| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
fairimear
   |
Posted - 2006.06.28 00:40:00 -
[1]
i think fair is fair and cloaks need to be totaly unerfed now.
balance must be maintaine dbetween the blobers and the anarchists.
to much protection for alliance that can't defened there space so don't deserve it.
|
fairimear
|
Posted - 2006.06.28 12:21:00 -
[2]
Edited by: fairimear on 28/06/2006 12:24:07
so tomb you are removind the ability to use a carrier in eve for anything but frontline(suicide work) and pos hugging?
that right no more carriers at ss deligating fighters.
and whats this no more carriers in 0.0 without a pos at all, why you ask?
o thats simple, because you can't cloak em any more to keep em safe from scans at a ss.
the nme now warp to it and becasue you are as slow as a brick there scouts with drone trails WILL fnd it.
and dont even think of trying to warp to another spot if they warp in, your forgetting you line up like a oil tanker.
less not forget the rest of your gang who strike poorly defened targets and then cloak at ss when a uber blob comes.
i mean it's all their fualt the alliance can't fight samll gang on small gang and win so you just hand their blobs a way to hunt down the small raiders and never let them do the work that keep's undeserving aliances from holding space.
heres a idea why dont you fix combat setups using wcs or the never balanced ecm/eccm, or the boring fleet fights of 100v1 ship repeated 100times untill it's over.
SCANNING CLOAKED SHIPS IS THE WORST IDEA IN THE LONG SAD HISTORY OF YOU BAD IDEAS TOMB
|
fairimear
|
Posted - 2006.06.28 12:45:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Deakin Frost
Originally by: xplosiv
you pt a carrier at a safe and run ops with cruiser frig and hac's with fighter for backup
you can stop them using the system as a industrial basis for npc/mining cus your carrier is off scan probe angle.
Gee, why don't we just make carriers baseline instead and have proxy warfare instead?
now theres a good idea, maybe some 1 responsible for balancing will look at the reasons why no one wants to put them on the front line.
|
fairimear
|
Posted - 2006.06.28 17:19:00 -
[4]
Originally by: TomB
Originally by: fairimear
so tomb you are removind the ability to use a carrier in eve for anything but frontline(suicide work) and pos hugging?
Carriers are supposed to be capable of frontline combat, have you ever wondered why they get these support bonuses? Making scanning a usable tool for finding things won't get cut off because this ship class ain't in the right state of balance.
should i be exectinga blog on balancing current ships within the next week then?
goodie i can't wait maybe we will get suport cruiser that people will fly to.
or is this just a way to explain off changes that affect ships as they are used now not effect ships as you would like them to be used at some point.
|
fairimear
|
Posted - 2006.06.28 18:02:00 -
[5]
Edited by: fairimear on 28/06/2006 18:05:28
Originally by: Deakin Frost
You know, you could just use multiple safespots instead and stay aligned to a new one to get the hell out as soon something shows up on overview? Jesus Christ, put some frickin' effort in it. If people are supposed to die against your drones, then you should be vulnerable, too.
Get the hell out!
there is just no need to be able to find cloaked ships.
if you had any idea you would be aware you can't make anything die to your fighters well you cloaked becasue you see you can't controll them then.
to use them you have to be uncloaked and then you are vulnerable to normal scanning, thats fair i think.
but why is it fair that some 1 can scan you well you are cloaked and have a covert ops waiting at that safe for when you uncloak to deligate OR to refit a ally ship.
O and btw tomb carriers have the ability to deligate fighters for remote combat, hence they should not always have to be on the front line.
|
fairimear
|
Posted - 2006.06.28 20:03:00 -
[6]
Edited by: fairimear on 28/06/2006 20:03:05
Originally by: Joerd Toastius
Originally by: fairimear
there is just no need to be able to find cloaked ships.
Yes there is. Just because it's a problem for the current implementation of carriers doesn't mean it's not a good idea for everything else.
COmE ON what way on earth is any non covertops (that can warp off from the safe cloaked any way) that is cloaked harming you.
why should you be able to stalk it waiting for it to decloak at it's safe when all it has done is sit there. it's can't fire at you without decloaking it can't do sod all.
so why is it not plenty being able to scan it when it is decloak when it may be actualy doing something to you other than putting you off mining because it's in system and you can't tell if he is afk or not just waiting for you to go do something like npc hunt.
god dam you don't deserve to be in 0.0 if you can't tactical lure it out and kill it with bait and your brains
|
| |
|