say. |

Qmamoto Kansuke
Killing with pink power
2
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 12:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Hes trying to sell t2 bpo.  
Gl with that crap t2 bpo = t2 bpcs pretty soon tm |

Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
54
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 15:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hes saying that reselling t2 bpo's is big business. (And it is)
Unfortaly he comes 3 yrs too late. Three yrs ago there was a hugh demand rise due some broken gamemechanics that gave the buyers unlimits "free isk" which they used for these investments. The mechanic is fixed, the bubble met its peek about a year ago and it is now decaing. These fanfest rumurs are just speeding up this process.
Buy low sell high is the trick, but what if you were not buying low enough and get stuck with a double digit billion isk worth item with uncertain future :D 
The selling rate is allready decaing at current conctract prices, some resellers with hugh stocks will be crying and damage controlling soon with plenty off alts.
Its like the risk vs reward story on a massive scale with eve life savings gone bad 
Multi billion isk loose rage in 3...2...1... |

Professional Forum Alt
The Witness Protection Program
138
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 16:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
I will not be crying when they are gone 
Any typos, spelling errors and bad grammer found, are free and yours to keep |

HeXxploiT
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 23:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:Hes saying that reselling t2 bpo's is big business. (And it is) Unfortaly he comes 3 yrs too late. Three yrs ago there was a hugh demand rise due some broken gamemechanics that gave the buyers unlimits "free isk" which they used for these investments. The mechanic is fixed, the bubble met its peek about a year ago and it is now decaing. These fanfest rumurs are just speeding up this process. Buy low sell high is the trick, but what if you were not buying low enough and get stuck with a double digit billion isk worth item with uncertain future :D  The selling rate is allready decaing at current conctract prices, some resellers with hugh stocks will be crying and damage controlling soon with plenty off alts. Its like the risk vs reward story on a massive scale with eve life savings gone bad  Multi billion isk loose rage in 3...2...1...
Except that BPO's maintained their value all that time. A product that maintains its value is not a good trade.
Now a product that one can buy for dirt cheap from one pilot because there is panic in the air and sell to another clueless individual....this makes for good business.
Not talking about long term T2 BPO value here folks. That part is obviously uncertain. We're talking about playing the craziness which is brought about by this uncertainty. The reason most of you are poor is because you haven't stepped outside the box. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2852
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 03:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Yeah if I had 200b in trading capital I'd be flipping T2 BPOs right now. Set the universe on fire - then sell the survivors ash. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Zahara Cody
Imperial Corrections Service.
102
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 06:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
12 bil for a sba II bpo is not all that surprising... seeing a Hobgob II bpo go for 15 and a Harpy go for 7.5 is surprising. Moreso to do with uninformed sellers. |

Grendell
Technologies Unlimited Superior Eve Engineering
872
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 17:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4587658#post4587658
|

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3477
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 17:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
mynnna wrote:It should nevertheless be noted that Greyscale did say that they'd like to do something sometime to T2 BPOs, during the Industry panel at Fanfest. See http://youtu.be/WTTyMhSKY9E?t=22m15s for details. Greyscale does believe that the market should be taking the possibility of removal into account, so... buyer beware, I suppose.
Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:37:00 -
[12] - Quote
mynnna wrote:mynnna wrote:It should nevertheless be noted that Greyscale did say that they'd like to do something sometime to T2 BPOs, during the Industry panel at Fanfest. See http://youtu.be/WTTyMhSKY9E?t=22m15s for details. Greyscale does believe that the market should be taking the possibility of removal into account, so... buyer beware, I suppose.
A member of the CSM participating in a large scale market manipulation attempt by his alliance? Using his assumed insider knowledge to spread rumors? Hmmm... 
This is going too far. At least in my humble opinion.
A CCP Developer just clarified that there are no plans to remove T2 blueprints from the game.
|

Dramaticus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
551
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:mynnna wrote:It should nevertheless be noted that Greyscale did say that they'd like to do something sometime to T2 BPOs, during the Industry panel at Fanfest. See http://youtu.be/WTTyMhSKY9E?t=22m15s for details. Greyscale does believe that the market should be taking the possibility of removal into account, so... buyer beware, I suppose. A member of the CSM participating in a large scale market manipulation attempt by his alliance? Using his assumed insider knowledge to spread rumors? Hmmm...  This is going too far. At least in my humble opinion. A CCP Developer just clarified that there are no plans to remove T2 blueprints from the game.
They're getting nerfed lawl The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal
The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3480
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:45:00 -
[14] - Quote
The linked video spells out explicitly that they would like to do something to them, sometime, and that the market should be accounting for that risk. There is no rumor involved here - he says more or less exactly that in the linked video, which is a publicly available recording of a public event. It's almost literally impossible to get less "inside info" than that.
Also, as long as you want to try to argue semantics, "We would like to do something to them, sometime" and "There are no plans to remove T2 blueprints from the game" are by no means mutually exclusive.
Basically, your humble opinion is wrong. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
mynnna wrote:The linked video spells out explicitly that they would like to do something to them, sometime, and that the market should be accounting for that risk. There is no rumor involved here - he says more or less exactly that in the linked video, which is a publicly available recording of a public event. It's almost literally impossible to get less "inside info" than that.
Also, as long as you want to try to argue semantics, "We would like to do something to them, sometime" and "There are no plans to remove T2 blueprints from the game" are by no means mutually exclusive.
Basically, your humble opinion is wrong.
As a CSM member you should be careful not to cross the line. At least in my humble opinion. And you know exactly what i mean  |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3480
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:51:00 -
[16] - Quote
If you wish to make the assumption that a line has been crossed, you are welcome to do so. I can only point out that your opinion is wrong, not change it or stop you from holding it.  Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

350125GO
Transcendent Sedition Dustm3n
50
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:55:00 -
[17] - Quote
mynnna wrote:The linked video spells out explicitly that they would like to do something to them, sometime, and that the market should be accounting for that risk. There is no rumor involved here - he says more or less exactly that in the linked video, which is a publicly available recording of a public event. It's almost literally impossible to get less "inside info" than that. Also, as long as you want to try to argue semantics, "We would like to do something to them, sometime" and "There are no plans to remove T2 blueprints from the game" are by no means mutually exclusive. Basically, your humble opinion is wrong. e: There's also this, which certainly is a not-that-roundabout nerf to BPOs. Quote:We are currently of a mind to shift invented BPCs so they have positive (or at worst 0) ME and TE figures. This a) prevents the removal of extra materials giving invention an extra-hard kick, and in particular b) prevents every invented T2 item from requiring two of the relevant T1 items (due to always rounding up materials). This will probably put all invented BPCs in the 1-5% ME/2-10% TE range, with decryptors adjusted to match. We may adjust T2 build costs upwards across the board to put the net T2 resource usage roughly where it is currently, so we don't end up nerfing the demand for T2 components. (This obviously also serves to close the gap somewhat between invention and T2 BPOs; this is not a goal here but it's an acceptable side-effect.)
How is that a nerf to T2 BPOs? It's a buff to invented BPCs. Hopefully it will stop the whinging about T2 BPOs being the scourge of New Eden. |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
mynnna wrote:If you wish to make the assumption that a line has been crossed, you are welcome to do so. I can only point out that your opinion is wrong, not change it or stop you from holding it. 
Let's just adhere to the important fact that a CMS representative should not spread false rumors on the official forum in an attempt to crash a market / to generate profits for his alliance. Whether you cross that line or not is up to you young lady. |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3480
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:If you wish to make the assumption that a line has been crossed, you are welcome to do so. I can only point out that your opinion is wrong, not change it or stop you from holding it.  Let's just adhere to the important fact that an official CSM representative should not spread false rumors on the official forum in an attempt to crash a market / to generate profits for his alliance. Whether you cross that line or not is up to you young lady. 
frankly, I can't find the line in the white paper that says a csm representative is not allowed to spread false rumors in an attempt to manipulate a market. can you show it to me? I mean it is kind of a moot point, since there are no false rumors involved in this thread as the previously linked video clearly demonstrates. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:If you wish to make the assumption that a line has been crossed, you are welcome to do so. I can only point out that your opinion is wrong, not change it or stop you from holding it.  Let's just adhere to the important fact that an official CSM representative should not spread false rumors on the official forum in an attempt to crash a market / to generate profits for his alliance. Whether you cross that line or not is up to you young lady.  frankly, I can't find the line in the white paper that says a csm representative is not allowed to spread false rumors in an attempt to manipulate a market. can you show it to me? I mean it is kind of a moot point, since there are no false rumors involved in this thread as the previously linked video clearly demonstrates.
Are you serious? |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1542
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:14:00 -
[21] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:If you wish to make the assumption that a line has been crossed, you are welcome to do so. I can only point out that your opinion is wrong, not change it or stop you from holding it.  Let's just adhere to the important fact that an official CSM representative should not spread false rumors on the official forum in an attempt to crash a market / to generate profits for his alliance. Whether you cross that line or not is up to you young lady.  frankly, I can't find the line in the white paper that says a csm representative is not allowed to spread false rumors in an attempt to manipulate a market. can you show it to me? I mean it is kind of a moot point, since there are no false rumors involved in this thread as the previously linked video clearly demonstrates. Are you serious?
Man, if you think THAT is the line. We can't even see that line from where we are. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3482
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:If you wish to make the assumption that a line has been crossed, you are welcome to do so. I can only point out that your opinion is wrong, not change it or stop you from holding it.  Let's just adhere to the important fact that an official CSM representative should not spread false rumors on the official forum in an attempt to crash a market / to generate profits for his alliance. Whether you cross that line or not is up to you young lady.  frankly, I can't find the line in the white paper that says a csm representative is not allowed to spread false rumors in an attempt to manipulate a market. can you show it to me? I mean it is kind of a moot point, since there are no false rumors involved in this thread as the previously linked video clearly demonstrates. Are you serious?
completely. please show me where commenting on a publicly available recording of a public presentation is crossing a line. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:29:00 -
[23] - Quote
Quote:Do they deserve the gift of your keystrokes? There are a finite number of keystrokes left in your hands before you die. - Scott Hanselman
(source: nice blog post)
What we see here are the leaders of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal in full swing. Writing post after post to warn the pubbies that T2 BPOs will be removed soon. Altruism at its finest...
Now you should ask yourself: Are they really gifting us such a large portion of their finite number of keystrokes? Just to warn us poor souls about the T2 BPO removal? Or are the assumed profits of their large scale market manipulation just worth every damn keypress? 
|

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3482
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:Quote:Do they deserve the gift of your keystrokes? There are a finite number of keystrokes left in your hands before you die. - Scott Hanselman (source: nice blog post) What we see here are the leaders of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal in full swing. Writing post after post to warn the pubbies that T2 BPOs will be removed soon. Altruism at its finest... Now you should ask yourself: Are they really gifting us such a large portion of their finite number of keystrokes? Just to warn us poor souls about the T2 BPO removal? Or are the assumed profits of their large scale market manipulation just worth every damn keypress?  I note that you've backed off from the utterly insensible position that I'm actually doing anything wrong; good for you. Regarding removal I will concede that when I said "removed" earlier I actually personally misspoke. I did mean to say "changed" somehow. I'm going to answer someone on the previous page to illustrate how at least some of that change actually just came.
Quote:
How is that a nerf to T2 BPOs? It's a buff to invented BPCs. Hopefully it will stop the whinging about T2 BPOs being the scourge of New Eden.
There are a couple of factors here. First is the fact that BPOs can't come anywhere near supplying demand, so prices fix themselves to invention cost. And second, going from ME-1 to ME0 for invention is just as large a decrease in build cost as going from ME0 to "perfect" is for blueprints, and going from ME-4 to ME0 as he seems to be suggesting is an even bigger drop. So, BPCs will be more competitive with BPOs, which dramatically shrinks the gap in which a BPO seller can work to sell and still be competitive.
For example A zealot currently goes for 150m on buys, 154.5m on sells in Jita. If you're building off a BPO at (for example) ME10, your build cost is about 102m isk, assuming you're buying materials off buys and building your own components, as is sensible. You can dump to buy orders for almost 50m isk per unit profit. You can see what I mean when I say that invention drives the cost here. If you're inventing, Eve IPH is telling me that the total costs come to either 128m (ME-1) or 131.8m (ME-2) isk depending on decryptor, with the latter probably being preferable due to the resulting 8 run print.
But then there's the proposed changes. We'll set aside the suggested material cost increase, as that only complicates the example. We do have to account for the research changes, though. "Waste" is eliminated as a concept but the base build cost (what we currently call "perfect") is being bumped by 11%, so the actual build price post-patch is 112m isk at ME0.
The ME10 on the BPO holder's BPO turns into ME10%, giving him a perfect BPO, so his build cost is 112m * .9 = 100.8m isk. Not a whole lot of a change on his part.
The inventor, on the other hand, ought to wind up with a blueprint at ME2% or ME3% instead, if we're assuming from what Greyscale said that they basically take the ME level and add 5. That means they save 2-3% off the base build price, so their build cost is now 108.6-109.9m isk.
Clearly, invention still drives the cost, since BPOs still don't come anywhere near supplying everything. If you figure that the profit margin for invention maintains the same (it's about 20% in this case, which is honestly quite good) then Jita price probably winds up being about 130m isk on sells.
To put that another way, the estimated effect in this example is that the BPO holder is now making 40% less profit than he was before. While Greyscale also spoke of increasing build costs across the board, that would affect BPO and BPC users equally and so can be ignored. So, yes, "a buff to invented BPCs" is absolutely a nerf, a massive nerf, to Tech II BPOs. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1542
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:Quote:Do they deserve the gift of your keystrokes? There are a finite number of keystrokes left in your hands before you die. - Scott Hanselman (source: nice blog post) What we see here are the leaders of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal in full swing. Writing post after post to warn the pubbies that T2 BPOs will be removed soon. Altruism at its finest... Now you should ask yourself: Are they really gifting us such a large portion of their finite number of keystrokes? Just to warn us poor souls about the T2 BPO removal? Or are the assumed profits of their large scale market manipulation just worth every damn keypress? 
I don't know how to break this to you in a way you will believe however I will give it a shot. There has not been a single manipulation we have done in years that I can recall that people have figured out. If you truly believe we have some evil plan to manip the price of T2 BPOS down, then buy them, I dunno what to tell you.
Only one of us even entertains the idea of owning one, and he only wants to get it to put it in his titan so when it dies he has a hilarious lossmail. (A good use of one) We preach to our memberbase to never buy one.
But hey, maybe it is all an evil plan. SO META! Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Zor Iwaira wrote:Quote:Do they deserve the gift of your keystrokes? There are a finite number of keystrokes left in your hands before you die. - Scott Hanselman (source: nice blog post) What we see here are the leaders of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal in full swing. Writing post after post to warn the pubbies that T2 BPOs will be removed soon. Altruism at its finest... Now you should ask yourself: Are they really gifting us such a large portion of their finite number of keystrokes? Just to warn us poor souls about the T2 BPO removal? Or are the assumed profits of their large scale market manipulation just worth every damn keypress?  I note that you've backed off from the utterly insensible position that I'm actually doing anything wrong; good for you. Regarding removal I will concede that when I said "removed" earlier I actually personally misspoke. I did mean to say "changed" somehow. I'm going to answer someone on the previous page to illustrate how at least some of that change actually just came.
Now you are back on track mate! Usually i like your contributions to the forum. Tip of the hat to you. |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3483
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
Just remember, the fact that I misspoke when I said "removal" doesn't mean (as illustrated above) that "make you regret ever buying them in the first place" isn't still an option. On that note, best of luck recouping your investment on that HAM Launcher II BPO.  Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 21:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
To keep this fair and balanced, just remember:
CCP Eterne wrote:An FYI to cease the rumor mongering that is happening in this (and other) threads:
There are currently no plans to remove T2 BPOs from the game.
(source: CCP Dev Post) |

Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
562
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 21:13:00 -
[29] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:To keep this fair and balanced, just remember: CCP Eterne wrote:An FYI to cease the rumor mongering that is happening in this (and other) threads:
There are currently no plans to remove T2 BPOs from the game. (source: CCP Dev Post) Thank you, backseat driver.
Notice that we are only referring to the changes which have been publicly posted on these forums. This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |

Fishbone
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 21:42:00 -
[30] - Quote
Personally, I am sick and tired of hearing all the whining about T2 BPO vs T2 BPC (Invention)
T2 BPO need to be either removed form the game, or seeded on the market. Plain and simple. That will solve this issue of "because I paid X amount of isk, I need to recoup the cost".
The T2 BPO's out there right now, the majority of them were passed out like candy back in the day when behind closed door deals were being done, and we all know when that time was, and who did it, and who benefited the most.
The way there were suppose to be introduced became a laughing joke. Then they resorted to "RP Auctions", yet it seemed like a select few were the ones that ever "won" these auctions. Then the general public found out that T2 BPO were being passed out. So am I complaining about how broke of a system T2 BPO's are in game, damn straight.
But that doesn't give everyone the right to constantly complain about this getting nerf, that getting nerf. All you care about is how much isk you stand to gain or lose. I for one am tired of it. Wanna risk your isk, there are plenty of Isk Doublers in Jita. |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
3603
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 21:56:00 -
[31] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Zor Iwaira wrote:mynnna wrote:If you wish to make the assumption that a line has been crossed, you are welcome to do so. I can only point out that your opinion is wrong, not change it or stop you from holding it.  Let's just adhere to the important fact that an official CSM representative should not spread false rumors on the official forum in an attempt to crash a market / to generate profits for his alliance. Whether you cross that line or not is up to you young lady.  frankly, I can't find the line in the white paper that says a csm representative is not allowed to spread false rumors in an attempt to manipulate a market. can you show it to me? I mean it is kind of a moot point, since there are no false rumors involved in this thread as the previously linked video clearly demonstrates. A lot of people seem to not understand what the CSM is, how it works, and what they do.
Becoming a CSM member doesn't mean the person has to change in any way. CSM are only expected to represent their voters to CCP. If they changed, then they wouldn't be doing that.
Outside of official CSM business, one can ignore the CSM tags, especially outside of the CSM forums. |

Seith Kali
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 10:52:00 -
[32] - Quote
mynnna wrote: There's also an unquantifiable here - with the removal of slots, invention ought to get a fair bit easier. Presumably, that leads to more people doing it, which leads to more people in the market, which means more price competition, which means lower prices.
And that isn't even close to the effect and improved UI is going to have. If we are moving to single click 'favourite' jobs the big guys will be able to out put 4-5x what they are currently for comparable effort levels, albeit with a couple more alts. This, alone, is going to decimate some of the better module margins as effort is very much the bottleneck in those markets currently. Incidentally these happen to include a number of the current better T2 bpos to have. Apprentice Goonswarm Economic Warfare Consultant - Drowning in entitlement and privilege.-á |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1968
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 03:55:00 -
[33] - Quote
i read this thread with some fava beans and a nice chianti.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
72
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 09:34:00 -
[34] - Quote
It is a renaissance of the t2 bpo. Giving it back to the poor man, by collapsing the market. The prints will change hands, a changing of the guard. Some will panic sell. For a while things may be "cheap". But in the long run, in eve, where everyone lives forever, and everyone gets rich, those that end up with them become the new guard, and the kings of the new bubble. |

Retar Aveymone
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
361
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 11:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:To keep this fair and balanced, just remember: CCP Eterne wrote:An FYI to cease the rumor mongering that is happening in this (and other) threads:
There are currently no plans to remove T2 BPOs from the game. (source: CCP Dev Post) that post got edited
"There are currently no immediate plans to remove T2 BPOs from the game."
figuring out why eterne had to go back and add that word is left as an exercise for the reader |

HeXxploiT
Rhongomiant Legion Industries The Explicit Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2014.05.17 03:12:00 -
[36] - Quote
Fishbone wrote:Personally, I am sick and tired of hearing all the whining about T2 BPO vs T2 BPC (Invention)
(Now pardon me as I proceed to whine)
T2 BPO need to be either removed form the game, or seeded on the market. Plain and simple. That will solve this issue of "because I paid X amount of isk, I need to recoup the cost".
The T2 BPO's out there right now, the majority of them were passed out like candy back in the day when behind closed door deals were being done, and we all know when that time was, and who did it, and who benefited the most.
The way there were suppose to be introduced became a laughing joke. Then they resorted to "RP Auctions", yet it seemed like a select few were the ones that ever "won" these auctions. Then the general public found out that T2 BPO were being passed out. So am I complaining about how broke of a system T2 BPO's are in game, damn straight.
But that doesn't give everyone the right to constantly complain about this getting nerf, that getting nerf. All you care about is how much isk you stand to gain or lose. I for one am tired of it. Wanna risk your isk, there are plenty of Isk Doublers in Jita.
Fixed.
Who cares. I'm sorry that you missed out the first time around. Maybe this time you will heed the queues and trade them while they are moving like a roller coaster. Then perhaps you won't have so much to cry about. |

Sir SmashAlot
The League of Extraordinary Opportunists Intergalactic Conservation Movement
123
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 01:17:00 -
[37] - Quote
The dirty speculator that I am here is my prediction with the invention changes coming down the pipe.
Invention Base ME (& PE ??) goes from -4 to 0. To compensate for this change, the build requirements of all T2 items is increased. Prices remain similar but the gap between invention and T2 BPOs shrinks dramatically.
T2 BPO owners are still marginally price competitive but until CCP revamps the invention UI and install process, T2 BPO will win out majorly in the isk/effort category.
It is a game of Hot Potato!
|

HeXxploiT
Rhongomiant Legion Industries The Explicit Alliance
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 01:27:00 -
[38] - Quote
Sir SmashAlot wrote:The dirty speculator that I am here is my prediction with the invention changes coming down the pipe.
Invention Base ME (& PE ??) goes from -4 to 0. To compensate for this change, the build requirements of all T2 items is increased. Prices remain similar but the gap between invention and T2 BPOs shrinks dramatically.
T2 BPO owners are still marginally price competitive but until CCP revamps the invention UI and install process, T2 BPO will win out majorly in the isk/effort category.
It is a game of Hot Potato!
Well said. How many more years will I be able to get away with pumping out copies if & when more significant changes occur. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
355
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 06:25:00 -
[39] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:Zor Iwaira wrote:To keep this fair and balanced, just remember: CCP Eterne wrote:An FYI to cease the rumor mongering that is happening in this (and other) threads:
There are currently no plans to remove T2 BPOs from the game. (source: CCP Dev Post) that post got edited "There are currently no immediate plans to remove T2 BPOs from the game." figuring out why eterne had to go back and add that word is left as an exercise for the reader i found that figuring out why eterne had to go and post both a warning and a threat in there to begin with was more fun of an exercise
....'will be dealt with harshly'... strong words to come from a CCP tag
:tinfoil: |

Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
1085
|
Posted - 2014.05.19 14:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4613373#post4613373
CCP Greyscale wrote:We would prefer to give a longer definite warning before changes to T2 BPOs themselves. I'm not ruling out something forcing our hand, but in the absence of that we're hoping not to have to tackle them head-on in Crius. Yeah, it's all a goon plot. T2 BPOs are going to stay the same forever so you should buy as many as you can right now. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |

Shiloh Templeton
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 03:44:00 -
[41] - Quote
mynnna wrote:frankly, I can't find the line in the white paper that says a csm representative is not allowed to spread false rumors in an attempt to manipulate a market. can you show it to me? I mean it is kind of a moot point, since there are no false rumors involved in this thread as the previously linked video clearly demonstrates. This thread reminds me of ... "It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is" B. Clinton
|

HeXxploiT
Rhongomiant Legion Industries The Explicit Alliance
29
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 06:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
Actually this has been more disappointing than I had anticipated. I only got a really good deal on ONE T2 bpo before prices seemed to float right back to where they were.
That didn't last as long as I'd hoped. |

Far Wanderer
Bank of Far
64
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 07:07:00 -
[43] - Quote
HeXxploiT wrote:Actually this has been more disappointing than I had anticipated. I only got a really good deal on ONE T2 bpo before prices seemed to float right back to where they were. That didn't last as long as I'd hoped.  That's one more good deal than I got, so from where I'm sitting you're in the lead. I really am wasting my breath though, when you can avoid questions from Hexxx and RAW23 like that you must have some seriously devoted investors. --Elizabeth Norn |

Agata Matahari
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
42
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 07:09:00 -
[44] - Quote
made about 200bill profit on that bpo scare. thanks a lot goons. <3 |

Altalicious
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.23 10:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Couple of items (maybe more):
1. Will not sell my T2 BPOs, ever, period. Even with the proposed nerf/buff having a BPO means you never have to invent that item. This can be huge especially when it comes to ships. Ammo, on the other hand, not so much.
2. Most of my sales come from invented BPCs.
3. I invent way more BPCs than I can produce.
4. Markets are driven by -4/-4 bpc prices. This gives a huge advantage to the T2 BPOs. So using decrypters that improve your ME does nothing but help your profitability.'
5. It's not rocket surgery. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3445
|
Posted - 2014.05.23 11:17:00 -
[46] - Quote
Altalicious wrote: 4. Markets are driven by -4/-4 bpc prices. This gives a huge advantage to the T2 BPOs. So using decrypters that improve your ME does nothing but help your profitability.
Are you aware that negative ME is going? Invented BPCs will supposedly have positive ME going forward, which reduces build cost in a massive way. The gap that T2 BPOs currently enjoy will not exist once the invention changes are brought in. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Altalicious
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.23 11:31:00 -
[47] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Altalicious wrote: 4. Markets are driven by -4/-4 bpc prices. This gives a huge advantage to the T2 BPOs. So using decrypters that improve your ME does nothing but help your profitability.
Are you aware that negative ME is going? Invented BPCs will supposedly have positive ME going forward, which reduces build cost in a massive way. The gap that T2 BPOs currently enjoy will not exist once the invention changes are brought in.
Yep and I am still not too concerned. I doubt if people will lower their prices a significant amount just because the ME gets improved. I know how much these items cost to build and for some items this is not a significant improvement.
I read that 80% of invented T2 BPCs are for self use and those items never make it to market. But I also know a lot of others don't do the industrialist thing. So someone has to do it. |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.24 08:13:00 -
[48] - Quote
What's going to happen is t2 bpos will be brought in line. Which will unload the full force of the market. Inflation will skyrocket to keep in line with plex. Which in turn will make t2 bpos worth even more.
Where's the firesales? You're all fools. You think they'll just remove something from the game? Where in 10 years, backs that theory.
Boom |

Felicity Love
It Was the Year 3030
1824
|
Posted - 2014.05.24 21:27:00 -
[49] - Quote
HeXxploiT wrote:Anyone taking advantage of blood in the water?
Anyone else playing the T2 BPO crazyness? It ain't real money folks. Big risks=big gains. Little risk=run of the mill daytrader.
Naw... the big money is yet to come... T2 BPO's are, well, "soooooooooo yesterday". 
"HTFU ! " -á--- -áKatee Sackhoff, aka "The F-Bomb Queen of EVE" ! !-á
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3453
|
Posted - 2014.05.25 10:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
joyous the wrote:Which in turn will make t2 bpos worth even more. Pretty much all of the decent economic predictions for the changes to come estimate that the profit margins on T2 BPOs will halve once the invention ME changes roll on. I very much doubt their price will remain as high as it has, since most aim for a price of about 8-10 years profit to cover the cost. Half the margins mean twice the time to cover, so in turn the value should drop. It may lead to people pushing the asking prices up, but anyone that buys a T2 BPO that generates half the profit at double the cost is pretty insane, so sales will be few and far between at that price.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
397
|
Posted - 2014.05.25 23:37:00 -
[51] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:joyous the wrote:Which in turn will make t2 bpos worth even more. Pretty much all of the decent economic predictions for the changes to come estimate that the profit margins on T2 BPOs will halve once the invention ME changes roll on. I very much doubt their price will remain as high as it has, since most aim for a price of about 8-10 years profit to cover the cost. Half the margins mean twice the time to cover, so in turn the value should drop. It may lead to people pushing the asking prices up, but anyone that buys a T2 BPO that generates half the profit at double the cost is pretty insane, so sales will be few and far between at that price. Yep. Although certain people (and their alts ) are trying to act as if nothing has changed, their prints are going to drop at least 50% in value from the looks of things... and that may only be the start  |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 01:00:00 -
[52] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:joyous the wrote:Which in turn will make t2 bpos worth even more. Pretty much all of the decent economic predictions for the changes to come estimate that the profit margins on T2 BPOs will halve once the invention ME changes roll on. I very much doubt their price will remain as high as it has, since most aim for a price of about 8-10 years profit to cover the cost. Half the margins mean twice the time to cover, so in turn the value should drop. It may lead to people pushing the asking prices up, but anyone that buys a T2 BPO that generates half the profit at double the cost is pretty insane, so sales will be few and far between at that price.
But here's the kicker. Inventors start making far greater money. With greater wealth, things unobtainable for the common poor i.e, the inventors, become obtainable. They become the new class. And the desire, as its always been. Is the ease of afk generation of isk. The t2 mother ******* bpo. |

Voyager Arran
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
204
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 02:00:00 -
[53] - Quote
Man I thought that post was going to be some pretty 101-level not-really-understanding-the-invention-market but it turned out to be a Dinsdale-esque work of art.
It's not going to be a huge change for Inventors. They're already primarily in a rat-race with each other outside of a few things that have small enough markets to be controlled by the limited output of a BPO. A BPO doesn't have much affect on a saturated market; it just generates a nice stream of low-effort income for the holder since his margins are much wider and he doesn't have to muck around with BPCs and decryptors and such. If Invention becomes more competitive with BPOs, it doesn't change much for the Inventor because his actual competition was already other Inventors. It just means the BPO guy suddenly doesn't make as much money.
On the other hand, a smart BPO holder would have already sold his stuff as soon as he realized he could have put a decade's worth of income in his pocket right now. |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3567
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 04:14:00 -
[54] - Quote
joyous the wrote: CCP has stated they have no immediate plans to remove them/ And I've never once - except in error - said they have plans to remove them, either.
That does not preclude plans to cut their ****ing heads off.
joyous the wrote:When has goon ever been true? When has anything, they've ever done or said been true? Do you really want me to start cataloging all the times I've been right?
Voyager Arran wrote:Man I thought that post was going to be some pretty 101-level not-really-understanding-the-invention-market but it turned out to be a Dinsdale-esque work of art.
It's not going to be a huge change for Inventors. They're already primarily in a rat-race with each other outside of a few things that have small enough markets to be controlled by the limited output of a BPO. A BPO doesn't have much affect on a saturated market; it just generates a nice stream of low-effort income for the holder since his margins are much wider and he doesn't have to muck around with BPCs and decryptors and such. If Invention becomes more competitive with BPOs, it doesn't change much for the Inventor because his actual competition was already other Inventors. It just means the BPO guy suddenly doesn't make as much money.
On the other hand, a smart BPO holder would have already sold his stuff as soon as he realized he could have put a decade's worth of income in his pocket right now.
Yeah, pretty much this. Make Invention yield positive or at worst 0 ME, adjust materials of the build to make up for the reduction in material consumption. Profit margin for an inventor doesn't change - if anything it might even drop a bit from more competition, depending on what other changes are made. The majority downside here falls almost entirely on BPO owners. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2962
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 04:27:00 -
[55] - Quote
I am loving watching everyone point out everywhere they think Mynnna is incorrect or deliberately misleading in this thread.
There are definitely times Mynnna is deliberately misleading, and probably times he's wrong. This thread is not one of them. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=346564 - a proposal to overhaul the Logistics skill https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. www.minerbumping.com - ganking miners and causing chaos |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 00:26:00 -
[56] - Quote
Where's the panic then? I've said all I could. I've always been a fighter for the poor man. You heed my advice or you don't. Simple as that, I've stated the facts. Nothing in eve depreciates. Imagine the market and imagine google earth, the +/-, hit the - and look a bit bigger. The context. At the end of the day your dealing with years, decades, multiple decades. That is what EVE is. And that is the notion being misinterpreted by the incorrect set of lenses. You can join us, or don't. We don't care. All we know, is we'll be there. |

Voyager Arran
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
214
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 01:01:00 -
[57] - Quote
This is just word salad with a few economic terms sprinkled over the top like spergy croutons. |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 05:06:00 -
[58] - Quote
And you guys, every one of you, seem hell bent on spreading this single notion. But why? |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
402
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 05:11:00 -
[59] - Quote
joyous the wrote:Nothing in eve depreciates. probably the funniest thing i've read today |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3466
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 07:45:00 -
[60] - Quote
joyous the wrote:But here's the kicker. Inventors start making far greater money. With greater wealth, things unobtainable for the common poor i.e, the inventors, become obtainable. They become the new class. And the desire, as its always been. Is the ease of afk generation of isk. The mother ******* t2 bpo. lol, a lot of people don't consider a T2 BPO to be end game industry. It's a terrible investment with an absolutely awful ROI, and that keeps getting worse as the price gets pushed up while the market price of the product doesn't. theres no way that inventors are going to be saying "Well I've made a heap of profit, lets spend 20 years of BPO profit on a BPO". That's just wishful thinking.
joyous the wrote:Look at the facts. Yes, look at the facts. CCP stated the value "will go down". CCP stated that there will be a "transitional plan" not just a "take them away and say screw you" (transitional plan to... what? The context suggest removal). CCP also stated there are no plans to remove them, then later revised that to no "immediate" plans (why the change if they will never be removed). Then look at the fact that the gap between BPOs and invention is being considerably reduced. Lets face it, if you look at the facts, they suggest that T2 BPOs have a limited shelf life and will lose a lot of value. The only thing going against that is people saying "nope!" with no actual evidence to support it. Look at yourself, your only "evidence" is that goons are saying it will go down, lol.
joyous the wrote:When has goon ever been true? When has anything, they've ever done or said been true? It's a scam, by the biggest scammers in the game to cause panic in a market that involves trillions of isk. Except, you know, loads of things they've said and done being true and all that.
joyous the wrote:The facts at the end of the day is that t2 bpos will not be removed, nothing in this game has been deleted in 10 years. Well that in itself is not a fact, loads of things have been removed and more things will be. At the end of the day when they build new mechanics, older ones need to go. They can't just keep every old idea around for eternity. You might get to keep the item to collect, but the function it has will not exist forever. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 13:14:00 -
[61] - Quote
as the workers converge, you hear the chants of "for dear leader"
alas, I am the lamb and you the grass for slaughter. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3471
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 14:57:00 -
[62] - Quote
Nice rebuttal. Good to see you taking on board the points given and countering them effectively. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Otti Ottig
Sushi Social Society
10
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 19:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:joyous the wrote:The facts at the end of the day is that t2 bpos will not be removed, nothing in this game has been deleted in 10 years. Well that in itself is not a fact, loads of things have been removed and more things will be.
For example? 
|

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 20:33:00 -
[64] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Nice rebuttal. Good to see you taking on board the points given and countering them effectively.
There is no need for a rebuttal, honestly I didn't even read what you wrote on the previous page. This isn't a debate. I'm telling you what's going to happen. Why it's going to happen. And to deal with it.
|

Voyager Arran
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
215
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 22:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
Hint:
They could entirely delete T2 BPOs from the game right now and it would have a minimal effect on most T2 markets.
They could also make items built from T2 BPOs cost no materials at all and achieve the same result.
Invention changes are not going to be the birth of a merchant class, which was the closest thing to a coherent statement I could pull out of your posts. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
402
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 22:45:00 -
[66] - Quote
Otti Ottig wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:joyous the wrote:The facts at the end of the day is that t2 bpos will not be removed, nothing in this game has been deleted in 10 years. Well that in itself is not a fact, loads of things have been removed and more things will be. For example?  eve used to have these things called mines...  |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
402
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 22:46:00 -
[67] - Quote
joyous the wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Nice rebuttal. Good to see you taking on board the points given and countering them effectively. There is no need for a rebuttal, honestly I didn't even read what you wrote on the previous page. This isn't a debate. I'm telling you what's going to happen. Why it's going to happen. And to deal with it. keeping your head in the sand doesn't change the facts  |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 22:57:00 -
[68] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Otti Ottig wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:joyous the wrote:The facts at the end of the day is that t2 bpos will not be removed, nothing in this game has been deleted in 10 years. Well that in itself is not a fact, loads of things have been removed and more things will be. For example?  eve used to have these things called mines... 
Which weren't deleted and are now worth far more than they ever were when in use? Really, that's what you came up with?
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3473
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 23:16:00 -
[69] - Quote
joyous the wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Nice rebuttal. Good to see you taking on board the points given and countering them effectively. There is no need for a rebuttal, honestly I didn't even read what you wrote on the previous page. This isn't a debate. I'm telling you what's going to happen. Why it's going to happen. And to deal with it. lol, no, you are telling us they won't change anything, for reasons unknown, while they've already made some changes and indicated others. It's that wishful thinking again. If you say it enough, maybe it'll come true, right?
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3473
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 23:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
joyous the wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:Otti Ottig wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:joyous the wrote:The facts at the end of the day is that t2 bpos will not be removed, nothing in this game has been deleted in 10 years. Well that in itself is not a fact, loads of things have been removed and more things will be. For example?  eve used to have these things called mines...  Which weren't deleted and are now worth far more than they ever were when in use? Really, that's what you came up with? They are no longer able to be used, so functionally removed. Are you saying that T2 owners would be happy if the ability to use a T2 BPO was removed, but the item was kept? When they say "removed" that's pretty much what I expect them to do.
That said, there are things they have removed, like learning skills for example. The most recent example of this, which has not yet come to pass but is already decided, is compression blueprints. Those are being removed. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
295
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 03:24:00 -
[71] - Quote
Learning skills were rolled into our stats and the SP refunded. Compression BPOs are being removed, but the NPC price for them is being refunded and Rorquals will be able to compress without them, as will starbases with a new module. Mines and their BPOs weren't removed, only their seeding.
Things definitely have been removed, but I don't think you're using good examples.
.
|

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 04:30:00 -
[72] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:They are no longer able to be used, so functionally removed. Are you saying that T2 owners would be happy if the ability to use a T2 BPO was removed, but the item was kept? When they say "removed" that's pretty much what I expect them to do.
That said, there are things they have removed, like learning skills for example. The most recent example of this, which has not yet come to pass but is already decided, is compression blueprints. Those are being removed.
Just deal with it bro. I understand what you're saying, and I understand that you, and your camp, has been preaching this all along. You made a good run, and it almost worked. But you're wrong. Some will fall victim to stupidity, and the smart will take advantage. It's the circle of life. But in EVE everyone lives forever, and everyone gets rich. Get a bigger bat, if you're planning on hittin these balls. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3474
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 07:20:00 -
[73] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote:Learning skills were rolled into our stats and the SP refunded. Compression BPOs are being removed, but the NPC price for them is being refunded and Rorquals will be able to compress without them, as will starbases with a new module. Mines and their BPOs weren't removed, only their seeding.
Things definitely have been removed, but I don't think you're using good examples. LOL. "I see those things have been removed but I don't accept it as good enough". That's a ridiculous response. Bascially, no matter what examples we give, you are going to complain that they are not good enough, because you'd rather not think about them removing T2 BPOs. And T2 BPOs, while being "removed" (or possibly made into collectors items with no use) would in the same way just be a refinement of the T2 industry system. T2 manufacture would still be possible through invention, so it's no different.
joyous the wrote:Just deal with it bro. I understand what you're saying, and I understand that you, and your camp, has been preaching this all along. You made a good run, and it almost worked. But you're wrong. Some will fall victim to stupidity, and the smart will take advantage. It's the circle of life. But in EVE everyone lives forever, and everyone gets rich. Get a bigger bat, if you're planning on hittin these balls. Deal with it? Deal with what? Deal with you burying your head in the sand? You realise you are not some special snowflake right? CCP have given me more than enough evidence to suggest that T2 BPOs have a limited shelf-life and in the short term with at least halve in value. You saying "nope!" isn't evidence in and of itself, because you are just some random. If you'd like to counter the actual points, be my guest, if you'd like to provide evidence yourself, be my guest, but just saying "nope!" doesn't actually make your case.
Importantly though, when they do inevitably remove T2 BPOs and you are back shrieking on the forums, I'll remember to point you at this thread and laugh heartily, since CCP provided you with more than enough information to make an educated decision. Let's face it, even if you believe nothing else, they stated unambiguously that T2 BPO value "will go down" and yet you still want to believe that nothing will change. You need an education my friend. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 07:34:00 -
[74] - Quote
Well I'm on a boat. I've got my binoculars. Guess we'll sea. |

Otti Ottig
Sushi Social Society
10
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 08:51:00 -
[75] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:
That said, there are things they have removed, like learning skills for example. The most recent example of this, which has not yet come to pass but is already decided, is compression blueprints. Those are being removed.
awesome selective reading/thinking.... learning skills are hardly items and even their SP/skillbooks have been reimbursed.. I had a good laugh with the mine example, ty Go Lucas, A single Item that has been removed....bring it!! back to the Facts and destroying your argument: No Item with the slightest value in eve has been removed in the past 10 years.
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3474
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 09:52:00 -
[76] - Quote
Otti Ottig wrote:awesome selective reading/thinking.... learning skills are hardly items and even their SP/skillbooks have been reimbursed.. So you are saying the skillbook was removed, thus confirming that items do get removed.
Otti Ottig wrote:I had a good laugh with the mine example, ty Go Lucas, A single Item that has been removed....bring it!!  Challenge accepted: Sisters Gravimetric Quest Probe.
Otti Ottig wrote:back to the Facts and destroying your argument: No Item with the slightest value in eve has been removed in the past 10 years. So what was that you were saying about about facts? The actual fact is that CCP have removed items from the game, and they even have a devblog stating the removal of compression blueprints, so you can;t even say that they don't remove stuff now. Then on top of that, even if you weren't categorically wrong about it, the removal of T2 BPOs may only be limited to the removal of their use, making them collectors only. From an invention mechanic iteration standpoint that would work just as well as their complete removal, so that may be how they are going to proceed. It doesn't change the end result of T2 BPOs being devalued and functionally irrelevant. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1442

|
Posted - 2014.05.29 21:23:00 -
[77] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.
ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 05:01:00 -
[78] - Quote
You know, the forums are for discussion, and what we were having in this thread is exactly what is intended. A dialogue. You stepping in with your **** waving wasn't needed. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
405
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 05:57:00 -
[79] - Quote
joyous the wrote:You know, the forums are for discussion, and what we were having in this thread is exactly what is intended. A dialogue. You stepping in with your **** waving wasn't needed. I'm seriously starting to think he might have an agenda and might be abusing his power because he keeps stepping into every single ******* T2 BPO thread over multiple sub-forums to censor, snip, close, or move. It has seriously become a pattern. He has even done arbitrary deletion of bids in sale threads. Getting ready to petition this **** for investigation if it continues. |

joyous the
Slippery Penguin The Crystal Palace
74
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 06:33:00 -
[80] - Quote
o know icee |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3475
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 07:26:00 -
[81] - Quote
Aww and after Otti got owned and everything. I was waiting for a response on that one. At least eve-search never forgets. Thanks again Chribba. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Dramaticus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
570
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 15:32:00 -
[82] - Quote
Direct from CCP Greyscale
- T2 BPO proxy-nerf. The changes are not explicitly targeted at T2 BPOs, but we're also not currently minded to do anything to prop up the value of T2 BPOs given that we're contemplating significant changes to them in the future anyway. The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal
The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them |

HeXxploiT
Rhongomiant Legion Industries The Explicit Alliance
33
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 17:51:00 -
[83] - Quote
Sold my scourge heavy assault This morning for 1.3bil profit. Not huge but significant.
Lot's of fear+lots of sellers+lots of buyers=lots of isk. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
410
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 00:43:00 -
[84] - Quote
I just made 1b off a single carrier sale and my investment was but a fraction of the cost of a T2 BPO.
filthy profits? lmao. something tells me you're just trying to get other people to hold the bag for you  |

HeXxploiT
Rhongomiant Legion Industries The Explicit Alliance
33
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 01:31:00 -
[85] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:I just made 1b off a single carrier sale and my investment was but a fraction of the cost of a T2 BPO. filthy profits? lmao. something tells me you're just trying to get other people to hold the bag for you 
And I have been very deliberate about not making any comments neither for nor against T2 BPO's. Merely that quick movements, both up and down, equal profitability if one is on the proper end of the trade. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |