Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23761
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:25:00 -
[61] - Quote
O2 jayjay wrote:MAYBE YOU HAVE A ISSUE WITH READING. No. But you have removed any and all doubt that you are in any way anything that could even be remotely and massively generously be described as literate.
GǪisn't the topic. The topic is muliboxing. What do they say about multiboxing? GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ
Quote:Problem is players are not using MULTI computers Irrelevant. At no point do they say that you must use multiple computers. Again, the topic is multiboxing. And what do they say about multiboxing? Oh right. GÇ£Lastly, multiboxing is allowedGÇ¥
There. You lost. You are wrong. You are incapable of reading even the most simple statement. Live with it. If possible, overcome it, but your incompetence will no doubt make that entirely impossible so you should probably seek some kind of disability support. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
14
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:27:00 -
[62] - Quote
Rhivre wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:
MAYBE YOU HAVE A ISSUE WITH READING.
Synergy allows you to move your mouse cursor to multiple different monitors which are hooked up to different computers and we do not have any qualms with players using the program for this purpose.
DONT KNOW HOW TO MAKE IT ANY MORE DUMMY STYLE FOR YOU! THAT AS BROKEN DOWN AS I CAN GET FOR YOU
Here is the magic thing... it allows YOU with YOUR mouse cursor to do things. Step away from your mouse/keyboard and see if synergy does anything for you :)
Please respond with a better argument. I have bold and underline the most important part of that statement and you completely ignored it. |
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
14
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:29:00 -
[63] - Quote
Tippia wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:MAYBE YOU HAVE A ISSUE WITH READING. No. But you have removed any and all doubt that you are in any way anything that could even be remotely and massively generously be described as literate. GǪisn't the topic. The topic is muliboxing. What do they say about multiboxing? GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ Quote:Problem is players are not using MULTI computers Irrelevant. At no point do they say that you must use multiple computers. Again, the topic is multiboxing. And what do they say about multiboxing? Oh right. GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ There. You lost. You are wrong. You are incapable of reading even the most simple statement. Live with it. If possible, overcome it, but your incompetence will no doubt make that entirely impossible so you should probably seek some kind of disability support.
-_- that is an old Multi boxing program and dude i copied and paste the GM respond. please read the OP as it has all that information in it. |
Barzai Mekhar
True Confusion
161
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
O2 jayjay wrote:Barzai Mekhar wrote:O2 jayjay wrote: This is a little bit confusing. I Bold some keywords that were written by GM Lelouch. Now the question remains. Do you need to be on different computers when Multi boxing as stated before. Also the rules need to be rewritten to clarify that more clearly to sum up any confusions and to stop reoccurring.
Well, obviously multiboxing is only allowed when done excatly the way described, using MULTIPLE computer with MULTIPLE screens. Multiple computers with a single screen are a bannable offence. This is very clear from the context, while phrases like " Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed." are very vague and easily misinterpreted. Problem is players are not using MULTI computers and are still playing the game which is the reason of this post. rules need to be the same as stated in OP. If you are going to ban bot-ing then players need to be ban for same computer multi boxing. 90% of multi boxers are doing is buying another screen or having one screen and logging into all 10 accounts. the program issues the same command to all 9 account while he controls one account which is breaking there rules. That isnt fair to others that are getting banned
It always makes me happy when people get exactly what I'm saying.
Synergy was a specific example.
A general ruling not specifying the need for multiple computers was also given.
General ruling > specific example. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23761
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:30:00 -
[65] - Quote
O2 jayjay wrote:Please respond with better arguments. I have bold and underline the most important part of that statement and you completely ignored it. You mean the part that proves you wrong? The part where it clearly and unambiguously says GÇ£Lastly, multiboxing is allowedGÇ¥?
Yeah. You completely ignored that one. So let's make it clear:
Multiboxing is allowed.
This has always been their policy and it remains their policy. You will never find them saying anything else unless you massively mangle what they say by wilfully misquoting and misinterpreting those official statements.
Quote:that is an old Multi boxing program GǪwhich is allowed sinceGǪ
GǪwait for itGǪ
GÇ£Lastly, multiboxing is allowedGÇ¥. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
Yarda Black
The Black Redemption
339
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:33:00 -
[66] - Quote
So....
If I open Excel 2 times and work on two spreadsheet, Microsoft will go nuts?
I get the software part. ISBoxing may be a grey area? (havent really kept up with that discussion to be honest)
But running more than 1 client is not breaking the EULA. That agreement is applied to every instance of the software seperately.
As a matter of fact; you can break the EULA with 1 client/account by using a botprogram for example, but not break it with another (manual play). |
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
14
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:34:00 -
[67] - Quote
From these replies are players that are Multi Boxing on a single computer. They are still playing the game and are not banned. They are posting saying "you dont have to use Multi computers". As stated before it is alittle confusing and i think the rules need to be written more clearly. As for now can we have players that was ban for bot-ing get a warning and have the rules written alittle more clearly? Thank you for your time. |
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
14
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:35:00 -
[68] - Quote
Yarda Black wrote:So....
If I open Excel 2 times and work on two spreadsheet, Microsoft will go nuts?
I get the software part. ISBoxing may be a grey area? (havent really kept up with that discussion to be honest)
But running more than 1 client is not breaking the EULA. That agreement is applied to every instance of the software seperately.
As a matter of fact; you can break the EULA with 1 client/account by using a botprogram for example, but not break it with another (manual play).
Here is another person that thinking Multi boxing on a single computer isnt against the rules. |
Rhivre
TarNec Invisible Exchequer
789
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:36:00 -
[69] - Quote
I completely ignored it because the topic of the thread is multiboxing, and you are unable to understand the difference between multiboxing and botting.
Synergy allows you to effectively remote desktop smoothly. Isboxer allows you to control multiple clients.
Your problem with Synergy would indicate that if I log in 3 remote desktop apps in different locations, and start an eve client in all of them, then I am botting because I am using 1 mouse (the one plugged to my PC) to control a desktop in say Germany or France.
Fluffy Bunny Pic! |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7519
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:36:00 -
[70] - Quote
I find myself embarrassed for people who do things wrong (lol, im sorry, I mean the OP's "friend") and then try to play rules lawyer after they get caught.
CCP says Isboxer (and whatever else)is fine. don't like it, screw off somewhere else and stop paying them. This is your only recourse OP, because if you thought you were gonna come here and drum up support for a mutiny against CCP, you thought wrong.
I tried isboxer once and boy was that tedious, so if you can use it well, more power to you. |
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23763
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:36:00 -
[71] - Quote
O2 jayjay wrote:Here is another person that thinking Multi boxing on a single computer isnt against the rules. Why would he think that it is when there is nothing to even remotely suggest that it would be and multiple GM statements that all explicitly allow it?
Quote:As for now can we have players that was ban for bot-ing get a warning and have the rules written alittle more clearly? What's unclear about them? You are not allowed to automate or accelerate gameplay. Multiboxing isn't even connected to those things. Are you also confused as to whether or not you're allowed to drink heavily while playing since doing so may make you have a warped sense of time? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
Yokai Mitsuhide
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5460
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:36:00 -
[72] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:I'm running 3 clients as I write this post. Can somebody report me, please!
I don't mind seeing people that do that, but I once saw one guy undock with like 40-50 exhumers, and I died a little inside. |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
3625
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:37:00 -
[73] - Quote
Tippia, can i have this ones femur when your done? I'm making a cane and i think it would suite for a handle. =][= |
De'Veldrin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
2767
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:37:00 -
[74] - Quote
Notorious Fellon wrote: CCP could actually declare that rule #1 in the Eula means "You may not ride an albino alpaca while mining".
Charlie is going to be so sad that I can't ride him anymore while I mine. At least I can still ride him while I pvp. De'Veldrin's Corallary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null. |
Barzai Mekhar
True Confusion
161
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:38:00 -
[75] - Quote
O2 jayjay wrote:From these replies are players that are Multi Boxing on a single computer. They are still playing the game and are not banned. They are posting saying "you dont have to use Multi computers". As stated before it is alittle confusing and i think the rules need to be written more clearly. As for now can we have players that was ban for bot-ing get a warning and have the rules written alittle more clearly? Thank you for your time.
The rules on multiboxing are confusing, therefore punishment for botting needs to be relaxed!
In other news, telling policemen to drop the speeding ticket because the manual of the radio is confusing doesn't work either. |
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:39:00 -
[76] - Quote
Tippia wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:Please respond with better arguments. I have bold and underline the most important part of that statement and you completely ignored it. You mean the part that proves you wrong? The part where it clearly and unambiguously says GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ? Yeah. You completely ignored that one. So let's make it clear: Multiboxing is allowed. This has always been their policy and it remains their policy. You will never find them saying anything else unless you massively mangle what they say by wilfully misquoting and misinterpreting those official statements. Quote:that is an old Multi boxing program GǪwhich is allowed sinceGǪ GǪwait for itGǪ GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ.
It seems you dont understand the part where you have to use different computers. I got the fact that Multi boxing is allowed on different computer but as many other are posting you can log in on the same computer and multi box is acceptable. which in all actuality isnt. As posted earlier, A GM said as long as different computer were used, CCP didnt have a problem with Multi boxers. I will update the OP to clearly explain this. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23763
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:39:00 -
[77] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Tippia, can i have this ones femur when your done? I'm making a cane and i think it would suite for a handle. You can have the whole thing. Just boil it good and apply some lye or something afterwards because I think there might be something hideously wrong with it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
Paranoid Loyd
1200
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:43:00 -
[78] - Quote
The word dense comes to mind. "PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
3625
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:44:00 -
[79] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Tippia, can i have this ones femur when your done? I'm making a cane and i think it would suite for a handle. You can have the whole thing. Just boil it good and apply some lye or something afterwards because I think there might be something hideously wrong with it. Its all good, my fedo has been Eyeing the tourist in my hold lustfully for a while so that's 2 problems solved =][= |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23763
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:44:00 -
[80] - Quote
O2 jayjay wrote:It seems you dont understand the part where you have to use different computers. It seems you don't understand that there is no part. It doesn't exist. It's something you've dreamt up. At no point is anything of the kind said. The number of computers does not matter.
Quote:I got the fact that Multi boxing is allowed No, you didn't, or you wouldn't be off on this hallucination-born tangent of yours where the number of computers is in any way relevant to the proceedings.
Quote:A GM said as long as different computer were using CCP didnt have a problem with Multi boxers. Nope. That is not what the GM said. It is something you've made up because your ignorant claims were so thoroughly demolished upon their first contact with reality and you are desperate to claw out some tiny shred of a morsel that could GÇö at least at cursory glance GÇö be misinterpreted as you being a teeeeensy bit right about somehting.
None of that will happen. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
|
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
662
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:47:00 -
[81] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:While I sympathize and happen to think that tools like isboxer should be banned, CCP does not feel the same way and draw a clear distinction between multiboxing and botting. Your friend was botting, which is a no-no. Get isboxer, get fleet of miners, mine all you like and only visit your computer every 15min or so to do stuff. Its sickening, but its the rules. Thankfully there is also the New Order of Hisec, and their own set of rules to bring balance to hisec mining. You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play. You may not rewrite or modify the user interface or otherwise manipulate data in any way to acquire items, currency, objects, character attributes or beneficial actions not actually acquired or achieved in the Game. written clear as day. this was copied and past from eve website http://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-eula/ Since isboxer on its own isn't using macros or stored rapid keystrokes, CCP has said it is a-ok. Isboxer does send your input to multiple windows at a time, but since it is you doing it, they don't have a problem with it. Since it is their rules governing your behavior, they are free to make exceptions whenever they like. IS boxer is third party software used to manipulate the game. No getting around it other than CCP allows it. Fact is they benefit from the subs so they choose to allow it.
Eve is the property of CCP. Vote with your feet and or wallet if you donGÇÖt agree with their hypocrisy.
|
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:48:00 -
[82] - Quote
Barzai Mekhar wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:Barzai Mekhar wrote:O2 jayjay wrote: This is a little bit confusing. I Bold some keywords that were written by GM Lelouch. Now the question remains. Do you need to be on different computers when Multi boxing as stated before. Also the rules need to be rewritten to clarify that more clearly to sum up any confusions and to stop reoccurring.
Well, obviously multiboxing is only allowed when done excatly the way described, using MULTIPLE computer with MULTIPLE screens. Multiple computers with a single screen are a bannable offence. This is very clear from the context, while phrases like " Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed." are very vague and easily misinterpreted. Problem is players are not using MULTI computers and are still playing the game which is the reason of this post. rules need to be the same as stated in OP. If you are going to ban bot-ing then players need to be ban for same computer multi boxing. 90% of multi boxers are doing is buying another screen or having one screen and logging into all 10 accounts. the program issues the same command to all 9 account while he controls one account which is breaking there rules. That isnt fair to others that are getting banned It always makes me happy when people get exactly what I'm saying.Synergy was a specific example. <- sorry bro but it was an example of a Multi boxing program. They just used that one since it was the most popular A general ruling not specifying the need for multiple computers was also given. General ruling > specific example.
|
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:50:00 -
[83] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:While I sympathize and happen to think that tools like isboxer should be banned, CCP does not feel the same way and draw a clear distinction between multiboxing and botting. Your friend was botting, which is a no-no. Get isboxer, get fleet of miners, mine all you like and only visit your computer every 15min or so to do stuff. Its sickening, but its the rules. Thankfully there is also the New Order of Hisec, and their own set of rules to bring balance to hisec mining. You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play. You may not rewrite or modify the user interface or otherwise manipulate data in any way to acquire items, currency, objects, character attributes or beneficial actions not actually acquired or achieved in the Game. written clear as day. this was copied and past from eve website http://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-eula/ Since isboxer on its own isn't using macros or stored rapid keystrokes, CCP has said it is a-ok. Isboxer does send your input to multiple windows at a time, but since it is you doing it, they don't have a problem with it. Since it is their rules governing your behavior, they are free to make exceptions whenever they like. IS boxer is third party software used to manipulate the game. No getting around it other than CCP allows it. Fact is they benefit from the subs so they choose to allow it. Eve is the property of CCP. Vote with your feet and or wallet if you donGÇÖt agree with their hypocrisy.
Please Read OP. It contains CCP response and what they allow and dont allow. |
xalongskam
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:50:00 -
[84] - Quote
O2 jayjay wrote:Tippia wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:Please respond with better arguments. I have bold and underline the most important part of that statement and you completely ignored it. You mean the part that proves you wrong? The part where it clearly and unambiguously says GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ? Yeah. You completely ignored that one. So let's make it clear: Multiboxing is allowed. This has always been their policy and it remains their policy. You will never find them saying anything else unless you massively mangle what they say by wilfully misquoting and misinterpreting those official statements. Quote:that is an old Multi boxing program GǪwhich is allowed sinceGǪ GǪwait for itGǪ GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ. It seems you dont understand the part where you have to use different computers. I got the fact that Multi boxing is allowed on different computer but as many other are posting you can log in on the same computer and multi box is acceptable. which in all actuality isnt. As posted earlier, A GM said as long as different computer were used, CCP didnt have a problem with Multi boxers. I will update the OP to clearly explain this.
Dude, use some common sense. 1. The post we are discussing was said to be OUTDATED. 2. Why would CCP care how many computers you use? It does not affect their game in any way. You are paying them to be able to play. They don't care how much you pay for your electricity or how often you go to your local computer store to buy a new machine.
You are obviously just trying to find a point that you can make, since the original point of your thread was already disproven.
On the other hand, if your friend was banned for using botting software, that's a whole different thing. Just compare it to what I said above: 1. The rule that botting is forbidden is NOT OUTDATED. 2. Botting affects the game very much by injecting ISK and items into the economy that otherwise wouldn't be there.
In the end your call that "every rule breaker should be banned" is nonsense. This is because 1. Multiboxing on 1 computer is no break of a rule, once more, this post is said to be OUTDATED. 2. Botting with let's say 5 accounts is as bad as for example breaking rule 18 (by copy-pasting a petition for example) and therefore you should be permabanned in both cases right? I believe that's also why theft and murder are punished the same way in rl, because in both cases you are "breaking the rules", OH WAIT ...
Also rule 26: We reserve the right to ban any user from the game without refund or compensation.
Deal with it.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23769
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:52:00 -
[85] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:IS boxer is third party software used to manipulate the game. No getting around it other than CCP allows it. There's also no getting around the fact that there's nothing to suggest that they would disallow it. There is no rule against using third-party software to manipulate the game, after all (unless you only mean GÇ£manipulateGÇ¥ in the sense of GÇ£modifyGÇ¥, but there's a specific rule for that and it doesn't care one whit about third-party software anyway). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
Yarda Black
The Black Redemption
339
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:56:00 -
[86] - Quote
10 seconds on the internet and over 2 years old:
http://joethemultiboxer.com/2012/04/politics-and-multiboxing-in-eve-online/ |
De'Veldrin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
2771
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:56:00 -
[87] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Tippia, can i have this ones femur when your done? I'm making a cane and i think it would suite for a handle. You can have the whole thing. Just boil it good and apply some lye or something afterwards because I think there might be something hideously wrong with it.
@ Tippia: Sadly, you cannot fix stupid.
@ the OP: While it does suck that ... ahem your uh "friend" got banned - actually, you know what? It doesn't. Botting is not and never has been allowed by CCP. Good on them for banning "your friend". Personally, I hope it was a perma ban for multiple infractions.
That said, CCP has repeatedly, clearly, and decisively said that Multi-boxing is allowed. ISBoxer is allowed to be used to manage those multi-boxing sessions, so long as they do not automate game play (which is what bots do, for the record).
Please, give in to your outrage over this and unsubscribe - the game will be better off, and no one here will miss you.
Reported for discussing moderation, bans, and for being a dumb ass repetitive thread on a topic that has been discussed to ******* death. De'Veldrin's Corallary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null. |
O2 jayjay
Tres Corvi INC. Mordus Angels
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:59:00 -
[88] - Quote
xalongskam wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:Tippia wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:Please respond with better arguments. I have bold and underline the most important part of that statement and you completely ignored it. You mean the part that proves you wrong? The part where it clearly and unambiguously says GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ? Yeah. You completely ignored that one. So let's make it clear: Multiboxing is allowed. This has always been their policy and it remains their policy. You will never find them saying anything else unless you massively mangle what they say by wilfully misquoting and misinterpreting those official statements. Quote:that is an old Multi boxing program GǪwhich is allowed sinceGǪ GǪwait for itGǪ GǣLastly, multiboxing is allowedGǥ. It seems you dont understand the part where you have to use different computers. I got the fact that Multi boxing is allowed on different computer but as many other are posting you can log in on the same computer and multi box is acceptable. which in all actuality isnt. As posted earlier, A GM said as long as different computer were used, CCP didnt have a problem with Multi boxers. I will update the OP to clearly explain this. Dude, use some common sense. 1. The post we are discussing was said to be OUTDATED. 2. Why would CCP care how many computers you use? It does not affect their game in any way. You are paying them to be able to play. They don't care how much you pay for your electricity or how often you go to your local computer store to buy a new machine. You are obviously just trying to find a point that you can make, since the original point of your thread was already disproven. On the other hand, if your friend was banned for using botting software, that's a whole different thing. Just compare it to what I said above: 1. The rule that botting is forbidden is NOT OUTDATED. 2. Botting affects the game very much by injecting ISK and items into the economy that otherwise wouldn't be there. In the end your call that "every rule breaker should be banned" is nonsense. This is because 1. Multiboxing on 1 computer is no break of a rule, once more, this post is said to be OUTDATED. 2. Botting with let's say 5 accounts is as bad as for example breaking rule 18 (by copy-pasting a petition for example) and therefore you should be permabanned in both cases right? I believe that's also why theft and murder are punished the same way in rl, because in both cases you are "breaking the rules", OH WAIT ... Also rule 26: We reserve the right to ban any user from the game without refund or compensation. Deal with it.
Yes i saw the part where it said that it was out dated. I have stated that that part confused me but deleted it from the OP. Also I didnt copy and paste a pention and this isnt a pention. this is a post in the General discussion which I am making very valid points. Another thing if your post about CCP not caring about Multi boxing because they make isk (which isnt the case since players will multi box incursions by themselves and plex all accounts. then why the perma ban for a player botting? wouldnt a 30 day ban get the point across? and if he was mining then take away all the ore that player mined with the 30 day ban. perma ban = no more $$ for CCP from that sucriber which makes less profit. If that is outdated then that means the EUAL is still in effect which you cannot use a program that will manipulate currency/ game play/ ect.
|
Bloody Slave
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
138
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 17:59:00 -
[89] - Quote
Tippia wrote:O2 jayjay wrote:It seems you dont understand the part where you have to use different computers. It seems you don't understand that there is no part. It doesn't exist. It's something you've dreamt up. At no point is anything of the kind said. The number of computers does not matter. Quote:I got the fact that Multi boxing is allowed No, you didn't, or you wouldn't be off on this hallucination-born tangent of yours where the number of computers is in any way relevant to the proceedings. Quote:A GM said as long as different computer were using CCP didnt have a problem with Multi boxers. Nope. That is not what the GM said. It is something you've made up because your ignorant claims were so thoroughly demolished upon their first contact with reality and you are desperate to claw out some tiny shred of a morsel that could GÇö at least at cursory glance GÇö be misinterpreted as you being a teeeeensy bit right about somehting. None of that will happen.
Tippia, you are not making any sense for him/her.
This is, clearly, a problem with:
1) Language;
2) Age;
3) Disability; or
4) all of the above.
Just report for discussing ban and move on.
If your balls are hurt and bleeding don't sit in a pool full of piranhas (note to myself: don't complain in GD) |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23774
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 18:02:00 -
[90] - Quote
Since the OP has edited the OP to add in even more blatant lies, I suppose it's best to address those head on.
O2 jayjay wrote:To stop any confusion, Multi boxing on seperate computers is allowed according to GM Lelouch but on the same computer isn't. Wrong. You know that it's not allowed to misrepresent CCP officials right? That is not what GM Lelouch said at all, and you know it. Instead, it is you incorrectly reinterpreting a positive statement into a negation that was never even remotely suggested.
Quote:Please dont post about CCP allowing Multi boxing on the same computer. Why not? Because it would prove you wrong and shatter your fantasy world?
The fact remains: multiboxing is allowed. The number of computers used is not a factor. You are lying about what a GM has said in an official capacity, and this can end as badly for you as it did for your friend. You going up in flames over something that idiotic just because your buddy was rightfully banned for botting is not a good way to go.
Accept the fact that you are wrong and let it rest. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |