| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ithildin
   |
Posted - 2006.06.18 17:45:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Ithildin on 18/06/2006 17:44:54
I can do nothing but agree with the OP. Long range (long range turret) ammo completely obsoletes all T1 turrets, even best officer turrets. EDIT: Also, T2 long range ammo nerfs Caldari turret ships.
As for Radio, it does too low TH damage, need to do 3 EM and 2 TH on Radio S. (And then extrapolated up to the larger ammos, of course)
New sig coming soonÖ
Tuxford's good for EVE. |
Ithildin
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 20:21:00 -
[2]
Stamm is talking about the ammo and Wrayeth (and Hey You) are talking about the ammo+ships. Bound to be mix-ups there.
New sig coming soonÖ
Tuxford's good for EVE. |
Ithildin
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 20:21:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Ithildin on 18/06/2006 20:21:12
FFS! Stupid wrong edit button
New sig coming soonÖ
Tuxford's good for EVE. |
Ithildin
|
Posted - 2006.06.18 21:03:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Ithildin on 18/06/2006 21:03:38
Let's just get the thred straight: it's not about launchers, it's about T2 long range ammo in general (no such missiles since precision are about hitting smaller things). That also means it's not about Aurora or Tremor specifically.
It's all about the OP and not about association.
New sig coming soonÖ
Tuxford's good for EVE. |
Ithildin
|
Posted - 2006.06.19 13:41:00 -
[5]
@ Tracking :: This is a non-argument. T2 long range ammo is severely unbalanced in a particular situation - and in this particular situation tracking is of no consequence.
@ ECM :: That one thing works too well and is unbalanced is not an argument not to balance another thing. Classic case of two wrongs not making right, only more wrong. Correct one of the errors and you are half way there, allow both to exist and you've failed.
@ T2 being better than T1 :: At one point one has to examine the difference between the concept of T1 being "less good" than T2 versus T1 being "useless" to T2. In this case, T1 is useless compared to T2.
By comparison, T2 turrets take more fitting and does about 0% to 32% more damage (depending on skill levels and what meta T1 item you compare) - this is by no means useless since it does not exclude the use of T1 in any way. Given that range is absolute whether you reach or not, T2 long range ammo does indeed obsolete T1 perfectly in a competative environment.
Please note that gate camps cannot be classified as "competative environment"
New sig coming soonÖ
Tuxford's good for EVE. |
Ithildin
|
Posted - 2006.06.21 16:36:00 -
[6]
 Originally by: Imperial Coercion
Edited by: Imperial Coercion on 21/06/2006 16:30:14
Originally by: Gronsak
T2 ammo needs to be balanced atm its stupidly overpowered,
I wonder who would possibly want to pay 5 mill per large Aurora after it too is nerfed.
But maybe t2 ammo should be like hac's?
Originally by: random bpo owner
Hac's isnt for everyone
Who said that they should remain the same price as before?
Oh, and T2 crystals are probably the only T2 ammo still over 300% profit.
New sig coming soonÖ
Tuxford's good for EVE. |
| |
|