Didn't Greyscale say this was cut?

Edit: Here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4786549#post4786549

(WTB Developers who talk to each other... )

MDD

Nit: You talk about the basePrice, but then use baseCost in your formulas.. :P
You also still talk about the multiple POS array thing, which I think is now gone, right?

Also, given the mention of team in w-space, can I actually recruit teams for a w-space system?

I have been asking this because there is no specific mention of it: Do NPC Corps standings play any part of the manufacturing costs? If yes, we are still tied to the standings grind to minimize costs. If no, we are freed to travel anywhere to use any NPC station because of an across the board equality between NPC corps.

Thanks for the hard work guys.

Will the personal inventory API endpoint show Time and Material reserach levels on blueprints?

With this new reliance on the very inaccurate UI "Estimated Value" number, can you please, please, please use better methods to determine this figure.

There is already data that is used to make a much more accurate picture of the price of an item. The daily average tickers. Calculated EACH DAY. Just grab that from the major trade hubs and average them together. Again, this figure is already calculated in every region, on a daily basis. How is it that hard to use it for the "estimated value"?

Atm, the "Estimated Value" of an item will be very missleading as to whether or not something is worth building. This will also help alleviate 'value' issues for new items that sometimes go a couple weeks before the game says they are worth anything.

Yeah, it looks likely. But heck, if this is meant to be an exponential function, why then calculate it as fractions? And anyway, why calculate it at all, instead of using a fixed figure? In fact an integer would surely suffice, as the multiplier is applied to something (baseCost) which will vary with at least some percentage points on a monthly timescale.

so what is a cost to resesach something to me 9?

Rly 20 times base cost :?

After getting the new blueprint data loaded, I noticed there is no longer a techLevel field for blueprints (I can get all other fields of the old invBlueprintTypes table). This value usually signaled 1,2, or 3. I've been looking at the dgmtypeAttributes table (attribute 633) for the meta value but this really isn't the same information since it's the meta level of the item but not the blueprint. It's also not easy to determine tech 3 blueprints unless I hack it to look for the 4 ship types.

Any way to get this data in the current SDE or is this an oversight?

Thanks

I use this as part of a system to work out what can be invented from something. Eg add a new T1 BPO t the system and have it ask if you want to add any inventable types at the same time.....

Any chance of having some form if link from a T2 type back to its T1 version?

My preference would be to have a T2 print have a value for it's parent print...

Thanks

And again the CREST is broken:

{
"message": "Problem communicating with the EVE proxies",
"key": "badGateway",
"exceptionType": "BadGatewayError"
}

Are the CREST endpoints actually cached server side and if so, are the caches invalidated at predictable times? i.e. are 1-hour long caches cleared every full our? What about the 23h cache? Or is it just a rate-limit by IP and the actual cache logic being completely opaque?

There is a "value" attribute...

@CCP: I find the industry/facilities endpoint hugely bloated, the only data of value in there seems to be "tax", everything else is static and available in the SDE.

I'd like to echo the request that the /industry/teams/ and /industry/teams/auction/ CREST endpoints show what type of RAM activity (manufacturing, ME research, TE research, copying, invention) each team affects. Without this information, the teams data is not particularly useful.

We really need that UI tooltip that was in one of the mockups that tells us exactly how we're getting to that number.

We really need that UI tooltip that was in one of the mockups that tells us exactly how we're getting to that number.

In the blog you say "Multiply the cost by any facility bonuses as described in the ramAssemblyLineTypes table in the SDE." Can you confirm that ramAssemblyLineTypeDetailPerGroup and ramAssemblyLineTypeDetailPerCategory are to be ignored?

Thanks

In the blog you say "Multiply the cost by any facility bonuses as described in the ramAssemblyLineTypes table in the SDE." Can you confirm that ramAssemblyLineTypeDetailPerGroup and ramAssemblyLineTypeDetailPerCategory are to be ignored?

Thanks