
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
1310
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 18:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Coyote Laughing wrote:Rowells wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:Your tears are glorious. they go really well when you serve them with freshly harvested whine. Zero content contribution. If you can't say something nice, then at least say something intelligent. Obviously, you are incapable of both. Obviously, you are incapable of taking negative feedback.
People don't tend to take well to posts with exceptional amounts of complaints and accusations, without proper evidence or a solution. Otherwise you are just here to have others agree with you and start a circle-jerk of agreement, while excluding or shunning anyone who disagrees.
Coyote Laughing wrote:For those players with POS anchored in a high system without other manufacturing facilties, you are fine - pity about those new players starting out in industry and paying orders of magnitude greater than the career mission reward to build a civilian shuttle.
However, lets look at some decisions by CCP.
1: Artificially set ice levels in high sec to 80% of total demand, but of course that always lags. effect: strangle fuel production and keep squeezing more when POS start going out of business 2: Create a monopoly on POCOs needed for fuel blocks and construction blocks (T2 ships, etc). effect: allow PvP corporations to squeeze out the industrial/mining corporations. 3: Remove the standing requirements for setting up a POS in empire space effect: remove the consequences for PVP corporations who have trashed their empire standings in lowsec.
How am I supposed to be able to afford to run a POS, let alone defend it - high sec facilities are my only realistic option?
Did CCP want to design an ISK sink, or a black hole that sucks everything in and leave an empty void?
For all those people living in alliances who get ship replacement so they can keep on having fun, laugh it up now - but when you don't have industrialists in your corps to build those disposable ships or your ratting taxes skyrocket, remember "I told you so." You choosing not to take advantage of other beneficial options while taking in a higher risk of loss/disruption, is a problem on a more personal level.
There are plenty of options.
E: damn I bit the bait, didn't I? |