Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
96
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 19:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
With the current situation of cross farming militas the simple question arises -
when will all toons have joined gal mil - farm in easy minmatar space and pay out in gal stores?
It is sad that FW is ****** up that hard - but there are facts we can not deny. |

Combatevolved
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
56
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 19:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
What happens when they run out of systems to Plex? |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
96
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 19:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
You can farm in minnie space 23/7 - that is the power of cross farming. The minnie FW L4 are so easy, you can do them in a bomber - that is all the minmatar milita does all day and night.
I would prefer an all out war all factions against each other. |

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
239
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 19:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
This happend when Caldari were at T3/T4 during the Test period and for some times before that.
Just attribute it to the pendulum swings and carry on. |

Combatevolved
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
56
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 19:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:This happend when Caldari were at T3/T4 during the Test period and for some times before that.
Just attribute it to the pendulum swings and carry on.
There is no more pendulum. |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
96
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 20:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
The FW system is broken - nothing is moving or swinging any more.
You gals may not have noticed that.
CCP made you guys win all - that is how CCP made the game. They even went so far to actively support you lads. CCP has every right to do so - it is their product.
Gals have the dev`s, the most OP ships etc. Best space, most null accesees etc.
So all will join gal mil. |

Paranoid Loyd
1514
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 20:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
LOL, FW tears "PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1876
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 20:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
We have cookies, too! And Fedo steaks. Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter! |

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
239
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 20:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Combatevolved wrote:Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:This happend when Caldari were at T3/T4 during the Test period and for some times before that.
Just attribute it to the pendulum swings and carry on. There is no more pendulum.
Yea I know. CCP went too far. We're gonna stay at T3/T4 until CCP reverts back some of the offensive plex changes.
But it's still the same deal. CalMil had like double the pilots we had when TEST joined and it was all because of farmers. No difference here. |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
373
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 21:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
pendulum again, in 2 month calmil will run the place when a 0.0 alliance will join just wait and see RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2456
|
Posted - 2014.08.23 23:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
I hope, that once this historic campaign is completed, the breakaway corporations that form the so-called "Caldari State" will return to the Federation, with full rights and responsibilities therein.
|

Combatevolved
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
56
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 00:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:I hope, that once this historic campaign is completed, the breakaway corporations that form the so-called "Caldari State" will return to the Federation, with full rights and responsibilities therein.
No matter what your ideas may tell you; you and your people are fighting a war of oppression. We have more in common with the Intaki and Mannars than you Gallenteans and your oppressive governments and regimes. You're the evil faction, the Amarr of this war. |

Christopher Mabata
Dominion Tenebrarum Reverberation Project
147
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 00:57:00 -
[13] - Quote
FW tears? this is new
Me like Is it bad if your friend says "that was a Metaphor" and you say "Meta 4? Get Tech II or faction" ?I love the sound of silent explosions in Space.-á |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2457
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 01:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
Combatevolved wrote:X Gallentius wrote:I hope, that once this historic campaign is completed, the breakaway corporations that form the so-called "Caldari State" will return to the Federation, with full rights and responsibilities therein. No matter what your ideas may tell you; you and your people are fighting a war of oppression. We have more in common with the Intaki and Mannars than you Gallenteans and your oppressive governments and regimes. You're the evil faction, the Amarr of this war.
Your isolationist culture has dimmed your perspective. Your faction needs to intermix with the rest of the universe. To help you along a more inclusive path, the region formerly known as "Black Rise" has been renamed "Eagle Rise", and we have invited corporations from all factions, not just the isolationist Caldari faction, to build stations throughout the region.
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1079
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 02:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:With the current situation of cross farming militas the simple question arises -
when will all toons have joined gal mil - farm in easy minmatar space and pay out in gal stores?
It is sad that FW is ****** up that hard - but there are facts we can not deny.
Well, since gal LP has been pretty unfashionable for the last few years this would be a welcome first!
People have been cashing out in caldari, amarr and particularly minmatar LP for the last few years would be a nice change to be the preferred faction! |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
64
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 03:04:00 -
[16] - Quote
The problem is there is no incentive to join the losing side. There is no cap on a militia. The entire server could enlist in Gal mil, this is a problem. Yes EvE is a sandbox but even a sandbox needs a structure to keep it from spilling over. Sucks because I like Gal Mil for RP purposes but I'll be damned if I am any part of a zerg. Instant gratification WoW players are ruining one of the coolest parts of EvE, FW. |

Utsukushi Shi
Pyre Falcon Defence and Security Imperial Outlaws.
42
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 03:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
X Gallentius, the last bastion of Fed RP. Pyre Falcon is recruiting - apply today! Backstage Recruitment thread EVEO Forum Recruitment thread |

Deen Wispa
Justified Chaos
731
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 03:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:The FW system is broken - nothing is moving or swinging any more.
You gals may not have noticed that.
CCP made you guys win all - that is how CCP made the game. They even went so far to actively support you lads. CCP has every right to do so - it is their product.
Gals have the dev`s, the most OP ships etc. Best space, most null accesees etc.
So all will join gal mil.
I'm not so sure about this. However, if CCP Fozzie gives Gallente Militia another medal when 100% warzone dominance occurs again, despite him proclaiming he wouldn't do it after we took the warzone last time, then I will be the first to admit that CCP is biased towards Gallente. Especially considering the FW rep on CSM is Gallente. Until then, this is all coincidence :) High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve . |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
373
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 03:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
4 month ago a 4000 people alliance joined caldari militia ... Instant gratification WoW players are ruining one of the coolest parts of EvE, FW you could have said that at this time now look at the numbers back in the days there was more tha 1.5 K people in difference between the 2 militia now and only since 15 days galmil > calmil in term of numbers of pilots same on the amarr/minma side a 0.0 alliance join amarr +1500 avatars.... so !! RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2457
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 04:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
Utsukushi Shi wrote:X Gallentius, the last bastion of Fed RP. The sad thing is that the lol-RP is better than the real RP on IGS.
|
|

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
648
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 04:56:00 -
[21] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Utsukushi Shi wrote:X Gallentius, the last bastion of Fed RP. The sad thing is that the lol-RP is better than the real RP on IGS.
Not empty quoting |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
99
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 06:39:00 -
[22] - Quote
Guys -
someone posted it - Amarr is the evil side.
Gal are "Freedom".
CCP made it this way and thus all players will go gal sooner or later.
Gals have: -Devs -CSM -Best ships (the most OP ships) -Best weapons -can do all damage and all ranges due to drones -best warzone (with the cals) -best LPs (due to cross farming)
Even in the industrial sector gals are the best - all mining ships are gal too.
These are facts, observations.
EVE never was a sandbox - EVE is a game with poor design, a running beta version (we still have the prototype D-scan, the "real" scanning system was announced 2005 or so, but never made).
Still it is fun to play EVE - so I congratulate the gals to their victory.
Gal mil was and is the best milita and so I salute you all.
|

Doctor Knuckles
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
44
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 08:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:The problem is there is no incentive to join the losing side.
Meh. When i joined galmil a few months ago, as a noob with meta fitted frigs, caldari was T4 and gal T1 with just a handful of systems.
And that's exactly the reason i joined Gal for, losing side, the underdog, more targets, more pews.
But what do i know, i'm in FW to blap stuff and not to farm ISK.
|

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
239
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 08:22:00 -
[24] - Quote
where were these scrublords when calmil was winning. galmil was in T1 vs T3/T4 for 4 months? 5? You've been there for less than a month and there's nonstop whining. |

RonPaul Rox
Justified Chaos
42
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 09:29:00 -
[25] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:You can farm in minnie space 23/7 - that is the power of cross farming. The minnie FW L4 are so easy, you can do them in a bomber - that is all the minmatar milita does all day and night.
I would prefer an all out war all factions against each other.
1. gallente can't run minmatar fw missions, and gallente fw missions are THE ONLY ONES YOU CANT RUN IN A BOMBER lol we have to risk an ishtar or a t3 to run our missions.
2. thats part of the reason gal mil are able to win with a lesser numbers of pilots, we dont join FW to pve, we join to pvp
3. we dont have the best LP store, the LP conversion is just better because its harder to farm for our LP. i wont deny that navy vexors are the best faction cruiser, but faction frigs are balanced, no one flies faction BCs, and caldari have the most popular faction BSes
4. i didnt know the devs were somehow helping us, if they are, why havent they taken the ECM out of our missions after like 5 years?
5. i've always heard the amarr/minnie warzone is laid out better than ours, its smaller and the systems are more interconnected, meaning fewer jumps on average to get to any fights that are goin on.
6. pendulum http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL
|

Arla Sarain
67
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 10:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
RonPaul Rox wrote:risk an ishtar xD
http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/risk wrote:A risk is an action that holds a chance of danger or failure. |

Silverbackyererse
Caldari Special Forces OLD MAN GANG
71
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 11:35:00 -
[27] - Quote
Anyone with some origami skills, an interest in millinery and some spare alu-foil can see that the O/P is perfectly correct.
|

Utsukushi Shi
Pyre Falcon Defence and Security Imperial Outlaws.
42
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 12:36:00 -
[28] - Quote
Super Chair wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Utsukushi Shi wrote:X Gallentius, the last bastion of Fed RP. The sad thing is that the lol-RP is better than the real RP on IGS. Not empty quoting
I was totally serious.
As for the OP. I joined CalMil originally because i like Caldari and at the time they were losing. Then TEST joined..... now I fly Amarr.
Stop crying. Pyre Falcon is recruiting - apply today! Backstage Recruitment thread EVEO Forum Recruitment thread |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
368
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 13:11:00 -
[29] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:The FW system is broken - nothing is moving or swinging any more.
You gals may not have noticed that.
CCP made you guys win all - that is how CCP made the game. They even went so far to actively support you lads. CCP has every right to do so - it is their product.
Gals have the dev`s, the most OP ships etc. Best space, most null accesees etc.
So all will join gal mil. Damar, is that you? CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
99
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 15:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
No, me.
I do not blame you gals - it is just boring like hell to see what is going on.
Cross farming i plexing. Tons of gals in minnie FW space.
The minnie milita has hordes of bombers alts - you see then every day at work in the bleak lands. |
|

Damen Apol
Dayman Industries
57
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:22:00 -
[31] - Quote
RonPaul Rox wrote:Rahelis wrote:You can farm in minnie space 23/7 - that is the power of cross farming. The minnie FW L4 are so easy, you can do them in a bomber - that is all the minmatar milita does all day and night.
I would prefer an all out war all factions against each other. we dont join FW to pve, we join to pvp
lol'd |

Rinai Vero
Moira. Villore Accords
326
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
Typical. Let's all go cry on the forums instead of holding our home systems. |

Plato Forko
Forko Nanorobotics
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 20:12:00 -
[33] - Quote
man, i've been in FW for long enough to know that the people who complain the most end up ruining militia the most while the guys who DGAF about militia and just want to get some lemmings together to go blap stuff incidentally do more good for the militia by providing the morale necessary for pilots to be ok with the idea of wasting time grinding for sov. My terribad blog where I QQ and rage about Amarr FW |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1348
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 20:25:00 -
[34] - Quote
Once you realize that occupancy is a completely broken game for people with too much time and alts, the happier you will be.
It wasn't the lp that broke it either. It was broken before lp.
"It took less than a week to achieve the maximum faction warfare rank (Divine Commodore), GǪ.111 faction warfare complexes were captured GǪ I did not kill anyone in the process..Gǥ Ankhesentapemkah Posted - 2008.06.18 02:29:00 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

greg01
Inglorious-Basterds
33
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 20:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
Just get an alt into every faction. Let the isk flow. ...
FW Comedy Central rages on.......... |

RonPaul Rox
Justified Chaos
43
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 20:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Damen Apol wrote:RonPaul Rox wrote:Rahelis wrote:You can farm in minnie space 23/7 - that is the power of cross farming. The minnie FW L4 are so easy, you can do them in a bomber - that is all the minmatar milita does all day and night.
I would prefer an all out war all factions against each other. we dont join FW to pve, we join to pvp lol'd
saw your bio, lol'd
sorry you lost china and russia bro, but hey, at least you've still got north korea right?
lol http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2461
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 23:01:00 -
[37] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Once you realize that occupancy is a completely broken game It's only broken if you don't win. |

Master Sergeant MacRobert
Space-Brewery-Association 24eme Legion Etrangere
136
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 23:13:00 -
[38] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Once you realize that occupancy is a completely broken game It's only broken if you don't win.
/o\
Mmm, CAOD is that way >>>>>>> "Remedy this situation or you shall live out the rest of your life in a pain amplifier" |

Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
229
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 23:21:00 -
[39] - Quote
Mmhmm tasty caldari tears mmhmm. |

Combatevolved
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
57
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 00:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ahh can't wait for the 6 or more months to get to T2. The nonexistent fighting will be overwhelming. |
|

Ginger Barbarella
2003
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 01:03:00 -
[41] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:With the current situation of cross farming militas the simple question arises -
when will all toons have joined gal mil - farm in easy minmatar space and pay out in gal stores?
It is sad that FW is ****** up that hard - but there are facts we can not deny.
I'm very happy with Minnie FW, and have occassionally dropped an alt into Amarr. CalMil doesn't interest me, and there's a reason most of my alts are KOS in Gallente space.  "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2461
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 01:12:00 -
[42] - Quote
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Once you realize that occupancy is a completely broken game It's only broken if you don't win. /o\ Mmm, CAOD is that way >>>>>>> Sorry, trollposts are the only valid response whine posts. The "Gallente are the favored sons of Eve" and "Plexing Alts win FW" are last year's excuses. And they would make perfect sense if not for the fact that Gallente have always had the worst rats to deal with, and we've thrived even though Caldari have always had more alts than us (until about 30 days ago).
|

Rinai Vero
Moira. Villore Accords
327
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 01:47:00 -
[43] - Quote
So much truth right there. We didn't hold our home systems with alts. |

Combatevolved
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
57
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 02:34:00 -
[44] - Quote
Rinai Vero wrote:So much truth right there. We didn't hold our home systems with alts.
Does anyone? |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
99
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 07:52:00 -
[45] - Quote
Gals are OP. It is a fact - easy to prove.
No one steals your victory or complains about you guys rolling the warzone, Xgal. Credit where it is due.
The intelligent players wants other players to play the game.
FW is totally broke and nothing than an ISK cow.
We can not fix that. |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
369
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 10:08:00 -
[46] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:Gals are OP. It is a fact - easy to prove.
No one steals your victory or complains about you guys rolling the warzone, Xgal. Credit where it is due.
The intelligent players wants other players to play the game.
FW is totally broke and nothing than an ISK cow.
We can not fix that. yes it's broken, just not in the way you are whinging about. There is no CCP favoritism. However,
The tier system needs some radical rethinking. It encourages farmers to gravitate to whoever gets the upperhand, thus perpetuating an advantage of the faction that is ahead atm. Essentially it is a feedback loop. Not the best structure for a perpetual war/struggle. At the very least some more tweaking needs to be done to the lp payouts and tier effects on them. Maybe this second wiping of all the systems by us will wake up the devs to the built in stupidity of the current system.
That being said, when you guys were up and steam farming us hard, we held off your pvp attemps on our home systems. This is something you guys haven't figured out how to do yet. Maybe next time. CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1348
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 12:56:00 -
[47] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Once you realize that occupancy is a completely broken game It's only broken if you don't win. /o\ Mmm, CAOD is that way >>>>>>> Sorry, trollposts are the only valid response to whine posts. The "Gallente are the favored sons of Eve" and "Plexing Alts win FW" are last year's excuses. And they would make perfect sense if not for the fact that Gallente have always had the worst rats to deal with, and we've thrived even though Caldari have always had more alts than us (until about 30 days ago).
XG it was bad when Caldari won and Ank posted about capturing 100 plexes in 2 weeks without a single kill, and its bad now that Gallente are winning and you post about your alt capturing 100 plexes in 2 weeks. Both posts show fw is broken. The same problem exists - occupancy is most efficiently won by rabbit plexing. CCP has said they will address this for years but never has.
As for the rest:
Gallente lost all the systems for a long time when they had the worst rats in plexes.
If you mean the worst rats in missions well that likely helps you win faction war occupancy (or at worst it is a wash) because it makes plexing a relatively better way to get lp. When plexing is the best way to get lp you will have more people plexing/winning occupancy and less people just watering down your lp by mission running.
You yourself admitted your alt was averaging about 1000 vp per week. Other Gallente are speaking up about how great having defensive plexing alts in the game. Every faction has peoplle who are very interested in plexing. They almost always have alts Minmatar had Sasawong with sheltering sky, FHP had too many alts to count.
Denying that fw occupancy is a game for alts is denying the validity of basic arithmetic. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 13:03:00 -
[48] - Quote
No one denied having alts. Just corrected you since you seem to believe people still capture systems with them and their d-plexing capabilities somehow fend off a determined assault.
In a way deplexing alts have ensured that every single system taken is done with some sort of pvp capable force.
Now, continue to entertain us with your presupposed grievances with a mechanic you try very hard to misunderstand. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1348
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 13:12:00 -
[49] - Quote
Rinai Vero wrote:So much truth right there. We didn't hold our home systems with alts.
I see plenty of alts deplexing home systems and I have seen plenty of gallente admitting that. Every faction does that if they want to sit in a home system in fw.
But even if you were right, so what? You were at best at tier 2 holding your "home" systems. You cant move up the tiers until you get your alts are out there plexing systems. If faction war were a game where people had to fight 2 fights on average for each plex or the timer would rollback it would be a completely different game. It would be a game based on pvp. Now its the other extreme where 10 out of 11 plexes are captured without a fight. Plexing for occupancy is a non-starter for people who like to pvp.
Sure I like to go in plexes to find fights in busy systems , but I am not going to wait around after the fight to close the plex. No one will even know I am there to fight me! I don't pretend that what I am doing is nearly as helpful for the occupancy war as those who put multiple alts in the game and rabbit plex. If I really wanted to help my militia win the occupancy war I would buy another video card so I can plug in more monitors and buy more accounts and sit my alts in plexes. They could just run if someone comes in and plex a few systems down. Those are the people who are having the biggest impact on the war. If that is your idea of good game design then you will not want to change it. But IMO that just shows the game needs some changes to the mechanics.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
375
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 13:24:00 -
[50] - Quote
so just kill the alts ... RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1348
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 13:27:00 -
[51] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:No one denied having alts. Just corrected you since you seem to believe people still capture systems with them and their d-plexing capabilities somehow fend off a determined assault.
In a way deplexing alts have ensured that every single system taken is done with some sort of pvp capable force.
Now, continue to entertain us with your presupposed grievances with a mechanic you try very hard to misunderstand.
Bottom line: Your militia can either muster up a large blob to hold one system long enough to take it, or there is nothing you can do to really contribute to the occupancy war.
FW = Null sec junior. Instead of blobs of 2000 battleships supporting caps and supers, we have blobs of 200 destroyers. \o/
IMO fw should involve a completely different type of warfare. Like Master Sergeant MacRobert keeps saying eve should have opportunities for all sorts of play styles. If you like the idea of blobbing a single system and winning a war based on being able to do that there is already null sec.
IMO FW should be for a different type of fighting. It should involve more than winning because you can put a bigger blob in a single system or 2. It should be constant fighting spread out throughout the war zone.
You should have to care if someone is plexing up your system enough to go fight them. You should think well I can just put an alt in there and deplex after he leaves. Timer rollbacks will frustrate alt rabbit plexers and thereby make it more important to fight the guy offensive plexing to begin with.
Irya Boone wrote:so just kill the alts ...
They just run a system or 2 over and plex there. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Captain Brace
Strong Erections Construction Company Honorable Third Party
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 14:03:00 -
[52] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:4 month ago a 4000 people alliance joined caldari militia ... Instant gratification WoW players are ruining one of the coolest parts of EvE, FW you could have said that at this time now look at the numbers back in the days there was more tha 1.5 K people in difference between the 2 militia now and only since 15 days galmil > calmil in term of numbers of pilots same on the amarr/minma side a 0.0 alliance join amarr +1500 avatars.... so !!
Even google translate isn't helping me understand this post. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
296
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 14:17:00 -
[53] - Quote
All join gal mil cuz stuff? Or because reasons? You decide for yourself I guess. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
369
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 14:24:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cearain wrote: FW = Null sec junior. Instead of blobs of 2000 battleships supporting caps and supers, we have blobs of 200 destroyers. \o/ I don't think I've yet seen a galmil fleet with 200 members, and that's in 2 and half years in galmil. So it appears you are just pulling a number out of your ass. Anyway, Caldari always had more characters until recently. And for a long time they could put together some rather large blobs (better than us in US prime even). Blobbage is all relative. But please 200, more like always less than 100 on either side is more accurate.
Cearain wrote: IMO fw should involve a completely different type of warfare. Like Master Sergeant MacRobert keeps saying eve should have opportunities for all sorts of play styles. If you like the idea of blobbing a single system and winning a war based on being able to do that there is already null sec.
IMO FW should be for a different type of fighting. It should involve more than winning because you can put a bigger blob in a single system or 2. It should be constant fighting spread out throughout the war zone.
You should have to care if someone is plexing up your system enough to go fight them. You should think well I can just put an alt in there and deplex after he leaves. Timer rollbacks will frustrate alt rabbit plexers and thereby make it more important to fight the guy offensive plexing to begin with. Gathering forces together, blobbage if you will, is necessary to contest a home system. How the Caldari got to their last remaining system again is a combination of the tier lp payout feedback loop inducing farmers to plex mostly for the side that already has an advantage, and the better ability of Galmil to pvp siege Caldari home systems. One of these factors CCP can address. The other is out of their hands.
CCP could rp some mechanic whereby once a militia gains an upperhand and invades the other faction FW space maybe the Dust fights get harder. Call it civilian resistance aiding the defending Dust militia. Repelling the invaders. Theres one way CCP could put some built in brakes on the current inevitable down to out process.
CCP could change the lp payouts again to favor dplexing, but only in the traditional own faction regions. Or something else, it really doesn't matter. They could put some built in brakes. LP is an npc construct. All sorts of ways then to mess with it's accumulation under the guise of rp/back story.
Hopefully this current conquest will convince CCP to do something again with lp/tiers/plexes/missions to bring a dynamic stability that really we all want. While it is smugly satisfying to take the entire warzone, actually, all of us would rather have more exciting fights against calmil than against opportunistic bored nullsec or pirate interlopers.
CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Moglarr
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
9
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 14:43:00 -
[55] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:CCP could change the lp payouts again to favor dplexing, but only in the traditional own faction regions. Or something else, it really doesn't matter. They could put some built in brakes. LP is an npc construct. All sorts of ways then to mess with it's accumulation under the guise of rp/back story.
Hopefully this current conquest will convince CCP to do something again with lp/tiers/plexes/missions to bring a dynamic stability that really we all want. While it is smugly satisfying to take the entire warzone, actually, all of us would rather have more exciting fights against calmil than against opportunistic bored nullsec or pirate interlopers.
This is possibly a terrible idea buuuut.... as your tier goes up oplexing LP goes up, as tier drops dplexing LP goes up. Basically the faction you're in wants you to push harder when you have momentum, and rewards it/or wants you to stand your ground and hold systems when the enemy is advancing. This way one side doesn't get completely tanked for income and pilots while the other side rolls in ISK and new recruits. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
296
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 14:55:00 -
[56] - Quote
Moglarr wrote:This way one side doesn't get completely tanked for income and pilots while the other side rolls in ISK and new recruits.
If you are having major issues with recruiting in Tier 1 to compete from a PVP or FW control perspective, then you are trying to recruit the wrong kind of players. Most PVP pilots like targets, especially ones they generally don't have to fly far to find. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos
85
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 15:51:00 -
[57] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:No one denied having alts. Just corrected you since you seem to believe people still capture systems with them and their d-plexing capabilities somehow fend off a determined assault.
In a way deplexing alts have ensured that every single system taken is done with some sort of pvp capable force.
Now, continue to entertain us with your presupposed grievances with a mechanic you try very hard to misunderstand. Bottom line: Your militia can either muster up a large blob to hold one system long enough to take it, or there is nothing you can do to really contribute to the occupancy war. FW = Null sec junior. Instead of blobs of 2000 battleships supporting caps and supers, we have blobs of 200 destroyers. \o/ IMO fw should involve a completely different type of warfare. Like Master Sergeant MacRobert keeps saying eve should have opportunities for all sorts of play styles. If you like the idea of blobbing a single system and winning a war based on being able to do that there is already null sec. IMO FW should be for a different type of fighting. It should involve more than winning because you can put a bigger blob in a single system or 2. It should be constant fighting spread out throughout the war zone. You should have to care if someone is plexing up your system enough to go fight them. You should think well I can just put an alt in there and deplex after he leaves. Timer rollbacks will frustrate alt rabbit plexers and thereby make it more important to fight the guy offensive plexing to begin with. Irya Boone wrote:so just kill the alts ... They just run a system or 2 over and plex there.
How can people that lose at FW be so adamant they understand it better then those that win, and have fun while doing so?
You really need to join a militia that wins occasionally.
People that are adamant they understand the game better than the people beating them are pretty annoying.
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1349
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 15:59:00 -
[58] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:Cearain wrote: FW = Null sec junior. Instead of blobs of 2000 battleships supporting caps and supers, we have blobs of 200 destroyers. \o/ I don't think I've yet seen a galmil fleet with 200 members, and that's in 2 and half years in galmil. So it appears you are just pulling a number out of your ass. Anyway, Caldari always had more characters until recently. And for a long time they could put together some rather large blobs (better than us in US prime even). Blobbage is all relative. But please 200, more like always less than 100 on either side is more accurate.
I meant total participants including all militias that join to fight in a system and neutrals that might join. Yes I was being charitable. The blob warfare is more like "baby null sec" than "null sec junior." The reason we don't get those sorts of numbers despite having 20,000 in faction war is because faction war is currently a game for alts.
But my point is still the same get the numbers to pile in a single system long enough and you win. Even if we had 2000 people fighting for a system it still would just be mirroring null sec. IMO FW should involve a different form of pvp.
And your saying Caldari had more characters is irrelevant. When there are only 200 showing up for a fight who cares if one militia has 5,500 and the other only has 5000? Very few are in it for the pvp because its not really a pvp system.
Deacon Abox wrote:Cearain wrote: IMO fw should involve a completely different type of warfare. Like Master Sergeant MacRobert keeps saying eve should have opportunities for all sorts of play styles. If you like the idea of blobbing a single system and winning a war based on being able to do that there is already null sec.
IMO FW should be for a different type of fighting. It should involve more than winning because you can put a bigger blob in a single system or 2. It should be constant fighting spread out throughout the war zone.
You should have to care if someone is plexing up your system enough to go fight them. You should think well I can just put an alt in there and deplex after he leaves. Timer rollbacks will frustrate alt rabbit plexers and thereby make it more important to fight the guy offensive plexing to begin with. Gathering forces together, blobbage if you will, is necessary to contest a home system.
I agree blobbage - gathering forces and putting them in one system is key to the current system. But home systems are irrelevant. to the tier system.
Deacon Abox wrote: How the Caldari got to their last remaining system again is a combination of the tier lp payout feedback loop inducing farmers to plex mostly for the side that already has an advantage, and the better ability of Galmil to pvp siege Caldari home systems. One of these factors CCP can address. The other is out of their hands.
Gallente can get a bigger blob in a single system to take the system. Then they have a larger number of alts to hold those systems. That is all there is to it.
The system is not that unbalanced it's just that if you aren't interested in having multiple alts rabbit plexing the game has no interest. Amarr had allot of systems and they are losing them to oplexers. Gallente just had a few large pushes but most systems became contested and fell because no one from caldari or amarr really wanted to multibox a bunch of defensive plexing alts. Well at least one guy did for amarr but I hear he biomassed his character. 
Make the occupancy game pvp and you make if fun. Most pvpers don't care whether they get an extra 500lp plexing for one side or the other. Nor do they care if they get some medal of high five from a dev. Does plexing bring about exciting fights? If yes they will do it. Actually allot more people will plex if it did that. But it doesn't. Plexing is most efficiently done in a system where no enemy even knows your there and if one happens to wander in your best avenue for occupancy is to simply warp out and start another plex in the next system. Come back to the plex later and it will be right were you left it because pvpers aren't interested in the current occupancy game.
As far as balance:
Capturing large plexes for amarr you get 2 million in tags for each npc killed. Thats about 120 mill per hour. (assuming you kill one per minute) So even if you lose time on the plex you still wont drop below that. You can easilly do this in a stabbed shield tanked vexor. Then when you capture the plex you get 30k lp at tier 2. That will get you about 3k isk per lp. So its not the case that the rewards are too slanted.
I think the tides will change. But they will likely change because people in gallente will find better things to do with their lives than sit rabbit alts in plexes. Most normal people get burnt out on that. After Gallente got there first medal we heard many of the pvpers happy that was over and glad to get back to pvp. (and kills went up allot after the plexing campaign) It's a rare bird that keeps at occupancy plexing for a long time. In sum the tides will change because the game is too boring for most people to keep at it.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Mr Duffo
Perimeter Defense Systems Templis CALSF
58
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 16:21:00 -
[59] - Quote
gals sux go back to villore and mine |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1349
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 16:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:Cearain wrote:Irya Boone wrote:so just kill the alts ... They just run a system or 2 over and plex there. How can people that lose at FW be so adamant they understand it better then those that win, and have fun while doing so? You really need to join a militia that wins occasionally. People that are adamant they understand the game better than the people beating them are pretty annoying.
All the factions have been winning and losing at faction war since it came out. The basic problem of rabbit plexing has never been addressed. It existed in 2008 when ank posted about capping over 100 plexes in 2 weeks without a kill and it exists now with XG talking about capping 100 plexes with his alt in the same amount of time.
I see with my eyes what happens in the warzone. I see the alts warping off. I see the api statistics and look at the killboards of those who get the most vp for a day. I see that when one side has sufficiently more numbers in a fleet the other side - yes even gallente - stands down. Plenty of my time in huola was spent plexing while gallente/minmatar pilots sat there docked up because they simply didn't have the numbers. When they had the numbers amarr/caldari stood down. I don't need to drink the kool-aid certain people offer on these forums about occupancy proving some sort of pvp prowess. I believe my own eyes more than what I read in the forums. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
|

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
750
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:31:00 -
[61] - Quote
What? You idiots are trying to take all the systems again? Didn't you learn last time? It's a BAD idea.
******* clowns... nom nom
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
297
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
Actually, I think most of those participating weren't around the last time. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
750
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:43:00 -
[63] - Quote
Doesn't matter, the numpty polesmokers leading this travesty certainly were. (for the most part)
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Actually, I think most of those participating weren't around the last time.
It's all good, if scoring with the hot chick who already got gang banged by 100's of your friends is your thing, have at it. Just don't complain when it smells bad and looks like a rotten taco.
nom nom
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
297
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:54:00 -
[64] - Quote
All I can smell at the moment is bitter. Lighten up a bit :p
Princess Nexxala wrote: Just don't complain when it smells bad and looks like a rotten taco.
BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:59:00 -
[65] - Quote
Princess Nexxala wrote:Doesn't matter, the numpty polesmokers leading this travesty certainly were. (for the most part) Thanatos Marathon wrote:Actually, I think most of those participating weren't around the last time. It's all good, if scoring with the hot chick who already got gang banged by 100's of your friends is your thing, have at it. Just don't complain when it smells bad and looks like a rotten taco.
Very serious post, was only expecting squid tears, but some qcats tears is a bonus!
Push has been going on for weeks (with some awesome action) and qcats CEO doesnt even know about it, kinda illustrates how sadly redundant they are. |

JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
295
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:01:00 -
[66] - Quote
Nexx hasn't been CEO for months... The pursuit of excellence and stabbed plexing alts. |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
750
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
lol! Honestly I really wish I was the bitter prick people like you make me out to be. I really do. Oh what fun that would be...
Thanatos Marathon wrote:All I can smell at the moment is bitter. Lighten up a bit :p Princess Nexxala wrote: Just don't complain when it smells bad and looks like a rotten taco.
nom nom
|

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
750
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:03:00 -
[68] - Quote
Hot damn crosi, uninformed and wrong as usual. Have another drink mate.
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Princess Nexxala wrote:Doesn't matter, the numpty polesmokers leading this travesty certainly were. (for the most part) Thanatos Marathon wrote:Actually, I think most of those participating weren't around the last time. It's all good, if scoring with the hot chick who already got gang banged by 100's of your friends is your thing, have at it. Just don't complain when it smells bad and looks like a rotten taco. Very serious post, was only expecting squid tears, but some qcats tears is a bonus! Push has been going on for weeks (with some awesome action) and qcats CEO doesnt even know about it, kinda illustrates how sadly redundant they are. nom nom
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:09:00 -
[69] - Quote
Princess Nexxala wrote:Hot damn crosi, uninformed and wrong as usual. Have another drink mate. Crosi Wesdo wrote:Princess Nexxala wrote:Doesn't matter, the numpty polesmokers leading this travesty certainly were. (for the most part) Thanatos Marathon wrote:Actually, I think most of those participating weren't around the last time. It's all good, if scoring with the hot chick who already got gang banged by 100's of your friends is your thing, have at it. Just don't complain when it smells bad and looks like a rotten taco. Very serious post, was only expecting squid tears, but some qcats tears is a bonus! Push has been going on for weeks (with some awesome action) and qcats CEO doesnt even know about it, kinda illustrates how sadly redundant they are.
Aww you are upset, being wrong about something as inconsequential as qcats leadership is understandable. Some great pilots, in a once great corp. Many of the active ones helping with the push, polesmokers right, lol.
If you dont like FW, then its probably time to leave. Hardly anyone would notice. |

Quentin Marshall
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:33:00 -
[70] - Quote
Why does Cosi purposely manage to find a way to annoy everyone regardless if its his own alliance mates or the enemy. That's true bitterness right there. |
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
297
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:37:00 -
[71] - Quote
Just a man practicing his craft. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
Quentin Marshall wrote:Why does Cosi purposely manage to find a way to annoy everyone regardless if its his own alliance mates or the enemy. That's true bitterness right there.
Pretty sure he called me and other members of his corp and alliance polesmockers. Kinda silly for someone that doesnt really play the game to still abuse people on the forums about it.
Alliance or no, elitism in a space submarine game always needs addressing. |

Quentin Marshall
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:57:00 -
[73] - Quote
What exactly does Gallente hope to get out of 100% warzone control? Is it simply just epeen rights that you spent half the day at the computer running a button? Or do you want fights? If it's the latter, I think there are other ways of getting fights rather than sitting on a button with a blob of other people and bullying an opponent who is nowhere near organized as you are. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
297
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:02:00 -
[74] - Quote
Quentin Marshall wrote:What exactly does Gallente hope to get out of 100% warzone control? Is it simply just epeen rights that you spent half the day at the computer running a button? Or do you want fights? If it's the latter, I think there are other ways of getting fights rather than sitting on a button with a blob of other people and bullying an opponent who is nowhere near organized as you are.
Epeen. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:13:00 -
[75] - Quote
Quentin Marshall wrote:What exactly does Gallente hope to get out of 100% warzone control? Is it simply just epeen rights that you spent half the day at the computer running a button? Or do you want fights? If it's the latter, I think there are other ways of getting fights rather than sitting on a button with a blob of other people and bullying an opponent who is nowhere near organized as you are.
Not putting them under pressure will not help them get better. Where were people like you when caldari dominated the entire warzone for 8 months? |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
750
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:32:00 -
[76] - Quote
Trying to say i called my corpmates names is quite low, even for you. Anyone can read my posts and see that's not at all what I was doing. I was calling you names. (and any other corp leader pushing this agenda)
Since when is it elitist to disagree with people doing silly things for their own selfish reasons? Usually I get a chance to rant about blobs and people who are bad at pvp before I get called elitist. I feel cheated.
Also I love the alliance centric ramblings when you haven't even registered on our alliance forums (in either iteration) or participated in the alliance in any shape or form.
On the topic of my playtime; I'm taking a bit of a break while the warzone gets all super blobby. 15k+ kills in 4.5 years earns me a bit of a holiday don't you think? Or am I slacking?
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Pretty sure he called me and other members of his corp and alliance polesmockers. Kinda silly for someone that doesnt really play the game to still abuse people on the forums about it.
Alliance or no, elitism in a space submarine game is always fun to address.
nom nom
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
405
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:38:00 -
[77] - Quote
Quentin Marshall wrote:What exactly does Gallente hope to get out of 100% warzone control? Is it simply just epeen rights that you spent half the day at the computer running a button? Or do you want fights? If it's the latter, I think there are other ways of getting fights rather than sitting on a button with a blob of other people and bullying an opponent who is nowhere near organized as you are. It's basically the inevitable conclusion of the push we started last summer, that was stalled when TEST entered CalMil last October. The Kronos changes just made it far easier for us to keep the rest of the WZ under control while we ground down the CalMil strongholds one by one.
My esteemed colleagues in the Gallente Militia learned a great deal from being on the receiving end of CalMil superior numbers. We can only hope that Templis CALSF, GHIOT, OMG, and other combat oriented Caldari Militia corporations can learn as quickly.
It will be interesting to see their inevitable counter assault. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
295
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:49:00 -
[78] - Quote
I'm not here to play peacemaker; I just had a question about something you wrote:
Quote:Not putting them under pressure will not help them get better. Where were people like you when caldari dominated the entire warzone for 8 months?
I agree that the occasional curbstomping is good for the soul. Scrubs, given the choice between teaching themselves to be better and doing nothing, thereby remaining scrubs, will almost always choose the latter. Scrubs who scrub along think their scrubbery is actually good with every instance of scrubbing it up going into the evidence locker of "why im actualy prety gud", which in fact only contains heaping amounts of scrub.
I can also see that corporation leadership has to organize content for its playerbase. It's true, QCATS hasn't really been playing a lot of Eve. Our small core of US TZ guys is online almost all the time, wrecking enemy bombers, fine-tuning un-plasma-able killing machines, and sending small green men to their doom.
Honestly, it's because we're having a blast playing these other games that we're not 'active'.
But I digress. I must have missed the mail about us helping out the squids by taking all their marbles, even though I see the value in the lesson. I just don't remember it being part of the stated goals. The pursuit of excellence and stabbed plexing alts. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:32:00 -
[79] - Quote
Wasnt a goal, was just a counterpoint to an opinion that wasnt raised in the planning stages, just raised by some inactive dude who used to play eve in this thread. |

JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
295
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:42:00 -
[80] - Quote
mkay The pursuit of excellence and stabbed plexing alts. |
|

Kimmy Blossom
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:33:00 -
[81] - Quote
Everyone joins the FW just to plex. I never cared for the winner, loser or the ISK income. I was here for the quick fights I could get without having to risk huge ships. My experience was complete crap in both factions. Around 99% of the players would warp away, cloak or burn away from me at 4k+ ms in bullshit fit. At one point, I was so desperate for a fight, I warped my Rifter at 0 on a DD and he bailed out(who the **** does that?).
So as I said above, the reward are way too good for how little it takes. No one wants to join the losing side and these said players are only here for the ISK. They need to change the mentality from "join FW to afk farm billions" to "join FW for PVP regardless of the rewards". It can only be done by nerfing the rewards to the ground or giving lot of LPs for killing a FW target.
Until then, I'd rather just fly in nullsec, it's much easier to get a fight. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2463
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:41:00 -
[82] - Quote
I gotta ask why Nexx is so bitter about what other people do with their gaming time. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1997

|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:59:00 -
[83] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The Rules: 3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
728
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 22:37:00 -
[84] - Quote
Kimmy Blossom wrote:So as I said above, the reward are way too good for how little it takes. No one wants to join the losing side and these said players are only here for the ISK. They need to change the mentality from "join FW to afk farm billions" to "join FW for PVP regardless of the rewards". It can only be done by nerfing the rewards to the ground or giving lot of LPs for killing a FW target.
I agree with most of your post, except for the "no one wants to join the losing side" part. If the system allowed us to, I would have probably moved QCATS over to the Caldari militia sometime after Gallente captured every single system. Being on the losing side in FW is the most fun this game has to offer IMO (up there with wardeccing brave newbies when they lived in lowsec).
Having said that, I'm proud of what Gal mil has accomplished over the years (this isn't a pat on my back, the latter 3 years hasn't really involved me). We've held against a numerically superior force for many, many years and kept trucking even when things looked bleak.
Just thought I'd toss in some congrats before my sub runs out in this game in a few months and I probably quit for good.
PS: Robocraft is an amazing game for any eve bittervets like myself who really enjoyed the EFT/pvp side of this game. If only I could combine something as customizable as robocraft in a sandbox MMO like eve it'd be awesome. (Oh, and I'd ******* give plexs timer rollbacks so that fighting is actually more efficient for sov than running, but I'll resist filling this post with CCP raging).
o/ Gallente |

Silverbackyererse
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 22:40:00 -
[85] - Quote
Congratulations Fedo's. Job's nearly done!
Crosi, why did you vanish from Ladistier about an hour after downtime last night when you were challenged to a 1v1 in your Garmur? I logged off very disappointed. 
|

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
55
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:21:00 -
[86] - Quote
chatgris wrote:
Having said that, I'm proud of what Gal mil has accomplished over the years (this isn't a pat on my back, the latter 3 years hasn't really involved me). We've held against a numerically superior force for many, many years and kept trucking even when things looked bleak.
Just thought I'd toss in some congrats before my sub runs out in this game in a few months and I probably quit for good.
o/ Gallente
Hi, how you doing. Can I have some of your stuff?
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:36:00 -
[87] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Kimmy Blossom wrote:So as I said above, the reward are way too good for how little it takes. No one wants to join the losing side and these said players are only here for the ISK. They need to change the mentality from "join FW to afk farm billions" to "join FW for PVP regardless of the rewards". It can only be done by nerfing the rewards to the ground or giving lot of LPs for killing a FW target. I agree with most of your post, except for the "no one wants to join the losing side" part. If the system allowed us to, I would have probably moved QCATS over to the Caldari militia sometime after Gallente captured every single system. Being on the losing side in FW is the most fun this game has to offer IMO (up there with wardeccing brave newbies when they lived in lowsec). Having said that, I'm proud of what Gal mil has accomplished over the years (this isn't a pat on my back, the latter 3 years hasn't really involved me). We've held against a numerically superior force for many, many years and kept trucking even when things looked bleak. Just thought I'd toss in some congrats before my sub runs out in this game in a few months and I probably quit for good. PS: Robocraft is an amazing game for any eve bittervets like myself who really enjoyed the EFT/pvp side of this game. If only I could combine something as customizable as robocraft in a sandbox MMO like eve it'd be awesome. (Oh, and I'd ******* give plexs timer rollbacks so that fighting is actually more efficient for sov than running, but I'll resist filling this post with CCP raging). o/ Gallente
Thats how you peace out! Bon voyage chat, you are a legend!
Silverbackyererse wrote:Congratulations Fedo's. Job's nearly done! Crosi, why did you vanish from Ladistier about an hour after downtime last night when you were challenged to a 1v1 in your Garmur? I logged off very disappointed. 
I dont and never will accept arranged fights or 1v1, the hunt is almost all of the fun, the kill is a technicality based entirely on a correct hunt.
if you want a 1v1 drop a can outside jita 4-4 like the rest of the spaz' Also, i was inot in a garmur. |

Soren Tyrhanos
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 01:38:00 -
[88] - Quote
Combatevolved wrote:X Gallentius wrote:I hope, that once this historic campaign is completed, the breakaway corporations that form the so-called "Caldari State" will return to the Federation, with full rights and responsibilities therein.
No matter what your ideas may tell you; you and your people are fighting a war of oppression. We have more in common with the Intaki and Mannars than you Gallenteans and your oppressive governments and regimes. You're the evil faction, the Amarr of this war.
Whoa lets calm down a moment here....... that was rather uncalled for don't you think? |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1349
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 02:05:00 -
[89] - Quote
Princess Nexxala wrote:lol! Honestly I really wish I was the bitter prick people like you make me out to be. I really do. Oh what fun that would be...
I also wonder what it would be like.
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Very serious post, was only expecting squid tears, but some qcats tears is a bonus!
Push has been going on for weeks (with some awesome action) and qcats CEO doesnt even know about it, kinda illustrates how sadly redundant they are....
Aww you are upset, being wrong about something as inconsequential as qcats leadership is understandable. Some great pilots, in a once great corp. Many of the active ones helping with the push, polesmokers right, lol.
If you dont like FW, then its probably time to leave. Hardly anyone would notice.
Qcats is probably the best thing to come out of faction war let alone gallente. But because they are not intimately involved in your latest round of alts orbitting buttons they are inconsequential? Ok.
Sorry to see a few great pvpers are leaving but I certainly understand.
Did gallente "win" again? If so congrats I hope you get another medal and another high five.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
298
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 02:13:00 -
[90] - Quote
Confirming, we loves us some cats. BLFOX is currently recruiting |
|

Silverbackyererse
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:50:00 -
[91] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
I dont and never will accept arranged fights or 1v1, the hunt is almost all of the fun, the kill is a technicality based entirely on a correct hunt.
Well............you could come hunt me 1v1 maybe. You were off like a bucket of prawns in the sun last night. The last time I saw someone move that fast it was Greg01 when he was confronted with some soap and a flannel in Rakapas many many moons ago.
I suspect you just didn't want to look bad in front of your homies but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and stop short at calling you a big girls blouse.
Oops! 
|

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
240
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:50:00 -
[92] - Quote
Kimmy Blossom wrote:Everyone joins the FW just to plex. I never cared for the winner, loser or the ISK income. I was here for the quick fights I could get without having to risk huge ships. My experience was complete crap in both factions. Around 99% of the players would warp away, cloak or burn away from me at 4k+ ms in bullshit fit. At one point, I was so desperate for a fight, I warped my Rifter at 0 on a DD and he bailed out(who the **** does that?).
So as I said above, the reward are way too good for how little it takes. No one wants to join the losing side and these said players are only here for the ISK. They need to change the mentality from "join FW to afk farm billions" to "join FW for PVP regardless of the rewards". It can only be done by nerfing the rewards to the ground or giving lot of LPs for killing a FW target.
Until then, I'd rather just fly in nullsec, it's much easier to get a fight.
Almost everybody in FW knows you're wrong, but nobody has posted about it yet because we all assume that everybody knows that you're wrong.
Fortunately to the brave new EVE pilots out there reading about the glorious Gallente uprising, a bit of advice. FW is a haven for small gang PvP. Everything you need is in FW. Enemies, friendlies, teachers, scumbags, trashtalks, good fights, logistics, safe havens, battlegrounds, and the all supporting ISK to PvP. There's nothing else like it. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2470
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 06:03:00 -
[93] - Quote
Mew!
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 06:17:00 -
[94] - Quote
Silverbackyererse wrote:Well............you could come hunt me 1v1 maybe.
i dont even know you, can you even dock in low sec FW space? |

Shad owLord
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
4
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 10:39:00 -
[95] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:
My esteemed colleagues in the Gallente Militia learned a great deal from being on the receiving end of CalMil superior numbers. We can only hope that Templis CALSF, GHIOT, OMG, and other combat oriented Caldari Militia corporations can learn as quickly.
It will be interesting to see their inevitable counter assault.
Inevitable - possibly, However I wouldn't hold my breath my friend. The only people left in Calmil these days(and these numbers are rapidly declining) are Pvp'ers and 95% of them have zero interest in plexing under the current system. So 'maybe' one day, but I doubt most of the current crop will be around to participate.
In the meantime - enjoy you warzone success. 
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
375
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 10:44:00 -
[96] - Quote
Shad owLord wrote:In the meantime - enjoy you warzone success.  We won't russians are pushing hard to get their systems back
RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

Rinai Vero
Moira. Villore Accords
327
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 10:53:00 -
[97] - Quote
Sounds about like GalMil when I joined. Back then tiers only got pushed for cashouts. At least 3/4 of the time CalMil was higher tier than us. When I asked about plexing people told me "We never plex. All we do is kill squids."
A few months later, some of the dudes you've seen posting in this thread organized our first full Warzone push. |

greg01
Inglorious-Basterds
33
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 11:02:00 -
[98] - Quote
Can you guys (gal mil) not hurry up with the 100% control? My alt wants another bs medal for the memories!
Silver, I still have that soap and flannel. Constantly in use. I will whip that big silver arse of yours if I get any more cheek! |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
101
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 13:29:00 -
[99] - Quote
Guys, after gals won FW - there is only one thing to do about FW.
We need a serious new start.
The current system is so ****** up that it is not worth playing.
We need a four faction FW board - not some CSM crap that does not work.
CCP does not care for us, its players in general or its factions.
And right they are.
Our game is their job.
It is up to us players to come on with some new ways or FW will be total dead.
I, for myself, would unite all fourr milita and wage war on null sex. |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
101
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 13:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
double post |
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 14:00:00 -
[101] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:Guys, after gals won FW - there is only one thing to do about FW.
We need a serious new start.
The current system is so ****** up that it is not worth playing.
We need a four faction FW board - not some CSM crap that does not work.
CCP does not care for us, its players in general or its factions.
And right they are.
Our game is their job.
It is up to us players to come on with some new ways or FW will be total dead.
I, for myself, would unite all fourr milita and wage war on null sex.
Can i have your stuff? |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:20:00 -
[102] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:
I, for myself, would unite all fourr milita and wage war on null sex.
We would get maybe 200 guys in destroyers. I don't think we would do very well against 2000 players in caps and battleships. The other 20,000 in the militias are just alts milking the lp.
Those who play Null Sec Junior blobbery, should not try to play against the varsity blob teams. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 17:31:00 -
[103] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Yuri Antollare wrote:Cearain wrote:Irya Boone wrote:so just kill the alts ... They just run a system or 2 over and plex there. How can people that lose at FW .. All the factions have been winning and losing at faction war since it came out. The basic problem of rabbit plexing has never been addressed. It existed in 2008 when ank posted about capping over 100 plexes in 2 weeks without a kill and it exists now with XG talking about capping 100 plexes with his alt in the same amount of time. I see with my eyes what happens in the warzone. I see the alts warping off. I see the api statistics and look at the killboards of those who get the most vp for a day. I see that when one side has sufficiently more numbers in a fleet the other side - yes even gallente - stands down. Plenty of my time in huola was spent plexing while gallente/minmatar pilots sat there docked up because they simply didn't have the numbers. When they had the numbers amarr/caldari stood down. I don't need to drink the kool-aid certain people offer on these forums about occupancy proving some sort of pvp prowess. I believe my own eyes more than what I read in the forums.
Numbers mean something of course, but you strip them of all the relevant context that allows them to mean anything valuable.
Your Huola observation is a good example, I was on for that period more than the average, forgive me if I'm wrong but I remember you being in local for a handful of hours towards the last couple of days. Burn Huola was a two week affair to begin with. My timezone (+/- 2/3 hours of DT) was the period where Min/Gal was the most outnumbered, have a look at my killboard, one evening I lost 15 ships in two hours. So you have to understand when a lot of people read your anecdotal viewpoint, blown out to encompass a two week OP, they simply sit there in stunned silence. I will agree however, Amarr suffered horribly from the 'outnumbered so dock' schtick and in my opinion was the number one reason they lost. Again, http://evf-eve.com/services/brcat/ allows a more holistic picture (including a timeline.)
Another example is your fascination with all VP being equal. So what if someone caps 100 plexes? 100 plexes in Kinakka or 100 plexes in Martoh? Does total VP count offer a more illuminating picture on this or don't you care? As others have said, offensive plexing alts (that don't even exist in the most recent iteration) did not take Kinakka, Okkamon, Asakai, Heyd etc. and defensive plexing alts did not keep Sarenemi, Mantenault, Alamel and Raihbaka under control in the backwaters against Calmill PvP entities. But of course without seeing the intel about who is doing what where, and how we responded, how could you know? You must admit the arrogance is slightly breathtaking that you think one metric will give you a brilliant understanding of anything.
You decry FW as being null sec lite and in the same post complain that some random out in the backwater is able to farm unless you put in effort to stop him. If you don't live in a system, or actively patrol it then why shouldn't some dude profit off the area? Why would you prefer to effectively increase force projection in FW by allowing one corp to hold sway over entire regions with for instance timer rollbacks?
Right now the corp I am in 'controls' about 6-7 systems in our area, our activity level is high enough that bot runners and afk plexers long since stopped sending their ships here, a good 90% of the people in plexes in our area lead to PVP. How is this not what we want? Do I have a right to complain that 12 jumps away some dude is making billions of isk, how do I own that area if we're not there long enough to deter him?
You need to stop looking in from the outside, and actually get to a position where you can see how it works in a functioning militia, Gallente get it, we have major home systems spread around the WZ, leaving few areas out of reship distance or control range, but you don't even factor something as basic as where pvpers live in you analysis of how a WZ is controlled or falls. The only thing you consistently prove to people involved in FW is how far removed you really are from the actual game, less spreadsheets and more playing.
|

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
101
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:37:00 -
[104] - Quote
FW never was null sex light - no nulbear ally would ever be able to hold sov on more than maybe 20 systems if it sov would be like FW.
Imagine station lockouts in null sex - all the nullbears would unsub in fear.
FW attack on null - why destroyers, cerar? My old corp alone could field about 12 caps with 3 or 4 players. In the past there were tons of caps in FW - in the age of BC and BS fights. Every simgle campaign against home systems was cap based - try to move war POSs, fuel and some 500 ships . . .
CCP - in their wisdom - made FW not null sex light but home for newbees - that was the idea behind the age of farming alts.
With FW utterly broken - I do not care.
There is so much more to play in EVE.
Btw, my old corp only attacked huola out of sheer boredom - the lads had the said intention to quit EVE after the campaign - because it is clear that CCP will not fix anything - they simply do not care for FW.
The huola campaign was lost when gals lead and defended huola - without them gals huola would have fell in the end of the first week. Them gals even equipped the minnies with ships - the minnie only had farming ships in huola.
I got some 9 bil only from some stuff some ppl quitting gave me, Crosi. That was only small change.
What do you think do ppl in FW earn in ISK - when they fly dual box high grade slaves in frigs and dessies? |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1087
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:52:00 -
[105] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:FW never was null sex light - no nulbear ally would ever be able to hold sov on more than maybe 20 systems if it sov would be like FW.
Imagine station lockouts in null sex - all the nullbears would unsub in fear.
FW attack on null - why destroyers, cerar? My old corp alone could field about 12 caps with 3 or 4 players. In the past there were tons of caps in FW - in the age of BC and BS fights. Every simgle campaign against home systems was cap based - try to move war POSs, fuel and some 500 ships . . .
CCP - in their wisdom - made FW not null sex light but home for newbees - that was the idea behind the age of farming alts.
With FW utterly broken - I do not care.
There is so much more to play in EVE.
Btw, my old corp only attacked huola out of sheer boredom - the lads had the said intention to quit EVE after the campaign - because it is clear that CCP will not fix anything - they simply do not care for FW.
The huola campaign was lost when gals lead and defended huola - without them gals huola would have fell in the end of the first week. Them gals even equipped the minnies with ships - the minnie only had farming ships in huola.
I got some 9 bil only from some stuff some ppl quitting gave me, Crosi. That was only small change.
What do you think do ppl in FW earn in ISK - when they fly dual box high grade slaves in frigs and dessies?
Calm down there rehelis, the war is over, you can stop the PR spin. The truth is out and you lost.
Also, dull sec has station lockouts. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 22:27:00 -
[106] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:Your Huola observation is a good example, I was on for that period more than the average, forgive me if I'm wrong but I remember you being in local for a handful of hours towards the last couple of days. Burn Huola was a two week affair to begin with. My timezone (+/- 2/3 hours of DT) was the period where Min/Gal was the most outnumbered, have a look at my killboard, one evening I lost 15 ships in two hours. So you have to understand when a lot of people read your anecdotal viewpoint, blown out to encompass a two week OP, they simply sit there in stunned silence. I will agree however, Amarr suffered horribly from the 'outnumbered so dock' schtick and in my opinion was the number one reason they lost. Again, http://evf-eve.com/services/brcat/ allows a more holistic picture (including a timeline.)
I took a few days off from work for that. What happened was no surprise. It the same that happens every time the fighting is confined to a single system. When you can't match the numbers you dock/pos up. Gallente/minmatar did that just as much and just as surely as amarr/caldari. Amarr/Caldari just didnGÇÖt have the numbers to hold long enough to get that magical net of 3000 vp.
Sure there were times when it was unclear who had the upper hand and fights were had and it was great. Sometimes they went our way sometimes yours. But most of the 2 week time numerical superiority was established by one side or the other. When I was online we often had the numbers. You know what happened then? Minmatar/Gallente stayed docked and we sat in plexes shooting nothing but rats for the extended periods of time to bring the system contestation level up.
Your claim that amarr lost the war because they did not throw free kills at the Gallente/minmatar when we were outnumbered is silly. Gallente and minmatar would stay docked when they had fewer numbers as well. If you want to blame our refusal to give free kills for our loss then minmatar and gallente should have lost as well. Anyone who understands eve or faction war in the least knows that if Amarr really had more firepower for the time necessary to flip the system then it would have become vulnerable. Your not fooling anyone but the new guys.
OK its true that really bad pvpers can still lose even though they have an overwhelming firepower advantage. But that wasn't the case here. The side that established they had the firepower advantage in that system would sit in plexes for extended periods of time. The fights happened when the firepower advantages changed. But gallente/and minmatar never repeatedly gave us free kills any more than Amarr/Caldari gave them to you.
Oh and claiming your fought outnumbered based on some killboard report is ridiculous. FCs don't decide if they are outnumbered based on how many people entered and fought in the system over the last week or even 1 hour before. They look at what they have in fleet right now, (and often even have to open a new fleet to see if the people are even really there!) and then they look at what is in the plex right now. They may have had a huge fleet 1 hour before but that won't mean they will have better chances in a fight in a plex now.
Second Amarr/caldari may have outnumbered minmatar/gallente 150 to 50 for 12 hours. But then if minmatar outnumber amarr 30 to 10 for the next 12 hours all the gains will be lost. What does the battle report show for the day? Amarr/caldari: 160 minmatar/gallente: 80. What is the significance of these numbers? 0 This is basic eveonline pvp so really stop pretending the silly battle reports show anything.
ThatGÇÖs what I mean about gallente kool-aid versus what I saw with my own eyes. I saw with my own eyes lots of gallente in system and even some flying around but they did not actually try to challenge the plex when we had the numbers. We just sat capturing plex after plex unopposed.
You can claim you were fighting outnumbered all you want - but you didn't do that when I was there. I may not have been there the whole time you were, but I was there allot of the time. Fighting larger blobs just feeds the enemy and boosts their morale. The strategy for both sides when they were outnumbered was to sit it out and let the other sides numbers start to drop from boredom/other obligations.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 22:28:00 -
[107] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote: Another example is your fascination with all VP being equal. So what if someone caps 100 plexes? 100 plexes in Kinakka or 100 plexes in Martoh? Does total VP count offer a more illuminating picture on this or don't you care? As others have said, offensive plexing alts (that don't even exist in the most recent iteration) did not take Kinakka, Okkamon, Asakai, Heyd etc. and defensive plexing alts did not keep Sarenemi, Mantenault, Alamel and Raihbaka under control in the backwaters against Calmill PvP entities.
ItGÇÖs odd that you would even try to deny how important rabbit plexing alts are. My fascination with vp has to do with the actual game mechanics as opposed to some imagined magical goal. If you net 3000 more vp in a system than the enemy controlling party it becomes vulnerable. Until it is vulnerable it cannot be taken. So whether the alts are defensive plexing to keep the net number of vp below 3000 or alts offensive plexing to get the net at or above 3000 they have just as much of an impact as a pvper who does the same.
Your deplexing alts were huge in the efforts to capture all systems. I had some alts offensive plexing in some of your systems. (so as for your claim they donGÇÖt exist well, I will believe my own eyes) and each time I would get the system contested level up and the next day it would drop again. Without plexing alts you guys would not have enough systems to get past tier 2 let alone hit tier 4. The rabbit alts from the caldari and amarr would overwhelm all but a few systems. ItGÇÖs the way the occupancy game is won and it always has been. See posts by ank if you donGÇÖt believe me.
Yuri Antollare wrote: But of course without seeing the intel about who is doing what where, and how we responded, how could you know? You must admit the arrogance is slightly breathtaking that you think one metric will give you a brilliant understanding of anything.
There is no arrogance in understanding the mechanic that reaching a net of +3000 vp in a system will make it vulnerable. If you donGÇÖt reach that net net of +3000 vp it will remain invulnerable. It doesnGÇÖt matter whether you are kept under the net 3000 because you kept losing pvp fights or because everytime you log off for the day someone elses alt comes in and deplexes it. It remains invulnerable.
There is nothing arrogant in understanding that if you only have 3 systems you will not be able to reach tier 2. These are the actual game mechanics. They are facts not arrogant opinions.
There is no arrogance in seeing with my own eyes how many enemies are on scan in a plex and how many people are in fleet and what they are saying they can bring. This metric will decide whether a competent fc will fight or not. If you claim gallente use some other metric it is amazing that it always seems to fit this metric when I see them in local GÇô unless they are new.
Much of what you gallente spew is magic talk. Despite their talk gallente worked no magic in huola. They generally won about as many fights as would be expected given the relative fire power of each side. Based on the number of alt d-plexing rabbits they have in the warzone taking the entire front is not surprising either.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 22:29:00 -
[108] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote: You decry FW as being null sec lite and in the same post complain that some random out in the backwater is able to farm unless you put in effort to stop him.
I call it GÇ£null sec juniorGÇ¥, not GÇ£null sec lite.GÇ¥ Its junior because the fights involve at best 200 destroyers instead of 2000 battleships and caps. But its not null sec lite because the actual game play is in no way more casual. Creating alts to defensive plex is not for casual gamers. ItGÇÖs boring and only hard core eve addicts will bother with it for very long before deciding other things should occupy their time. Gallente are hard core and in fact I think many of them should take their hardcore attitudes to null sec where they belong. Leave fw for people who like a game with action and fun pvp. Not grinds with alts and blobs. If you are sitting in a system outnumbered 10 to 30 your options are no different than if you are in a system outnumbered 300 to 900. If you are against pvpers who can fog a mirror you are still just going to sit it out instead of giving free kills. So Faction war occupancy is shaping up to have all the calories of null sec but lacks the flavor of high stakes, huge battles.
It is a problem that the fighting is becoming focused on one or 2 systems. Everyone get to huola! If you canGÇÖt get a blob big enough then you will just be giving free kills there. If you go a few systems over you will find no fun pvp and can expect to have your plexing work undone by d-plexing alts after you log off.
Yuri Antollare wrote: If you don't live in a system, or actively patrol it then why shouldn't some dude profit off the area? Why would you prefer to effectively increase force projection in FW by allowing one corp to hold sway over entire regions with for instance timer rollbacks?
The only way they would hold sway over entire regions is if they had pvpers spread out over those regions fighting in plexing. That is how it should be. They shouldnGÇÖt have sway because they have 3xs the number of rabbit alts that will swoop in as soon as the pvpers leave.
Yuri Antollare wrote: Right now the corp I am in 'controls' about 6-7 systems in our area, our activity level is high enough that bot runners and afk plexers long since stopped sending their ships here, a good 90% of the people in plexes in our area lead to PVP. How is this not what we want? Do I have a right to complain that 12 jumps away some dude is making billions of isk, how do I own that area if we're not there long enough to deter him?
But your militia controls all of the caldari gallente front. ItGÇÖs easy to claim you control those 6-7 systems but itGÇÖs really the larger gallente militia that controls them. If the rest of the militia switched sides to caldari you wouldnGÇÖt control them. Why? Because your fc would look in a plex and see 50 people there and see that you only have 10 in fleet. Regardless of whether your fc would suicide your fleet you would lose those systems one after another. And then when you tried to oplex you would find that alts come in and dplex when you are not there and if you still manage to chase them like a fool and build the contested level, eventually the blob will come back and undue your work.
Yuri Antollare wrote: You need to stop looking in from the outside, and actually get to a position where you can see how it works in a functioning militia, Gallente get it, we have major home systems spread around the WZ, leaving few areas out of reship distance or control range, but you don't even factor something as basic as where pvpers live in you analysis of how a WZ is controlled or falls. The only thing you consistently prove to people involved in FW is how far removed you really are from the actual game, less spreadsheets and more playing.
I think you need stop believing the gallente are magic talk and start understanding the actual mechanics. You will then have a better understanding of the game. BTW I am not anti gallente. When the gallente lost the war it was not due to some brilliant caldari plan.
Gallente want to claim what they did involves some brilliant strategy. But really those strategies are mundane. Plus they donGÇÖt work unless you keep deplexing in the empty frigates that I see warping off throughout the war zone. Yes I see them with my own eyes and I see how many vp they get on the api dump with my own eyes. You telling me GÇ£never mind those alts they donGÇÖt effect a thingGÇ¥ is not going to work. I am going to believe my own eyes.
Getting as many players as you can in a single system to try to outblob the other side is not a brilliant strategy either. It works under the current mechanics but itGÇÖs not brilliant. It only works when you can get the blob in a single system for long enough to get that net 3000vp. Gallente can do that. ThatGÇÖs fine. But itGÇÖs nothing magic or brilliant. ItGÇÖs null sec junior.
If on the other hand each plex was to be fought over because players knew were the timers were running and tried to assign pilot to different systems rationally (as opposed to always saying GÇ£everyone form up in system ______GÇ¥) then we would see some interesting strategies. Strategies that are different than dull sec blob formation for the win.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1087
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 23:27:00 -
[109] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Because your fc would look in a plex and see 50 people there and see that you only have 10 in fleet. Regardless of whether your fc would suicide your fleet you would lose those systems one after another.
You do know who you are talking to right? Those guys held the line against one of the games largest alliances for months. |

Rinai Vero
Moira. Villore Accords
327
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 23:41:00 -
[110] - Quote
Ya, fighting against superior numbers never works. That's why TEST conquered Eha then went on to successfully sweep the warzone while they were in the State Protectorate. |
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2484
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 00:18:00 -
[111] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Much of what you gallente spew is magic talk.
Don't hate us because we're better than you.
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2484
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 00:22:00 -
[112] - Quote
Rinai Vero wrote:Ya, fighting against superior numbers never works. That's why TEST conquered Eha then went on to successfully sweep the warzone while they were in the State Protectorate. TEST would have never been able to do what they did if they didn't have the entire Caldari militia on their side as well.
It was a bit embarrassing living out of Aeschee for all those months, but you know what we did? We ran Sisters of Eve missions until the Caldari left Eha out of boredom. Then our alts plexed it up and we moved back.
|

Rinai Vero
Moira. Villore Accords
327
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 00:51:00 -
[113] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Rinai Vero wrote:Ya, fighting against superior numbers never works. That's why TEST conquered Eha then went on to successfully sweep the warzone while they were in the State Protectorate. TEST would have never been able to do what they did if they didn't have the entire Caldari militia on their side as well. It was a bit embarrassing living out of Aeschee for all those months, but you know what we did? We ran Sisters of Eve missions until the Caldari left Eha out of boredom. Then our alts plexed it up and we moved back.
Not really that big of a deal though. I just spent the whole time running Squid missions in my stealth bomber. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 01:47:00 -
[114] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Because your fc would look in a plex and see 50 people there and see that you only have 10 in fleet. Regardless of whether your fc would suicide your fleet you would lose those systems one after another.
You do know who you are talking to right? Those guys held the line against one of the games largest alliances for months.
A single corp I was in farmed test, before they failscaded. We had the luxury of basing out of the same low sec station as them. It was mostly easy kills because they never could figure out the most basic low sec mechanics of how to dock and undock (and I didn't really participate much myself).
http://archive.evenews24.com/2012/02/08/test-a-different-kind-of-alliance/
It's surprising they could even find their way to the right low sec region to find a plex.
I scan through both gallente and test postings of the time. The bottom line from what I read was test played the mechanics and did not enter the gallente fantasy world where faction war is all about "home systems." They steamrolled gallente to hit their goal of tier 4 to farm lp and left. Gallente kept saying they didnt' want that system anyway, nor that one, or that one. And then gallente claimed to "win" because they managed to hold a handfull of systems that test never needed to hit tier 4 anyway. \o/
But yeah drink the gallente koolaid and you will get the idea that test entered some home syste with 2000 players and 4 gallente fought them off in atrons. Whatever revision history you want.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2484
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 01:58:00 -
[115] - Quote
Cearain wrote: But yeah drink the gallente koolaid and you will get the idea that test entered some home syste with 2000 players and 4 gallente fought them off in atrons. Whatever revision history you want.
Scoreboard: Gallente 2, Cearain 0.
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 02:34:00 -
[116] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: But yeah drink the gallente koolaid and you will get the idea that test entered some home syste with 2000 players and 4 gallente fought them off in atrons. Whatever revision history you want.
Scoreboard: Gallente 2, Cearain 0.
You think so little of the gallente militia that you pit them all against one character and keep score?
I admit I can not beat the entire gallente militia alone but the way some of them blob I think many would consider it a good fight.
But anyway we were talking about how 4 gallente in atrons fought off 2000 test pilots and how your most recent sweep of warzone had nothing to do with alts rabbit plexing.
You should get back to that since it sounds more impressive than an entire militia beating a single character. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2484
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 02:42:00 -
[117] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: But yeah drink the gallente koolaid and you will get the idea that test entered some home syste with 2000 players and 4 gallente fought them off in atrons. Whatever revision history you want.
Scoreboard: Gallente 2, Cearain 0. I admit I can not beat the entire gallente militia alone but the way some of them blob I think many would consider it a good fight. Don't be so mad. At least you didn't take any days off work to try to stop us this time.
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 03:08:00 -
[118] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: But yeah drink the gallente koolaid and you will get the idea that test entered some home syste with 2000 players and 4 gallente fought them off in atrons. Whatever revision history you want.
Scoreboard: Gallente 2, Cearain 0. I admit I can not beat the entire gallente militia alone but the way some of them blob I think many would consider it a good fight. Don't be so mad. At least you didn't take any days off work to try to stop us this time.
Yeah this gallente campaign was not likely to be much more exciting than huola so I didn't bother taking off work - or even logging in. I think I called that right. But you can still count it as a win against me if it makes you feel better about yourself.
But before we move off of test I have a question for you. Are you upset that test and caldari steamrolled to tier 4 and never needed your "home systems"? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos
92
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 04:37:00 -
[119] - Quote
It seems the point went over your head slightly. Yes it takes 3000 VP, again, where is this VP scored and what is its impact? Is VP scored in Alamel the same as VP scored in Innia when it was a calmill home system? You say that gallente deplexing alts kept the backwaters down as we went for a medal, yet I'm there moving corp ships to the systems in question and scoring 10 kills a night against pvp fit squids, so understand how I think you are a little silly. Lest we even mention the 0 impact alts had on pushing defended calmill systems.
Was someone able to send an unfit derptron at some point of the day to deplexe freely in a system that Calmill needed to survive? Almost certainly... and?? Again if there is not enough Calmill resistance to push out an unfit atron then who are they or you to complain? Would you feel better if it was a pvp fit gallente pilot plexing against no resistance? If so why? No one's there to shoot him anyway, aka the caldari strategic decision doomed them in either scenario, the fact it can be achieved with an unfit ship is a symptom, not a cause.
Your Huola analysis is consistently bewildering, just remember, this forum is filled with people who were actually there and won't be relying on this forum post to know what they saw. The vast majority of galmill plex doctrines are designed around the singular purpose of fighting outnumbered and being able to treat the campaign as a game of inches when we have to. Derptrons are designed to cost so little they can be used in an attrition format, the long range kestrels are designed to give 5-6 people a chance in novices against 20-30 man gangs, breacher coraxes are again, designed to pack the most punch for tank/isk and swing the casualty rates. These are fits that have been used as intended since the closing days of Evoke, let alone TEST.
For me to believe what you seem to think happened in Huola, would require me to assume that Galmill all of a sudden stopped fighting in the manner that we always do and that our logistics demand. When you are also the guy selling derptrons, periodically logging into UStz, and being heavily involved in AU/early EU, your opinion becomes even harder to believe because I was actually there.
Quips like "if they have 30 and u have 10 no one warps in" reveal your lack of understanding of the deeper strategies at play. No we don't warp into your occupied plex, we go open the novice with 5 dudes and sit there till you warp over to push us out, then we warp to the plex you just left and kill the poor sod you (by 'you' I mean others actually engaged in strategy) left behind. One has to only look at the fits and doctrines Amarr use (in comparison to us) to realize they were never structured to fight that way, you kill two derptrons and we kill your 9mill inquisitor, ad infinitum. Your inability to fight for a minute here or there or inflict losses during 'bad' times for you stood in stark contrast to our ability to slow you and still inflict losses even when we had four people in fleet.
As to the TEST goals, its a sandbox so we can't deny them a victory if they wish to define it as reaching T4, tbh though under the system as was then, that wouldn't be much of a goal as it would be fairly inevitable given their size. You may say we moved the goalposts but the truth is our metric is always our homesystems as when the pendulum swung hardest in the past it was the only thing people could hold on to as an accomplishment. But the assertion that TEST didnt want to take Eha or continue crushing galmill home systems from there is patently ludicrous to anyone with passing familiarity of the conflict. Not only did they say as much in their first leaked meetings, but I was there for month after month of the sperging in local about exactly what their intentions were.
Perhaps others such as your esteemed Amarr could have also held them off, but since we've beat both you and them, forgive us for not really caring either way.
P.S The kool-aid references would work better if minnies/gals lost Huola, if the georgetown residents had actually ascended to heaven then we would have been the idiots. It is not gallente kool-aid when we are helping you understand why you lost and we won, people 'drink the koolaid' when they make up **** for why THEY lost. Aka your side of the encounter.
|

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Pyre Falcon Defence and Security Imperial Outlaws.
1640
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 04:50:00 -
[120] - Quote
I for one welcome the price reductions in Navy Comets, Vexors, and Exeqs, made possible by this stunning military victory. I can only hope CCP adjusts FW missions so FDU can run them solo in stealth bombers at last, so I can enjoy further reductions on these excellent hulls.
I think making these hulls more accessible to the oppressed, the downtrodden, and the common man is the real victory here for Freedom, and for that I salute you all in the FDU. |
|

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate
464
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 05:01:00 -
[121] - Quote
Walls of text decrying how defensive plexing alts win FW. First it was offensive plexing alts, now defensive plexing alts. You look for any excuse to try and belittle the efforts of actual pilots who took the time and effort to flip systems and take full warzone control. Probably because you couldn't do it yourself. Last I checked it actually takes people offensive plexing to flip a system. You want to prove your theories? Then do it. Get your own friends/allies and army of de-plex alts, then come on over to the Gallente warzone and take our systems. Stop shiptoasting on the forums and actually do something.
TL:DR: Plexing alts don't flip systems. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2484
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 05:13:00 -
[122] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: But yeah drink the gallente koolaid and you will get the idea that test entered some home syste with 2000 players and 4 gallente fought them off in atrons. Whatever revision history you want.
Scoreboard: Gallente 2, Cearain 0. I admit I can not beat the entire gallente militia alone but the way some of them blob I think many would consider it a good fight. Don't be so mad. At least you didn't take any days off work to try to stop us this time. Yeah this gallente campaign was not likely to be much more exciting than huola so I didn't bother taking off work - or even logging in. I think I called that right. But you can still count it as a win against me if it makes you feel better about yourself. It was actually pretty damn exciting. Thousands of kills over 2 weeks. Lots of death and carnage. And yes, I'll take the win over players who decide to quit and not show up for the fight. Win is win.
|

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
101
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 07:42:00 -
[123] - Quote
Plexing alts are the major power in CCP FW.
Crosi - station lockouts in NPC null sex? In never heard of that.
But lets us face the facts.
Gals won FW.
|

Veronica Isagar
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
7
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 08:26:00 -
[124] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:Plexing alts are the major power in CCP FW.
But lets us face the facts.
Gals won FW.
I'm just curious, when was the last time you ran a plex, in FW.
And since the mechanic change, alts don't normally o-plex, mite de-plex, if anything, and the people who did de-plex key systems far as I know were all main's. mite have 1 or 2 alts in the mix, but all mains.
We (as in Gallente Federation) took the warzone, we provided content, we proven our logistical capabilities, we were ready to fight when the fight was there. We stood our watch. But what I can't get over is the amount of text that is written just in an attempt to prove or disprove a point, you ever heard of K.I.S.S.? You really mite want to look it up one day, as you clearly have a lot time on your hands to write full essays and novels while you operate in null-sec, by the way hows them deadly asteroids working out for ya, and there friends, the red crosses?? I'm sure someone will quote this statement and write out another chapter, or two, just to say something. Like I said K.I.S.S. its such a wonderful thing.
Enjoy |

Veronica Isagar
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
7
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 08:32:00 -
[125] - Quote
Mr Duffo wrote:gals sux go back to villore and mine
Duffo, play nice, we won fair and square, Maybe you should go remove those pesky varmints the asteroids from Vlillore and there Deadly Friends, the dreaded red crosses, for a change. I know living in hi-sec isn't your cup of tea, but I hear Amarr has lovely weather this time of year hun, give ya a chance to work on your tan.
Enjoy!! |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1353
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 14:54:00 -
[126] - Quote
Test proved that you don't need to take home systems to hit tier 4. You guys keep talking about how important home systems are but the mechanics don't actually say that. Sure it causes some disruption. But really by now people know how to use black frog. It's not that big of a deal.
As far as how many kills you get plexing "back waters" I have my experience you have yours. Your telling me what it is like is not going to change what I see with my own eyes. I will let others make up their own minds based on whether they see lots of pilots warping out of plexes. Why don't we leave it at that?
Yuri Antollare wrote: Was someone able to send an unfit derptron at some point of the day to deplexe freely in a system that Calmill needed to survive? Almost certainly... and?? Again if there is not enough Calmill resistance to push out an unfit atron..
I don't think its that no one could fly an unfit derptron to rabbit plex. Its more that rabbit plexing is not very fun. Since you need to do that to win occupancy war people don't really care about winning it. That is why this campaign had fairly pathetic numbers compared to the number of subscribers in eve and even compared to the number of people in fw. Its not the players it's the game.
Yuri Antollare wrote: Your Huola analysis is consistently bewildering, .. The vast majority of galmill plex doctrines are designed around the singular purpose of fighting outnumbered and being able to treat the campaign as a game of inches when we have to
You feel bewildered because I am telling you something inconsistent with the gallente magic talk. Start counting the numbers in your fleet and the number of enemies that show up on dscan in a plex before the fight. You will see you do not fight outnumbered any more than they do.
As far as what you saw you said you were on a few hours before or after downtime. Thats about 6am central time for the us an about noon in Europe. Think about what I said about the numbers in battle reports and understand how your time period might not be a very good indicator.
Yuri Antollare wrote: . Derptrons are designed to cost so little they can be used in an attrition format, the long range kestrels are designed to give 5-6 people a chance in novices against 20-30 man gangs, breacher coraxes are again, designed to pack the most punch for tank/isk and swing the casualty rates. These are fits that have been used as intended since the closing days of Evoke, let alone TEST.
I love the gallente derptron doctrine everyone in fleet would salivate when we would see them on d-scan. But gallente would only send a few in and then stop feeding them to us in huola. Whether something like this would work against test or other nullbears I imagine it would. But they don't claim to be pvpers at all.
Yuri Antollare wrote: For me to believe what you seem to think happened in Huola, would require me to assume that Galmill all of a sudden stopped fighting in the manner that we always do and that our logistics demand. When you are also the guy selling derptrons, periodically logging into UStz, and being heavily involved in AU/early EU, your opinion becomes even harder to believe because I was actually there.
Ok so you think the entire time that huola was plexed up to say 70% contested gallelnte were throwing derptrons the entire time? Sorry to say this isn't true, I wish it were if you did we probably would have kept the fleet numbers up. But gallente sat docked with the minmatar and the amarr ran plexes unopposed. Again I will believe my own eyes. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1354
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 15:29:00 -
[127] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote: Quips like "if they have 30 and u have 10 no one warps in" reveal your lack of understanding of the deeper strategies at play. GǪOne has to only look at the fits and doctrines Amarr use (in comparison to us) to realize they were never structured to fight that way, you kill two derptrons and we kill your 9mill inquisitor, ad infinitum. Your inability to fight for a minute here or there or inflict losses during 'bad' times for you stood in stark contrast to our ability to slow you and still inflict losses even when we had four people in fleet.
Sure both sides were trying to get in plexes early and split the other side up a bit when they were outnumbered. But the vast majority of the time when one side was outnumbered 3 to 1 they sat out.
You are wrong to think isk was a big issue in this campaign. A nine million isk inquisitor was not a big deal. Generally speaking when you have fewer pilots you try to get a bit more out each with better fittings. Sure itGÇÖs dumb to go with faction fittings unless you are extremely space rich but t2 fittings are usually preferred. On the other hand if you outnumber your opponent sufficiently you might as well fly cheap tech 1 fits. So you got it backwards.
Isk was not the issue. I offered the ceos isk and fittings if they wanted it and never had one take me up on it. The problem was we could not keep the numbers in fleets that we needed for the extended time we needed to bring huola vulnerable.
Yuri Antollare wrote: As to the TEST goals, its a sandbox so we can't deny them a victory if they wish to define it as reaching T4, tbh though under the system as was then, that wouldn't be much of a goal as it would be fairly inevitable given their size. GǪ. You may say we moved the goalposts...
Tier 4 is basically the goal in the mechanics. Tier 5 is hardly cost effective in the current system.
Ok I will be fair. I it wasnGÇÖt really changing the goalposts. Gallente have been talking about holding home systems before test. But the goalpost is a made up one. And all the talk about how holding these GÇ£key systemsGÇ¥ will prevent the other side from this or that were basically proven false. Test proved you donGÇÖt need to take home systems to hit tier 4. And tier 4 is basically the best economic situation you can get under the current mechanics.
Yuri Antollare wrote: But the assertion that TEST didnt want to take Eha or continue crushing galmill home systems from there is patently ludicrous to anyone with passing familiarity of the conflict. Not only did they say as much in their first leaked meetings, but I was there for month after month of the sperging in local about exactly what their intentions were.
Ok I admit I just read the forums and some of the reddit threads. On reddit you would have someone say hey lets take _____ home system! And the response would be GÇ£why fight at a disadvantage in their home system? Of course gallente want us to go where they are all set up but why go to the terrain they want? I have to say that makes allot of sense.
On the forums you would have some test member saying how they took all these systems and they are at this or that tier. Then some gallente yeah but you didnGÇÖt take system X so we win! And honestly I donGÇÖt think most people from test thought you were serious. Because when you look at something describing the actual mechanics of faction war you donGÇÖt see anything about victory conditions based on holding certain systems. I know the guy was serious but there was really no reason to expect someone who wasnGÇÖt used to the militia rp lore to take that seriously. Now it seems clear that test did make some sort of half assed effort at eha GÇô I think because they had agents there. And maybe you did fight outnumbered but the fights I saw from that campaign on you tube showed gallente with the numerical advantage. In other words Test did not bring 2000 pilots in system and gallente held them off. But I admit I donGÇÖt really know. Maybe you did fight outnumbered against test. If I were to pick a group to fight outnumbered against Test would be near the top.
Yuri Antollare wrote: Perhaps others such as your esteemed Amarr could have also held them off, but since we've beat both you and them, forgive us for not really caring either way.
Well like I said before it wasnGÇÖt really the amarr militia but one amarr corp of 31 players that farmed kills from test when they happened to base out of the same low sec system.
IGÇÖm not sure what you mean when you say you GÇ£beat the amarr.GÇ¥ But yeah you probably could beat the amarr at this game of rabbit plexing. Amarr has fairly consistently been the smallest and most pvp focused militia. We donGÇÖt have an interest in the whole rabbit plexing game. But why donGÇÖt you come and see? I am sure many would like the pvp to be conveniently delivered close to home even if it is mostly blobby.
Yuri Antollare wrote: P.S The kool-aid references would work better if minnies/gals lost Huola, if the georgetown residents had actually ascended to heaven then we would have been the idiots. ..
The issue is not whether you held huola. Sure that is reality. The kool-aid is when you start claiming you won all the battles when you were clearly outnumbered and kept fighting when you were outnumbered. You didnGÇÖt. When you were outnumbered you mostly sat in stations and Amarr plexed up the system unopposed.
To use your analogy we are not idiots for not drinking the kool-aid. Some koolaid drinkers might in fact be there. They are likely there despite drinking the koolaid as opposed to being there because they drank it.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
414
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 15:32:00 -
[128] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Test proved that you don't need to take home systems to hit tier 4. Simple math proves that. Owning 61% of systems in the WZ can give you Tier 4 if you play it right. Going for more than that doesn't make sense unless you're pushing for another reason.
Quote:You guys keep talking about how important home systems are but the mechanics don't actually say that. Sure it causes some disruption. But really by now people know how to use black frog. It's not that big of a deal. You're confusing Tier and number of systems held with actual control. Probably something to do with your insane focus on VP numbers uber alles, which leads you to believe that "rabbit plexers" are the ultimate tool of control.
They're not.
Control depends on your ability to project power over an area. "Home Systems" are well stocked nodal points chosen for their geographic advantages - specifically their ability to influence traffic through their zone of control.
Failure to recognize that means you're not even playing the same game we are.
Granted, you're over in the Min/Amarr zone, which is a totally different beast - primarily because of geography. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
102
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 06:11:00 -
[129] - Quote
Cear - the gals won - it is true that CCP made them OP and did even actiivly help them - but the other side is the gal mil did better than any other milita.
This is a fact.
As I said before, I do not blame my fellow players in EVE - and I still love the game - the problem is simply bad game design.
I have great respect for them gals - they show commitment and fight. What more can you wish of an opposing milita?
You are measured by you foes, after all.
Huola campaign is over - we set it up to burn stuff and had good fun doing so.
The future is what matters. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 10:19:00 -
[130] - Quote
Veskrashen
I think we agree on quite a bit actually.
We both agree simple math shows that you don't need home systems to take tier 4.
We both might agree that tier 5 is really not an economically sound goal.
Those are the goals set up by ccp. The rest like holding a home system are personal goals that anyone can strive for but there is no real mechanic incentive.
I do agree that holding on to your home bases allows gallente to have more power projection. And because you have a larger war zone that might have more importance. But even the caldari gallente war zone has about 20 systems that border the faction war zone. Not all have stations so you may have to go another jump from there. And some are high sec which might be a problem for some pilots below -5 (although I never really had a problem going one jump into low sec when my sec status was that low) And yes some are in enemy high sec space but again there is generally no problem bringing plexing ships one or 2 jumps in.
So from the perspective of pure occupancy gaining there are multiple places that anyone can base and have better access to these multiple border systems than your home systems would provide. Then its just a matter of grinding plex after plex after plex, for those with the will to do that. From there putting plexing ships in a few stations as you work in is not a big deal. Again if you are interested in plexing.
The problem is who wants to do that? It's extremely boring. Especially if you gain occupancy in the most efficient manner possible. That is why so many in faction war don't even bother with it. It's not that there is some big secret on how to do it.
Veskrashen wrote:
You're playing a different game, Cerain. You know nothing about the world our militia inhabits. Trying to tell us we're wrong while demonstrating a shocking lack of understanding of the realities of our faction and our warzone is why we continue to marginalize your arguments.
I understand the game. The fact that 5 veteran players and a pack of 50 new players following them disagree and try to marginalize the points I raise is not a big deal.
Huge numbers of people are finding that faction war occupancy is not worth playing. Its for the same reasons. They eventually realize that the best way to gain occupancy is to get multiple alt accounts and start rabbit plexing.
XG tries to deny it and is one of the most outspoken in trying to marginalize the points I make. Yet he admits his alt deplexed 100 plexes in 2 weeks. The proof is in what you do, not in what you say.
Crosi admits plexing alts are important and has learned to embrace them.
Both of those players now say rollbacks are "no longer needed." Gallente used to have a stong emphasis on pvp and it was a gallente pilot who gave the most elegant proposal for timer rollbacks. But in the meantime gallente started getting lots and lots of alts to defensive plex. I saw this in the war zone. Caldari would oplex to farm isk. Gallente would have alts to dplex mainly for occupancy.
Well ccp boosted defensive alt plexing and that happened to help the gallente defensive plexing alt army and stunted the caldari farmers. It wasn't an intentional boost to gallente by ccp - so no I'm not tinfoil hatting, and to be clear, I don't think ccp ever intentionally tried to help a particular miltia. But this change happened to be good for the gallente defensive alt army and bad for the caldari alt army.
So now since it is defensive alts that are favored all of a sudden timer rollbacks are "not needed." As if defensive alts in plexes are any more pvp oriented.
There are 300,000 subscribers to eve. Tens of thousands of those players have tried faction war and see that occupancy mechanics need to be fixed so don't waste their time. Possibly you and the few dozen people who think its great are the ones at the margin. Even the other 20,000 players currently in faction war understand that the occupancy war with these mechanics is not something to care about. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1099
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 12:42:00 -
[131] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I understand the game.
Then how do you explain almost everything you have ever posted?
Non of your impressions of FW are even close to the game i play. Your lack of interest in how people who actually play the game see it, is as always, astonishing. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 12:53:00 -
[132] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:I understand the game. Then how do you explain almost everything you have ever posted? Non of your impressions of FW are even close to the game i play. Your lack of interest in how people who actually play the game see it, is as always, astonishing.
Were you astonished when XG admitted his alt captured 100 plexes in 2 weeks?
I wasn't surprised at all. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1099
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:06:00 -
[133] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:I understand the game. Then how do you explain almost everything you have ever posted? Non of your impressions of FW are even close to the game i play. Your lack of interest in how people who actually play the game see it, is as always, astonishing. Were you astonished when XG admitted his alt captured 100 plexes in 2 weeks? I wasn't surprised at all.
You might be astonished how many fights xg's alts generated him. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:17:00 -
[134] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:I understand the game. Then how do you explain almost everything you have ever posted? Non of your impressions of FW are even close to the game i play. Your lack of interest in how people who actually play the game see it, is as always, astonishing. Were you astonished when XG admitted his alt captured 100 plexes in 2 weeks? I wasn't surprised at all. You might be astonished how many fights xg's alts generated him.
Oh yeah here we go with the spin. Really all these d-plexing alts don't really effect occupancy, they are actually there to get fights. Right right. There are much better ways to use an alt to get fights than sitting him in a plex orbitting a button 20 hours a week. We both know that.
Oh and by the way XG himself isn't even showing as getting 780 vp for the week.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1099
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:24:00 -
[135] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:I understand the game. Then how do you explain almost everything you have ever posted? Non of your impressions of FW are even close to the game i play. Your lack of interest in how people who actually play the game see it, is as always, astonishing. Were you astonished when XG admitted his alt captured 100 plexes in 2 weeks? I wasn't surprised at all. You might be astonished how many fights xg's alts generated him. Oh yeah here we go with the spin. Really all these d-plexing alts don't really effect occupancy, they are actually there to get fights. Right right. There are much better ways to use an alt to get fights than sitting him in a plex orbitting a button 20 hours a week. We both know that. Oh and by the way XG himself isn't even showing as getting 780 vp for the week.
Excuse me for one second while i compare xg's killboard and yours to see who is doing it right. Oh, lol. No surprises there, zero kills this month. You are quite the authority on how to play eve. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
417
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:25:00 -
[136] - Quote
Cereain -
We actually don't agree. Case in point:
Quote:Those are the goals set up by ccp. CCP does not create goals. They create incentives. It is the players who create the goals, who define the desired end state, who decide how the game they are playing in this giant sandbox will be scored.
When we say you don't understand the game we're playing, we're serious. You are playing a different game with different rules and a different scoreboard.
In your game, it's all about the LP gained and the VP gained. For us it's PvP opportunities and warzone control defined as how much of the warzone we can project power into and reasonably determine the ownership / use of.
Thus, pre-Kronos, timer rollbacks for instance were a huge deal. The alt farming hordes, combined with the ease of o-plexing, meant that the time required to take a plex compared to that to defend it was seriously out of whack. We thus narrowed our zone of influence that we'd be willing to patrol / keep at low contested levels. Timer rollbacks would have helped balance this effort / reward a great deal.
CCP went a different route, requiring a lot more commitment in terms of time / ship fit / risk / etc in order to get the lucrative rewards of oplexing. That definitely cut down the alt oplexing, which correspondingly reduced the defensive burden. Of course we keep deplexing alts on hand - that way we ensure our home systems and those being farmed in the backwaters don't get out of control. You'll note that the systems currently under pressure in our WZ are those right next to highsec, those with L5 agents, and Diesel's home system of Mantenault. In other words, areas that are considered valuable and that are being deliberately plexed higher.
Look, your WZ is different, you're using different metrics for success, you have different goals, your culture is different over there. YOU ARE PLAYING A DIFFERENT DAMN GAME. You cannot use that as a reference for how things are played in our part of the game, and the fact that you keep arguing when even our Caldari opponents are telling you you're wrong never ceases to amaze me.
We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:37:00 -
[137] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:Cear - the gals won - it is true that CCP made them OP and did even actiivly help them - but the other side is the gal mil did better than any other milita.
This is a fact.
As I said before, I do not blame my fellow players in EVE - and I still love the game - the problem is simply bad game design.
I have great respect for them gals - they show commitment and fight. What more can you wish of an opposing milita?
You are measured by you foes, after all.
Huola campaign is over - we set it up to burn stuff and had good fun doing so.
The future is what matters.
Rahelis
If you want to be good at the occupancy war you will do what XG and Cynthia nezmor and fhp did. You will get alts and start them orbiting buttons. Gallente are better than that than other militias that is true. They are might also be the best at blobbing a single system.
As for what follows I am not sure but its more of a hunch based on what I saw anecdotally and what I read:
I don't think gallente alts are farmers. If they were farmers they would not be deplexing they would be oplexing in amarr space. I don't know but suspect much of the gallente deplexing alt phenemona started with inferno. They did it so they could simply dock in fw space due to station lockouts.
I think the caldari tended to be more farmers. In it primarily for the isk than the gallente. This change happened to help gallente since their alts were doing defensive plexing anyway since they were not in it for the isk. It hit caldari a bit harder because their alts were farmers.
The change also helped gallente because unlike caldari when offensive plexing got harder they could switch to missions. Running missions only effects the warzone for your side negatively unless you use all that lp to help your side. But ideally players would run missions for the other side to water down the lp the enemy plexers get and use that for their side.
But anyway if you want to win occupancy by all means get out there and plex. Don't believe the people who say vp doesn't matter. Gallente got more vp than the caldari that is why the caldari systems went vulnerable. Until you get 3000 more vp in an enemy system the system is *invulnerable* and can not be flipped. Get as much vp as you can. I think you will find its just as easy to use an alt as your main and multiple alts are better. You might find you don't even want your main to be in space when you are running the maximum number of plexing alts you can handle/afford. If someone comes just jump over a few systems and run a plex there. Then come back to your plex after you finish that one or get chased out again. You will drive the contested most effieicently that way.
If that is your future good luck. It's not my future.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1099
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:41:00 -
[138] - Quote
Cearain wrote:hunch based on what I saw anecdotally
Cearain wrote:I don't know but suspect
Pretty much sums up all cearain posts ever. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:42:00 -
[139] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo
I see you are uncomfortable talking about the fact that XG admitted his alt gained 100 plexes in 2 weeks and so your trying to switch the topic to killboards. I'm not surprised.
We are talking about occupancy not kills. Kills at best indirectly effects occupancy vp always directly effects it. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
309
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 13:45:00 -
[140] - Quote
Seems the way we play generates a lot more PVP than whatever you are doing, and yes, I have plexing alts. BLFOX is currently recruiting |
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
417
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 14:21:00 -
[141] - Quote
Cearain wrote:We are talking about occupancy not kills. Kills at best indirectly effects occupancy vp always directly effects it. Wrong. VP only affects occupancy if the kills come along with it. Otherwise it's just spinning wheels in the ether.
We'll say it again so it's easy for you to grasp, without all the noise.
Occupancy changes when iHUBs get bashed. iHubs only get bashed when PvPers decide to do so. In general, there are fights on the hub or in the system beforehand. Any VPs gained up until that point, that don't directly lead to a hub bash, are essentially irrelevant.
Total VP/day per faction means nothing unless systems are actually getting flipped. Otherwise, it's just LP farming or maintenance or existing holdings.
Also, you often need more or less than 3000VP to make a system vulnerable, and anyone with a brain overplexes their target systems before bashing.
We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2489
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 15:10:00 -
[142] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:You might be astonished how many fights xg's alts generated him. Actually, none - but because it wasn't needed. The Caldari weren't really pushing the backwater systems hard enough. If the counter attack would have been sustained then we would have used alts as "Canaries (in a coal mine)" in that if a WT fleet came by we would then get a fleet up to go meet them. We did this one night and it worked out really well, but in the end it wasn't needed. BTW, this counter plexing technique was learned from PERVS a long time ago.
But, again, it wasn't needed. Caldari were finally defeated in Asakai and the rest turned out to be the cleanup effort that all winning sides need to do to finish off their victory. (Of course this is 20/20 hindsight now. At the time we still expected heavier resistance in Heydieles, and perhaps an Amarrian intervention in Ladistier. But.... nothing....)
|

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
103
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:01:00 -
[143] - Quote
Cear - I have no interest in winning occupacy war - nether had FHP.
We had interest in fights.
That was the reason we joined FW. It was good fun. The fights ended with the huola campaign - we all knew that.
Now the amarr farmzone is dirven by all those alts that joined gal mil for the LP.
FW is over and it was complete fail., game wise.
Some amarr heros still hold on an def - they do nothing than providing farmers of the other actions with LP. 07 to all that carry on.
The four miltas all suffer from different fail game design.
Some of them failed designs where corrected - like the new systems and gates in amarr space. Or the removal of cloaks in 30k radius.
The asymmetry is still too big.
Cal mil is extinct and only farmers remain. Amarr mil mostly withdrew and players went to other places in EVE. Minmatar mil is still farming as ever - the only thing they ever did. Gal mil won FW and is now farming in minmatar space.
There is no war in FW.
it is FF - faction farming - I am not bitter about this - this is how CCP wanted FW to be from the start.
CCP never wanted FW to be concurrent to null sex.
Look at the WH changes - CCP is making WH space a second null sex space now.
If you want to see bitter ppl - read the WH farmers posts.
CCP is right - there can only be warfare in EVE if it is player driven. |

Shad owLord
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
7
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:15:00 -
[144] - Quote
Rahelis wrote: Cal mil is extinct and only farmers remain.
Quite the opposite actually. |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
103
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:22:00 -
[145] - Quote
I am not trying to insult you.
Fleets of kestrels and the like - that is not the FW I was used to play. We used to fly BS/BC and had cap fights in cal mil. Those were great times. Fleets were too full so we had to make second fleets. Same before in amarr mil - those were the biggest cap fights I saw so far.
That is all gone now - CCP removed it to make FW nothing than a farm zone.
There will always be some fighting between farming - that is for sure - but the age of FW is over. |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate
467
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:32:00 -
[146] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:I am not trying to insult you.
Fleets of kestrels and the like - that is not the FW I was used to play. We used to fly BS/BC and had cap fights in cal mil. Those were great times. Fleets were too full so we had to make second fleets. Same before in amarr mil - those were the biggest cap fights I saw so far.
That is all gone now - CCP removed it to make FW nothing than a farm zone.
There will always be some fighting between farming - that is for sure - but the age of FW is over.
Bittervet tears = Best tears! |

Dread Delgarth
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
48
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:32:00 -
[147] - Quote
All this moaning about defensive plex alts is a bit lame IMO.
It's like complaining PL are only successful because they have so many cyno alts. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:33:00 -
[148] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:You might be astonished how many fights xg's alts generated him. Actually, none - but because it wasn't needed. The Caldari weren't really pushing the backwater systems hard enough. If the counter attack would have been sustained then we would have used alts as "Canaries (in a coal mine)" in that if a WT fleet came by we would then get a fleet up to go meet them. We did this one night and it worked out really well. BTW, this counter plexing technique was learned from PERVS a long time ago. But, again, it wasn't needed. Caldari were finally defeated in Asakai and the rest turned out to be the cleanup effort that all winning sides need to do to finish off their victory. (Of course this is 20/20 hindsight now. At the time we still expected heavier resistance in Heydieles, and perhaps an Amarrian intervention in Ladistier. But.... nothing....)
Your honesty is appreciated. And I have used plexing alts to help get fights but I have found that to the extent I wanted to really use them to find fights they actually finished very few plexes.
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Seems the way we play generates a lot more PVP than whatever you are doing, and yes, I have plexing alts.
I am not doing anything to get pvp now. So yeah your likely doing more. My favorite pvp is/was in and around plexes. When I was after pvp I would go to busy systems open a plex and see if anyone would come. If not I would leave. Rarely would I bother finishing the plex. If I saw plexes open I would dscan to see if someone was running them and warp in on them - usually in a t1 frig but some other stuff as well. They would usually bail and I would rarely want to stay to finish the plex. (if the system was busy enough and the timer had been run down I might stick it out a bit) If they fought and I won I would rarely stay to finish the plex. From a pvp perspective my time was always better spent moving on to the next system instead of sitting there orbitting the button hoping someone will notice me. But of course 99% of the enemies who would fight me, never even knew I was there so why sit there? Sure someone might roll in but I found I got more fights by leaving the plex than staying.
My point: there is a trade off of how much pvp you get versus how much occupancy you gain. I think reducing that trade off as much as possible would be good.
I am not at all surprised you or other Galllente have plexing alts. I have seen them around the warzone and since the gallente alts are often dplexing relatively low contested systems I know they aren't farmers from people unconnected with faction war. I think I am different from most people because I care more about the effect alt plexers have on occupancy than the isk they get or don't get. If gallente didn't have alt plexers they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:37:00 -
[149] - Quote
Dread Delgarth wrote:All this moaning about defensive plex alts is a bit lame IMO.
It's like complaining PL are only successful because they have so many cyno alts.
There is no accounting for taste.
If you think running defensive plexing alts is fun then you won't mind the current mechanics that make them so important to fw occupancy. I don't like it, and I think very few people do.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2491
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:52:00 -
[150] - Quote
Cearain wrote: My point: there is a direct correlation between much pvp you get versus how much the other side thinks they can win. Fixed. PvP usually drops off significantly when the other side decides they can't win. Nothing you can do about it tbh. If one side goes for the throat and overships to win FW, then fights are going to drop off.
We knew that going in, and sometimes going for the win is worth the decrease in PvP. You'll see some in Gallente Militia complain about it, but it's not like we're bent on destroying the warzone for months - just a few days.
Caldari will be back, and I hope they try to kick us in the throat. The game is more fun when both sides don't let up.
|
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
418
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:52:00 -
[151] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:There is no war in FW. Not anymore, no. We won the war, let peace reign!
Quote:CCP is right - there can only be warfare in EVE if it is player driven.
So all the changes CCP took are measured in only one direction - constant warfare amongst them players. All CCP can do is create incentives. Players decide what goals to pursue and how.
I'm all for CCP making changes to the various incentives to drive more conflict - it's why I"m in FW instead of dullsec.
Quote:Whining about lack of BC/BS fights This is driven by a few different things:
1. Bored nullbears dropping on everything shiney because they blued themselves into boredom 2. Travel speeds on BC/BS now so much slower, making travel around the WZ a pain 3. Lack of objectives that require a BC/BS gang to complete EDIT: 4. Other hulls being made more effective and more fun for less isk/skill investment
You still see them, quite often too, at least in our WZ. Yours is hosed for a lot of other reasons, don't generalize your experience to all of FW. It's not applicable.
What you ought to be focusing on, IMO, is why the Min/Amarr zone is so different from the Cal/Gal one. We're obviously playing different games, even though we've both got the same rulebook. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
103
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:53:00 -
[152] - Quote
As I was in cal mil the biggest part of cal mil simply refused to plex - it was useless to explain the mechanic to them.
They only came to the mili to fight.
That was stupid in an occupancy point of view - but pertinent in a gamers point of view.
The gamer lost in the long run, of course. The only thing that stayed was the farmer. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
418
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:54:00 -
[153] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:As I was in cal mil the biggest part of cal mil simply refused to plex - it was useless to explain the mechanic to them.
They only came to the mili to fight.
That was stupid in an occupancy point of view - but pertinent in a gamers point of view.
The gamer lost in the long run, of course. The only thing that stayed was the farmer. This is not my experience, speaking as one who's been shooting them constantly for the past year or so. Again, you're wrong, simple as. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2491
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 18:58:00 -
[154] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:The gamer lost in the long run, of course. The only thing that stayed was the farmer. Yeah whatever. We're generating more kills now than we ever did before. The difference between then and now are: 1. BCs don't rule the game (rebalancing efforts) 2. BS's cost too damn much - Domis used to be 42mil. Now they are 200 mil. 3. All large ship fleets are really just targets waiting to be hot dropped nowadays. 4. Plexes have been skewed from Dessie/Cruiser/BC to Frig/(Dessie or T2 Frigate)/ T2 Cruiser. |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
103
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 19:00:00 -
[155] - Quote
My bad - I was in cal mil 2 years ago - I should have wrote that.
Believe me - we tried to explain why plexing is important - we did a lot.
Xgal,
we all know that. |

Andre Vauban
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
344
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 19:15:00 -
[156] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:You might be astonished how many fights xg's alts generated him. Actually, none - but because it wasn't needed. The Caldari weren't really pushing the backwater systems hard enough. If the counter attack would have been sustained then we would have used alts as "Canaries (in a coal mine)" in that if a WT fleet came by we would then get a fleet up to go meet them. We did this one night and it worked out really well. BTW, this counter plexing technique was learned from PERVS a long time ago. But, again, it wasn't needed. Caldari were finally defeated in Asakai and the rest turned out to be the cleanup effort that all winning sides need to do to finish off their victory. (Of course this is 20/20 hindsight now. At the time we still expected heavier resistance in Heydieles, and perhaps an Amarrian intervention in Ladistier. But.... nothing....) Your honesty is appreciated. And I have used plexing alts to help get fights but I have found that to the extent I wanted to really use them to find fights they actually finished very few plexes. Thanatos Marathon wrote:Seems the way we play generates a lot more PVP than whatever you are doing, and yes, I have plexing alts. I am not doing anything to get pvp now. So yeah your likely doing more. My favorite pvp is/was in and around plexes. When I was after pvp I would go to busy systems open a plex and see if anyone would come. If not I would leave. Rarely would I bother finishing the plex. If I saw plexes open I would dscan to see if someone was running them and warp in on them - usually in a t1 frig but some other stuff as well. They would usually bail and I would rarely want to stay to finish the plex. (if the system was busy enough and the timer had been run down I might stick it out a bit) If they fought and I won I would rarely stay to finish the plex. From a pvp perspective my time was always better spent moving on to the next system instead of sitting there orbitting the button hoping someone will notice me. But of course 99% of the enemies who would fight me, never even knew I was there so why sit there? Sure someone might roll in but I found I got more fights by leaving the plex than staying. My point: there is a trade off of how much pvp you get versus how much occupancy you gain. I think reducing that trade off as much as possible would be good. I am not at all surprised you or other Galllente have plexing alts. I have seen them around the warzone and since the gallente alts are often dplexing relatively low contested systems I know they aren't farmers from people unconnected with faction war. I think I am different from most people because I care more about the effect alt plexers have on occupancy than the isk they get or don't get. If gallente didn't have alt plexers they would be lucky to be at tier 2.
Will it make you feel better to know that Andre and Andrea are my plexing alts and they have 100M and 40M skill points respectively? Do you still consider them plexing alts?
QCATS is recruiting:-á https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3896299 |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 19:38:00 -
[157] - Quote
Andre Vauban wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:You might be astonished how many fights xg's alts generated him. Actually, none - but because it wasn't needed. The Caldari weren't really pushing the backwater systems hard enough. If the counter attack would have been sustained then we would have used alts as "Canaries (in a coal mine)" in that if a WT fleet came by we would then get a fleet up to go meet them. We did this one night and it worked out really well. BTW, this counter plexing technique was learned from PERVS a long time ago. But, again, it wasn't needed. Caldari were finally defeated in Asakai and the rest turned out to be the cleanup effort that all winning sides need to do to finish off their victory. (Of course this is 20/20 hindsight now. At the time we still expected heavier resistance in Heydieles, and perhaps an Amarrian intervention in Ladistier. But.... nothing....) Your honesty is appreciated. And I have used plexing alts to help get fights but I have found that to the extent I wanted to really use them to find fights they actually finished very few plexes. Thanatos Marathon wrote:Seems the way we play generates a lot more PVP than whatever you are doing, and yes, I have plexing alts. I am not doing anything to get pvp now. So yeah your likely doing more. My favorite pvp is/was in and around plexes. When I was after pvp I would go to busy systems open a plex and see if anyone would come. If not I would leave. Rarely would I bother finishing the plex. If I saw plexes open I would dscan to see if someone was running them and warp in on them - usually in a t1 frig but some other stuff as well. They would usually bail and I would rarely want to stay to finish the plex. (if the system was busy enough and the timer had been run down I might stick it out a bit) If they fought and I won I would rarely stay to finish the plex. From a pvp perspective my time was always better spent moving on to the next system instead of sitting there orbitting the button hoping someone will notice me. But of course 99% of the enemies who would fight me, never even knew I was there so why sit there? Sure someone might roll in but I found I got more fights by leaving the plex than staying. My point: there is a trade off of how much pvp you get versus how much occupancy you gain. I think reducing that trade off as much as possible would be good. I am not at all surprised you or other Galllente have plexing alts. I have seen them around the warzone and since the gallente alts are often dplexing relatively low contested systems I know they aren't farmers from people unconnected with faction war. I think I am different from most people because I care more about the effect alt plexers have on occupancy than the isk they get or don't get. If gallente didn't have alt plexers they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Will it make you feel better to know that Andre and Andrea are my plexing alts and they have 100M and 40M skill points respectively? Do you still consider them plexing alts?
Fair point.
Thats why I use the term "rabbit plexer." Because rabbit plexers are set up to run from pvp combat. They might be mains they might be alts. They might be in it for isk and thus a farmer or they might be in it just for occupancy and therefore not really a farmer. I guess I really don't care so much, if they are alts.
I just don't think players who always run away from fights should be as effective as they currently are in the occupancy war. Most rabbit plexers are indeed alts. But sure if the alts stay and fight thats fine with me.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
310
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 20:00:00 -
[158] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Fair point.
Thats why I use the term "rabbit plexer." Because rabbit plexers are set up to run from pvp combat. They might be mains they might be alts. They might be in it for isk and thus a farmer or they might be in it just for occupancy and therefore not really a farmer. I guess I really don't care so much, if they are alts.
I just don't think players who always run away from fights should be as effective as they currently are in the occupancy war. Most rabbit plexers are indeed alts. But sure if the alts stay and fight thats fine with me.
What if they don't run but stay and die in naked hulls cuz they are AFK and part of their income stream is selling kill rights? BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
77
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 20:35:00 -
[159] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:My bad - I was in cal mil 2 years ago - I should have wrote that.
Believe me - we tried to explain why plexing is important - we did a lot.
Xgal,
we all know that.
you are definitely right on that. people just look for fight and log. the people who dont need isk, which was apparently my alts entire alliance, would never be caught plexing. all in all FW promotes zergs and joining the winning side. it promotes farming instead of pvp. again fw is currently just a non meaningful perma wardec between a winning side and a losing side. noone in their right mind would NOT join gal mil. there is no reason not to unless you want to be the underdog.
edit: there is no logical reason to join calmil unless you want to fight an uphill battle. there is nothing to stop the entire player base from joining one side. that is a problem. |

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos
95
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 05:07:00 -
[160] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Veskrashen
We both agree simple math shows that you don't need home systems to take tier 4.
I'm being trolled right? Are you jumping your bash fleet in from hi-sec/non-fw lowsec and travelling 10 jumps to flip a system? Are you actually suggesting that Calmill position themselves around the edges of the map in isolated numbers and push in against our internal lines of defence? Do you know how far it is from Yvangier to Karjataimon? From Mara to Mantenault? Cearain, this is getting stupid and again your ignorance of both the important subtleties in FW and general strategic good sense is showing.
Cearain wrote:
Those are the goals set up by ccp. The rest like holding a home system are personal goals that anyone can strive for but there is no real mechanic incentive.
Aw ****, stop doing what you're doing because CCP didn't write in black and white that you should try and occupy the best systems in the warzone. It's called a strategic imperative, when the opposing militia lives closer to you, the amount of fighting in your home system you have to do goes up. When the activity levels in your home go up, more of your pilots are curtailed from roaming further afield, aka your area of control (effective control) shrinks.
The statement, that an opposing militia HQ system present does not increase resistance to efforts to flip the surrounding area, is patently, and obviously ludicrous. To argue that the presence of an enemy home base in the area wont have any effect on the contested rates nearby is again, stunningly myopic. Lest we even bring up pipe and gateway systems (Eha, Okkamon, Heyd, Kehjar etc etc.)
If you really want to get pedantic about this almost all of the CCP information on FW, and everything the common person would understand about "us versus them" strategy games heavily implies if not leaves as the only logical conclusion that you should indeed take all of enemy space. Our progress bar shows 371/606 for our measure of warzone control, "warzone control," fyi, is another way to say "your control of the warzone." How could having every system not be the ultimate fulfillment of "warzone control" or the apparent full scale 606/606? Your not just getting the in-game details wrong, but your analysis relies on incredible perversions of what everyone commonly understands strategy games to entail.
Cearain wrote:
And yes some are in enemy high sec space but again there is generally no problem bringing plexing ships one or 2 jumps in.
lol
Cearain wrote:
So from the perspective of pure occupancy gaining there are multiple places that anyone can base and have better access to these multiple border systems than your home systems would provide. Then its just a matter of grinding plex after plex after plex, for those with the will to do that. From there putting plexing ships in a few stations as you work in is not a big deal. Again if you are interested in plexing.
This is a really dumb tactic, coincidentally its pretty much what Calmill does and got them in this position to begin with. Again, see reference above to your need to actually look at the map of our WZ and to educate yourself on just the basics of strategy and tactics, aka, don't leave your forces in tiny isolated concentrations that can't support one another waiting to be crushed by someone who "gets" it.
Someone "getting it" is not "AHA Crosi admits alts have an effect!"
Here's the rub of the issue, none of us believe plexing alts have zero influence. We just don't take them to be the alpha and omega of our analysis, we prefer more robust frameworks that incorporate more than one causal explanation. For instance in about ten pages of your diatribe across three seperate threads, I doubt you have spared even a single paragraph towards the strategic decisions Calmill made throughout the year defending and taking systems, or even a sentence towards the fits and doctrines that Calmill use, this despite those reasons being the first proffered by the Caldari themselves. According to your own words, both the contours of the map and the amount of isk one faction uses are also irrelevant. The problem when you build a snarky worldview based on one metric and/or thought bubble is your theory lacks explanatory power, I have highlighted this issue below for you in much the same way an undergrad professor would.
Cearain wrote:
Well ccp boosted defensive alt plexing and that HAPPENED (???) to help the gallente defensive plexing alt army and stunted (why??) the caldari farmers. It wasn't an intentional boost to gallente by ccp - so no I'm not tinfoil hatting, and to be clear, I don't think ccp ever intentionally tried to help a particular miltia. But this change HAPPENED (???) to be good for the gallente defensive alt army and bad for the caldari alt army (why???)
The above paragraphs explanatory power is effectively zero if not purposefully misleading, yet it represents the capstone of your thoughts.
As to your random numbers about subscribers EvE has ever had, or attempts to appeal to the unverifiable majority, I again offer my own experiences. A big system siege last year would be 100 people in local, this year a big one is closer to 200 and some have sat in the 2-300 range for periods of the day. B-5 only had 2100 its self, FW corps remain littered throughout the top ten ranking on zkill for activity and I personally can't reship fast enough or have more fun. Its about defining your own content, I think the sooner you realize that, the less bitter you will seem to this forum.
|
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 13:55:00 -
[161] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote: Of course we keep deplexing alts on hand - that way we ensure our home systems and those being farmed in the backwaters don't get out of control.
I don't disagree with much, if any, of your post. For me what you say here is the issue. You fight alt plexing with alt plexing. As you said "of course" you do.
Thats why the occupancy war is not fun. The occupancy war should be won by pvp not having alts participate in a rabbit plexing race. Timer rollbacks push us toward an end to that. Other suggests work to end the rabbit plexing race you describe. You may think its "fine" now. But eventually most people who have been at this game long enough get tired of it. Few people get tired of the pvp.
And any gallente who want to say alts don't matter etc etc. Well I will look at what they do, not what they say. If they don't really matter then stop using them, and see what happens.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1104
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 14:13:00 -
[162] - Quote
What you are complaining about is players, not game mechanics.
If people want to plex in pve fits and run away from fights there is nothing you or i can do to stop them - apart from forcing them to stay out of the plexes by having a presence there or getting better at killing them.
CCP could kill FW and remove LP from plexing, then station lockouts would be the only incentive to fight occupancy. No more farmers. All systems would be completely ignored apart from a handful of well placed station systems.
But i would rather take simple steps to curtail farmers, like dplexing alts, than drastic measures which make FW a less viable place to play for both new and old players. For me, any mechanic that puts ships in space has its fundamentals in order.
You obviously have some drastic tunnel vision that prevents you from seeing a bigger picture, i know pointing this out will not help. I dont even know if you care about the bigger picture, or if you have just become so focused on debating minutia for its own sake.
Sorry for disturbing you, ill let you get back to fixating on non/minor problems. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2006

|
Posted - 2014.08.29 16:44:00 -
[163] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them.
The Rules: 30. Abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers is prohibited.
CCP operate a zero tolerance policy on abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers. This includes but is not limited to personal attacks, trolling, GÇ£outingGÇ¥ of CCP employee or ISD volunteer player identities, and the use of any former player identities when referring to the aforementioned parties. Our forums are designed to be a place where players and developers can exchange ideas in a polite and friendly manner for the betterment of EVE Online. Players who attack or abuse employees of CCP, or ISD volunteers, will be permanently banned from the EVE Online forums across all their accounts with no recourse, and may also be subject to action against their game accounts. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 22:46:00 -
[164] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:What you are complaining about is players, not game mechanics.
If people want to plex in pve fits and run away from fights there is nothing you or i can do to stop them - apart from forcing them to stay out of the plexes by having a presence there or getting better at killing them..
I don't blame the players for playing this game however they like. It is a sandbox.
But CCP can and does change the mechanics to encourage certain behavior an discourage other behavior. For example, they wanted offensive plexers to have weapon systems so they required the rats to be killed. You could still enter the offensive plex without the ability to do damage but you won't accomplish much.
Here I want them to encourage the behavior of staying and fighting for a plex instead of just running and hiding in a new system to plex.
With timer rollbacks yes, of course, people can still use pve fits and warp out. But they will then lose time on the plex. Thus that behavior will have a disadvantage relative to the person who stays and fights. I'm not trying to completely prevent behavior like a bubble that prevents warping. I am trying instead to start weighing the occupancy war more in favor of the pvpers. This means that corps who fight for occupancy will value a good pvper more than a person who just has multiple accounts and rabbit plexes.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: CCP could kill FW and remove LP from plexing, then station lockouts would be the only incentive to fight occupancy. No more farmers. All systems would be completely ignored apart from a handful of well placed station systems..
You know I think I am about the only person who doesn't really care that much about how much isk/p is in fw. I used to care more but not really anymore. I have done plexing with lp, and without, and on the whole I think adding some lp was an improvement. But really how much lp for this or that and at what tier really doesn't concern me. I just want the game the occupancy war to be fun. And for me that means to make it a pvp haven. If we can gain isk in the meantime great if not then I would buy plex or do something else to support my pvp. As someone who has been playing this game for years I have more isk than worthy things to spend it on.
I am much more interested in how fun the game is to play than how much isk I can make. If I am having a blast playing the game then I am glad to spend an extra 20 bucks every now and then to buy a plex and get more ships.
BTW I dont think gallente won due to "farmers." I know the plexers were often in low contested systems that really don't pay much.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: But i would rather take simple steps to curtail farmers, like dplexing alts, than drastic measures which make FW a less viable place to play for both new and old players. For me, any mechanic that puts ships in space has its fundamentals in order.
You obviously have some drastic tunnel vision that prevents you from seeing a bigger picture, i know pointing this out will not help. I dont even know if you care about the bigger picture, or if you have just become so focused on debating minutia for its own sake.
Sorry for disturbing you, ill let you get back to fixating on non/minor problems.
No problem your entitled to your opinion and I have thick skin.
Yep I want more than ships in space. I want more fighting and less warping around.
I think you miss the big picture, when you wring your hands over how much isk this or that activity brings. Isk can only be used in game. If there is nothing fun to do in the game than what is the point? My focus is on making fw more fun and less about creating alts to rabbit plex. For me the funnest thing in eve is the pvp in and around plexes. So mechanics that encourage that are what I push for. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1108
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 23:03:00 -
[165] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Nothting of substance
No, you missed the point, i and most of the people i fly with are playing hard and having fun (with a few notable exceptions).
We are doing this with the same mechanics as everyone else.
I think its time you look within. |

Mister Tuggles
Faceless Men
92
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 23:33:00 -
[166] - Quote
Amusingly enough... with all the farming going on there is still more fighting in FW/low sec than in Null. Hell, one member of my FW alt's corp had over 500 kills in one month.
God how I loathe nullbears.... |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 03:07:00 -
[167] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:Cearain wrote:Veskrashen
We both agree simple math shows that you don't need home systems to take tier 4.
I'm being trolled right? Are you jumping your bash fleet in from hi-sec/non-fw lowsec and travelling 10 jumps to flip a system? Are you actually suggesting that Calmill position themselves around the edges of the map in isolated numbers and push in against our internal lines of defence? Do you know how far it is from Yvangier to Karjataimon? From Mara to Mantenault? Cearain, this is getting stupid and again your ignorance of both the important subtleties in FW and general strategic good sense is showing.
Answers in order:
No, No, Caldari have to do that you kicked them out of all the other systems, Do you want that in jumps or light years?
I am not saying that people should never put ships in fw space. I thought I made that clear. You can have multiple bases with plexing ships.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1355
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 03:16:00 -
[168] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Nothting of substance No, you missed the point, i and most of the people i fly with are playing hard and having fun (with a few notable exceptions). We are doing this with the same mechanics as everyone else. I think its time you look within.
Of course, you and the 50-200 or so others who care about the occupancy war to varying degrees are having fun. Otherwise you wouldn't be doing it right? Sasawong and his alt Sheltering Sky must have had fun orbiting buttons because they did that more than any player corp in the game. Otherwise why would he have done so much of it? I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that. People like different things.
I'm just saying that for being a substantial part of a mmo 50-200 players who care is pretty bad. Don't you agree? Eve has over 500,000 subscribers and over 20,000 characters in faction war. And the entire warzone was won with very little resistance. I mean anyone who cared could see it coming. Yet very few from amarr or caldari even cared enough to get some guys together and try to start plexing some other systems down to at least keep you jumping around. The current rabbit plexing system is just too boring to care about. And how big were the gallente fleets on average? From the reports I am reading they sound extremely underwhelming for a game that often has battles involving 2000.
I am with the vast majority. You and those who think the occupancy game is worth playing are the extreme fringe.
The Catholic Church took a survey and asked their priests if they thought the celibacy restriction was too harsh. And of course the priests said it wasn't. Well of course they said it wasn't, if they thought it was too harsh they probably would not be priests. You have to look outside your little group at the bigger picture with this game. The bigger picture shows the occupancy war is not something people care about. CCP should really ask why people have such a low interest in this. With a few tweaks It could be a great reason to stay subbed.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2500
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 05:14:00 -
[169] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Yet very few from amarr or caldari even cared enough to get some guys together and try to start plexing some other systems down to at least keep you jumping around. You mistake "care" for "didn't think they could win". For example, the Caldari cared enough to push fights to 1-2k kills/day in several systems before they finally gave up (after they convinced themselves that they couldn't win). If you can name another mechanic in this game that have lead to more fights in this game than the FW mechanic, then please do so. Until then, don't you think your time is better spent whining about all the other mechanics in this game that don't generate anywhere near the number of fights that the FW mechanic does?
|

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
78
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 05:23:00 -
[170] - Quote
Over the past months many caldari casuals re-enlisted as gal because there was no incentive to stay t1 and out numbered. It didn't take long for people to realize there was no reason to fight against a zerg of rabbit plexers so might as well reap the rewards of t4 and the uncontested life. So in a way, CalMil beat Calmil. |
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2500
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 05:30:00 -
[171] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:Over the past months many caldari casuals re-enlisted as gal because there was no incentive to stay t1 and out numbered. It didn't take long for people to realize there was no reason to fight against a zerg of rabbit plexers so might as well reap the rewards of t4 and the uncontested life. So in a way, CalMil beat Calmil. We welcome the fact that many separatists have decided to rejoin the Federation. Amnesty will given to all that join the Federation and help our cause.
|

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
80
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 05:37:00 -
[172] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Samwise Everquest wrote:Over the past months many caldari casuals re-enlisted as gal because there was no incentive to stay t1 and out numbered. It didn't take long for people to realize there was no reason to fight against a zerg of rabbit plexers so might as well reap the rewards of t4 and the uncontested life. So in a way, CalMil beat Calmil. We welcome the fact that many separatists have decided to rejoin the Federation. Amnesty will given to all that join the Federation and help our cause. just sucks when people ruin the best part of eve. your idea of fw is to win by any means necessary even if that means taking in former competition as allies. different strokes for different folks but id like a more meaningful fw where its a constant struggle/balance between the factions and where taking over a system isnt something that can be done with an alt in a naked ship. I guess I want FW to work more like teams pvp than just pick w/e side is winning and farm the hell out of it.
I am starting to think the whole LP incentive needs to be taken out. pve should not be the deciding factor in a pvp teams environment. and yes FW generates alot of pvp but thats lowsec in general. its easier to get into smaller fights without bubbles and other bs mechanics. any newb can fly a frigate in lowsec and get in some pvp.
being able to switch militias in itself kills my immersion. as a mild RP (prefer gal ships and lore) it really pisses me off that my favorite faction is the zerg atm. i cant enjoy the game because of it. militia switching farming ******* get the **** out of GAL MIL. i am about to be FORCED into joining calmil just so i dont feel like a piece of **** for taking the easy rode and re-joining the winning side. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2500
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 06:12:00 -
[173] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote: i am about to be FORCED into joining calmil just so i dont feel like a piece of **** for taking the easy rode and re-joining the winning side. Join a corporation in Templis.
|

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
657
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 06:59:00 -
[174] - Quote
I have my gimp mask ready, do you? |

RonPaul Rox
Justified Chaos
44
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 07:58:00 -
[175] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:Over the past months many caldari casuals re-enlisted as gal because there was no incentive to stay t1 and out numbered. It didn't take long for people to realize there was no reason to fight against a zerg of rabbit plexers so might as well reap the rewards of t4 and the uncontested life. So in a way, CalMil beat Calmil.
Just to give an example, GalMil were still forming fleets bigger than my active alliance during burn huola where alot/most of galmil were. I remember a few specific instances where I felt like there was a zerg hatchery nearby because they could escillate their numbers out of nowhere while still maintaining a huge presence in a different warzone. zerg gonna zerg.
LP rewards for killing player ships should always be at T5 levels for everyone, this will encourage the real PvPers to stay and fight, even if they are on the losing side.
There were 10-15 of us in Huola tops, we were just very vocal about it on the forums 
gallente have been outnumbered by Caldari since FW started, it never stopped gallente from defending their home systems.
IMO gal and cal were having pretty even fights until Bohica Empire joined us. Our regulars plus their ishtar fleets were admittedly overwhelming.
we are of course glad to have bohica with us, but maybe if you had welcomed them when they tried to join you, you wouldnt b docking in high sec right now.
yalls tunnel vision on rabbit plexing is funny, do you realize that caldari are WAY better known for this than we are?
http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL
|

Arla Sarain
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 10:09:00 -
[176] - Quote
RonPaul Rox wrote:
we are of course glad to have bohica with us, but maybe if you had welcomed them when they tried to join you, you wouldnt b docking in high sec right now.
We were docking in highsec regularly when we had systems. You keep turning it around and saying "we lost cos we knew we couldn't win". It is a consequence of no one giving a left monkey testicle to hold a low sec station and in general the occupancy war. |

Doctor Knuckles
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
50
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 10:42:00 -
[177] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:RonPaul Rox wrote:
we are of course glad to have bohica with us, but maybe if you had welcomed them when they tried to join you, you wouldnt b docking in high sec right now.
We were docking in highsec regularly when we had systems.
well that explains why cal mil became irrelevant, doesn't it |

Arla Sarain
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 10:54:00 -
[178] - Quote
Doctor Knuckles wrote:Arla Sarain wrote: We were docking in highsec regularly when we had systems.
well that explains why cal mil became irrelevant, doesn't it I guess if you fantasize that your self worth is proportional to how many systems you hold. |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 11:13:00 -
[179] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Doctor Knuckles wrote:Arla Sarain wrote: We were docking in highsec regularly when we had systems.
well that explains why cal mil became irrelevant, doesn't it I guess if you fantasize that your self worth is proportional to how many systems you hold.
Conan said what's best in life is "to crush your enemies, see them driven before you and to hear the lamentation of their women". So yes, it's about how many systems. All of them to be more precise. |

Lupe Meza
Hedion University Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 13:02:00 -
[180] - Quote
Don't have a dog in this fight but have been lurking a while. FW seemed the most consistent place to get some PvP and make some ISK. Particularly if you can't be logged in for 4 hours, 3 hours and 59 minutes to find a good fight, 1 minute for the actual fight.
I lurked around these forums for a few months to get a feel for what the scene was like here, to see which militia I'd have the best time in, not necessarily make the most ISK in, as I gauge my enjoyment of EvE not by ISK/Hr but by Fun/Hr. Of course you need ISK to stay in ships, but as long as I can come out ahead I'm good, I pay my sub cash.
Preface out of the way, and really not trying to take sides, but I'd like to point out there were numerous back and forth arguments when TEST joined CalMil a few months back. Test would wag their e-peens around, crowing about how they where winning the occupancy war, to which GalMil, some of the same in this very thread, said that occupancy and sov was irrelevant in FW, it was all about the kills and PvP.
Now fast forward to a sweep and occupation of the system and now CalMil is essentially being taunted with the same occupancy bravado TEST would use, by the same folks that argued so passionately that such metrics were meaningless. Is this to try to provoke a response to get more fights which have no doubt dried up? Or is it just hypocrisy?
I'm only asking because more and more in the waning months of my sub to this game I was drawn to because of the "sandbox" play and player driven content; I'm seeing more and more examples of the "sandbox" boiling down to kids hitting each other over the head with pails rather than making sand castles and flinging their poo at the walls and calling it content. "Look what I made! Content!'
Anyway, just so I understand the situation clearly. GalMil has completely taken over the CalGal zone and have now started in on deplexing the Amarr zone. With the influx of Cal defectors inflating the numbers, I've read that folks are now bleeding into Amarr space.
What happens if theoretically Amarr and CalMil have no systems? Aside from mass chest bumping off course. I mean when the smoke clears, and everyone is GalMil or Minny and cruising around raking in their LP, does FW now become a mini-"Blue Donut"? Or PvP is now just Null Alt Pirate Corps in Low rolling you with HAC/Guardian gangs or hot dropping you and you thanking them for it because that was the only fight you got that night? Why? Because the "enemy" is now either in your faction or just plain quit FW?
I fully believe that if you can't defend or fight for something in this game, you don't "deserve" to have it. If you can't be bothered to mount a counter offensive or defensive action you deserve to lose. However my one major gripe with FW is there is no motivation for sticking it out with a militia when things go bad outside of hubris. And yes, while EvE is this sandbox of infinite possibilities and poo flinging surface area, it is also a game. And a game usually needs at least some basic balancing mechanics. I never understood why time in a militia is not rewarded. It seems like you get rewarded for running missions after folks do the heavy lifting just fine.
You get rewarded for jumping on the bandwagon just fine. But actually sitting in that foxhole getting shelled for months when you can just put on the uniform is not. In fact, it is actually more pragmatic to do so outside of ego or pride. It would be nice if there was some "loyalty" mechanic to go with these loyalty points to offset sitting in T1 for a while based on your time actually fighting for a militia. And not just calendar time, I mean time spent fighting(even if you lose), plexing, missioning; some multiplier that increases as you do these things over time and then gradually over days resets when you stop.
But granted I'm just one of those annoying Non-FW that sits in the occasional plex and my knowledge of FW dynamics is nonexistent, so I don't know if things like this have been attempted before. From what I'm gleaning from the forum this could be headed in a bad direction for everyone so matter how elated some may feel in the moment. When the wolves eat all the sheep, what happens? |
|

Silverbackyererse
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 13:18:00 -
[181] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote:Arla Sarain wrote:Doctor Knuckles wrote:Arla Sarain wrote: We were docking in highsec regularly when we had systems.
well that explains why cal mil became irrelevant, doesn't it I guess if you fantasize that your self worth is proportional to how many systems you hold. Conan said what's best in life is "to crush your enemies, see them driven before you and to hear the lamentation of their women". So yes, it's about how many systems. All of them to be more precise.
Conan also said "If life gives you lemons, make some kind of fruity juice." I think he also said "I have an abacus at home".
How cool is Conan? We really should have more Conan quotes. 
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Drunk 'n' Disorderly
376
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 14:04:00 -
[182] - Quote
Lupe Meza wrote:
Now fast forward to a sweep and occupation of the system and now CalMil is essentially being taunted with the same occupancy bravado TEST would use, by the same folks that argued so passionately that such metrics were meaningless. Is this to try to provoke a response to get more fights which have no doubt dried up? Or is it just hypocrisy?
Nope ur wrong we told test holding bkwaters was irrelevant and that taking home systems and wracking up kills was was an accomplishment.
So no hypocrisy
GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
376
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 14:52:00 -
[183] - Quote
Lupe Meza wrote: Preface out of the way, and really not trying to take sides, but I'd like to point out there were numerous back and forth arguments when TEST joined CalMil a few months back. Test would wag their e-peens around, crowing about how they where winning the occupancy war, to which GalMil, some of the same in this very thread, said that occupancy and sov was irrelevant in FW, it was all about the kills and PvP.
Now fast forward to a sweep and occupation of the system and now CalMil is essentially being taunted with the same occupancy bravado TEST would use, by the same folks that argued so passionately that such metrics were meaningless. Is this to try to provoke a response to get more fights which have no doubt dried up? Or is it just hypocrisy? You are not remembering what happened correctly. Yes, people did get on here from galmil and said occupancy of backwater systems leading to tier 4 meant nothing. They also said take the home/core systems we care about, and then you can crow on the forums. Test never did. Evoke never did. And neither of them were able to do it under the pervious plexing standards with easily killed rats.
We held out against a huge zerg of plexing alts for months. Our current population advantage is slight in comparison, Samwise you whiner. And our offensive "plexing alts" have had to have some teeth to take uninhabited systems this last go round. Then we successfully mounted pvp sieges of the Calmil home systems. Lupe, these events were very different.
Lupe Meza wrote: I fully believe that if you can't defend or fight for something in this game, you don't "deserve" to have it. If you can't be bothered to mount a counter offensive or defensive action you deserve to lose. However my one major gripe with FW is there is no motivation for sticking it out with a militia when things go bad outside of hubris. And yes, while EvE is this sandbox of infinite possibilities and poo flinging surface area, it is also a game. And a game usually needs at least some basic balancing mechanics. I never understood why time in a militia is not rewarded. It seems like you get rewarded for running missions after folks do the heavy lifting just fine.
You get rewarded for jumping on the bandwagon just fine. But actually sitting in that foxhole getting shelled for months when you can just put on the uniform is not. In fact, it is actually more pragmatic to do so outside of ego or pride. It would be nice if there was some "loyalty" mechanic to go with these loyalty points to offset sitting in T1 for a while based on your time actually fighting for a militia. And not just calendar time, I mean time spent fighting(even if you lose), plexing, missioning; some multiplier that increases as you do these things over time and then gradually over days resets when you stop.
. . . When the wolves eat all the sheep, what happens? Yes Calmil people have posted in these very threads of how they didn't deserve to keep their space. They didn't fight smart, and they had a lack of endurance. That is actually a good thing. First you have to realize and admit what what wrong before you can fix it. The sheep have to become wolves and have a wolf on wolf fight. This is good for the game. But this realistically can't be the sole responsibility of players.
CCP can change some of the rules under which we fight in order to prevent these disheartened abandonment of the warzone by an entire militia. They can radically reduce the reward for deplexing conquered systems within the warzone.
For example, deplexing lp should not be doled out the same everywhere. If a galmil plexer is dplexing Iralaja after it is conquered, it simply should not return as much lp as that same plexer dplexing Intaki. Similarly a calmil deplexing Heyd should be getting the same lp as one deplexing Hykanima. Defending home space should have the most reward, and make you a real hero to the cause. Defending space you took from the other side should be a shittier job.
I can't imagine that this would be very difficult to code.
CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Doctor Knuckles
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
50
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 15:23:00 -
[184] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Doctor Knuckles wrote:Arla Sarain wrote: We were docking in highsec regularly when we had systems.
well that explains why cal mil became irrelevant, doesn't it I guess if you fantasize that your self worth is proportional to how many systems you hold.
You misinterpreted.
What i'm saying is, if you tell me cal mil used to live in hi sec, that's one big reason for their recent debacle. As to why, it should be self evident, but in case it's not so obvious as i think it is, here goes: it's a matter of fact that living out of the warzone will delay response times, will make reshipping harder or mroe time consuming, impairs the ability to reach and control larger swathes of space. If you then consider the almost daily gatecamp on Nov gate in Tama and the amount of squids falling to it...
The first thing any newbro in gal mil learns is "get the **** out of Villoire and bring your stuff to a corp's low sec home" |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 16:17:00 -
[185] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Yet very few from amarr or caldari even cared enough to get some guys together and try to start plexing some other systems down to at least keep you jumping around. You mistake "care" for "didn't think they could win". For example, the Caldari cared enough to push fights to 1-2k kills/day in several systems before they finally gave up (after they convinced themselves that they couldn't win). If you can name another mechanic in this game that have lead to more fights in this game than the FW mechanic, then please do so. Until then, don't you think your time is better spent whining about all the other mechanics in this game that don't generate anywhere near the number of fights that the FW mechanic does?
They couldn't put up a fight anywhere because not enough pilots cared. That is my point. Can you at least admit that in a game that is known to get fleet fights of 2000, that they should have at least been able to get 60 pilots together to put up some sort of organized resistance? That shows how little anyone cares.
No one in caldari was organized to really fight for occupancy right? Very few in caldari had ships ready to fight for occuancy right? You know if they really cared about occupancy that wouldn't be the case.
You keep talking about "mechanics in this game" but there are 2 problems with that:
1) how do you even define faction war as a single mechanic. There are faction war players who just roam and almost never bother with plexes. There are faction war players who just run missions. The question is how many really care about winning the occupancy war. Yes lots of people come and run missions or put an alt in to plex for lp. Others come to have fights on gates or wherever. But very few care about occupancy itself. Saying "faction war mechanic" as if it were a single mechanic is misleading. Is sov null sec a single mechanic? I has produced more kills than fw. Are gates a game mechanic? they produced more pvp than fw.
2) Your asking what produces more pvp "in this game" but "this game" is starved for pvp. Pvpers are leaving faction war and this game generally. Finding pvp in this game is a real problem. I mean are we supposed to be jumping for joy that we get more than "dull sec"? Really you set your expectations so low anything meets them. If ccp wants to really expand this game as opposed to letting it languish they need to look expand what is offered in the game and not set their limits on what the game currently offers.
X Gallentius wrote:Samwise Everquest wrote:Over the past months many caldari casuals re-enlisted as gal because there was no incentive to stay t1 and out numbered. It didn't take long for people to realize there was no reason to fight against a zerg of rabbit plexers so might as well reap the rewards of t4 and the uncontested life. So in a way, CalMil beat Calmil. We welcome the fact that many separatists have decided to rejoin the Federation. Amnesty will given to all that join the Federation and help our cause.
Just another example of players not caring about winning the occupancy war. Its time to stop blaming the players and understand that there is a reason so few care.
The game would be great if the occupancy war was so fun and challenging that players got isk so that they could participate in it. But as long as the occupancy war is about as fun as most other pve activities players will continue to mostly just do it for the isk. If CCP wants to keep long time players they need more activities that players find engaging enough to spend their isk on, not just more ways to make isk. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
80
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 16:38:00 -
[186] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:[quote=Lupe Meza]We held out against a huge zerg of plexing alts for months. Our current population advantage is slight in comparison, Samwise you whiner. This sweep of the warzone was not the accomplishment of a zerg of farmers as you put it. Farmers do not contest home systems and bust hubs. They had a part to play but were nowhere near enough alone to accomplish the goal. And our offensive "plexing alts" have had to have some teeth to take uninhabited systems this go round. Then we successfully mounted pvp sieges of the Calmil home systems.
My main was in gal mil when it was the underdog, it was great and fun times. Even thought CalMil was t3 or whatnot I never felt like it was so unbalanced that they could sweep the warzone with little effort. Jump a year or two later and yes, hardly anyone in calmil gave a ****. the major alliances in CalMil talked more about nullsec and other non low sec bullshit more than FW. not once did I hear on comms to deplex our home system, hell i dont even recall them telling us to O plex either. my alt was in DT and the majority of the time they were on was spent roaming looking for pvp or political bs about nullsec.
another thing i saw while on my alt was that none of the corperations or alliances for that matter worked together. never would you see DT and templis flying together. we didnt defend each others home and whatnot. calmil has no organization and like the guy said above me, noone cares about occupancy except the new bros and a few heroes like my alts self who spent more time plexing down systems we owned then probably my whole alliance (DT.)
I wish they cared but most dont. On average I'd say we were losing at least a pilot a day to gal while I was active. I could post a dozen eve mails if i reactivated the alt account where people specifically said they were defected to gal mil because there was no point in staying on the losing side when they can do the same thing in galmil at t4. |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
80
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 16:47:00 -
[187] - Quote
I am the type of gamer who likes to be on the losing side but I at least hope for a fighting chance. In EverQuest I played on a deity based pvp server called Sullon Zek. It had 3 "teams", good, neutral, and evil. You could only have one character per account so whatever team you picked was your team forever unless you deleted your character and started over. I did that when after months of playing as a neutral, I saw the good team was completely outnumbered. I deleted my character (which in EverQuest was a pure grindfest for anything) and rerolled a good guy. In WoW I made sure I joined the side with the fewest people which on Frostmane was the Horde at the time. ect ect ect. I am a gamer who likes a challenge and nothing makes me madder than a bunch of team flippers riding on the coattails whichever team is winning. Especially when they brag later like it is some kind of achievement they earned. They ruin the game imo for anyone trying to play this game for entertainment and a challenge.
I am also a light RPers. Not that I pretend I am really Samwise Everquest but I tend to fly Gallente ships ONLY. I mean ive tried all the other ships and have skilled in them but I was born and raised gallente so I like to stick with my kind. The fact that my RP side and my underdog side are conflicting make FW bitter sweet for me. My heart wishes the Federation success but my brain wants a good fight as the underdog. Maybe I just need meds :)
tldr To all the people who join the winning side, FU :) |

Fourteen Maken
State Protectorate Caldari State
138
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 17:15:00 -
[188] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote: Yes Calmil people have posted in these very threads of how they didn't deserve to keep their space. They didn't fight smart, and they had a lack of endurance. That is actually a good thing. First you have to realize and admit what what wrong before you can fix it. .
Smak talk aside that's unfair, they literally pulled every active player in militia chat into a fleet one night to help defend a system but we were still outnumbered almost 2 to 1 yes they did have close to 200 pilots in system at one point when I was there, we had less than 40 at that time and that includes people like me who don't have good cruiser skills. Even though we were already well and truly on the ropes at our peak nearly 90 players showed up to help out, I thought that was a good showing under the circumstances the best that could have been hoped for, and when the numbers were more even Galmil were pushed back several times, but they kept coming back with even more pilots and even shinier ships until it became a joke. Unfortunately most of our pilots didn't even have the skills to fly the ships they were being offered as your spies will be able to tell you. the fc's were trying to give away ships but couldn't get anyone with the skills to take them except probably a few galmil alts who filled their boots im sure. the rest of us were going out half skilled in a hodgepodge of ships against superior numbers, with proper doctrines and bigger ships. Galmil had far more resources, both in terms of sheer numbers, skill points, and experience but we still warped into them knowing we couldn't win.
Galmil should stop pretending to be the underdogs, it's beyond a joke, in fact they have never been the underdogs since I've been playing. They always had more active pilots in the warzone and they definitely always had more pilots in dedicated fw corps. Regardless of what the stats say, the faces you see in local tell a different story and Gallente have had the upper hand for as long as i've been in fw except when test joined. |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
80
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 17:20:00 -
[189] - Quote
I think a lot of newer GalMil want to feel like they accomplished something far greater than what actually happened. You cannot use logic friend or even facts for that matter. Everyone spins everything, welcome to EvE. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2501
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 18:06:00 -
[190] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:I think a lot of newer GalMil want to feel like they accomplished something far greater than what actually happened. You cannot use logic friend or even facts for that matter. Everyone spins everything, welcome to EvE. Running an offensive for two weeks nonstop in three different areas of operation is quite a feat. All the players on the Gallente side know how difficult it really was, even if the final two systems were pretty much a cakewalk.
We basically did Huola, but 1) it was over several systems and not just one, 2) we actually won, and 3) it was nonstop. The Amarr Huola campaign lasted 2-3 days each week before they had to take time off the rest of the week.
|
|

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
83
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 23:14:00 -
[191] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Samwise Everquest wrote:I think a lot of newer GalMil want to feel like they accomplished something far greater than what actually happened. You cannot use logic friend or even facts for that matter. Everyone spins everything, welcome to EvE. Running an offensive for two weeks nonstop in three different areas of operation is quite a feat. All the players on the Gallente side know how difficult it really was, even if the final two systems were pretty much a cakewalk. We basically did Huola, but 1) it was over several systems and not just one, 2) we actually won, and 3) it was nonstop. The Amarr Huola campaign lasted 2-3 days each week before they had to take time off the rest of the week.
Historically fighting a war with 2 fronts is suicide. I think this statement shows more of weak the Caldari State is atm than how much work it took from the Federation to win.
I just need to put this disclaimer. I love GalMil and specially XG. I think I've had you on +10 standings since the 2nd day I was in FDU. You, Deen, as well as the old school QCATS/JUSTK members, I respect you all a lot so don't confuse my posts with hating. It is no secret, GalMil is a fuckin powerhouse atm.
I've actually never enlisted CalMil on my main because honestly I hate Caldari from an RP perspective and more importantly I love Gal ships (7 mil sp in drones yall.) I am considering it tho, I hate how lopsided the warzone is. If I must I will betray my beliefs just to fight for the weaker side. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2504
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 23:26:00 -
[192] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:
Historically fighting a war with 2 fronts is suicide. I think this statement shows more of weak the Caldari State is atm than how much work it took from the Federation to win.
I just need to put this disclaimer. I love GalMil and specially XG. I think I've had you on +10 standings since the 2nd day I was in FDU. You, Deen, as well as the old school QCATS/JUSTK members, I respect you all a lot so don't confuse my posts with hating. It is no secret, GalMil is a fuckin powerhouse atm.
I've actually never enlisted CalMil on my main because honestly I hate Caldari from an RP perspective and more importantly I love Gal ships (7 mil sp in drones yall.) I am considering it tho, I hate how lopsided the warzone is. If I must I will betray my beliefs just to fight for the weaker side.
You could join the FDU and we can go kill pirates together. :)
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |