Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
831
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 17:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:The information we have so far from Ero on this latest round of bans is very disconcerting. We will update as more information becomes available. F Hmmm. I may actually start recommending Eve Online to friends now that CCP seems to be taking a serious stand against harassment and grief play. Thanks for sharing.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
832
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 22:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:If you don't want to get banned you have some very simple solutions. Stop making the focus of your gameplay hurting/angering/humiliating others. Tear collection is not a legitimate objective in Eve. Focus on accomplishing things that help you, not on accomplishing things that hurt others. Now, if in the process of helping yourself and you suicide gank or scam someone, and they get angry, that is fine. Just take your win and move on. Don't look to revel in the moment, collect tears, mock them, try to get them on coms, etc.... Just take your winning, give a GF and go. If the focus of your game is to see how mad you can make other people get, and what kind of reactions you can elicit, then yes, you are doing it wrong, and potentially could get banned. If you just focus on helping yourself, and don't engage with people you are harming, then no, you are not really at risk of a ban. To me that is a clear enough line already. Well said.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
834
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 23:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Mira Robinson wrote:Gankers take joy in carebear tears, so carebears take joy in ganker tears. The difference of course being that the carebears are incompetent delicate ******* flowers who need mommy CCP to deal with the big bad ganker baddies. They throw tantrums when CCP doesn't act and pretend it was their doing when CCP does. Nice Ad Hom there.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
835
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 02:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I can't think of any reason why having a public ban list would be a bad thing... Because it will be turned into a spectacle for even more ridicule and harassment. Not everyone enjoys this crap. I certainly don't want bans to be turned into some kind of public exhibition for cheap ***** and giggles.
The way CCP handles it now is fine. These are decisions that are made and kept within house as it should. Keep this professional and diplomatic.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
838
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 14:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Myles Wong wrote:Is their word so trustworthy you would allow them access to your account to play on with no worries? No because account sharing is a bannable offense. It's got nothing to do with trust. And in this you are absolutely correct. It has nothing to do with trusting those claiming they've done nothing wrong. It has to do with using and exploiting this thread to push personal agendas.
Only CCP and those that got banned really know why they got banned. And my isk is in that there is more to this story than the ban "victims" area leading us to believe. But like you said, it doesn't matter.
No time for that. We have agendas to push. Carry on.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
839
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 15:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: And in this you are absolutely correct. It has nothing to do with trusting those claiming they've done nothing wrong. It has to do with using and exploiting this thread to push personal agendas.
Only CCP and those that got banned really know why they got banned. And my isk is in that there is more to this story than the ban "victims" area leading us to believe. But like you said, it doesn't matter.
I don't think those banned are claiming that they've done "nothing wrong", well at least not all of them. Rather that they don't know what they have been banned for other than a three-word vague description. So no, they really don't know why they got banned - only CCP does at this point. And I agree, there is likely more to this story than we have been told, but again therein is the problem with these policies - confusion, lack of consistency, uncertainty and resentment. Regardless of what they did it seems to me those banned, if not the community-at-large in the case of a mass ban wave, deserve a specific account of what they did that made CCP decide they are no longer welcome to play Eve. If some rule has changed, or is now being enforced, the player base need to know. Most people are reasonable and smart enough to know when they're near that line you shouldn't cross. And they're sensible enough to steer clear from there.
The problem arises when you have people that make it a point to dance and pounce around the line and see how far they can test the limits and still get away with it. This is akin to primary school kids threatening to slap someone while waving a hand in front of your face saying "I haven't touched you, so you can't do anything about it!".
In other words, the only people that are legitimately affected by this "ambiguousness" in the rules are those intent in coming close to the line to begin with. All this "but what if I gank!1! will I be banned?1?!" and "OMG scamming is bannable now!1!" are just idiotic distractions and foolishness meant to fuel their own personal agenda. Nothing more.
Also, I don't think we need to know for what reasons they got banned. That is dirty laundry that needs to stay in the hamper and between CCP and the banned. If the banned party truly doesn't know why he has been banned (I very highly doubt this) then he needs to sort that out with CCP. Like I said, the rest of us know where that line lies and are not interested in coming near it.
My own personal opinion? They know exactly why they got banned. They want to know how much CCP knows. They want to build a case defense based on technicalities to wiggle themselves out of whatever mess they got themselves into. Unfortunately for them, this isn't court where your ticket may get dismissed if the street where you were 30 miles over the limit was misspelled precisely because CCP gives itself space to review the issue. CCP knows better than to entrap itself with technicalities.
This also allows players that may, for whatever reasons genuinely and unknowingly come close to the line an opportunity to have their case reviewed individually without a habitual perp with ill-intent claiming they should also get the ban because "it's in the rules".
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
842
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 15:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Marc Callan wrote:Strangely enough, the dev posts in this thread, or on this topic, not only don't state why anyone was banned, they don't state whether anyone was banned. We've got people who claim to have been banned, assumptions as to why they were supposedly banned, and a lot of talk about what is and is not harassment, that might be suitable for a philosophy symposium, but doesn't have a universally applicable, objective definition.
As far as I can tell, CCP really only has two choices: decide on a case-by-case basis depending on the circumstances, or draw a bright line that will be far too restrictive for the tastes of a lot of people in this discussion. (I talked about the various do-not-cross depth lines for submarines about twenty pages back in this thread; this would be equivalent to drawing a line at "test depth" and saying "do not cross or you will be banned".) Well said, sir.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
845
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 17:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Hai space lawyer! Please contrast your above links with the following ones... This. Thisand recently... This. I welcome your insights on how 'common sense' can be uniformly applied by the multitude of players in the 'sandbox' to make the right call on grey areas, when CCP marketing and CCP banhammer aren't even evidently on the same page? F Sigh. This discussion is near impossible when you don't understand the difference between in-game and real life. I'm not blaming you for not understanding. Just trust me when I say (or not) that when CCP states you can be the "villain" or "everything is fair game" they mean in game. It doesn't apply to real life.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
849
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 18:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Andski wrote:i also find it hilarious that he believes he's important enough to be shown evidence
i guess he was told he was special as a child, like so many others, and this gives him the notion that his opinion is so important that he must be swayed with concrete proof i know right? "Evidence" and "proof". pfft. Where I come from word is bond, son!
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
850
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 18:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Hydra Reloaded ATXII ad.... love it, applies here with a minor tweak. MY HEART'S BEATIN', MY HEART'S BEATIN', MY HANDS ARE SHAKIN', MY HANDS ARE SHAKIN', BUT I'M STILL SHOOTIN'. AND IM STILL GETTIN' HEADSHOTS BOOM! HEADSHOT! evepal -> BOOM! HEADSHOT! -> Remiel Pollardevepal -> BOOM! HEADSHOT! -> Andskievepal -> BOOM! HEADSHOT! -> Kaarous Aldurald Holy ****. Thanks for this ! First time I've seen that video.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
854
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 10:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:But how much empathy could you have for someone like this? They enjoy making others angry, upset, and miserable for cheap laughs and giggles. Thats exactly what myl little brother used to do to me when we were kids. Our mother would often tell me, "he's just doing this to make you mad, to get a reaction out of you, so dont let him upset you like that." In retrospect, Im glad she didnt kick my brother out of the house, and her advice about not letting someone "get to you" has served me well in life. And in EVE  This type of behavior is more acceptable from little children, of course. And I sure hope no parent is kicking children out of their homes. With proper guidance from parents they end up outgrowing it. But we're not dealing with children here. These are adults with sadistic tendencies taking pride and pleasure in making others miserable on purpose. This, no matter how they make it seem, is not normal behavior for an adult.
Eve is a beautiful game. But because of how it works it also tends to attract these types of personalities which are able to use the game as a tool to project ill intent and malice.
I do agree with you in that we need to learn, if we haven't already, to ignore and shake off their interactions.
Successfully doinitwrongGäó since 2006.
|
|
|