|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10750
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 18:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Audrey UntzUntz wrote:Most caught botting*
It could still be the case, or it could be that null-sec botters are better at their craft, not sure.
if you observe more of a thing in area A than in area B, that usually means there is more of that thing in area A Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10751
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 07:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:Audrey UntzUntz wrote:Most caught botting*
It could still be the case, or it could be that null-sec botters are better at their craft, not sure. if you observe more of a thing in area A than in area B, that usually means there is more of that thing in area A It is also the case that if you spend more time looking for something in A than you do in B then you are more likely to find it in A.
so you think that CCP's security team actually logs into the game and flies around looking for bots
interesting Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10751
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 08:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jaun Pacht-Feng wrote:Combatting Nullsec Ratting bots would go against Alliance leaderships RMT quotas each month.
I'd suggest getting into a Nullsec Bloc, and moving up the ranks to leadership level...as Alliance leaders/lackys are the only ones allowed to Bot in their space under a alt botting corp so their main Alliance get's left alone by a new Dev.
Then you collect as much evidence as you possibly can, then you go public about it, posting it anywhere in the EVE-O forums would get a swift lock...then deleted thread, with a account wide ban for you.
i don't think i want whatever you're smoking
tell us more about these things that you are apparently so well-informed of Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10753
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 22:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Veld San wrote:2. Disallow any 3rd party apps, currently there is some 3rd party app, I forgot the name, that the bots use to let them synchronize multiple clients and run simoultaneously. If CCP changed TOS / EULA to specifically disallow it then implimented tools to check for this, bots would die.
That's called ISBoxer, which has nothing to do with botting
Veld San wrote:4. Change SOV mechanics, so that botting content pays out less, lets say make it worth 50% of what high sec equivalent lvl missions pay out, risk vs reward doesn't matter, since actually, ratting in high sec is more risky then ratting in goon space anyways.
Right, let's also nerf highsec mining and l4 missions into the ground (i.e. 20% of what they currently pay out) because that's the most heavily botted content in the game. See the failure of your logic here? Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10757
|
Posted - 2014.05.17 20:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Xavier Higdon wrote:Do you have numbers that back up the assertion that bots are more prevalent in high sec? Can you show how many bots there are in high sec as compared to null sec, or can you only show us what CCP tells us they caught? This kind of circular logic, where you argue that I can't prove anything, and I argue you can't prove anything, can go on forever. There is no way for either one of us to prove our statements.
"there's no evidence that highsec is home to most of the bots in the game because the only numbers show many bots have been caught, therefore, most bots operate in 0.0" Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |
|
|
|