| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2790
   |
Posted - 2014.07.13 13:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
Maximum Entropy wrote:
Man I wish EVE forum users had even a modicum of intelligence.
the irony of this scentance...oh my...i dont think.....no
"Confirming EVE is hot, batshit crazy, and puts out."
-Omar Alharazaad
"CAKE CANNOT HOLD UP TO BEING A CHARACTER DAMNIT."
--áUnsuccessful At Everything |
Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
384
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 13:11:00 -
[32] - Quote
Maximum Entropy wrote:-snip-
I really don't have to change a thing in this post for you.
Schrodinger's Hot Dropper - The Fate of Forum Alts - Click me! Click me! |
Fer'isam K'ahn
None Of One
201
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 13:15:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kaerakh wrote: This is not a new idea. There are a slew of reasons why this is not done and others have already iterated on those reasons for why.
Oh no, You brought Doreen into this ... and I tried to avoid it so hard. (@dit: I saw what you did there - you sleeky sneaky editor)
And the reply of 'I can ping the server any time' as a counter argument to 'that you pay for the server access' being false is a new monument of the Mount Olympus of troll mentality and 'I haz zhe lasd w+Śrd'
Are you sure your issues aren't elsewhere ?! |
Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
1798
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 13:55:00 -
[34] - Quote
Pretty obvious no.
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY?No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided""So it will be up to a pilot to remain vigilant wherever they may be flying and be ready for anything at any time" |
Karak Bol
Low-Sec Survival Ltd.
192
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 14:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
This idea was now posted about 500 times and its still horrible. You say that missions should be the only way to grind SP? Seriously? I am trading and training newbies, when not FCing or herding my cats (corpmember). So you should be SP rewarded for your useless Missionrunning, where no one else in the community has an improvement of live, while someone like me who sacrifices his Eve time willingly so that other people can have fun will get nothing? Seriously?
Dumb idea, zero points, sit down. |
Komi Toran
Paragon Trust
The Bastion
132
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 14:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
OP, in the future, please post these ideas in the proper thread. |
Maximum Entropy
Entropic Principal
13
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 14:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
Karak Bol wrote:This idea was now posted about 500 times and its still horrible. You say that missions should be the only way to grind SP? Seriously? I am trading and training newbies, when not FCing or herding my cats (corpmember). So you should be SP rewarded for your useless Missionrunning, where no one else in the community has an improvement of live, while someone like me who sacrifices his Eve time willingly so that other people can have fun will get nothing? Seriously?
Dumb idea, zero points, sit down.
Learn to read. I'm not advocating taking away timed training.
But you got your +1 post so I guess that's all that matters.
Why is the total number of "likes received" a poster has inversely proportional to the quality of posts one makes? |
Maximum Entropy
Entropic Principal
13
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 14:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
Kaerakh wrote:Maximum Entropy wrote:-snip- This is not a new idea. There are a slew of reasons why this is not done and others have already iterated on those reasons for why.
I've read every single one of those reasons. They're all completely wrong, illogical, nonfactual, inconsistent, or just plan stupid. I have yet to be provided with a good reason not to do this.
I'm not saying take away timed training. I'm saying add more options for advancement, which is going to KEEP NEW PLAYERS SUBBED AND PLAYING. I realize that forum users don't give a **** about whether or not new players keep playing. But I play the game, not the forums, so I do care. CCP makes money from more subs, so they care.
Why is the total number of "likes received" a poster has inversely proportional to the quality of posts one makes? |
Da Dom
Wii R
90
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 14:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
Maximum Entropy wrote:Kaerakh wrote:Maximum Entropy wrote:-snip- This is not a new idea. There are a slew of reasons why this is not done and others have already iterated on those reasons for why. I've read every single one of those reasons. They're all completely wrong, illogical, nonfactual, inconsistent, or just plan stupid. I have yet to be provided with a good reason not to do this. I'm not saying take away timed training. I'm saying add more options for advancement, which is going to KEEP NEW PLAYERS SUBBED AND PLAYING. I realize that forum users don't give a **** about whether or not new players keep playing. But I play the game, not the forums, so I do care. CCP makes money from more subs, so they care.
I was a new player once and I am still going to say no
Reason: Its completely wrong, illogical, nonfactual, inconsistent, or just plan stupid. I have yet to be provided with a good reason to do this
(see how silly I look saying that  )
:)(: |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1860
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 16:23:00 -
[40] - Quote
...Must...refrain...from......
Ok, where were we, oh yes:
Thread locked.
The Rules:
11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.
25. Re-opening locked topics is prohibited.
Recreating or re-opening a thread that has been closed by a moderator is prohibited. Threads that have been closed by a moderator have been closed for the benefit of the community. Re-opening a locked thread will result in its removal.
ISD Ezwal
Captain
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |