| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 23:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions?
Economics 101 - When you provide better income it drives demand because there is more disposable income being spent. - When things are cheaper, people will also buy more, creating more demand.
Result - Greater demand reduces supply thus increasing prices etc.
It's basic economics and we see it every day all over the world in RL.
In Eve, this translates to "lesser" pilots flying better ships which makes for richer targets. Given that these same pilots will also have less aversion to risk because they can replace easier.
It means more BPO's sold, more towers with better mods and so on. This in turn generates demand in other areas such as fuels and even ships to do the logistics for said extra towers etc.
Why is this a problem?
Jealousy? |

Zynar11
RennTech Fatal Ascension
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 23:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
That would be true except for that inflation thing. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
169
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zynar11 wrote:That would be true except for that inflation thing.
There is far more wrong with the Eve economy than inflation. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Zynar11 wrote:That would be true except for that inflation thing. Inflation has the effect of increasing prices due to demand because of greater disposable income.
Unless I've read the markets wrong, I'm seeing most prices fall. (except PLEX but that has external contributing factors)
That's a result of oversupply. If it were the result of isk faucets it'd be the reverse.
|

Zleon Leigh
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
All the extra income in going into hedging -PLEX because of manipulation and CCP development uncertainties.
Because of skill limits - people limit themselves to a given level of purchases. Since you can only drive a one shiney BS's per account, and the high PLEX price, which leads to fewer accounts, the isk drains are blocked even more. Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Terminal Insanity
Convex Enterprises The Silent One's
105
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
It became a problem when people realized how much control they have over CCP, mostly via CSM.
Other developers can just flat out rip people off (look at tf2 store) and they would simply ignore / move / lock posts by people who really raged about the issue
CCP has been really awesome, too awesome, in this dept. CSM was a really cool idea, but in the end, they've given way too much power to the players, and now the players can essentially destroy the game
Valve charges players 5000+ real dollars for a glowing hat, and did you see any news on game websites over that? Nope. But CCP dare place a 150 dollar monocle on their store? *GRABS PITCHFORKS*
(And those 5000 dollar tf2 hats are NOT available via any other means) |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
61
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
Economy is an lie. Money is an idea. People are ******.
And soon we will all feel it. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
Zleon Leigh wrote:All the extra income in going into hedging -PLEX because of manipulation and CCP development uncertainties.
Because of skill limits - people limit themselves to a given level of purchases. Since you can only drive a one shiney BS's per account, and the high PLEX price, which leads to fewer accounts, the isk drains are blocked even more. And this can be easily offset by CCP by injecting PLEX or reducing RL cost for PLEX.
Keep in mind that PLEX prices have external factors (less expenditure in RL is one of them) and their bearing on the Eve economy should be mutually exclusive insofar as "fiddling the books" to make it fit.
As for 1 x shiney BS per account, I beg to differ. MOST players would have many ships available because most core SP allows for mutliple types to be flown. Players with greatest income to buy said ships also have the greatest SP to make it possible. |

ASadOldGit
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
K Suri wrote:wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions?
I didn't think it was the amount they made that they were complaining about, but the vastly reduced level of risk compared to making the same amount of ISK in nullsec... My container is NOT imploding! It's just a bit upset that it only sees cheap crap. |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
75
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:Economy is a lie.
Is that a thinly-disguised Portal reference?
Btw, fyp. |

betoli
Morior Invictus. Velocitas Eradico
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:40:00 -
[11] - Quote
K Suri wrote: Economics 101
I'm going to guess at this point that you haven't studied any economics.
|

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
ASadOldGit wrote:K Suri wrote:wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions? I didn't think it was the amount they made that they were complaining about, but the vastly reduced level of risk compared to making the same amount of ISK in nullsec... I'm inclined to agree but that's not the fault of highsec bears. Nerfing highsec seems to be the popular call but L4's have been making the same coin for a longtime so it's only the milking of Incursion sites that may have been overlooked or underestimated by CCP that is relatively new.
And CCP has already stated that they ****** up insofar as 0.0 income so hopefully the new anom regime will start the correction.
But it doesn't explain why ship/mod prices are so low. PLEX prices may have increased dramatically (lack of PLEX coming into Eve is what is causing the issue I think) but the "new" income being generated should easily offset that for most players and still keep demand high.
I'm still of the view that the amount of material available - i.e. oversupply - is the cause of price drops.
Is it because there's no serious wars and/or perhaps a large part of the playerbase has gone indy? |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:45:00 -
[13] - Quote
betoli wrote:K Suri wrote: Economics 101
I'm going to guess at this point that you haven't studied any economics. Basics only a long time ago. But I pose the topic more as a question than a statement.
I'm not sure the rage against missioners and Incursions is justified. Looking for views as to the causes of the grief. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Economics 101 - When you provide better income it drives demand because there is more disposable income being spent. - When things are cheaper, people will also buy more, creating more demand.
Result - Greater demand reduces supply thus increasing prices etc.
It's basic economics and we see it every day all over the world in RL. LOL.
Four years getting an economics degree: $28,000 plus interest Attending twenty-six "occupy" protests: $198 for lattes to be able to use the Starbucks bathroom Graduating into unemployment and loan shark debt: one kidney Laughing at people who don't have a clue as to what they're talking about: priceless
There are some things money can buy. For everything else, there are ignorant people making public observations on the Internet. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:K Suri wrote:Economics 101 - When you provide better income it drives demand because there is more disposable income being spent. - When things are cheaper, people will also buy more, creating more demand.
Result - Greater demand reduces supply thus increasing prices etc.
It's basic economics and we see it every day all over the world in RL. LOL. Four years getting an economics degree: $28,000 plus interest Attending twenty-six "occupy" protests: $198 for lattes to be able to use the Starbucks bathroom Graduating into unemployment and loan shark debt: one kidney Laughing at people who don't have a clue as to what they're talking about: pricelessThere are some things money can buy. For everything else, there are ignorant people making public observations on the Internet. Quite. 2 posts stating I have no idea while not providing any actual evidence that they do.
I reiterate. It's a QUESTION based on the premise of what I understand in RL based on MY spending habits etc.
And yes, the world's economy is working just dandy. All created and operated by people with "Economics degrees". And in your case, it's working so well, you paid 28k for it and you're outta work and spend your time making protestional gestures to fix the "economic problems".
I'm just a dunderheaded lumberjack without a economic degree earning 100k a year.
LOL |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:37:00 -
[16] - Quote
K Suri wrote:[quote=Destiny Corrupted]I'm just a dunderheaded lumberjack without a economic degree earning 100k a year.
LOL Well, if you really do make that much money cutting down trees, I'm glad you managed to find a place in the world, because your ideas of the workings of economics are wrong in so many ways that it is difficult to summarize. |

Otocinclus
FODT
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
K Suri wrote:I reiterate. It's a QUESTION based on the premise of what I understand in RL based on MY spending habits etc.
It's a good thing you fly spaceships IRL, otherwise what you learned about economics in high school might not apply. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:42:00 -
[18] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:I'm just a dunderheaded lumberjack without a economic degree earning 100k a year.
LOL Well, if you really do make that much money cutting down trees, I'm glad you managed to find a place in the world, because your ideas of the workings of economics are wrong in so many ways that it is difficult to summarize. That's 4. Besides me NOT knowing what I'm talking about is there anywhere out there that DOES? Incidentally, the lumberjack reference is to imply stupidity which is not in fact synonymous with ignorance.
However, TITLE == Economics 101 or is it?
I don't know. I'm ASKING.
Edited to modify count of "You're an idiot and I'm an expert" posts. |

Otocinclus
FODT
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:45:00 -
[19] - Quote
K Suri wrote:But it doesn't explain why ship/mod prices are so low. PLEX prices may have increased dramatically (lack of PLEX coming into Eve is what is causing the issue I think) but the "new" income being generated should easily offset that for most players and still keep demand high.
Do you actually know this little about the game? |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
Otocinclus wrote:K Suri wrote:But it doesn't explain why ship/mod prices are so low. PLEX prices may have increased dramatically (lack of PLEX coming into Eve is what is causing the issue I think) but the "new" income being generated should easily offset that for most players and still keep demand high. Do you actually know this little about the game? Obviously not it seems.
Perhaps you'd be patient enough to enlighten me? |

Vigdis Thorisdottir
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
Can you imagine what would happen if the Eve economy allowed you to spend money you don't have? |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:53:00 -
[22] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Edited to modify count of "You're an idiot and I'm an expert" posts. I'm not an expert, nor have I ever claimed to be, but I know enough to know that you ARE an idiot.
PLEX prices are rising because, as the new expansion is on the verge of release, poor college students with no money and no jobs who built up massive amounts of ISK over the summer are coming back to play and spending their ISK reserves on PLEX to keep their accounts alive.
It doesn't have a damn thing to do with your crazy backwards idea of supply, demand, and sinks/drains. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:56:00 -
[23] - Quote
K Suri wrote:my solo earned multi-billion empire GUYS
he knows how to grind missions all day
CCP should hire him to replace their economics expert immediately. |

Otocinclus
FODT
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 01:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote:K Suri wrote:But it doesn't explain why ship/mod prices are so low. PLEX prices may have increased dramatically (lack of PLEX coming into Eve is what is causing the issue I think) but the "new" income being generated should easily offset that for most players and still keep demand high. Do you actually know this little about the game? Obviously so it seems. Perhaps you'd be patient enough to enlighten me? (I will have to preclude knowledge of my solo earned multi-billion empire as any kind of expertise though. I'm OK with that.)
People make billions of isk off the market, it's nothing new. If anything, it serves to show how much of a flaming ****** you are, as it's clearly not given you any knowledge of how an economy actually works. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:03:00 -
[25] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:Edited to modify count of "You're an idiot and I'm an expert" posts. I'm not an expert, nor have I ever claimed to be, but I know enough to know that you ARE an idiot. PLEX prices are rising because, as the new expansion is on the verge of release, poor college students with no money and no jobs who built up massive amounts of ISK over the summer are coming back to play and spending their ISK reserves on PLEX to keep their accounts alive. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with your crazy backwards idea of supply, demand, and sinks/drains. If the post was about PLEX specifically I'd be most humble and retract my sarcasm but unfortunately you failed so I'll pass on that.
I am in fact asking why there are so many complaints about how much highseccers are earning and calls for nerfing of L4's and Incursion income as a "fix".
I'm making suppositions - based on my limited knowledge - as to why that might be hoping to illicit answers. Perhaps you "economists" can get off the holier-than-thou train and move into the education arena.
|

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:05:00 -
[26] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:my solo earned multi-billion empire GUYShe knows how to grind missions all dayCCP should hire him to replace their economics expert immediately. In fact no. I started BPO aquisitions from the get-go and have enough invested in S&I to play very, very passively.
I have so much time on my hands while I make these 100's of millions that I come here to be abused by people with little else to do obviously.
|

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:07:00 -
[27] - Quote
Otocinclus wrote:K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote:K Suri wrote:But it doesn't explain why ship/mod prices are so low. PLEX prices may have increased dramatically (lack of PLEX coming into Eve is what is causing the issue I think) but the "new" income being generated should easily offset that for most players and still keep demand high. Do you actually know this little about the game? Obviously so it seems. Perhaps you'd be patient enough to enlighten me? (I will have to preclude knowledge of my solo earned multi-billion empire as any kind of expertise though. I'm OK with that.) People make billions of isk off the market, it's nothing new. If anything, it serves to show how much of a flaming ****** you are, as it's clearly not given you any knowledge of how an economy actually works. Oh the rage is palpable.
I have dared to question the economic theorists.
(I might even send you a postcard next time you buy one of my cap BPC kits. Can you afford it?)
EDIT: Triple Post!! Yahooo.  |

Otocinclus
FODT
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:Edited to modify count of "You're an idiot and I'm an expert" posts. I'm not an expert, nor have I ever claimed to be, but I know enough to know that you ARE an idiot. PLEX prices are rising because, as the new expansion is on the verge of release, poor college students with no money and no jobs who built up massive amounts of ISK over the summer are coming back to play and spending their ISK reserves on PLEX to keep their accounts alive. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with your crazy backwards idea of supply, demand, and sinks/drains. If the post was about PLEX specifically I'd be most humble and retract my sarcasm but unfortunately you failed so I'll pass on that. I am in fact asking why there are so many complaints about how much highseccers are earning and calls for nerfing of L4's and Incursion income as a "fix". I'm making suppositions - based on my limited knowledge - as to why that might be hoping to illicit answers. Perhaps you "economists" can get off the holier-than-thou train and move into the education arena.
No, you specifically put down people who were actually arguing against an extremely unbalanced isk faucet, specifically incursions. You called them jealous whiners, and now you're annoyed that they're pointing out that you clearly have no clue what you're talking about, even as you continue to dig yourself deeper into your self-centered pit of cluelessness?
Incursions, when run properly, produce an insane amount of isk for an activity that is almost completely free of risk, and is even moreso with the recent aggro mechanics changes.
If you would like to continue to propose your half-assed theories based on your nonexistent knowledge of economics, then by all means... |

Otocinclus
FODT
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:14:00 -
[29] - Quote
K Suri wrote:I have so much time on my hands while I make these 100's of millions that I come here to be abused by people with little else to do obviously.
Oh the rage is palpable.
I have dared to question the economic theorists.
(I might even send you a postcard next time you buy one of my cap BPC kits. Can you afford it?)
EDIT: Triple Post!! Yahooo. Shocked
You'll notice, students, that the OP began to realize that his argument was indeed lost right around here. |

JitaJane
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
47
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:18:00 -
[30] - Quote
First: I have no doubt that is what your econ 101 prof told you. It is also completely wrong. Your Chem 101 prof told you that electrons orbit the nucleus in neat valence orbits. This is also good fertilizer. Second: The reason some group gets blamed for the general state of the economy almost never has anything to do with the economy. Usually it is whomever the speaker think's is 'getting over' This is true in RL as well as Eve. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
77
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:19:00 -
[31] - Quote
K Suri, I'll give you an entirely serious answer this time.
The difference between EVE economics and real-life economics is that the former lacks the potential for infinite innovation of the latter. In real life, living standards go up as inventions are discovered; this is why economies progress. In EVE, we're limited to only building (and destroying) the things that CCP creates. The only thing that drives EVE's economy is asset destruction.
I mentioned this in another post a few weeks ago. Imagine an auto industry that was limited only to the first consumer vehicle produced on a large scale: the Ford Model T. What would happen to this industry a few years down the line, after many factories go up, and the entirety of the world's population owns cars? Sure, some cars would be wrecked in crashes every year, and some would just break down on their own. But you see what I'm getting at, right?
So back to your OP. You say that increased income would lead to increased demand. This is only partially true, because demand tapers off. You also say that greater demand would decrease supply. This is absolutely false. In real life, resources are limited. As demand increases, the supply will increase as well. Whether the price also immediately increases is dependent on the good being produced (rarity of materials vs. the economies of scale). However, because resources are limited, at some point the price will increase dramatically, leading to demand tapering off, as mentioned earlier.
In EVE, resources are essentially unlimited. Well, resources for T1 and T3 production are unlimited. Moon goo for T2 is a slightly trickier matter. Still, any ISK faucets are offset on the supply-demand curve with material faucets. This is called a shifting equilibrium point.
But all of this is rather beside the point.
The true problem with high-sec income is, as other people have said, the risk factor involved. Too little risk and too much reward means that the high-sec mission/incursion bears will indeed be flying more shinies. And this is exactly what brings so many pvpers to high-sec. While I absolutely love high-sec pvp, I also understand that low and null are very important aspects of EVE online. I'd certainly like them to be more enticing, and to give me more reasons to go there. But when my options are "fight in high, kill faction-fit navy battleships, get 15 kills for every 1 death, and make money from ransom and mercenary contracts" and "fight in null, kill T2-fit Drakes, get 1 kill for every 1 death, and be forced to grind NPCs just to be able to afford ships," which do you think I'll choose?
The problem with high-sec income doesn't hinge on some esoteric concept of economics; it hinges on unbalancing the viability and balance of less secure space than high-sec. If the bears want to make us get out of high-sec and go fight elsewhere, they first need to make it economically viable for us to do so. This means either boosting our income, or lowering their own. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
K Suri wrote:...as to why that might be hoping to illicit answers.
*elicit
K Suri wrote:(I might even send you a postcard next time you buy one of my cap BPC kits. Can you afford it?)
I know for a fact that Oto will never fly one of your horrible capital ships.
As for educating you ... as I stated earlier, your idea of economics is so incalculably wrong that it is difficult to summarize, much less pinpoint the key area of misunderstanding.
Let's try starting here: Just because people make more money doesn't meed they need more things. When everyone has more money but doesn't actually need more things, prices will rise until the opportunity cost for spending that money is the same as it was prior to the increased money.
And in EVE, when more and more money flows into the economy, it doesn't necessarily leave faster. Only ISK sinks do that, and they do not scale with player income.
Aside from your botched understanding of cause-and-effect in supply/demand equations, this should clear up some of your ignorance should you choose to internalize it. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
Otocinclus wrote:K Suri wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:Edited to modify count of "You're an idiot and I'm an expert" posts. I'm not an expert, nor have I ever claimed to be, but I know enough to know that you ARE an idiot. PLEX prices are rising because, as the new expansion is on the verge of release, poor college students with no money and no jobs who built up massive amounts of ISK over the summer are coming back to play and spending their ISK reserves on PLEX to keep their accounts alive. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with your crazy backwards idea of supply, demand, and sinks/drains. If the post was about PLEX specifically I'd be most humble and retract my sarcasm but unfortunately you failed so I'll pass on that. I am in fact asking why there are so many complaints about how much highseccers are earning and calls for nerfing of L4's and Incursion income as a "fix". I'm making suppositions - based on my limited knowledge - as to why that might be hoping to illicit answers. Perhaps you "economists" can get off the holier-than-thou train and move into the education arena. No, you specifically put down people who were actually arguing against an extremely unbalanced isk faucet, specifically incursions. You called them jealous whiners, and now you're annoyed that they're pointing out that you clearly have no clue what you're talking about, even as you continue to dig yourself deeper into your self-centered pit of cluelessness? Incursions, when run properly, produce an insane amount of isk for an activity that is almost completely free of risk, and is even moreso with the recent aggro mechanics changes. If you would like to continue to propose your half-assed theories based on your nonexistent knowledge of economics, then by all means... Settle down a little mate. You're getting upset.
A good Incursion runner can pull at least a plex a day so why the "rush" to purchase driving prices?
DEMAND for PLEX has increased under whatever guise and SUPPLY has obviously reduced. A lot of theories about "poor college kids prepping for summer" etc. do not hold water because we'd be seeing similar massive spikes every year. There have been marginal seasonal spikes in PLEX prices before, but NOTHING compared to now.
I am also trying to fathom why, if this income is so "insane" then why isn't demand for other stuff increasing in the markets with it?
Let's face it, 0.0 anoms used to be faucets in the billions and seems by and large to have been "replaced" with Incursions for ISK. So why the inflation in PLEX and deflation for everything else?
People with insane incomes, as being suggested can't be "hoarding" plexes and not spenidng as a result. You only need 12 plexes for a years subs. 6b at current prices. That's only 2 weeks work!
So where's all this "insane income" being spent? |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
170
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:27:00 -
[34] - Quote
K Suri wrote:wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions?
Economics 101 - When you provide better income it drives demand because there is more disposable income being spent. - When things are cheaper, people will also buy more, creating more demand.
Result - Greater demand reduces supply thus increasing prices etc.
It's basic economics and we see it every day all over the world in RL.
In Eve, this translates to "lesser" pilots flying better ships which makes for richer targets. Given that these same pilots will also have less aversion to risk because they can replace easier.
It means more BPO's sold, more towers with better mods and so on. This in turn generates demand in other areas such as fuels and even ships to do the logistics for said extra towers etc.
Why is this a problem?
Jealousy?
That's Keynesian at best. You left out the inflation. If you understood the Austrian school (mises.org) you would know that inflation will drive up prices even when value of commodities should cause prices to drop. Inflation is caused by the creation of money, such as by reserve or central banking. Incursions, insurance, missions, and bounties all create ISK, but that's not backed by any commodity or limited precious metals. Therefore prices can still go up even when the cost of some items goes down - much of it depending on what items are needed.
For example, while the US Federal reserve prints more money to bail out the "too big to fails", this is causing inflation. Yet the recession is causing a deflation of items that are not considerably needed - therefore the prices of fuel and food go up, because the dollar is weaker, but the price of a used sport car or fancy clothes goes down.
Leaving inflation out of the equation is the product of modern economics teachings, which tends toward the Keynesian economic policies (remarkable suitable for governments that like to print money for bread and circuses and warfare/welfare states).
|

Otocinclus
FODT
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:32:00 -
[35] - Quote
K Suri wrote: A good Incursion runner can pull at least a plex a day so why the "rush" to purchase driving prices?
DEMAND for PLEX has increased under whatever guise and SUPPLY has obviously reduced. A lot of theories about "poor college kids prepping for summer" etc. do not hold water because we'd be seeing similar massive spikes every year. There have been marginal seasonal spikes in PLEX prices before, but NOTHING compared to now.
EVE's playerbase is constantly changing it's preferences and spending habits based on what CCP is doing. The economy is never the same every year. As for the rest of your "theories", you continue to base them off of how you believe economics to work, and I'll allow you to read the other posts that explain it in further detail than I could. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:33:00 -
[36] - Quote
K Suri wrote:A good Incursion runner can pull at least a plex a day so why the "rush" to purchase driving prices?
DEMAND for PLEX has increased under whatever guise and SUPPLY has obviously reduced. A lot of theories about "poor college kids prepping for summer" etc. do not hold water because we'd be seeing similar massive spikes every year. There have been marginal seasonal spikes in PLEX prices before, but NOTHING compared to now.
So where's all this "insane income" being spent? Mostly on more shiny incursion ships, because they don't actually need anything else right now. You didn't listen last time I told you this, did you? Give a hobo five thousand dollars a week and he'll get a nicer place to live. Give a bank CEO a thousand dollars a week and he'll maybe buy a fancy new watch or something.
And you clearly didn't read my description of what is happening to PLEX. This time of year, students are settling into school and either they are still playing or are re-subscribing now that school is in a rhythm, but they are out of money. That is what happens. This year's spike is bigger because the new expansion is one of the best yet, and it is being widely publicized as such.
Most people can't make 6 billion isk in 2 weeks. You clearly are an ass. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:A good Incursion runner can pull at least a plex a day so why the "rush" to purchase driving prices?
DEMAND for PLEX has increased under whatever guise and SUPPLY has obviously reduced. A lot of theories about "poor college kids prepping for summer" etc. do not hold water because we'd be seeing similar massive spikes every year. There have been marginal seasonal spikes in PLEX prices before, but NOTHING compared to now.
So where's all this "insane income" being spent? And you clearly didn't read my description of what is happening to PLEX. This time of year, students are settling into school and either they are still playing or are re-subscribing now that school is in a rhythm, but they are out of money. That is what happens. This year's spike is bigger because the new expansion is one of the best yet, and it is being widely publicized as such. I think I mentioned somewhere about not enough RL coin buying plex to bring into Eve. Which is surprising given the ROI atm.
Quote:Most people can't make 6 billion isk in 2 weeks. You clearly are an ass. Yes I was being an ass when I said it - that was my point tbh. The yapping going on about the amount of isk being generated via L4's and Incursions is bullshit imho
(I saw recently someone stating 1 billion for a 8-10 hour Incursion session - that's 100m+/hr!! My questioning includes whether some of the rage directed at Incursions runners is as a result of stupid comments like this rather than any ACTUAL effect.)
|

Otocinclus
FODT
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:A good Incursion runner can pull at least a plex a day so why the "rush" to purchase driving prices?
DEMAND for PLEX has increased under whatever guise and SUPPLY has obviously reduced. A lot of theories about "poor college kids prepping for summer" etc. do not hold water because we'd be seeing similar massive spikes every year. There have been marginal seasonal spikes in PLEX prices before, but NOTHING compared to now.
So where's all this "insane income" being spent? And you clearly didn't read my description of what is happening to PLEX. This time of year, students are settling into school and either they are still playing or are re-subscribing now that school is in a rhythm, but they are out of money. That is what happens. This year's spike is bigger because the new expansion is one of the best yet, and it is being widely publicized as such. I think I mentioned somewhere about not enough RL coin buying plex to bring into Eve. Which is surprising given the ROI atm. Quote:Most people can't make 6 billion isk in 2 weeks. You clearly are an ass. Yes I was being an ass when I said it - that was my point tbh. The yapping going on about the amount of isk being generated via L4's and Incursions is bullshit imho (I saw recently someone stating 1 billion for a 8-10 hour Incursion session - that's 100m+/hr!! My questioning includes whether some of the rage directed at Incursions runners is as a result of stupid comments like this rather than any ACTUAL effect.)
A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this.
I can also personally tell you that 8-10 hours for a billion isk is understated, unless you're running one account with a slow, unorganized group for some reason. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:56:00 -
[39] - Quote
Apparently our friend here thinks that 100+ million isk per hour running incursions is an exaggeration.
It isn't. It's a pretty reasonable expectation. And that's BEFORE using any of the loyalty points, that's just raw ISK payout. You can make an amortized 300 million isk an hour with 2 characters once you're in a fleet, and that's in high security space.
This still has precious little to do with PLEX prices. Only the rich and experienced can really make good money in incursions these days. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:56:00 -
[40] - Quote
Otocinclus wrote: A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this.
I can also personally tell you that 8-10 hours for a billion isk is understated, unless you're running one account with a slow, unorganized group for some reason.
On the former, so what is? It doesn't make sense. If there were plenty available why would the price go up. You say you've explained this?? Where?
As for the latter, you're telling me that they DO make this kind of cash. Someone else said I was wrong when I suggested if that were true they could make 6b in 2 weeks easily. Effectively a years plex!
Which is it guys? |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
131
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:57:00 -
[41] - Quote
When you pump a lot of ISK into the game items will lose value overall, but Items will cost more in ISK.
Say an item is currently worth 50 mil to buy, but tomorrow it is on the market for 75 mil, because you now make so much ISK the increase becomes fairly meaningless in the scheme of your spending. Sure the item increased but your willing to pay it because you now are making more than enough ISK to cover it. So overall the item has de-valued.
By the way I'm no economist, but this seems like a natural progression of what happens. Feel free to explain the nuances of economics that I've completely missed and I'm sure there's plenty.  Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
169
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:58:00 -
[42] - Quote
K Suri wrote: Quite. 2 posts stating I have no idea while not providing any actual evidence that they do.
I reiterate. It's a QUESTION based on the premise of what I understand in RL based on MY spending habits etc.
And yes, the world's economy is working just dandy. All created and operated by people with "Economics degrees". And in your case, it's working so well, you paid 28k for it and you're outta work and spend your time making protestional gestures to fix the "economic problems".
I'm just a dunderheaded lumberjack without a economic degree earning 100k a year.
LOL
(Protip. Read the title of the OP and start again)
It's not that you don't "know" what you're talking about. But your statements are broad generalizations lacking any specifics with which to hold a convo beyond water cooler chit chat using more broad generalizations that accomplish and/or fulfill absolutely nothing. That's no different from most topics in GD or elsewhere. There are very few people who have put in the time to understand and observe the dynamics in this player driven economy. It's a game, afterall, and for many spending 100's of hours developing the tools to do such a thing is not within the realm of "fun" and rightly so.
From what I know, your statements ignore null, and w-space.....and even losec contributions to market dynamics in the game.
Are Incursions contributing? Yes. So are a lot of things. Plex prices have always wanted to go up even before Incursions were popular and familiar. And they have always gone up. But, CCP has in the past held onto the brakes. They're not doing that atm. So, plex prices are rising, presumably, to identify the point at which the market will no longer support such increases. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:59:00 -
[43] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote: A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this.
I can also personally tell you that 8-10 hours for a billion isk is understated, unless you're running one account with a slow, unorganized group for some reason.
On the former, so what is? It doesn't make sense. If there were plenty available why would the price go up. You say you've explained this?? Where? As for the latter, you're telling me that they DO make this kind of cash. Someone else said I was wrong when I suggested if that were true they could make 6b in 2 weeks easily. Effectively a years plex! Which is it guys? I don't understand how you can be so blitheringly dim. Read my previous post, and meanwhile try to knock it through your thick skull that not everyone can run incursions, and even those who can aren't always able to spare that much time. |

Otocinclus
FODT
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:06:00 -
[44] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote: A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this.
I can also personally tell you that 8-10 hours for a billion isk is understated, unless you're running one account with a slow, unorganized group for some reason.
On the former, so what is? It doesn't make sense. If there were plenty available why would the price go up. You say you've explained this?? Where? As for the latter, you're telling me that they DO make this kind of cash. Someone else said I was wrong when I suggested if that were true they could make 6b in 2 weeks easily. Effectively a years plex! Which is it guys?
Again, if you understood the basics of economics, the increase in price wouldn't be so difficult to grasp. Various people have tried to explain it to you, but you seem to be too preoccupied replying to widders and myself.
Most people don't make 6 billion isk in two weeks. Most incursion runners do. Your arguments are so undefined that you and others have trouble figuring out what you're talking about. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:12:00 -
[45] - Quote
Otocinclus wrote:Again, if you understood the basics of economics, the increase in price wouldn't be so difficult to grasp. Various people have tried to explain it to you, but you seem to be too preoccupied replying to widders and myself.
oh ffs.
Oto says >>> A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this.
Iam says >>> The fact remains that there are a limited number of people who can afford to spend extra money IRL and are willing to do so to get money in EVE, a limited amount they can spend, and a limited amount of ISK they actually need. Meanwhile, the number of people paying for the game by purchasing PLEX is rising rapidly.
K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL.
Iam says >>> I don't understand how you can be so blitheringly dim.
Neither can I. I'm more confused now than when I started.  |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
K Suri wrote:wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions? I won't go into the econ. part of your post, because I don't know enough to address it. What I will say, is that there is a perception amongst various groups in the game, that having Hi-Sec being the *best* answer for all manufacturing, R&D and isk making activities when the "risk/reward" ratio is so slanted to "minimal risk" in Hi-sec, compared to other areas of space.
Having all (or most, or just a good portion of it) concentrated in Hi-sec, reduces the population of other areas of the game.
See the "farms and fields" thread (I think it's still there). So it's not "jealousy" as much as it is, a game balance idea. Another good thread is Malcanis' thread "A Hi-Sec Manifesto" wherein he explicitly states that it is *not* a good idea to force people to move, rather it is better to "attract" people towards moving zones of operation.
Hope that helps.
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Otocinclus
FODT
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:24:00 -
[47] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote:Again, if you understood the basics of economics, the increase in price wouldn't be so difficult to grasp. Various people have tried to explain it to you, but you seem to be too preoccupied replying to widders and myself.
oh ffs. Oto says >>> A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this. Iam says >>> The fact remains that there are a limited number of people who can afford to spend extra money IRL and are willing to do so to get money in EVE, a limited amount they can spend, and a limited amount of ISK they actually need. Meanwhile, the number of people paying for the game by purchasing PLEX is rising rapidly. K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL. Iam says >>> I don't understand how you can be so blitheringly dim. Neither can I. I'm more confused now than when I started. 
Are you going to continue to pick and choose quotes from the two of us, or listen to the collective reason of everyone telling you essentially the same thing? |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:26:00 -
[48] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:K Suri wrote:wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions? I won't go into the econ. part of your post, because I don't know enough to address it. What I will say, is that there is a perception amongst various groups in the game, that having Hi-Sec being the *best* answer for all manufacturing, R&D and isk making activities when the "risk/reward" ratio is so slanted to "minimal risk" in Hi-sec, compared to other areas of space. Having all (or most, or just a good portion of it) concentrated in Hi-sec, reduces the population of other areas of the game. See the "farms and fields" thread (I think it's still there). So it's not "jealousy" as much as it is, a game balance idea. Another good thread is Malcanis' thread "A Hi-Sec Manifesto" wherein he explicitly states that it is *not* a good idea to force people to move, rather it is better to "attract" people towards moving zones of operation. Hope that helps. Alas. Someone read my OP. Muchos gracias.
As much as I usually disagree with Malcanis (and he with me), the attraction to other sectors by inducement has always been my belief too rather than the nerf bat continously yielded.
(On the economics, I'm just seeing too much "it's messing with the economy" as a reason for the bitching about highsec income. Hence "jealousy?" was questioned as a motive behind it.) |

Otocinclus
FODT
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:32:00 -
[49] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:K Suri wrote:wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions? I won't go into the econ. part of your post, because I don't know enough to address it. What I will say, is that there is a perception amongst various groups in the game, that having Hi-Sec being the *best* answer for all manufacturing, R&D and isk making activities when the "risk/reward" ratio is so slanted to "minimal risk" in Hi-sec, compared to other areas of space. Having all (or most, or just a good portion of it) concentrated in Hi-sec, reduces the population of other areas of the game. See the "farms and fields" thread (I think it's still there). So it's not "jealousy" as much as it is, a game balance idea. Another good thread is Malcanis' thread "A Hi-Sec Manifesto" wherein he explicitly states that it is *not* a good idea to force people to move, rather it is better to "attract" people towards moving zones of operation. Hope that helps. Alas. Someone read my OP. Muchos gracias. As much as I usually disagree with Malcanis (and he with me), the attraction to other sectors by inducement has always been my belief too rather than the nerf bat continously yielded. (On the economics, I'm just seeing too much "it's messing with the economy" as a reason for the bitching about highsec income. Hence "jealousy?" was questioned as a motive behind it.)
The only people who would be jealous of your game-wealth are carebears who are too poor to consume or produce enough to be a factor. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
78
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:33:00 -
[50] - Quote
K Suri wrote:K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL. As an addition to my previous post, I want to add that demand isn't always natural. Demand can be artificially created through market manipulation.
Not too long before the PLEX system was introduced, we bought and sold 30 and 90 day time codes in a special section of the forums. At some point, the sellers wised up, and realized they could drive the prices up very quickly. What they did was create many sell threads, and then use alts to pretend to purchase them. They then inflated their prices, as well as the fake bids their alts gave. Within only a few months, time code prices skyrocketed to twice the cost. A few months after that, the PLEX system was implemented. I believe PLEXes initially cost a bit less than 300 million a pop. Compare that to the 270-360 million price tag for a 90 day GTC just a year earlier.
I can't say with absolute certainty that PLEXes are currently being manipulated in the same manner. It could be that a bunch of big market players are buying them out and stockpiling them. It could be that less PLEXes are being bought because of difficult real-life economic times. It could also be that there is more ISK than materials being created, and the equilibrium point has been shifted. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:35:00 -
[51] - Quote
Otocinclus wrote:K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote:Again, if you understood the basics of economics, the increase in price wouldn't be so difficult to grasp. Various people have tried to explain it to you, but you seem to be too preoccupied replying to widders and myself.
oh ffs. Oto says >>> A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this. Iam says >>> The fact remains that there are a limited number of people who can afford to spend extra money IRL and are willing to do so to get money in EVE, a limited amount they can spend, and a limited amount of ISK they actually need. Meanwhile, the number of people paying for the game by purchasing PLEX is rising rapidly. K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL. Iam says >>> I don't understand how you can be so blitheringly dim. Neither can I. I'm more confused now than when I started.  Are you going to continue to pick and choose quotes from the two of us, or listen to the collective reason of everyone telling you essentially the same thing? Neither. You guys go argue amongst yourselves. It's been more about playing semantics with supposed experts than getting answers. I mean let's face it, a quick look at "economics" on Wiki alone tells me that even you experts can't agree on what is an appropriate economic principle! Why so many damned economic theories if it's all so precise?
I'll stick with the 2 broadest forms of economic principle there is for simple plebs:-
SELLER >> I've got it, you want it, you pay. BUYER >> I can't afford it. Bye.
(It takes 28k and 4 years to learn THAT!?) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
78
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:39:00 -
[52] - Quote
K Suri wrote:SELLER >> I've got it, you want it, you pay. BUYER >> I can't afford it. Bye. And then both people starve. |

Otocinclus
FODT
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
K Suri wrote: Neither. You guys go argue amongst yourselves. It's been more about playing semantics with supposed experts than getting answers. I mean let's face it, a quick look at "economics" on Wiki alone tells me that even you experts can't agree on what is an appropriate economic principle! Why so many damned economic theories if it's all so precise?
I'll stick with the 2 broadest forms of economic principle there is for simple plebs:-
SELLER >> I've got it, you want it, you pay. BUYER >> I can't afford it. Bye.
(It takes 28k and 4 years to learn THAT!?)
From what I can see, it's been about you ignoring the actual experts, arguing with Widders and I, and presenting your overly simplified and completely incorrect view of economics. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:K Suri wrote:K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL. As an addition to my previous post, I want to add that demand isn't always natural. Demand can be artificially created through market manipulation. Not too long before the PLEX system was introduced, we bought and sold 30 and 90 day time codes in a special section of the forums. At some point, the sellers wised up, and realized they could drive the prices up very quickly. What they did was create many sell threads, and then use alts to pretend to purchase them. They then inflated their prices, as well as the fake bids their alts gave. Within only a few months, time code prices skyrocketed to twice the cost. A few months after that, the PLEX system was implemented. I believe PLEXes initially cost a bit less than 300 million a pop. Compare that to the 270-360 million price tag for a 90 day GTC just a year earlier. I can't say with absolute certainty that PLEXes are currently being manipulated in the same manner. It could be that a bunch of big market players are buying them out and stockpiling them. It could be that less PLEXes are being bought because of difficult real-life economic times. It could also be that there is more ISK than materials being created, and the equilibrium point has been shifted. If you'll forgive my absolute stupidity in economics, I had wondered if speculation was occurring because there is a vast amount of free flowing cash in game. If so, it's generally self-correcting and requires no intervention from what I can understand
And someone said, CCP seems to be letting it go. And I think I made the point they could intervene (justifiably) if they wanted to. . |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:K Suri wrote:SELLER >> I've got it, you want it, you pay. BUYER >> I can't afford it. Bye. And then both people starve. Probably fair to assume discretionary expenditure don't you think. 
EDIT. Even then, so Seller doesn't starve isn't he likely to reduce prices to get Buyer to buy? |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:47:00 -
[56] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote:Again, if you understood the basics of economics, the increase in price wouldn't be so difficult to grasp. Various people have tried to explain it to you, but you seem to be too preoccupied replying to widders and myself.
oh ffs. Oto says >>> A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this. Iam says >>> The fact remains that there are a limited number of people who can afford to spend extra money IRL and are willing to do so to get money in EVE, a limited amount they can spend, and a limited amount of ISK they actually need. Meanwhile, the number of people paying for the game by purchasing PLEX is rising rapidly. K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL. Iam says >>> I don't understand how you can be so blitheringly dim. Neither can I. I'm more confused now than when I started.  All of these are saying the same ******* thing, in a nearly unending hail of conceptual baseball bats hammering your God-forsaken skull:
1. Supply is more or less the same 2. Demand is skyrocketing, as is the wealth of certain groups of players 3. This is why PLEX prices are going up
It is you who are incapable of reading, even when you go to the trouble of highlighting the sa. (I did read your OP, it made my brain bleed a little bit.) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
78
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:48:00 -
[57] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:K Suri wrote:SELLER >> I've got it, you want it, you pay. BUYER >> I can't afford it. Bye. And then both people starve. Probably fair to assume discretionary expenditure don't you think.  EDIT. Even then, so Seller doesn't starve isn't he likely to reduce prices to get Buyer to buy? Absolutely. But now it's not "It takes 28k and 4 years to learn THAT!?" simple anymore. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:52:00 -
[58] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote:Again, if you understood the basics of economics, the increase in price wouldn't be so difficult to grasp. Various people have tried to explain it to you, but you seem to be too preoccupied replying to widders and myself.
oh ffs. Oto says >>> A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this. Iam says >>> The fact remains that there are a limited number of people who can afford to spend extra money IRL and are willing to do so to get money in EVE, a limited amount they can spend, and a limited amount of ISK they actually need. Meanwhile, the number of people paying for the game by purchasing PLEX is rising rapidly. K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL. Iam says >>> I don't understand how you can be so blitheringly dim. Neither can I. I'm more confused now than when I started.  All of these are saying the same ******* thing, in a nearly unending hail of conceptual baseball bats hammering your God-forsaken skull: 1. Supply is more or less the same 2. Demand is skyrocketing, as is the wealth of certain groups of players3. This is why PLEX prices are going up It is you who are incapable of reading, even when you go to the trouble of highlighting the sa. (I did read your OP, it made my brain bleed a little bit.) edit:K Suri wrote:Even then, so Seller doesn't starve isn't he likely to reduce prices to get Buyer to buy? Obviously people are still buying them, you blithering mudkip.
K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL.
So looking past the anger it would have been easier to say "yes" when I asked the question before.
No wonder the world's economy is so ******.  |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 03:55:00 -
[59] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:K Suri wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:K Suri wrote:SELLER >> I've got it, you want it, you pay. BUYER >> I can't afford it. Bye. And then both people starve. Probably fair to assume discretionary expenditure don't you think.  EDIT. Even then, so Seller doesn't starve isn't he likely to reduce prices to get Buyer to buy? Absolutely. But now it's not "It takes 28k and 4 years to learn THAT!?" simple anymore. Touche' - but THAT might be half the problem.
(I couldn't make Occupy Wall Street sorry - I was too busy making money in RL) 
|

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
257
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 04:36:00 -
[60] - Quote
There hasn't been a study done to find out why. Any conjecture that has been made is already summarized in my posts and others in this thread, if only you had read them.
TL;DR this thread K Suri insults and browbeats everyone who tries to answer his solitary, poorly stated, stupid question while ignoring the copious amounts of valid answers presented.
K Suri wrote:(I couldn't make Occupy Wall Street sorry - I was too busy making money in RL)  You are a douche. |

Otocinclus
FODT
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 05:00:00 -
[61] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:Otocinclus wrote:Again, if you understood the basics of economics, the increase in price wouldn't be so difficult to grasp. Various people have tried to explain it to you, but you seem to be too preoccupied replying to widders and myself.
oh ffs. Oto says >>> A lack of PLEX supply isn't causing the rise in price. I don't know how many posts will be required for you to understand this. Iam says >>> The fact remains that there are a limited number of people who can afford to spend extra money IRL and are willing to do so to get money in EVE, a limited amount they can spend, and a limited amount of ISK they actually need. Meanwhile, the number of people paying for the game by purchasing PLEX is rising rapidly. K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL. Iam says >>> I don't understand how you can be so blitheringly dim. Neither can I. I'm more confused now than when I started.  All of these are saying the same ******* thing, in a nearly unending hail of conceptual baseball bats hammering your God-forsaken skull: 1. Supply is more or less the same 2. Demand is skyrocketing, as is the wealth of certain groups of players3. This is why PLEX prices are going up It is you who are incapable of reading, even when you go to the trouble of highlighting the sa. (I did read your OP, it made my brain bleed a little bit.) edit:K Suri wrote:Even then, so Seller doesn't starve isn't he likely to reduce prices to get Buyer to buy? Obviously people are still buying them, you blithering mudkip. K Suri SAID >>> Demand in game is obviously exceeding supply from RL.So looking past the anger it would have been easier to say "yes" when I asked the question before. I KNOW they're going up. I KNOW people are buying them. I KNOW SUPPLY is not keeping up with DEMAND. I was asking WHY?!!?!??! (i.e. Was highsec income the sole contributing factor?) No wonder the world's economy is so ******. 
The supply of plex isn't at a sudden risk of being depleted by the increased demand for plex. The demand is vastly increased, and sellers are able to take advantage of it by charging more, knowing that the demand will be coming from incursion runners in desire of more accounts, college students, and people resubbing in anticipation of Crucible. Of course, those of us who have billions in the wallet will probably continue to pay for the inflated plex, hoping that it's just a spike. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:33:00 -
[62] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:K Suri wrote:(I couldn't make Occupy Wall Street sorry - I was too busy making money in RL)  You are a douche. Why's that? Because I'm calling the whole Occupy concept into question? It's failed.
Now get a job, work hard, make yourself rich and stop blaming everyone else.
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
81
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:48:00 -
[63] - Quote
How? Are you hiring?
K Suri wrote:( It's a bit like this topic. A lot of people are getting rich using the games many options. The complaints are coming thick and fast that highseccers shouldn't be "allowed" to because they can do so with less risk.
I ask, why not join them? Instead of complaining and looking to change payouts etc. because YOU can't get it right! ) What do you mean we can't get it right? I think we got it right just fine by figuring out how to gank them and take their stuff. They're the ones complaining; we're just saying that the only way we'll shift our target priorities is if income is rebalanced. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1538
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 23:04:00 -
[64] - Quote
Here's an interesting word for you: consumption. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 00:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Zynar11 wrote:That would be true except for that inflation thing. Inflation has the effect of increasing prices due to demand because of greater disposable income.
Prices go up because producers can charge more, not because people want more. People always want an unlimited supply of goods, infinite demand will exist regardless.
Those items in Eve, that have relatively inelastic supply, have generally the same cost in terms of time (real cost versus nominal (ISK price)) they always have always had. |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 00:37:00 -
[66] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:I mentioned this in another post a few weeks ago. Imagine an auto industry that was limited only to the first consumer vehicle produced on a large scale: the Ford Model T. What would happen to this industry a few years down the line, after many factories go up, and the entirety of the world's population owns cars? Sure, some cars would be wrecked in crashes every year, and some would just break down on their own. But you see what I'm getting at, right?
Glad to see the overlooked aspect of the Broken Window Fallacy get some light shed upon it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1541
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 00:54:00 -
[67] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Glad to see the overlooked aspect of the Broken Window Fallacy get some light shed upon it. Well, that's one of the more important things that separates the EVE economy from the real-world economy: around here, the broken window is no longer a fallacy, but a key componentGǪ
GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 01:30:00 -
[68] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Adunh Slavy wrote:Glad to see the overlooked aspect of the Broken Window Fallacy get some light shed upon it. Well, that's one of the more important things that separates the EVE economy from the real-world economy: around here, the broken window is no longer a fallacy, but a key component
Yep, quite true. It does have some curious side effects, not enough places for excess wealth to go is the big one. Suppose that Nex store stuff could be bought with ISK and only ISK, so that it was an ISK sink. That would be one way to consume excess wealth from the game. Granted we can buy PLEX with ISK and use PLEX to Aurum conversion, but that just moves ISK around, it doesn't consume it, so that excess wealth consumption is not expressed with the Nex store.
Suppose we could feed minerals to our ships, and as we "feed" them minerals, they grow more EHP, do this over a logarithmic scale, so that it takes ever increasing amounts of minerals to boost stats. Lots of excess wealth could be consumed that way too.
But things like this don't exist, so we get more and more and more stuff, none of which has any sort of inelastic demand component.
Eve needs some consumables, hungry mouths to feed, a derivatives market, a capital market, more places for excess wealth to go with high risk. True invention, player created content that can be sold in-game (massive consumer of time those would be.)
etc etc |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
265
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 02:05:00 -
[69] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Eve needs some consumables, hungry mouths to feed, a derivatives market, a capital market, more places for excess wealth to go with high risk. True invention, player created content that can be sold in-game (massive consumer of time those would be.)
etc etc There sort of exists an aspect in which investments yield logarithmically decreasing returns; that is, T2 / Faction / Deadspace / Officer fittings and ships. The problem with these, from a macroeconomic standpoint, is that they do not actually destroy extra ISK; from a personal (microeconomic) standpoint, sure, you just lost 20 billion isk when your stupidly expensive Machariel was exploded, but VERY little of the resources that went into the production of this item actually removed ISK from the market: it merely changed hands to someone who spent an awful lot of time and got lucky with some fancy goods for you to buy.
Implants are an exception; a significant portion of the cost of most implants is destroyed directly by the LP store.
As for the Broken Window parable, it is true that a large number of goods in EVE are constrained only by user activity: All standard minerals, as well as ISK itself, are good examples of this. Some other things, such as bottleneck moon minerals and some of the rarer faction goods, are not: Their production rate is relatively, or completely, inelastic compared to the amount of time and effort that is spent to acquire them. Technetium is a prime example of this: At a conservative estimate, at least 95 percent of EVE's theoretical maximum capacity for Technetium production is being exploited constantly. |

Hebsley
Dark Riders Games of Divinity
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 03:44:00 -
[70] - Quote
lol |

Hebsley
Dark Riders Games of Divinity
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 03:46:00 -
[71] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:You are a douche.
this |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
298
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 04:01:00 -
[72] - Quote
K Suri wrote:wtf is it with people whining how much is made by players in all the various ways in Eve, in particular L4 missions and Incursions?
Economics 101 - When you provide better income it drives demand because there is more disposable income being spent. - When things are cheaper, people will also buy more, creating more demand.
Result - Greater demand reduces supply thus increasing prices etc.
It's basic economics and we see it every day all over the world in RL.
The counter to "greater disposable income being spent" is "demand is satisfied." All these people flying around 30B ISK mission boats are not consumers. They are ISK producers who consume very little (if any) resources. The volume of resources consumed by ammunition pales in significance to the quantity of ISK obtained through the consumption of those resources. The mission-runners certainly aren't flying the 35B ISK ship anywhere that they're expecting to consume the ship itself. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |