| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. What has happened to EVE? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have to send some sympathies to the OP here. I also agree that EVE has never been fair, but imo that is not really what the OP was concerned with. Fact is, different people have different preferred gamestyles. Some prefer fleet battles, some...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.18 11:11:00
|
2. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jaketh Ivanes You want potential gankers to be at risk all the time. Well, I have guns fitted onto my ship and i could potentially gank someone at a random gate, so should I be at risk all the time (or anyone else with w...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.05 13:45:00
|
3. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for the good posts (forgetting the flamekids), there are some good suggestions there. I'll edit some into the first post, lets try to keep staying on topic. ___________________________________________ You are never alone in schizophreni...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.05 12:47:00
|
4. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sure. Point being? ___________________________________________ You are never alone in schizophrenia. ___________________________________________
- by Needo - at 2007.10.05 08:33:00
|
5. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Saris Dadra Suicide Ganking: I don't think suicide ganking is a problem. The problem is people don't realize what game they are playing. EvE-Online is not a nice place. Every time I undock I am prepared to lose my ship, my ...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.05 08:03:00
|
6. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ok, you could call unexpected good tank some kind of counter perhaps (not for freighters obviously), but still all the initiative lies with the gankers. They are at no risk what so ever until they fire. The bait strat is however not really feasi...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.04 21:11:00
|
7. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ofcourse Concord can't act on the campers before they do anything, that's granted. The problem is that noone can, because if they try concord will pop them. That creates a safe haven from which the gankers can threat others and that's against all ...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.04 16:12:00
|
8. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Needo on 04/10/2007 15:22:59 Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Needo A) Seems the root of this problem, as with some others like macromining, is that people hide in noob-corps. Noone in noob-corp should imo tra...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.04 15:22:00
|
9. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sorry, have to get some points off my chest after reading tons of these threads the last months. Agreed: * It's fine that its possible to high-sec gank if you want it enough. There must be some limit to high sec trading, otherwise you can get ...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.04 15:02:00
|
10. Fun macro mining fix? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bored at work and shooting from the hip so bear with me. What if we got a new hislot module to fool around with macrominers with, lets call it Roid Tainter Mk 5. Uses ammo, for example Radioactive Uranium, and with it you can taint one roid. It ...
- by Needo - at 2007.10.03 12:40:00
|
11. Local changes in Rev3.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Needo on 13/09/2007 12:06:07 I kinda like the idea that you can turn your comm-relay off -> you dont show up on local, you cannot read local or any other chat channel. If this would be implemented you would need a signature cou...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.13 12:04:00
|
12. Legitimize the Dark Side: In a way... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Good suggestions, only problem is the lowsec/highsec intersection. Like someone said, griefers divide systems between gankable and non-gankable systems, thats why it is such a sharp line... If its possible to gank in highsec, they will until there...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.13 11:07:00
|
13. Plight of the Carebear - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
OP> Heh, nice one! Addition: Whine to CCP that you're not allowed to smear the gankers crappy ships all over the Jita gate without being spanked by Concord. Counter-sarcasm ftw! ___________________________________________ You are nev...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.12 11:35:00
|
14. Mature discussion on the rising star of eve and the server - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If I understood things correctly it is in a way "sharded" already in terms of cpu-load for the solar systems, and will be even more seamlessly so after the upgrade when you can have several nodes for the same system. So, upscaling should be no big...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.12 11:20:00
|
15. Old player returned - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When going back to 0.0, do it in a shuttle first and get a feel for locking times and the no-warp-bubbles mechanics. You'll last longer in a shuttle than in a bs for sure. :) ___________________________________________ You are never alone in s...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.10 12:39:00
|
16. Not an exploit?!?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Originally by: Needo -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am not writing on behalf of myself, I have never been high sec ganked, nor will I most likely. I wrote that simply because the ...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.10 07:54:00
|
17. Not an exploit?!?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I am not writing on behalf of myself, I have never been high sec ganked, nor will I most likely. I wrote that simply because the mechanics of high sec ganking is borked. That's it. Call everyone stupid all you like, it doesnt change a thing. It ...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.09 19:03:00
|
18. Not an exploit?!?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: I'm afraid I don't understand how CONCORD protects us. Anyone I've blown up has killrights on me for a month, and I'm usually in one of two places if they want to come after me. Your post isn't very clear at all, quite frankly, and yo...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.09 17:02:00
|
19. Not an exploit?!?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: You act as though some idiot loading, say, a full pithi set into his shuttle is somehow CCP's fault, like it's on-par with a bugged complex. The game is a sandbox - people can do what they want, as long as it isn't an exploit. And sho...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.09 15:13:00
|
20. Not an exploit?!?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
C'mon guys. The problem is not that high sec ganking can take place. The problem is that a high sec ganking has no risk that is even near the reward-level because the blockade is protected by CONCORD. Anyone that would have wanted to blow them ...
- by Needo - at 2007.09.09 13:08:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |