|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2098
|
Posted - 2014.08.16 23:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Faeana wrote: it's not balanced and it's why the belts are full of skiffs. it's balanced because even a max yield skiff has less yield than a hulk.
Well, not really, because if 5x the tank = balance then a hulk should have something like 5x the yield.
The idea behind the boosts, was that players would take it to dangerous players to mine, well apparently the most dangerous part of eve is multiboxing belts in highsec..  ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2098
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 02:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Zero Sum Gain wrote:Cerisia wrote:The way I see it is that they pay for all those accounts and therefore have the right (imo) to do what they like with them. If they are eating up all your ice then why not war dec them?
That is after all, the way the game is supposed to work..... Oh come on, does it really have to be said they're in npc corps? That just means there is a problem with npc corps.......
There's no problem with NPC corps, without NPC corps people would just flood to the biggest alliance there is, thats if the continue to play.
Ganking counters blobs as well as, bots, and afkers. The only problem is an extremely over-tanked ship that let you afk/bot away in extreme safety, especially in massive multi-boxed fleets. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2098
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 05:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudflation
Before you cheer too much. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2099
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 21:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:It's a well known fact that most bots operate in highsec as miners. Kicking highsec mining in the nuts kicks highsec botting in the nuts. No ice, Veldspar & Scordite only in 50% less quantities.
Without botting highsec, how will a typical goonpet support himself? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2099
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 00:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Heinrich Erquilenne wrote:Blame multiboxing (and greed from CCP) not ships. Mining without a max tank procurer or skill in nullsec would be suicidal. These are pvp barges. Deal with it. Then we can start to complain about the real issue: how long will ccp allow something that greately lowers the enjoyment of many players for some cash? How's driving players who don't want to play an army of bots out of the game an interesting policy?
Hate to break it to you but banning multi-boxing directly leads to less players and more bots. If CCP wants players to take Skiffs to dangerous areas, then a tank isn't what it needs. You can give the Skiff 5x the tank it has now and people still won't take it to dangerous and unmined areas because unless a complete idiot flies into you, the only thing the tank does is delay your inevitable destruction. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2100
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Mining, huh...
Guess I should look into isboxer, apparently it's quite "the bomb".
Should be expect a Goonminer invasion of highsec soon? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
|
|
|