|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Tirelion
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
22
   |
Posted - 2014.09.20 19:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
This should, in no way, be seen as an "exploit" bump. It is tragic that, an irresponsible titan pilot, who had obviously left himself vulnerable, should be reimbursed and that a player should be permabanned for what should have been a legal bump using a Tornado. CCP has, at this point, completely removed any element of risk to owning a "POS titan", which is counter to the spirit of the game as we know it. If this kill was not a "legal" kill, then EVERYONE must know that they cannot, EVER, try and touch a titan in a pos in any way that would lead to it's destruction (unless it is an Awox apparently). Even if the Titan (or any ship for that matter) is sticking out of the shields. This along with the new change to cynoing on a tower will make having a titan in lowsec absolutely risk free. That's really just what we need (#sarcasm). |
Tirelion
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
24
|
Posted - 2014.09.22 23:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:Two things I'd like to points out:
CCP has a policy of NOT commenting or sharing GM communications. There are probably details we are unaware of, and won't become aware of.
If a guy was perma banned for simply bumping a titan ship out of the POS, without forewarning and/or a chance to toe the line of CCP's fairly ambiguous precedent, I'd support getting that permabanned removed. It seems pretty severe. However, I really wonder if there is much more to this story than is being made public!
Being personally involved in this (I got the final blow on the Titan) and knowing the involved parties, I can tell you that no, there is nothing relevant that you have not been made aware of. This issue has been completely transparent on the Soul Takers/Shadow Cartel side. The GM who banned Aglon is, to put it bluntly, being lazy (not paying attention) at best, or at worst, incompetent. |
Tirelion
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
27
|
Posted - 2014.09.23 20:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
I would just like to point out that it is literally disgusting that this has gone on this long with no official GM/Dev/CSM response to this thread. Certainly none of our current CSM will be getting my vote at this point. |
Tirelion
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
28
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 00:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
I certainly do appreciate that a CSM member finally saw fit to comment on this. Thank you. What I do not appreciate however is a comment that is blind and un-informed. Clearly the CSM member who did respond has no real understanding of how the Titan was bumped, or what the circumstances were at all. Since he sited a an upcoming change that would in NO WAY have effected this situation were it in effect at the time. C'mon CSM I really do expect more from you, and I think everyone else does as well. We are not asking you to pick sides, we ARE asking you to advocate for the player base who wants a clear resolution to this issue. I think you all should be able to handle that. |
Tirelion
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
30
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 01:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
#freeaglon I'd have bumped it too. So would any of you @ CCP. |
Tirelion
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
31
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 17:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
This is going to sound like a broken record, but I am not going to stop until something is done. CCP please, it isn't funny, it isn't a joke. You are literally spitting in the face of every lowsec alliance, corp, and pilot and showing us that we are all worthless to you. We are your customers. We pay subscription fees. We need you to actually look at and respond to this in a serious and meaningful manner. According to the policy that you yourself laid out, Aglon should not be banned. It makes me question whether or not I want to continue giving you my money. Thus far you have been detestable, both in your lack of clarification and your lack of response and attention. CCP, you must realize the damage that you are causing here, please, please fix this. |
Tirelion
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
37
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 01:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
a newbie wrote:Pretty easy here, if you cannot lock the ship its IN THE SHEILD. If you were obnoxious enough to bump it out and someone got banned, well, ban earned.
Blowing up on twitter about something because you can't get an EXACT case answer for semantics is a useless and annoying behavior because someone was punished.
If you can't lock it, you're not supposed to. Bumping is allowed for things like LOCKABLE targets, to-from stations, gates, etc. If its inside a pos, enjoy the ban.
Would you like to go ahead and show me where in the policy that an unlockable ship is considered to be "in" the shields, or how in any way that was clarified? Want to field this one for me? Because right now you sound like an uneducated imbecile. There a many situations where a ship may be "unlockable", perhaps a jammer on the tower has you jammed, how would you know? Don't go pontificating on a topic you obviously know nothing about just to make your pedantic little self sound smarter than you actually are.
#freeaglon |
|
|
| |
|