Bugs:

Empty ideas exist.

Empty tags exist, I suspect that people entered text in the tags box but didn't hit 'Enter'.

Bah. Limit put in place to ensure every thing is at least 5 characters long. (and the blank thing removed). I'll see about making it handle it a little more gracefully than it does now.

I'll have a think about how to handle the tags.

Told you earlier the tags where going to be an issue lol.

the 'log in' link sends me to sisilogin.testeveonline.com to sign on?

Evening all,


I soft launched this site a while back, and haven't had any bug reports on it, so here's the hard launch.


https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/things/



Use the site to give us short form explanations of things you'd like to see change in eve, or things you'd like to see added.

(It's not on the CSM 9 site, because I wanted it behind SSL, and didn't want to have to pay for another IP address, and SSL certificate)


You log on with EVE's new single sign on, (check the url it sends you to. If it's not login.eveonline.com then there's a problem and you shouldn't continue) All it gives me is your Character ID, and something to let me know your character hasn't changed account. I can't determine what account it's on.

For now, voting is entirely private, with no interface to make it public. I can see how people voted, but that's needing me to go and dig into the database. Other than me, no-one will see who voted for what. I will make aggregated voting numbers visible to CCP and the rest of the CSM on demand.


Any thoughts or questions, drop them here and I'll answer. Other than that, have at it. Please keep it clean, I don't want to wave the banhammer.

Serious question - if I had a proposal that was longerish (roughly 8 or 9 typed pages), how would I put that into the hands of my friendly CSM reps?

Your best option is to write it up somewhere (forums (probably F&I), or on a blog) then fling us a link.

Forgot i was in GD, so what is this exactly?

Feature request:
Be able to mark something as implemented. For example someone submitted "Enable in game sharing of Overview settings" I'd like to be able to click something to say "Already implemented" and then it would mark it for someone to review in the back end.

Yeah, this. I can't help noticing that a fair amount of things listed already exist in the game and/or that the description does not offer any explanation for why existing solutions are inadequate.

I was just about to post one:
"packet monitor much like the existing FPS monitor - so we can see when things are getting choppy"
Ctrl+Alt+Shift+M, "Outstanding" tab

All ready in the list.

lol... "Enable in game sharing of Overview settings"
Won't they be pleasantly surprised.


Uh yes, I was pointing out one that I saw that was already in the game, and explaining how to access it.

Steve what you really should have done is leave the site up for submissions only for a time, and then close the submissions and only then allow voting.

With your current system you have the earlier submissions collecting more votes than new ones, which has the effect of making newer, would-be popular ideas seem not as good as they are, and newer, crappy ideas seem better than they are.

IMO you should close voting right now and reset everything to 0 upvotes and downvotes, then after say two weeks of submissions you close that down and open up the voting again.

Sometimes there are little things which can make the game better. (sometimes they seem small, but aren't. Like 'change characters without quitting the game')

This is a way to get lists of these things, in a way people can vote on and report on.

Steve what you really should have done is leave the site up for submissions only for a time, and then close the submissions and only then allow voting.

With your current system you have the earlier submissions collecting more votes than new ones, which has the effect of making newer, would-be popular ideas seem not as good as they are, and newer, crappy ideas seem better than they are.

IMO you should close voting right now and reset everything to 0 upvotes and downvotes, then after say two weeks of submissions you close that down and open up the voting again.

(From the webpage) "If you have no idea what Eve Online is, ItGÇÖs a Massively Multiplayer game, set in the far future, where you play a Starship pilot, who is immortal, being copied into a new body, every time they die. Kill your enemies. Build stuff. Gather resources. Play the market. With 500,000 other accounts, all in the same game universe. If they play Eve, you can interact with them (Unless theyGÇÖre in China. There are only two GÇÿserversGÇÖ to play on) Go to the Eve Online site to learn more."

I cannot help but suspect Fuzzworks is built upon Zend Framework, version two if I'd have to guess. I've been meaning to ask for a while now if that is correct.

Because logging in to a 3rd party site with your Eve account info is a really good idea

Shouldn't the CSM just use these forums to judge what people want?

Why should I have to go to your website and fill out something in order for my voice to be heard?

This seems unsafe and it makes you look like you are too lazy to read through the Features and Ideas forum.

It also give Devs a change to flick through ideas quickly, when they're looking for something to do, to fill a small gap in the development cycle.