| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Pesadel0
   |
Posted - 2006.07.31 08:52:00 -
[1]
If the ship remains at 8/6/6 give it a speed bonus make it more agile and with less mass and there you have it the super staber.
|
Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 13:35:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
8/6/6 solo ship?
Yep. :)
The solo cyclone PVP setup doest use its shield bonus either and kicks ass .But when the ECM balance arrives you can say hasta la vista maelstrom.
|
Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 17:12:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kazaam
Edited by: Kazaam on 31/07/2006 16:57:21
I don't think it needs another med slot imo.
Don't forget that if the stats remain that way, it will have a built-it Shield Boster Amplifier I at BS 4, and like a built-in Gist B-Type Ampli at BS 5, which actually saves a slot.
I personnally think Maelstrom's ed slot lay out is quite justified.
My 2 isk.
Agree with you mate ,now they should make the rohk a armor repair ship switch the meds for lows .
|
Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 10:15:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Jevnikar
i am sorry but i got to whine since noone of you is never happy with what you get....
opening threeds like this before ships even fly empire is pointless.
wouldnt it be better, if you just wait to see one in space, see what it's capable off, found out if it realy missed it's purpes and then start proposing.
rgr J.
Because mate the same happen with t2 ammo we tough that they would change the stats,and they didn't ,and then it was to late ;(.
I think that it will stay 8/6/6 and with the shield bonus 
|
Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 18:21:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Isabelle Velchan
Originally by: Pesadel0
Because mate the same happen with t2 ammo we tough that they would change the stats,and they didn't ,and then it was to late ;(.
I think that it will stay 8/6/6 and with the shield bonus
Unofficial info posted elsewhere seemed to indicate that the current build only had 8/6/5 (with roughly the same pg/cpu). So really, there are two groups of people here arguing for a boost - whether they realized it or not. One group wants 8/6/6, the other 8/7/5.
And if we have to choose between the two, the latter gets my vote.
If the slot layout is going to be 8/6/6 i don't want to have a bonus(shield) that binds me to shield tank a 6 med slots turret BS,scrap that shield bonus and give it a damage/speed/whatever bonus.
If they manage to make her a 8/7/5 ,then as much as i don't like shield boosting matari ships ,i can see that slot layout will give room to some crazy sweet setups.
|
Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.08.02 12:26:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Johnny Bravo
Edited by: Johnny Bravo on 02/08/2006 11:01:53
For long range arty platform Maelstrom NEED damage bonus instead of ROF. With RoF bonus it NEED 7 medslots to be decent AC platform. With just 6 medslots and ROF bonus i know what i would fly Tempest in fleet battles and close range PvP every time.
Same damage, better flexiblity for 30-40% less cost always win.
My feelings exactly .
|
| |
|