|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 14:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Very glad to see meta items and data interfaces being removed from the invention process.
A question (if it can even be answered at this point): how will decryptors affect the new non-binary success chance? This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Querns wrote:Very glad to see meta items and data interfaces being removed from the invention process.
A question (if it can even be answered at this point): how will decryptors affect the new non-binary success chance? Since the non-binary success chance will be affected by anything that affects invention chance. Thus, decryptors with a high chance bonus may be worthwhile to use to try and get an exceptional result. However, as mentioned in the blog, we'll need to make sure Decryptors are properly balanced not to break things in the new system. So, the chance for each type of successful result would be increased at the same time?
E.g. (with fake numbers): I have a 50% chance to invent normally, with a 30% standard, 10% good, 7% great, and 3% exceptional. I add a decryptor that changes my success chance to 75% -- would that change my success "bands" to 45% standard, 15% good, 10.5% great, and 4.5% exceptional? This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: How about breaking it down showing how much was done in high sec pre and post Crius. Or how many characters are doing industry today (and not 1 week's worth to test out the new system), as opposed to 1 year ago, and where they are located. Maybe that would explain the drop in the PCU.
They actually did this during the Alliance Tournament -- during a break between fights, CCP Greyscale showed some charts with industry breakdown before and after Crius along highsec / lowsec / nullsec lines. There wasn't much change -- both sides showed 80-85% highsec, 15-20% nullsec. (I don't recall the exact amount, sorry.) Total job count increased in highsec's favor very slightly ( < 1% ) and total job minutes increased in nullsec's favor very slightly ( < 1% ).
Incidentally, despite having access to superlative facilities in nullsec, I'm doing all of my manufacturing in highsec, because, surprise surprise, nullsec's shipping costs make my particular industry a non-starter. I'm turning over hundreds of billions of isk a week and pocketing 5-10% margin for my troubles. This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Considering that "Battleship Construction" is being transformed into "Advanced Battleship Construction," that'd be impossible. :V This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 16:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:Well, for the most part things look very good.
But the changes to base invention chance have me very confused.
Freighters are currently grouped with frigates and destroyers with a base of 30%.
The new invention chances do not list "Freighters" specifically, but I assume they will fall under Capitals and Capital Industrial Ships have 20%". Although they are NOT listed as capital industrial ships in the market tree. If they are, that will be a huge negative impact for jump freighters, are they not expensive enough already?
This title just seems odd to me, as there are no other ships in this catagory with a T2 variant. the only "capital" ship industrial or otherwise with a T2 variant is freighters>>Jump freighters.
Also this one"All Battleships, Industrial Command Ship have 25%"
What industrial command ships are there? The ORCA is the only one I can think of as the Roqual should fit under the capital industrial ship catigory with the freighters. However neither the ORCA or the Roqual blueprints can be invented from, so the invention chance does not apply to them.
Why list ships here that do not have a T2 variant that can be invented? Should we expect T2 ORCA's, Roquals, Dreads, and Carriers, coming so that these new invention chances would have something to be applied to?
I kinda doubt they are specifically planning new T2 ships as a result of this change. Listing the chances like this just lets them have that work done now in case they want to do it later, if at all. This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 16:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote: Team sniping really needs to be addressed as teams become even more vital.
Agreed -- I'd like to see Vickrey auctions or something similar, that allow for sniping to be mitigated. This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
785
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 17:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sir SmashAlot wrote:I am thrilled that industry is continuing to receive love from CCP and I look forward to these invention changes.
However, I would strongly urge that CCP begins communicating that there is Null sec/SOV changes in the works if there are any. Flashy new mechanics add little value to industrialists if they are selling into a congested market. I guess no one watched the Alliance Tournament. They laid down the general order of changes forthwith: starbases, then nullsec. This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
788
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 23:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote: The Orca & Rorqual are due to both be rebalanced very soon. This dev blog gives you the hint that there will be T2 versions of both ships released as well. On the proviso as usual that if you use this information to speculate it may not turn out as you think.
Unlikely. But, hey, if you wanna throw away your money, go for it. This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
788
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 01:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
To all those decrying the loss of meta items in invention, fear not -- there are plans to make them matter more in the future. Your mission scavenging businesses are going to get a shot in the arm. This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |
|
|
|