| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
12470
   |
Posted - 2014.09.14 08:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mackenzie Nolen wrote:EDIT: Though since proof is so important to you, here is the proof for my counterclaim that you are, at best, very badly misinformed and therefore not fit to be discussing these mechanics or, at worst, merely here to troll GD (see #3, #4, #6, and #7 specifically).
Sometimes I wonder why this sort of information is totally buried in the forums. The topic title of that thread is very telling, and very troubling..
lol rolling on floor.. i would probably be laughing though.. not crying --Pepper the Penguin
~ And when the seasons change, will you stand by me? ~ |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
12674
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 01:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Suggestion #1 to disallow closing of corp. This really won't accomplish anything if everyone just moves out of the corporation (as stated). You can't really prevent people from moving OUT of corp because that could easily turn into a situation that causes quite a bit of heartache/RL interference, etc.
Suggestion #2: Not sure I like the idea of economic war waged by wealthier individuals on less affluent capsuleers. This wiil essentially turn into a wallet-destroying mechanic.
Instead of wardecs you should Awox. Wardecs are a tool for two large corporations to cause each other damage. Wardecs are not a tool for you to seek out one or two individuals and get free kill capabilities on them in hisec. For this kind of thing, stop throwing money at the problem and learn to Awox.
lol rolling on floor.. i would probably be laughing though.. not crying --Pepper the Penguin
~ And when the seasons change, will you stand by me? ~ |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
12674
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 01:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
malcovas Henderson wrote:
to use a VB's argument. If it is allowed then it must be a tool for that purpose.
If Wding a small corp of 1-2 players is allowed, then it follows that it is a tool for that purpose.
To use another example, you can tank a single ship in 3 different ways simultaneously too but that doesn't mean it's the best way to do things.
You can WD a small corporation with a few individuals. They can dodge the WD by closing up shop and starting anew. This will happen until your wallet runs out.
Infiltration, in this case, would be a much better way. WD seems to only be a prelude to banging head against wall..
lol rolling on floor.. i would probably be laughing though.. not crying --Pepper the Penguin
~ And when the seasons change, will you stand by me? ~ |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
14212
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 15:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Stop wardeccing small corps, unless you like losing money for no reason at all. Awox them.
Reserve your wardeccs for established corps that won't dissolve and reform at a moment's notice.
I'm sorry Peps
~ And when the seasons change, will you stand by me? ~ |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
14399
|
Posted - 2014.09.19 16:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:Wardec price should depend on the NPC standings and sec status of the corps involved. For a deccer, the price should be higher if they had bad relations to authorities, and even higher if the declared corp has better relations to authorities.
Furthermore, the declared corp should be able to counter-bribe CONCORD to nullify the war declaration.
I like this idea. Gives value to higher standings.
my brains not functioning.. need somethign meaningful to say here --Pepper the Penguin
~ And when the seasons change, will you stand by me? ~ |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
14403
|
Posted - 2014.09.19 16:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ria Nieyli wrote:
A large corp would have some difficulties getting all its member to grind the required standings, and that's without taking alts into consideration.
I think it depends. Members with no standings at all do not contribute negatively, and there is a 7 day cooldown for member contributions to corp pool..
my brains not functioning.. need somethign meaningful to say here --Pepper the Penguin
~ And when the seasons change, will you stand by me? ~ |
| |
|