EVE Search - Another Technical Question

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Another Technical Question

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
xpero	Posted - 2003.10.01 05:55:00 - [61] Quote: Edited by: Nemiyen on 30/09/2003 11:08:28 Who says it isn't possible.... Have you seen, prooved / disprooved or know for a FACT that 2 AU speed (in real life) is not possible? Probably not .... Anyway, my theory is that all theories in this world are WRONG... I mean think about it - we build a machine that does millions of calculations a second but it's built by HUMANS that make millions of mistakes a second .... We build our theories based on what WE BELIEVE, just because we can prove it using our OWN METHODS doesn't mean that it isn't possible.... to someone / something.... Who made the laws of physics - WE DID! Who's to say they aren't wrong... we're known to be wrong in the past..... Not 100 years ago - maybe more people would say the world is flat and if you sail too far to the edge of the world you fall off... Anyway, that's what I think BTW, this was posted by a human so based on my original theory, this theory is wrong EDIT: How come thoery "tho ery" (without the space between) is censored lmao? Is it picking on me because im a bad speller? First off, phisics that we study are not wrong they are just too basic to see the bigger picture. they focus on the most minor stuff. everyone believed sound barrier can not be overcome. well, as it turns out, it is quite possible. a whiplash tip travels at supersonic speed when it is put to use. thats an example fo how our physics state that something is impossible and tomorrow u get to see that law broken. so by saying FTP is impossible is like saying we are the only intelligent species in the entire universe. absurd. it was taught that anti-gravity is impossible but it is ! i have an experiment in the basement of my home proving antigrav drive is real ! its all in the magnetics and electromagnetics. (\_/) (O.o) (> <)
xpero	Posted - 2003.10.01 06:17:00 - [62] Edited by: xpero on 01/10/2003 06:17:37 Quote: Ok, I think IÆm safe to say we both agree that information can not travel faster than the speed of light. We most likely also agree that the speed of light is a constant and light moves away from you at the speed of light no matter how close to the speed of light you get. Those are both pretty basic concepts in current thinking about physics. hmmm How can light keep distancing from you even if you are travelling at a higher speed ? basically what u are saying is that light can travel even faster ? but then you are contradictiong yourselves ! if light can travel even faster than it already does, then subluminal speed is possible. but when i say "subluminal" i mean c=299,792,458 m/s (in a vacuum). saying that it can travel faster considering you gained that speed, is exactly saying that c=indefinite. sound barrier was broken but it was believed it is phisically impossible. its like saying speed of sound is still before the jet plane even though it is travelling at supersonic speeds. once again, this is theory. theoretical application did not take place yet. so until then we can argue about it for a long time. (\_/) (O.o) (> <)
Lola	Posted - 2003.10.01 06:32:00 - [63] Quote: Edited by: xpero on 01/10/2003 06:17:37 Quote: Ok, I think IÆm safe to say we both agree that information can not travel faster than the speed of light. We most likely also agree that the speed of light is a constant and light moves away from you at the speed of light no matter how close to the speed of light you get. Those are both pretty basic concepts in current thinking about physics. hmmm How can light keep distancing from you even if you are travelling at a higher speed ? basically what u are saying is that light can travel even faster ? but then you are contradictiong yourselves ! if light can travel even faster than it already does, then subluminal speed is possible. but when i say "subluminal" i mean c=299,792,458 m/s (in a vacuum). saying that it can travel faster considering you gained that speed, is exactly saying that c=indefinite. sound barrier was broken but it was believed it is phisically impossible. its like saying speed of sound is still before the jet plane even though it is travelling at supersonic speeds. once again, this is theory. theoretical application did not take place yet. so until then we can argue about it for a long time. Not traveling at a higher speed. if you are travelling at 99.9999% the speed of light light still moves away from you in all directions at the speed of light. I suggest you look up Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light. It turned the traditional Newtonian worldview on it's ear in the 1880s. ----------------------------------------- Sig rented by Drethen Nerevitas.
Zezman	Posted - 2003.10.01 07:16:00 - [64] I would reply to your reply lola, but I wont because I would simply be reiterating my previous argument, and that would be redundant. My argument stands as is. (»)(») À\Oo/ À=\/= This is Rat. It is a vermin. It has eaten all of Bunny's lettuce.
Lola	Posted - 2003.10.01 08:23:00 - [65] Quote: I would reply to your reply lola, but I wont because I would simply be reiterating my previous argument, and that would be redundant. My argument stands as is. Yes, and our time is better spent Zezing, no? ----------------------------------------- Sig rented by Drethen Nerevitas.
Needo	Posted - 2003.10.01 11:38:00 - [66] Eh, I am not a physicist or anything, but if you start to approach the speed of light and your mass nears infinity, will you not start to curve the space infinitely around you, like a black hole or sumthin? ___________________________________________ You are never alone in schizophrenia. ___________________________________________
Einheriar Ulrich	Posted - 2003.10.01 11:55:00 - [67] Ok I just cancelled my subsription on RL, my graphic card could not coupe with the Data Flow So Say I. Einheriar Ulrich of the Bloodline of Einheriar. **Minion Of VOTF**
Daesdemona	Posted - 2003.10.01 11:58:00 - [68] A few points. Our postulates are based on our perception. We cannot even INTERACT with 80% of the universe's mass. (another statement that might as well be wrong, as its made to make up for the fallacies of our models) We attempt to 'define' things, to bring them into order, to limit them, so we can better relate them to our own limited existence. EVERY theory will be eventualy replaced by a better one (assuming there are things/people left to formulate theories). Formulating these theories is admirable, although as individual ends they are doomed in their conception, they serve a higher end. "I know more than you because I am aware of my ignorance." nice thread... ----------------------------------------------- Bart: "Do you even have a job any more?" Homer: "I think its obvious that I Don't" -----------------------------------------------
Temerlyn	Posted - 2003.10.01 12:02:00 - [69] We have what are classed as profesional programers making this game, what would we get if they were profesional physisicts.
Daesdemona	Posted - 2003.10.01 12:03:00 - [70] Quote: We have what are classed as profesional programers making this game, what would we get if they were profesional physisicts. a boring game. ----------------------------------------------- Bart: "Do you even have a job any more?" Homer: "I think its obvious that I Don't" -----------------------------------------------
Lola	Posted - 2003.10.01 12:05:00 - [71] Quote: Quote: We have what are classed as profesional programers making this game, what would we get if they were profesional physisicts. a boring game. But would there be more or less bugs? ----------------------------------------- Sig rented by Drethen Nerevitas.
Cortex Reaver	Posted - 2003.10.01 13:44:00 - [72] Quote: Edited by: BoBoZoBo on 29/09/2003 21:33:28 OMG Cortex...it was a typo... MPH=MPS and if you wanna get technichal..its not even c, its c 1 AU = 93,000,000 Mi Hence twice that (2AU) would be 186,000,000Mi, as stated If you bothered to do the math yourself, you would see that it was correct, as Gigi Ana has confirmed. Next time.. BE smart, don't TRY to look smart, but by judging the rest of your posts, I think THAT is a little out of your league as well. c ya later You're a joke. -CR /* Cortex Reaver crtxreavr at trioptimum dot com "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 */
xpero	Posted - 2003.10.01 14:30:00 - [73] Lola, here is an interesting site you can check out: http://www.physicsguy.com/ftl/html/FTL_part1.html#sec:srreasoning (\_/) (O.o) (> <)
xpero	Posted - 2003.10.01 14:32:00 - [74] http://www.physicsguy.com/ftl/html/FTL_part1.html#sec:srreasoning For the lazy (\_/) (O.o) (> <)

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.