|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 28 post(s) |
Acks
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
75
   |
Posted - 2014.07.20 16:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
MissPrissy wrote:Could someone clear this up for me please?
Is there or isn't there a stacking benefit for POS structures, like labs, assembly arrays etc.? It seems there is contradictory info out there from CCP. Last I heard they couldn't squeeze in the stacking benefit in this patch so it's been dropped "to be looked at later". If thatGÇÖs the case then there is no longer any point to having a HS POS larger than a small as you would only need 1 of each structure type or am I missing something?
They were going to do the POS module stacking thing. They decided it was not a good solution for this release so it is out for now. It may be revisited in upcoming releases.
As to Large vs Small. War decs and defense are still a factor. If you put industrial mods on a small you will not be having much of a defense. And a small is an easy target even when defended.
CCP Greyscale wrote:We had intended to implement a bonus for having multiple similar facilities of the same type at a given starbase. This was in fact implemented in a draft state, but there was no easy way to make it both user-friendly and well-performing (it was only updating once an hour), and given the relatively limited upsides it provided, we elected to cut it and focus the time that would've been spent bringing it up to an acceptable standard on polishing the rest of the release instead.
Link for truthiness:
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/eve-industry-all-you-want-to-know/
Go down to the "Things we AREN'T doing" section, second paragraph. |
Acks
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
75
|
Posted - 2014.07.23 21:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jonathan Yatolila wrote:and don't even talk about ore reprocessing. I went from 100% refine to 67%. This is really FUBAR!!!!! Someone in CCP really needs to fix - or better yet - undo this garbage.
Oh well, at least I used to focus on active Trade - and that is what i will be going back to -- but just watch CCP screw that up too.
With Max skills, +4% refining implant, and 50% refine station you get exact same perfect refine on ice. You get about 98% of previous on ore. You have to take into account the new ore batch sizes and the fact they increased the total mins in the ore. So yes, while in the UI it says you are getting 69% (or whatever), it is still possible to get the same amount of mins from the same amount of ore as before (or at least REALLY close). |
Acks
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
75
|
Posted - 2014.07.23 22:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:sell the compressed ice or ore and buy minerals/topes with the proceeds
Well yes.. my point was that IF you refine it is still possible to get almost identical outputs as before. You are correct though the sale of compressed ores will soon outstrip refined.
|
Acks
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
75
|
Posted - 2014.07.24 05:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jonathan Yatolila wrote:Acks wrote:Jonathan Yatolila wrote:and don't even talk about ore reprocessing. I went from 100% refine to 67%. This is really FUBAR!!!!! Someone in CCP really needs to fix - or better yet - undo this garbage.
Oh well, at least I used to focus on active Trade - and that is what i will be going back to -- but just watch CCP screw that up too.
With Max skills, +4% refining implant, and 50% refine station you get exact same perfect refine on ice. You get about 98% of previous on ore. You have to take into account the new ore batch sizes and the fact they increased the total mins in the ore. So yes, while in the UI it says you are getting 69% (or whatever), it is still possible to get the same amount of mins from the same amount of ore as before (or at least REALLY close). Thanks I will check that out on my alt that does the refine. Worst case scenario is that it will give me better refine than now. Will also have to check to see the ore/mineral refine results and compare them. I do hope you are correct - and if proven correct - I will gladly post a retraction - as it would give a real value then to the implant which prior had no real value. 
I verified on SISI 3 hours before the patch went live. I have not reverified post patch, but unless they seriously altered things in those last few hours it should still hold true. |
|
|
| |
|