EVE Search - SB need a boost

All Channels

Ships and Modules

SB need a boost

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Audri Fisher	Posted - 2006.06.24 07:23:00 - [1] It's freaking retarded that one can uncloke on me, and before it can pop a completley untank destroyer, i can return fire, relize I am not in range, switch ammo, start firing again, relize that I am not going to kill it before I get hit with another volley, and warp away.
Aloysius Knight	Posted - 2006.06.24 07:27:00 - [2]
Twilight Moon	Posted - 2006.06.24 07:43:00 - [3] Edited by: Twilight Moon on 24/06/2006 07:44:24 Oh...you want to boost it? Ok. /signed --------------------- Sig to come soonish.
Audri Fisher	Posted - 2006.06.24 07:48:00 - [4] Originally by: Aloysius Knight yes rly
Leandro Salazar	Posted - 2006.06.24 09:59:00 - [5] Okay, now what exactly do you want to boost? Shield boosters, Sensor boosters, or Smartbombs? :P (I am guessing the last, but your rant didn't make a lot of sense you know...) --------- ZOMG my sig was concordokkened! Link removed due to bad language on remote site. -wystler
Stamm	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:06:00 - [6] I'm thinking he's talking about smartbombs. One smartbomb isn't much. A full rack of larges is pretty mean.
HippoKing	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:06:00 - [7] Originally by: Leandro Salazar Okay, now what exactly do you want to boost? Shield boosters, Sensor boosters, or Smartbombs? :P (I am guessing the last, but your rant didn't make a lot of sense you know...) Stealth bombers SB is the worst acronym in eve though
Twilight Moon	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:28:00 - [8] Originally by: Stamm I'm thinking he's talking about smartbombs. One smartbomb isn't much. A full rack of larges is pretty mean. aye, I'm pretty certain its Smartbombs myself. --------------------- Sig to come soonish.
AsfALT	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:36:00 - [9] Originally by: Twilight Moon Originally by: Stamm I'm thinking he's talking about smartbombs. One smartbomb isn't much. A full rack of larges is pretty mean. aye, I'm pretty certain its Smartbombs myself. Nah he is either refering to sensor bombers or stealth boosters :)
The Wizz117	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:41:00 - [10] he got ganked to fast, he wants more defence i think. but theyr olrady going to boost the defence and make fights take longer. ------------------------------------------- That ccp created a universe doesen't mean they'r gods
Terraform	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:41:00 - [11] you're all wrong, it's pretty obvious that he is talking about SuperBurgers, stop trying to mislead people with all you guessing. i'm right
Novarei	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:45:00 - [12] Spare Parts
inSpirAcy	Posted - 2006.06.24 10:48:00 - [13] Originally by: The Wizz117 he got ganked to fast, he wants more defence i think. You shouldn't assume everyone is a 'boost me' whiner. Re-read: Originally by: Audri Fisher It's freaking retarded that one can uncloke on me, and before it can pop a completley untank destroyer He's in the destroyer, some other guy takes him on in a stealth bomber (and fails).
Twilight Moon	Posted - 2006.06.24 11:12:00 - [14] Edited by: Twilight Moon on 24/06/2006 11:14:15 Originally by: AsfALT Originally by: Twilight Moon Originally by: Stamm I'm thinking he's talking about smartbombs. One smartbomb isn't much. A full rack of larges is pretty mean. aye, I'm pretty certain its Smartbombs myself. Nah he is either refering to sensor bombers or stealth boosters :) No no.....I reget to imform you that its definately Stealth Sensors and Bomber Boosters. --------------------- Sig to come soonish.
Sebroth	Posted - 2006.06.24 14:45:00 - [15] Originally by: Novarei Spare Parts Yeah, the skill requirements for them is way to high, I mean seriously, Minmatar Titan V ----- Never knock on Death's door; ring the doorbell and run (he hates that)
Spiderweb	Posted - 2006.06.24 15:49:00 - [16] Whats wrong with Sansha Battleships? :D ----------------------------------------------- We all live in a Yellow Submarine
Malthros Zenobia	Posted - 2006.06.24 17:09:00 - [17] Originally by: Aloysius Knight
Audri Fisher	Posted - 2006.06.25 05:13:00 - [18] WTB a sensor booster taht can fire volleys WTS a smartbomb that can cloak.
Asuna	Posted - 2006.06.25 05:16:00 - [19] I ******* hate these forums. This topic is just a prime example of why.
Arcadies Solari	Posted - 2006.06.25 09:29:00 - [20] Originally by: Audri Fisher Edited by: Audri Fisher on 25/06/2006 05:19:18 It's freaking retarded that one can uncloke on me, and before it can pop a completley untank destroyer, i can return fire, relize I am not in range, switch ammo, start firing again, relize that I am not going to kill it before I get hit with another volley, and warp away. Here is the rundown for anyone thinking this thread is about dead owls. The poster (Audri Fisher) was flying in an untanked destroyer, minding his own business. A Stealth Bomber uncloaks within cruise missile range and fires. He (the OP) has the time to attempt to return fire, realize he isn't in gun range, switch his ammo, attempt to return fire again, realize he can't kill it before he is struck by another missile volley, and finally warp away. Audri Fisher (the OP) feels that this is "freaking retarded" and by that he means Stealth Bombers need to be improved if they can't kill a destroyer thats not even prepared to fight properly. But honestly the Bomber should have closed and warp scrambled. Yarr
Fuazzole	Posted - 2006.06.25 14:58:00 - [21] The OP has got a point, when you merge Recon with Bomber,...we have a ship with the recon ability of a Boeing 747,...and the bombing potential of hand glider. These ship's are cheep, but costy to kit corectly, they are also almost usless and by far obsilete. It's hard to justifie thier use, but also hard to justifie a boost,..thier not ment to be good war machines...or better the covert ops at stealth. At most with this ship I killed a T1 rifter on the test server but not to base a ship class of my experiance....just that ive killed more and easyer with War bagger's
Cohkka	Posted - 2006.06.25 15:04:00 - [22] Edited by: Cohkka on 25/06/2006 15:05:23 Originally by: Audri Fisher Edited by: Audri Fisher on 25/06/2006 05:19:18 It's freaking retarded that one can uncloke on me, and before it can pop a completley untank destroyer, i can return fire, relize I am not in range, switch ammo, start firing again, relize that I am not going to kill it before I get hit with another volley, and warp away. How does the text connect to the topic? edit: Ahh, I got it now. It's a joke thread... Don't speak english, just F5, F5, F5...
Audri Fisher	Posted - 2006.06.25 18:40:00 - [23] Originally by: Cohkka Edited by: Cohkka on 25/06/2006 15:05:23 Originally by: Audri Fisher Edited by: Audri Fisher on 25/06/2006 05:19:18 It's freaking retarded that one can uncloke on me, and before it can pop a completley untank destroyer, i can return fire, relize I am not in range, switch ammo, start firing again, relize that I am not going to kill it before I get hit with another volley, and warp away. How does the text connect to the topic? edit: Ahh, I got it now. It's a joke thread... ERR no, it is not a joke thread. The entire point of this is that I got caught with my pants down, and the one ship class in eve designed to take advantage of that failed. Not for pilot skill, but becuase it is that poor of a ship.
Paigan	Posted - 2006.06.25 20:09:00 - [24] All i say is: Add the 'bomber' to bombers well okay, apart from that: - Nemesis has 5pg too less - Manticore is overpowered - Turret bonusses are useless -- This game is still in beta stage
Joshua Foiritain	Posted - 2006.06.25 20:12:00 - [25] Bombers are fine, people just dont know how to fly them. ----- [Coreli Corporation Mainframe]
Audri Fisher	Posted - 2006.06.26 07:54:00 - [26] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Bombers are fine, people just dont know how to fly them. How would this bomber pilot done anything better? get into scram ( and therefor antimatter range, which i had in my guns? ) Gee, I wonder if he could have tanked 200 dps for the time to get off his second volley, his shield would have been gone before the first volley hit, even at 20km.
Paigan	Posted - 2006.06.26 10:39:00 - [27] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Bombers are fine, people just dont know how to fly them. reminds me of a petition i wrote when i was new in the game. I complained about double-MWD being totally imba, unlogic and abusive. The GM countered thats its perfectly logical and bla. Next patch, it was gone. so, short-cut sentences like "it's fine, stfu noob" without any argumentation seem in 90% of the cases to be an equivalent for "i don't have much idea about the game, so i don't see the error" -- This game is still in beta stage
Boonaki	Posted - 2006.06.26 10:49:00 - [28] Originally by: Aloysius Knight Get 15 stealth bombers, sit at a gate, when someone jumps through, let them see you, let them **** their pants, when they decloak, everyone cloak. Psycholgical warefare. Fear the Ibis of doom!
cytomatrix	Posted - 2006.06.26 11:10:00 - [29] Originally by: Boonaki Originally by: Aloysius Knight Get 15 stealth bombers, sit at a gate, when someone jumps through, let them see you, let them **** their pants, when they decloak, everyone cloak. Psycholgical warefare. 15 stealth bombers? With that much money i can buy a dread and gate camp. And how the hell are gonna find 15 stealth bomber pilots?

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.