| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Tiuwaz
Minmatar
   |
Posted - 2006.07.31 13:03:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Dixon
And the resist bonus is nice but 37.5% boost amplifier would set you back a few hundred isk, while the resists are not that hard to get.
I think by now it's been established that 5% resists > 7,5% boost bonus
I would take the resists over the boost bonus any time, as i am sure would do the vast majority of minni users
I also still dont see the sense of an artillery ship with a bonus to an active shield tank (besides pve >_>, in which case i'd still prefer they typhoon for pve, missiles >> projectiles)
Originally by: Oveur
This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|
Tiuwaz
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 13:25:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Tiuwaz
I also still dont see the sense of an artillery ship with a bonus to an active shield tank (besides pve >_>, in which case i'd still prefer they typhoon for pve, missiles >> projectiles)
Something i missed before is that the Rokh also gets 4 missile launchers. Perhaps it can manage to be better than the Typhoon as well...
well typhoon gets a rof bonus so it should do more dmg than rokh, while the rokh should be able to field a better tank, both will still get beaten by raven, sooo .... 
Originally by: Oveur
This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|
Tiuwaz
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 16:27:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Akiman
Edited by: Akiman on 31/07/2006 16:14:42
7 meds and 8 highs?
fit 1 mwd 1 20k 1 cap booster x4 ecms
8 turrets cool to fit with cool pg with Rof uber damage
drones for small targets
make armor tank with 2 rep 3 hardener.
who cares shield boost per second lol 
well thats new uber setup right?anybody? :P
1.) A maelstrom would do about 6,25% more damage than tempest, this is not factoring in the 2 spare highlsots of the tempest (can fit nos, or missiles in which case tempest does more dps than mael). So i fail to see your Uber damage
2.) ECM are going to be changed/nerfed, so who knows if it will be still worth using them on non ecm ships (and definately shouldnt be the iwin button anymore that it is now)
3.) 2x armourtank with 2 adaptives + 1 damage control ( better than 3 hardeners tbh), leaves no room for gyro's (falling further behind the tempest in terms of damage)
while at the same time ignoring half the ships bonuses
my conclusion: lol?
Originally by: Oveur
This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|
Tiuwaz
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 23:16:00 -
[4]
Originally by: KilROCK
I support this suggestion 
dang! where did we go wrong? 
 
Originally by: Oveur
This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|
Tiuwaz
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 16:42:00 -
[5]
if i could somehow change the bonuses it would be
5% dmg
5% shield resists or 10% shield hp (or something like that)
that is under the assumption that they intend the maelstrom for artillery, because the current bonuses make little sense for that in my opinion
Originally by: Oveur
This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|
Tiuwaz
Minmatar
Omacron Militia
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.08.02 08:19:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Tiuwaz on 02/08/2006 08:19:28
Tuxford is on vacation, besides i dont get the desire to see a post of him in every thread . I am sure he read this thread. I am also pretty sure the maelstrom is far away from the point where he could substentially comment about it.
Of course if he/they already have a more concrete vision of what the mael will be allowed and whatnot, then i'd also be interested in hearing them, in the context of this thread.
Unlikely tough ^^, they havent even confirmed if the tier 3's will have 19 or 20 slots.
edit: typos
Originally by: Oveur
This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|
| |
|