|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1177
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 14:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Saar Ynier wrote:Giuseppe R Raimondo wrote:a way to reduce highsec ganking is to remove the option to turn in tags and buy your security status up. Everyone knew it was a stupied idea when introduced, i am supriced its still a thing I kind of have to agree here.
With people like this that don't even have a basic understanding of the game mechanics it's easy to see how CODE gets so many easy ganks.
When will they ever learn...
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1177
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 14:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lilly Naari wrote:Highsec PvPers are not in it for a shiny killboard, they want you to be so buthurt that you want to kill yourself in real life, and they love to feed off your pain. Your "Real" pain.
I don't think this is true at all. I've played with and against some nasty lowsec and highsec PVP'ers in Eve and they're awesome people in RL.
Eve is just a game... It is not real life. You're not in a real ship flying through space. It's a program on a computer.
If you're having trouble separating real life from a video game stop and get help immediately! Please don't harm yourself or someone else! No pixel in any game is worth someone getting hurt in real life. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1179
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 16:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Azov Rassau wrote:Helena Tiberius Mabata wrote:we provide content for people in high sec everywhere from the miners and haulers to the white knights themselves. ^ Confirming this as a "white knight" myself. I clearly see your contribution to Highsec and it's great because you create content for me, and at the same time, our presence creates content for you, too: There were times when, while protecting miners at a belt in a Falcon, I clearly realized that those miners didn't even deserve such protection, because they were AFK and protecting them seemed more and more like 'rewarding AFK laziness'. But then I remembered, it's not about protecting them only, but also creating fun content for myself and for gankers too. I mean, I remember waiting for hours (yes, that's how anti-ganking is), refreshing D-Scan approx. every 5 seconds, and then suddenly noticing a local spike followed by this. Imagine the sensation a patient and bored anti-ganker can get at that moment. It's even better if he manages to completely shut down about 7-8 of those Catalysts with Hypnos Ion Field ECM I and prevent the gank. I experienced those unforgettable moments many times and enjoyed every second of it. So yes, keep it up. You are making Highsec more interesting and 'alive'. It's hard to tolerate all that mass of drama balancing between real-life threats and role-play (including the "New Order"s creepy RP exaggeration, sorry), which is sometimes enough reason take a break from highsec (  ). We should play this great game to have fun, not to send insults and humiliations in local and online blogs or real life threats in EVE mails. 
I couldn't agree more. I love it that people are providing protection for miners. I love all kinds of PVP so adding more makes me happy.
As to RP I get into some of it and it also adds content. I think it's very important to keep it in game. It's fine to say "Pay me___ISK or I will destroy your ship and pod you" but not okay to say "You're a fat couch potato that needs to stop playing Eve". One is directed at the pilot and the other at the player.
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1179
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 17:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Wow this says it all.. Please please please read that blog if you haul, mine or whatever. Make yourself a "hard target".
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1185
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 05:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Froggy Storm wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:NoLife NoFriends StillPosting wrote:Suicide gankers do have it far too easy in EVE. Seems pretty unfair to everyone else who has to take risks for their rewards. The opposite is true. You know what's unfair? That people actually have to take it upon themselves to punish those who don't play the game correctly. That the game in and of itself is so easy that you can just afk autopilot through all of highsec, and if a player doesn't kill you, nothing will. They should implement rats that gatecamp in highsec. That'd solve that problem nicely. Now that is an idea that could be fun. Make it part of the whole empire losing its grip narrative as well. Make most gates a running battle between rats and faction police entities such that players need to be even more aware of the status of gates at all times. *gasp* Maybe even scouting in hisec will become a thing!!
Carebear response: But if I can't autopilot to Jita how will my stuff get there?... Do you really expect me to sit at my computer the whole time? |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1185
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 05:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Froggy Storm wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:NoLife NoFriends StillPosting wrote:Suicide gankers do have it far too easy in EVE. Seems pretty unfair to everyone else who has to take risks for their rewards. The opposite is true. You know what's unfair? That people actually have to take it upon themselves to punish those who don't play the game correctly. That the game in and of itself is so easy that you can just afk autopilot through all of highsec, and if a player doesn't kill you, nothing will. They should implement rats that gatecamp in highsec. That'd solve that problem nicely. Now that is an idea that could be fun. Make it part of the whole empire losing its grip narrative as well. Make most gates a running battle between rats and faction police entities such that players need to be even more aware of the status of gates at all times. *gasp* Maybe even scouting in hisec will become a thing!! Make burner mission rats spawn on gates. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1215
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 00:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Oh please push me.... ... push me sooo hard .....
.... oh pleeeaaaseee push me ...
.... oohh yeah.... yeah i like it ...
.... and punish me... oh god please punish me ... ... spank my candy ass so hard .... ... i deserve it so much ......
.... i am such a bad girl, please punish me ....... <3
So much this ^ |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1223
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 18:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
NoLife NoFriends StillPosting wrote:DJentropy Ovaert wrote:NoLife NoFriends StillPosting wrote: I typed in "EVE" and "Suicide ganker" into google and this game up.
par-+a-+site -êpar+Ö-îs-½t/ noun noun: parasite; plural noun: parasites
an organism that lives in or on another organism (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients (newer and casual players) at the host's (EVE's) expense.
Wait, you mean this is a video game where the weak beat the hell out of unaware(newer players, casuals). fixed for you. The reason you prey on noobs and casuals in HS instead of engaging in challenging targets is precisely because you are weak and are fearful of real pvp.
I'm going to answer this with something I said on another anti ganking thread
IIshira wrote: Eve is a PVP game. Like any game people want to win. Just because a player sucks at it doesn't mean someone else shouldn't try to win just as hard. "Oh I'm sorry you don't know how to fit your ship, read local, and have no clue what you're doing?... Okay I won't attack you then"
If someone is terrible at Eve (Or any game) should I try to be just as terrible so they have a "fair chance"?
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1223
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 18:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bottom line is this is a PVP focused game and that's not going to change. If you don't like PVP Eve isn't the game for you...
CCP knows this... I know this... You know this.. But people need a way to get their feelings out. They leave threads like this one open so people can vent their emotions in a healthy manner. I think if they keep the trolling to a minimum it can be a good discussion too. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1229
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 14:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
DJentropy Ovaert wrote:It's generally pointless. It's just another space lawyer who will come up with some wild idea, and when dozens of players who actually have a ton of experience with the subjects they are ranting on about correct them, and then CCP itself comes in and corrects them - they will always stick to their same original point, much like a dying man clings to a life raft. It's almost that they feel the more times they express a incorrect belief, the more correct it becomes.
You mean they have "I've been playing Eve for a few months and I know more than all of you and CCP combined" syndrome? 
With that crowd you can have every CCP dev in existence post in this thread saying they are incorrect and they'll still insist they're right. |
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1231
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 15:50:00 -
[11] - Quote
NoLife NoFriends StillPosting wrote:It is unfair
Wow you're so smart! Congratulations you figured it out! ..
Eve is unfair!... If you want "fair" I suggest you look for a different game. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1231
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 16:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Bronson Hughes wrote: 1. Folks below -5.0 sec status are pretty much denied all in-space activity in hisec except suicide ganking. They can't really stay in space long enough to do anything else without getting shot at.
This is a good point... Perhaps the penalty for suicide ganking is too severe that it prevents someone who wants to occasionally gank from doing anything else.
I did maybe 20 ganks on one of my pilots and now she has open kill rights and negative sec status. Even if I wanted to spend hundreds of millions for tags I have kill rights for 30 days...
So I could
1. Don't play on that pilot for 30 days then pay a few hundred million for tags to get my sec status up.
2. Keep ganking since it's about the only thing I can do in highsec
3. Move to nullsec then wait for the kill rights to go away while I'm working her sec status up.
The thing is how many new pilots that want to try ganking can afford option #1 or have option #3? I think most would just pick #2.
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1238
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 22:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
I just noticed one CODE pilot has gone missing...
If you click"View Profile" on the author of this post you will see that he "cannot be found"
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4999644#post4999644 |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1238
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 23:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ah sucky... I guess it's better than him just disappearing... I thought maybe he was "Deleted" or something.
I guess after 7 years his name is no longer acceptable |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1274
|
Posted - 2014.09.24 10:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Are you stupid?
I think the answer to that question is pretty obvious. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1276
|
Posted - 2014.09.24 15:41:00 -
[16] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:
They are not brain dead. They use neutral scouts to pick out targets, and will primary DPS ships that try to intervene. How long is your rail fit moa gonna survive when 5 T2 catalysts land on top of it?
What is broken is the fact that criminals can run freely around high security space with nothing more than a 15 minute timeout, regardless of how much carnage they cause. The suicide gankers are the risk averse ones, their exposure is capped at the cost of their cheap gank ship. Everyone else who flies ships that are worth something, and have a purpose beyond suicide ganking, are the real risk takers.
You have said repeatedly that you will only engage with someone who is already under fire from CONCORD, you have also stated you are proactive in terms of ganking avoidance, what risks are you talking about again? I'm not sure what you are trying to say. I fly expensive ships worth billions of isk, entering into a limited engagement with a ganker would entail major risk for me..
So you make fun of gankers for attacking targets that can't shoot back but you're too cowardly to do the same... Awesome
Actually having a limited engagement timer with another player is a scary thing...  |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1277
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 01:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Veers Belvar wrote: 2. Lose expensive blinged out ships on a regular basis
Ha ha, what?
If you're loosing ships on a regular basis doing anything other than suicide ganking you are just plain terrible. This just shows how far out in space Veers is. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1278
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 14:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Yes incursion SRPs are tiny and unused. And that virtually every community loses more than an expensive ship a day is totally false. Carry on.
I've done incursions for about a year and never lost a ship. Out of the many pilots that do incursions do some lose ships? Of course. I bet mining barges are lost to NPC belt rats on a regular basis if you count EVERYONE in Eve that mines...
My point was as a pilot if you are losing ships on a regular basis you are doing something wrong. I wasn't talking about EVERYONE that plays Incursions combined. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1278
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:00:00 -
[19] - Quote
I really hate those! |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1278
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 18:42:00 -
[20] - Quote
Iain Cariaba wrote:Omar Alharazaad wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Well, since Fabulous Rod and his latest alts have mysteriously disappeared once again(cough), I now name Veers Belvar as the new "Face of Doing It Wrong". The only way to win against Veers is to not play against Veers. As he has shown a tendency in the past to respond to EVERY post that disagrees with his wrong minded drivel, the only way YOU and all right minded posters can win when playing his game... is to not play his game. Do not respond. Ignore it and it will go away. It's hard, I know, being that oftentimes the crap that is spewed DEMANDS a response... it is still best to not. It's a test of temperance. But... but... the righteous indignation and hard headed belief in his own delusions of mediocrity make for such amusing threads to read. Veers ranks right up there with Dinsdale, Dryson, and Gevlon in sheer hilarity of shiptoasts.
No way! Veers Belvar maybe at a safe spot but Dyson is at an unscanable spot so far off the grid not even he knows where he's at.
|
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1279
|
Posted - 2014.10.05 14:53:00 -
[21] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:That's hilarious - nullsec is vastly more profitable than highsec....especially in the ultr-safe blue donut.
You're making me hungry and I need to lose weight!
So nullsec shouldn't be more profitable than highsec?
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1314
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 11:46:14 -
[22] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:CODE Agent AC wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Hahaha, I thought the isd incinerated this thread months ago. hands up, whose the necromancer, I'm looking at you anal canal . I thought that this thread would be like a nice wine that gets better with age. That would require it having been a nice wine in the first place. You know, instead of makeshift, halfassed prison liquor, fermented behind a radiator.
Don't knock good radiator made booze till you try it :D |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1316
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 20:56:20 -
[23] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:IIshira wrote: Don't knock good radiator made booze till you try it :D
I've had that, and seen worse besides. I once had someone make the most wretched cocktail I have ever encountered in my whole life in front of me. Hand sanitizer, kosher salt and generic orange sports drink powder. I could barely disguise my revulsion, and I did not partake. For which my brain cells thanked me.
I think this was a wise decision on your part... Homemade booze isn't toxic if made correctly... Hand sanitizer can be deadly depending on the type of alcohol and other ingredients. I guess both carry a risk but one is intended for drinking and the other isn't.
I know people that tried moonshine just to say they did it but I don't think anyone would be impressed if someone said "I've tried hand sanitizer" lol |
|
|
|