I'm too sexy for my Character!

Feminists lack ambition. Before you flame away .. think about it... they want equality with men. The same men that have been perpetuating a world view that they find to be horrible. So to attain equality with something as disgusting as that... what good has been achieved?

They lack ambition, I tell you.

Remember... sexism!

Don't get me wrong, I'm all fer gender equality when it comes down to wages and such, but when it comes down to holding the door for a lady and such, I'm a chauvenistic pig.

Don't underestimate the instigatory (it ought to be a word) value of huge tracts of land.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all fer gender equality when it comes down to wages and such, but when it comes down to holding the door for a lady and such, I'm a chauvenistic pig.

WTB endgame Banana hammock armor.



Also: why is chest hair a bad thing on avatars? You just don't see much righteous man fuzz in gaming.

Who cares.

Who cares.

I feel most self-proclaimed-feminists just want equality where it brings them an advantage. That sounds backwards i guess, but imagine a guy taking a "feminist" out to diner. He then proceeds to split the check and expect her to pay for what she had. Now is she going to say 'Thank you for treating me as an equal" or is she going to rant and expect him to pay for her food?


Don't get me wrong, I'm all fer gender equality when it comes down to wages and such, but when it comes down to holding the door for a lady and such, I'm a chauvenistic pig.

You'd be wrong about that almost every time. A woman who is a feminist (not all feminists are women, remember) would usually prefer to be treated as if she is capable of independence even if she makes a lot less money than you do. Exceptions are when:
a.) you invited her to dinner, which gives the impression you'll be paying
b.) she doesn't make enough to afford eating there

Some feminist women get irritated by chivalry (NOT the same as chauvanism), especially in situations where the woman wasn't significantly disadvantaged, such as a man holding a door open for her when she's clearly capable of opening it easily by herself, paying for her dinner when she invited and makes more than the man, or something else along those lines. A lot of women, especially feminists, like to be treated as strong, capable individuals.

I hold the door open for people who look like they'll have a harder time at it than me, I try to pay for dinner when I invite, and if I can't pay both sides of the meal I let the person know beforehand. When I am invited to a meal, I never ask how the bill will be split but I bring funds just in case, though I have the expectation that the other person will accept the majority or all of the bill. I treat both sexes equally, though I am more likely to avoid hitting a woman in self defense not on the basis of their sex but on the basis of them being less likely to be a threat or able to defend themselves. Of course what I really determine is the threat level and their capabilities in the fight, regardless of sex. I treat women equally in pretty much every other venue.

Meh, I hold doors open for all kinds of people all the time when I happen to go through said door before them, or sometimes when we arrive almost at the same time and I let them go first.

Are you serious that some people may be offended by that? o.o

anyway the answer is that estrogen generally leads to less aggression/muscle tone/upper body strength, and you shouldn't be hitting people that are weaker than you even if you're not a violent misogynist

I'm not likely to hit people who are a bit stronger than me. I just am not much of a hitter. But in the right situation I'll resort to the right action.

Ah, Britney Spears, one of my favorite pop stars. Some would say she is an icon of masculist sexism, but I believe she would take advantage of her freedom to disagree.

My favorite Britney Spears song: 3

If a songwriter dares to approach her with lyrics containing less then 100 L's,

I don't understand this