Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Anal Canal
The Conference Elite CODE.
26
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 03:48:00 -
[91] - Quote
I thought they were defeated by the scissor technique. My sources might be false though. |

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
684
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 04:21:00 -
[92] - Quote
Binah 369 wrote:CODE. is insignificant. They always have been and they always will be. I am not sure why there was any anticipation of any other result than what ended up happening. Did people really expect them to fight against ships with guns?
The moment they form a real fleet (even a rifter blob would be fine by me) and come out to null is the moment they will have my attention and respect. whoa the respect of binah 369, noted person people care about
that's some serious stuff |

Serene Repose
1522
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 04:42:00 -
[93] - Quote
What exactly happened to CODE? Why, they showed us who they really are. They also showed us what ganking miners really is. Think about it. If THEY can do it, then....but we've wasted SO much bandwidth on CODE. They are what happen when you leave a huge HOLE in your stuff. Trying to build an empire off the suicide gank? Noooooo. They never had it in them to think that thought! Trying to SEEM like they've built an empire off the suicide gank? Now you're talking.
What happened to CODE happens to us all. Some of us can meet the moment. Some of us cannot:
Eventually, life delivers unto you the "Put up or shut up" moment.
CODE's came. CODE went. Those of you who thought there was more to them than this need to recalibrate your thinking. I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-á |

Anal Canal
The Conference Elite CODE.
26
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:05:00 -
[94] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:What exactly happened to CODE? Why, they showed us who they really are. They also showed us what ganking miners really is. Think about it. If THEY can do it, then....but we've wasted SO much bandwidth on CODE. They are what happens when you leave a huge HOLE in your stuff. Trying to build an empire off the suicide gank? Noooooo. They never had it in them to think that thought! Trying to SEEM like they've built an empire off the suicide gank? Now you're talking. What happened to CODE happens to us all. Some of us can meet the moment. Some of us cannot: Eventually, life delivers unto you the "Put up or shut up" moment. CODE's came. CODE went. Those of you who thought there was more to them than this need to recalibrate your thinking. Oh yes, and the AT is rigged. But, I've been saying that for YEARS.
Do you know where the Eve Bank is? I seem to have lost my way point. |

mow hawk
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:10:00 -
[95] - Quote
Heman Skeletor wrote:Everyone here seems to gloss over the probable financial motives they would have to not show up to this match. 
You mean the match that someone else had to pay their way for?
I find this more interesting than them backing out, actually. I thought that an alliance that has kills and loot of such high value would be able to buy its way in... but I guess that's another mystery of CODE.... Where does the money go? |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
3415
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:46:00 -
[96] - Quote
Kayagainen Iwalula wrote:Why didn't they field thrashers and nados instead? If they were dead-set on fielding a gank squad they should have had the foresight to know that someone would have banned their signature ships.
If the goal of entering the AT was to win, yes, we would have fielded Vexors/Ishtars/Navy Vexors/Dominixes or something like that. Lots of our mains have decent drone skills since I've been pushing people to train into gank Vexor fits.
If the goal of entering was to have fun and cause hilarious stories for almost all of EVE to laugh with, we'd have forfeited.
If some of us had bet on a 100-0 whelping, we might also have forfeited.
If RvB or a third party offered us good ISK, we might have forfeited.
Draw your own conclusions.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=346564 - a proposal to overhaul the Logistics skill https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. www.minerbumping.com - ganking miners and causing chaos |

Elsa Hayes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:50:00 -
[97] - Quote
Jebediah Phoenix wrote:I would like to congratulate Code. for generating the most discussion of an alliance tournament match in the history of the event. A greater victory could not have been achieved had Code. "won" the tournament outright. Once again speculation is rife within the Eve online community about everyone's favourite pantomime villain corp, keeping the metagame alive and well.
Code. have brought the metagame to this annual event that has otherwise suffered from failing at demonstrating this key element of Eve. Praise James 315, may he and Code. continue to improve Eve through the metagame for many years to come, they and others like them are what set this game apart from all others.
People also talked about Mr Hands......... There is fame and there is........"fame" |

Binah 369
Ripshitz and Killit LLC
9
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:02:00 -
[98] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:Binah 369 wrote:CODE. is insignificant. They always have been and they always will be. I am not sure why there was any anticipation of any other result than what ended up happening. Did people really expect them to fight against ships with guns?
The moment they form a real fleet (even a rifter blob would be fine by me) and come out to null is the moment they will have my attention and respect. whoa the respect of binah 369, noted person people care about that's some serious stuff
Insignificant troll from insignificant pilot is still insignificant. Go figure. |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
186
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:10:00 -
[99] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Mister Marram wrote:Quote:He decided to gank freighters instead. :v: Well given you don't have an unlimited amount of time and the two options of some kind of setup WOW-style arena PvP Tournament v.s. real Tranquility elite Freighter PvP, how can you blame us for going with the real stuff?
Relevant.
 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
20182
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:11:00 -
[100] - Quote
Binah 369 wrote:Retar Aveymone wrote:Binah 369 wrote:CODE. is insignificant. They always have been and they always will be. I am not sure why there was any anticipation of any other result than what ended up happening. Did people really expect them to fight against ships with guns?
The moment they form a real fleet (even a rifter blob would be fine by me) and come out to null is the moment they will have my attention and respect. whoa the respect of binah 369, noted person people care about that's some serious stuff Insignificant troll from insignificant pilot is still insignificant. Go figure. That applies as much to your post as it does to his tbh  Never hold your farts in. They travel up your spine and into the brain, where they ferment. They then migrate to your keyboard via your fingers. That's where shiptoasts come from.
Nil mortifi sine lucre. |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
186
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:15:00 -
[101] - Quote
Jebediah Phoenix wrote:Chopper Rollins wrote:Jebediah Phoenix wrote:I would like to congratulate Code. for generating the most discussion of an alliance tournament match in the history of the event. A greater victory could not have been achieved had Code. "won" the tournament outright. Once again speculation is rife within the Eve online community about everyone's favourite pantomime villain corp, keeping the metagame alive and well.
Code. have brought the metagame to this annual event that has otherwise suffered from failing at demonstrating this key element of Eve. Praise James 315, may he and Code. continue to improve Eve through the metagame for many years to come, they and others like them are what set this game apart from all others. POSSIBLY AN ALT GåæGåæGåæGåæ I'm getting good at this. No this is my main and if you check my employment history you'll find I was in Code. until 8 days ago.
Then, AT was on the horizon and you were supposed to be on the team? |

Binah 369
Ripshitz and Killit LLC
9
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:16:00 -
[102] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Binah 369 wrote:Retar Aveymone wrote:Binah 369 wrote:CODE. is insignificant. They always have been and they always will be. I am not sure why there was any anticipation of any other result than what ended up happening. Did people really expect them to fight against ships with guns?
The moment they form a real fleet (even a rifter blob would be fine by me) and come out to null is the moment they will have my attention and respect. whoa the respect of binah 369, noted person people care about that's some serious stuff Insignificant troll from insignificant pilot is still insignificant. Go figure. That applies as much to your post as it does to his tbh 
Did I suggest otherwise? 
|

Anal Canal
The Conference Elite CODE.
28
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:24:00 -
[103] - Quote
The lack of points prevent my premier of the 'Code Combat Orca'... |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5332
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:49:00 -
[104] - Quote
The Great Karnak predicts much controversy. Bring back DEEEEP Space! |

Tyburn Stannis
Xenon Salvage Inc.
133
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 06:59:00 -
[105] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: If the goal of entering the AT was to win, yes, we would have fielded Vexors/Ishtars/Navy Vexors/Dominixes or something like that. Lots of our mains have decent drone skills since I've been pushing people to train into gank Vexor fits.
If the goal of entering was to have fun and cause hilarious stories for almost all of EVE to laugh with, we'd have forfeited.
If some of us had bet on a 100-0 whelping, we might also have forfeited.
If RvB or a third party offered us good ISK, we might have forfeited.
Draw your own conclusions.
Not laughing with. Laughing at.
If you wanted to be laughed with, a fleet of T1 fit T1 frigs named "Catalyst" would have gotten the same attention, and far, far less genuine derision. A fleet of mining barges would have trumped that. Battle ventures maybe, or suddenly Badger! (*disclaimer I have no idea if AT rules actually permit these, but you get the idea.)
Used to be a fan of the code antics - opening up the sandbox, forcing people to adapt, countering the myth of "safe" space, creating an intelligent bastard persona for it's pilots and the alliance to fence with the miner-whiners. Now... Too many juvenile hangers on, living off the shadows of past rhetoric and believing the great joke to be reality.
o/ |

Binah 369
Ripshitz and Killit LLC
9
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 07:18:00 -
[106] - Quote
Tyburn Stannis wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote: If the goal of entering the AT was to win, yes, we would have fielded Vexors/Ishtars/Navy Vexors/Dominixes or something like that. Lots of our mains have decent drone skills since I've been pushing people to train into gank Vexor fits.
If the goal of entering was to have fun and cause hilarious stories for almost all of EVE to laugh with, we'd have forfeited.
If some of us had bet on a 100-0 whelping, we might also have forfeited.
If RvB or a third party offered us good ISK, we might have forfeited.
Draw your own conclusions.
Not laughing with. Laughing at. If you wanted to be laughed with, a fleet of T1 fit T1 frigs named "Catalyst" would have gotten the same attention, and far, far less genuine derision. A fleet of mining barges would have trumped that. Battle ventures maybe, or suddenly Badger! (*disclaimer I have no idea if AT rules actually permit these, but you get the idea.) Used to be a fan of the code antics - opening up the sandbox, forcing people to adapt, countering the myth of "safe" space, creating an intelligent bastard persona for it's pilots and the alliance to fence with the miner-whiners. Now... Too many juvenile hangers on, living off the shadows of past rhetoric and believing the great joke to be reality. o/
well said. |

Anal Canal
The Conference Elite CODE.
28
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 07:27:00 -
[107] - Quote
Tyburn Stannis wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote: If the goal of entering the AT was to win, yes, we would have fielded Vexors/Ishtars/Navy Vexors/Dominixes or something like that. Lots of our mains have decent drone skills since I've been pushing people to train into gank Vexor fits.
If the goal of entering was to have fun and cause hilarious stories for almost all of EVE to laugh with, we'd have forfeited.
If some of us had bet on a 100-0 whelping, we might also have forfeited.
If RvB or a third party offered us good ISK, we might have forfeited.
Draw your own conclusions.
Not laughing with. Laughing at. If you wanted to be laughed with, a fleet of T1 fit T1 frigs named "Catalyst" would have gotten the same attention, and far, far less genuine derision. A fleet of mining barges would have trumped that. Battle ventures maybe, or suddenly Badger! (*disclaimer I have no idea if AT rules actually permit these, but you get the idea.) Used to be a fan of the code antics - opening up the sandbox, forcing people to adapt, countering the myth of "safe" space, creating an intelligent bastard persona for it's pilots and the alliance to fence with the miner-whiners. Now... Too many juvenile hangers on, living off the shadows of past rhetoric and believing the great joke to be reality. o/
The time value of money. |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 07:34:00 -
[108] - Quote
Anal Canal wrote:The lack of points prevent my premier of the 'Code Combat Orca'...
And the lack of skill prevented you from fighting with anything else!

Forum Main |

Matius Udan
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 07:36:00 -
[109] - Quote
Sure I read somewhere that Jimmy 'THE CODE' (some numbers) said that players interested in making money was selfish and bad and whatever. Now it seems the CODE people are in it for the money. Although it will have little impact on what they do, as they will just keep doing it, and what they do is funny, its just a shame they didnt give us a good fight to watch. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
3416
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 07:40:00 -
[110] - Quote
Tyburn Stannis wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote: If the goal of entering the AT was to win, yes, we would have fielded Vexors/Ishtars/Navy Vexors/Dominixes or something like that. Lots of our mains have decent drone skills since I've been pushing people to train into gank Vexor fits.
If the goal of entering was to have fun and cause hilarious stories for almost all of EVE to laugh with, we'd have forfeited.
If some of us had bet on a 100-0 whelping, we might also have forfeited.
If RvB or a third party offered us good ISK, we might have forfeited.
Draw your own conclusions.
Not laughing with. Laughing at. If you wanted to be laughed with, a fleet of T1 fit T1 frigs named "Catalyst" would have gotten the same attention, and far, far less genuine derision. A fleet of mining barges would have trumped that. Battle ventures maybe, or suddenly Badger! (*disclaimer I have no idea if AT rules actually permit these, but you get the idea.) Used to be a fan of the code antics - opening up the sandbox, forcing people to adapt, countering the myth of "safe" space, creating an intelligent bastard persona for it's pilots and the alliance to fence with the miner-whiners. Now... Too many juvenile hangers on, living off the shadows of past rhetoric and believing the great joke to be reality. o/
I probably would have suggested something like that that if I was on the team (i.e. able to compete, darn cutoff), but this worked. It got everyone talking.
Chaos is good. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=346564 - a proposal to overhaul the Logistics skill https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. www.minerbumping.com - ganking miners and causing chaos |

flakeys
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
2415
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 07:55:00 -
[111] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Kayagainen Iwalula wrote:Why didn't they field thrashers and nados instead? If they were dead-set on fielding a gank squad they should have had the foresight to know that someone would have banned their signature ships. If the goal of entering the AT was to win, yes, we would have fielded Vexors/Ishtars/Navy Vexors/Dominixes or something like that. Lots of our mains have decent drone skills since I've been pushing people to train into gank Vexor fits. If the goal of entering was to have fun and cause hilarious stories for almost all of EVE to laugh with, we'd have forfeited. If some of us had bet on a 100-0 whelping, we might also have forfeited. If RvB or a third party offered us good ISK, we might have forfeited. Draw your own conclusions.
I understand , it must be a dreadfull idea to fight an equal force while they also have guns like yourselves .
/me shivers .... what a terrifying idea .
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
I probably would have suggested something like that that if I was on the team (i.e. able to compete, darn cutoff), but this worked. It got everyone talking.
Chaos is good.
I know there is a saying that goes ''any publicity is good publicity'' but if your the laugh of the day it is something i find hard to believe.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 08:24:00 -
[112] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: I probably would have suggested something like that that if I was on the team (i.e. able to compete, darn cutoff), but this worked. It got everyone talking.
Chaos is good.
Sure, it was all planned alright. Just for the fun of it, let me break it to you again: CODE. failed massivly. So massive, that any excuse like making ISK or upholding the code, blow right back into your faces.
Running away was PRICELESS!
There is no equivalent in ISK.
Oh and by the way: Only CODE. is in chaos, the rest is just laughing hard!

Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 08:29:00 -
[113] - Quote
Matius Udan wrote:Sure I read somewhere that Jimmy 'THE CODE' (some numbers) said that players interested in making money was selfish and bad and whatever. Now it seems the CODE people are in it for the money.
No it dosn't seem so, thats just Propaganda.
Hint: "Propaganda" equals "Lies"
Read this: http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2dtert/rvb_best_ban_ever_catalyst_vs_code_code_forfeits/
Quote:So for fun, I'll release this. n++[ 2014.07.09 01:20:36 ] loyalanon > we havent even had 12 people x up for alliance team Clockwork Pineapple were the reason code were even in the alliance tournament, since we floated them the isk and plex to get started. However they just didn't have the people wanting to even participate. Their FC Loyalan0n wanted to legit have people participate and have a serious run, but their own membership couldn't give a ****. With a month until the start of the tournament they had done no practices, didn't have a team and didn't even have a single comp set up. We tried to get them to have a few members tag along to our practices against rote, but they just said **** it and kept shooting freighters. n++[ 2014.06.22 00:19:55 ] Elmnt80 > Hey, I was curious what preperations code had started making for AT practices n++[ 2014.06.22 00:20:15 ] Elmnt80 > Or if you were waiting for duality n++[ 2014.06.22 00:25:06 ] Elmnt80 > But basicly, I want to offer any help I can. Because watching pubbies heads start exploding when you guys start winning will be the best thing ever. n++[ 2014.06.22 00:31:07 ] loyalanon > nothing really n++[ 2014.06.22 00:31:12 ] loyalanon > we are going to gank freighters till monday n++[ 2014.06.22 00:31:14 ] loyalanon > then start practising n++[ 2014.06.22 00:31:20 ] loyalanon > but if you guys want to train against us would be cool n++[ 2014.06.22 00:41:01 ] Elmnt80 > Yeah, we can also help you guys with some basic fits and setups to get started if you'd like. We do practices on */* at : on singularity (at least until duality is up) n++[ 2014.06.22 00:44:39 ] Elmnt80 > Tuesdays would probably work better, since we tend to practice against rote on wedsdays n++[ 2014.06.22 00:50:02 ] loyalanon > yes no problems n++[ 2014.06.22 00:50:09 ] loyalanon > that would be amazing n++[ 2014.06.22 00:55:41 ] Elmnt80 > Cool, and like I said, I really wanna see you guys take home a few wins. The reaction of all the pubbies currently going "DURR HURR, AIN'T NO MINING BARGES OR FREIGHTERS IN THE TOURNAMENT" will be priceless n++[ 2014.06.22 00:56:40 ] loyalanon > yeah hardcore n++[ 2014.07.09 01:19:42 ] Elmnt80 > Well, if you do have people on who want to come practice, have them get on our TS n++[ 2014.07.09 01:19:50 ] Elmnt80 > and we'll combine teams for a practice or two n++[ 2014.07.09 01:20:01 ] Elmnt80 > then your dudes can get an idea of the kind of flying they need to do n++[ 2014.07.09 01:20:29 ] loyalanon > yeah mate at the moment we have noone online n++[ 2014.07.09 01:20:36 ] loyalanon > we havent even had 12 people x up for alliance team n++[ 2014.07.09 01:20:56 ] Elmnt80 > Well, you should show up n++[ 2014.07.09 01:21:15 ] Elmnt80 > cause I know we won't have people today and will need extras. :P n++[ 2014.07.09 01:23:14 ] loyalanon > give me a little bit n++[ 2014.07.09 01:23:27 ] Elmnt80 > We won't be starting until : anyways n++[ 2014.07.09 01:23:42 ] Elmnt80 > Just meet us in ** around then anyways n++[ 2014.07.09 01:26:58 ] loyalanon > kk ill let you know He decided to gank freighters instead. :v:
All whats left is hysterical damage control! Forum Main |

Marc Callan
Nuclear Manhattan Limited
459
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 08:50:00 -
[114] - Quote
Isn't part of the point of the Alliance Tournament to generate publicity for EVE to attract new blood?
And doesn't applying for one of the limited number of slots in the Alliance Tournament (even if it was with other people's money) carry with it an implicit promise to ... how can I phrase this properly ... participate? "We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." - Kurt Vonnegurt |

Grog Aftermath
Need more grog
39
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 08:51:00 -
[115] - Quote
I believe people pay to watch the tournament (never seen one myself although did consider it up until 2012 I think when some group threw the contest)
I hope CCP takes these events seriously and investigates the reasons behind what happened and then takes appropriate action. Because if this allowed to continue then it puts the who tournament in jeopardy especially future ones.
There should be no scamming or bribing or simply trying to bring the tournament into disrepute allowed. For the tournament to work it has to be serious for it to mean anything. |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
186
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 09:39:00 -
[116] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: but this worked. It got everyone talking.
a streaker gets everyone talking too and the chase is always nice to watch. |

Adrie Atticus
The Shadow Plague The Bastion
223
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 09:47:00 -
[117] - Quote
Is this one of thsoe GRRR CODE. threads?
My neutral alt got touched on his freighter but for some reason they forgot to finish the job. |

Ab'del Abu
Atlantis Ascendant
74
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 10:00:00 -
[118] - Quote
Grog Aftermath wrote:I believe people pay to watch the tournament (never seen one myself although did consider it up until 2012 I think when some group threw the contest)
Watching the AT live on twitch is for free. |

MonkeyBusiness Thiesant
randomly named no tax corp v2
5
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 10:17:00 -
[119] - Quote
Don't have much time for CODE myself, but quitting because the opponents banned Taloses/Cats is pure style. |

Solecist Project
Mew Age Outpaws
5051
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 10:24:00 -
[120] - Quote
http://residentoutlaw.tumblr.com - CODE, RvB, the AT, and what DJEntropy said .... :) http://residentoutlaw.tumblr.com - CODE, RvB, the AT, and what DJEntropy said .... :) The Mew Age Calender is in need of models! Plus payment! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4908292#post4908292 |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |