Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Enthropic
Infinite Point Nulli Secunda
92
|
Posted - 2014.08.04 07:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
this will lead to less PvE and PvP activity in WHs, there are countless posts in this thread explaining why.
CCP you never cease to surprise me. Undo this please asap and either leave WHs mechanics as they are because they are one of the few aspects of the game that you did NOT f... up with your changes and 'rebalancing'
if you want to give WHers some love then create something new and exciting for us, something that is fun to do while you wait for your corpmates to log in. New sites to run for example. Or dedicated pvp systems, where groups can connect to and brawl and have fun, there are thousands of ideas.
simply changing working mechanics because you have no insipration to add something really new to the game is not creating fun for anyone.
PLEASE RECONSIDER THIS xxxxed up idea you implemented on Sisi |

Enthropic
Infinite Point Nulli Secunda
92
|
Posted - 2014.08.04 07:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Maybe I am not understanding this correctly but the idea I'm getting is CCP is trying to prevent people from opening up a wormhole, seeing something they do not like for whatever reason and able to instantly roll it.
people should ask themselves why actually it is a bad idea that people can closing a wh that they dont like.
carebears want to close connections to run sites in peace - win gankers want to roll their static to kill carebears - win
consequenc: carebears can play and run sites, gankers get a chance to shoot
everbody wins
if you limit this, you get less pve content that people enjoy, and consequently less pvp targets
I dont get it |

Enthropic
Infinite Point Nulli Secunda
94
|
Posted - 2014.08.04 10:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Winthorp wrote: I have never seen half the people in this thread bitching about how this is so game breaking ever come to Wh forums to come to discuss any WH mechanics or ideas until their perfect little world of insta rolling away issues is threatened.
People don't complain about things they consider to be working reasonably well... Do you think this change will result in more activity in wormhole space (more wormhole connections, more people running sites, more people rolling) or less? Please explain your answer.
indeed. I would like to hear your answer as well, Winthorp.
|

Enthropic
Infinite Point Nulli Secunda
96
|
Posted - 2014.08.05 07:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dear CCP
I have voiced my own opinion on this change several times now in this thread, so have many others. I did not have the time to read through all the posts here, but it seems to be out of the question that the vast majority of players are very much against this change.
I realize this is your game CCP, and you can do what you think is best, but can such a heated discussion not simply be resolved based on a player vote?
If you announce such a vote and create a simple forum poll, would that not tell you what your players really want? Based on the outcome, you can then say you did (or hopefully did not..) change the WH spawn distance variable based on player feedback.
You cant make everyone happy, but you could at least try to make most of us happy. |
|
|