| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jim Raynor
   |
Posted - 2006.06.17 22:41:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Matrices Reborn
I don't want to artifiacially compensate anything but you can tell the devs or gm's try to make up for the 2 holes in armour by making no holes in shield If you read the beginning post you might realize I want to have one hole in armour and one in shield since the minnie tank is interchangeable.
And stop whining you plenty of mids which aren't going to be used for tackling to boost your EM resist on the cerb. By my definition of a hole(<50%) one hardener would be sufficient for the EM hole.
so if you have 10% explosive and 25% base kinetic than 1 hardener each should work fine, no?
------
FPDOMS MINER KILLBOARD |
Wheya
|
Posted - 2006.06.17 23:09:00 -
[32]
If we can agree that EANII are too powerful for armor tanking than yes, the Minmatar armor resistance isn't that easy to tank. They need 2 active hardeners to fill the holes compared to all other races that have one resistance hole only. This becomes more of a problem as less low slots are available.
Unfortunatly we Amarr do have problems to take advantage of this Minmatar problem. As an Amarr who usually armor tanks I don't complain about the amarr t2 shield resistance that also has some holes.
I would prefer two additional low and med slots reserved for additional resistance modules only. This modules of course should only be available for t2 ships. So everyone can choose the resistance boost he prefers instead of this RP excuse. Same idea should apply to the 10% t1 racial boost.
|
Kyguard
|
Posted - 2006.06.17 23:11:00 -
[33]
I can see where the OP is coming from, but the vaga can have a broken bonus to lasers and it will still pwn. Nerf it then fix. 
===
God is on the side with the best arti |
Swiftness
|
Posted - 2006.06.17 23:44:00 -
[34]
Seen a lot of "nerf this" " boost that" threads recently, and it occured to me that some people will only be happy when everyone fly ships with the same optimals / resists / dps / speed / slot layout 
|
Matrices Reborn
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 00:22:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Swiftness
Seen a lot of "nerf this" " boost that" threads recently, and it occured to me that some people will only be happy when everyone fly ships with the same optimals / resists / dps / speed / slot layout
And it occurs to me that you have contributed absolutely nothing to this thread and if people didn't whine about nerfs and boosts where would Eve be right now and how balanced would it be?!
|
Aramendel
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 00:30:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Swiftness
Seen a lot of "nerf this" " boost that" threads recently, and it occured to me that some people will only be happy when everyone fly ships with the same optimals / resists / dps / speed / slot layout
The thing is that if noone is speaking up eventually the same thing will happen. "Everyone fly with the same optimals / resists / dps / speed / slot layout", but not because every ship will be the same, but because everyone will use the same ship because it is superior to everything else.
Balancing is a neverending process, and it is fuelled by the *****es and whines of people.
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 16:24:00 -
[37]
There's nothing wrong with minny t2 resists. The shield tankers only have a slight kinetic hole and the armour tankers have enough low slots to patch the holes, fit damagemods and wtfpwn most ships in the same class.
Make Khanid Useful! |
Haniblecter Teg
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 17:03:00 -
[38]
This is a whine thread, please lock it. Minmatar arent supposed to tank well, having two holes proves this.
----------------------------------------
Friends Forever
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 17:25:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Haniblecter Teg
This is a whine thread, please lock it. Minmatar arent supposed to tank well, having two holes proves this.
yes, the sleipnir and claymore have pathetic shield tanks 
Make Khanid Useful! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |