EVE Search - Mistakes in propulsion system

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Mistakes in propulsion system

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
AngryWabbit	Posted - 2006.08.05 14:19:00 - [1] I noticed with the Prophecy, the info says it has 7 propulsion, and I only see six streams of blue colored light coming out the back of this. Anyone experienced such things wrong with the info?
Lori Carlyle Black Avatar Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2006.08.05 14:22:00 - [2] Isn't propulsion a stat for something thats not yet in game ?. PINK PINK PINK PINK PINK ERIS Quote: Eris is out of order, bikini error. Supply sunscreen and press enter.
Deja Thoris Contraband Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2006.08.05 14:23:00 - [3] Propulsion strength used to be something to do with scramming ships, not how many pretty contrails came out of its bum. so it's not really a mistake.
Cyleth Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.08.05 14:24:00 - [4] Don't think that's the case here. Apparently you were viewing propulsion strenght which has the value you said. There was some testing with propulsion strenght and warp scrambling strenght + racial scrambling and the values got left there(iirc). However, they are not in use and dunno if the scrambling system is ever gonna change to that. -- Nobody stays behind
AngryWabbit	Posted - 2006.08.05 15:55:00 - [5] Ok thanks. I looked at different ships, and propulsion strength matched the number of streams coming out, but for the prophecy it didn't. Thanks for clearing that up.
Lowfat Yogurt Minmatar Forsaken Empire	Posted - 2006.08.05 16:09:00 - [6] Originally by: Deja Thoris Propulsion strength used to be something to do with scramming ships, not how many pretty contrails came out of its bum. so it's not really a mistake. Propuulsion jamming is a stat that was added into the game a few major pacthes ago. It never had any in game effect. However it will when they nerf scramming.
Novarei The Dead Parrot Shoppe Inc.	Posted - 2006.08.05 18:51:00 - [7] Originally by: Lowfat Yogurt Originally by: Deja Thoris Propulsion strength used to be something to do with scramming ships, not how many pretty contrails came out of its bum. so it's not really a mistake. Propuulsion jamming is a stat that was added into the game a few major pacthes ago. It never had any in game effect. However it will when they nerf scramming. QFT
Maya Rkell Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2006.08.05 18:56:00 - [8] Originally by: Lowfat Yogurt Originally by: Deja Thoris Propulsion strength used to be something to do with scramming ships, not how many pretty contrails came out of its bum. so it's not really a mistake. Propuulsion jamming is a stat that was added into the game a few major pacthes ago. It never had any in game effect. However it will when they nerf scramming. It was a WEB effect. It was removed because it was demonstratably a bad idea, but they've never removed the stat.
Novarei The Dead Parrot Shoppe Inc.	Posted - 2006.08.05 18:58:00 - [9] Originally by: Maya Rkell Originally by: Lowfat Yogurt Originally by: Deja Thoris Propulsion strength used to be something to do with scramming ships, not how many pretty contrails came out of its bum. so it's not really a mistake. Propuulsion jamming is a stat that was added into the game a few major pacthes ago. It never had any in game effect. However it will when they nerf scramming. It was a WEB effect. It was removed because it was demonstratably a bad idea, but they've never removed the stat. QFT also.
ReaperOfSly Gallente Universal Army Curse Coalition	Posted - 2006.08.05 20:17:00 - [10] I thought it had to do with agility. --------------------------------------------------------------------

Dahak2150	Posted - 2006.08.05 20:48:00 - [11] Hmmm, if it was linked to the number of thrusters on the ship.... Thorax would own. ---------- My sig is boring.
Kalixa Hihro	Posted - 2006.08.05 21:56:00 - [12] Originally by: Dahak2150 Hmmm, if it was linked to the number of thrusters on the ship.... Thorax would own. Thorax does own in the agility department. I had 2 taranis' chase me half way across Deklein and I got out. No stabs. Stabber is probably the only thing that comes close. Granted, they were probably the worst interceptor pilots I've ever seen, but almost any other cruiser would have been caught. Maybe they didn't have warp disruptors fitted... either way, (o.O)? /----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ My opinion in no way represents that of my corp or anyone I am associated with, and is probably entirely wrong.
Ambrose	Posted - 2006.08.06 00:57:00 - [13] Speaking of contrails, does it bother anyone else that the thorax has 20 some odd engine trails but other ships have inert thrusters that look horrid (Particularly the brutix).
Dahak2150	Posted - 2006.08.06 05:12:00 - [14] Originally by: Ambrose Speaking of contrails, does it bother anyone else that the thorax has 20 some odd engine trails but other ships have inert thrusters that look horrid (Particularly the brutix). Yeah, make the brutix look like the larger version of the thorax like it acts! I think there's 8 or 9 thruster clusters inactive, plus the 6 separate drives built into the wings. Call me OCD, but it would look really cool. ---------- My sig is boring.
Machiu Troyan Minmatar Red Dagger Fleet	Posted - 2006.08.06 05:44:00 - [15] Originally by: Dahak2150 Originally by: Ambrose Speaking of contrails, does it bother anyone else that the thorax has 20 some odd engine trails but other ships have inert thrusters that look horrid (Particularly the brutix). Yeah, make the brutix look like the larger version of the thorax like it acts! I think there's 8 or 9 thruster clusters inactive, plus the 6 separate drives built into the wings. Call me OCD, but it would look really cool. QFT. Give the Domi more/larger engines as well, as the ones it has barely look like they could move the thing. Caldari need bigger bloom and contrails as well. ------------------
Ross Ice Gallente adeptus gattacus Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.06 08:03:00 - [16] Originally by: Machiu Troyan Originally by: Dahak2150 Originally by: Ambrose Speaking of contrails, does it bother anyone else that the thorax has 20 some odd engine trails but other ships have inert thrusters that look horrid (Particularly the brutix). Yeah, make the brutix look like the larger version of the thorax like it acts! I think there's 8 or 9 thruster clusters inactive, plus the 6 separate drives built into the wings. Call me OCD, but it would look really cool. QFT. Give the Domi more/larger engines as well, as the ones it has barely look like they could move the thing. Caldari need bigger bloom and contrails as well. Amusing discussion going on here, I'd say the capital ships are the worst. Due to the 'the more speed the bigger the engine trail' rule the capital ships have an inappropiately small engine trail. Its not gonna get changed unless some changes in the code are made and thats most unlikely atm, as its nothing game breaking.
Michiyo Daishi	Posted - 2006.08.06 08:38:00 - [17] sounds like doable stuff in Kali tbh, give the ships more visual oomph when the engines kick in. Would definately look cool and attract more players to EVE. nudges CCP and gives a wink - posts posted are not official statements of EVEnews.com, and are the poster's own
Wild Rho Amarr Black Omega Security	Posted - 2006.08.06 08:56:00 - [18] There was originally an idea to change propulsion jamming to somthing similar to what the ECM system is now with chance based warp scrambling, however the idea was less than popular for and it was never implemented. The stat you are seeing is one of the values used in the calculations and is little more than a relic of this system, it has no other significance as far as I'm aware. WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your ass will be laminated. - Jennie Marlboro
Lorette Gallente Mythian Empire	Posted - 2006.08.06 09:08:00 - [19] Edited by: Lorette on 06/08/2006 09:08:09 Originally by: Ross Ice Originally by: Machiu Troyan Originally by: Dahak2150 Originally by: Ambrose Speaking of contrails, does it bother anyone else that the thorax has 20 some odd engine trails but other ships have inert thrusters that look horrid (Particularly the brutix). Yeah, make the brutix look like the larger version of the thorax like it acts! I think there's 8 or 9 thruster clusters inactive, plus the 6 separate drives built into the wings. Call me OCD, but it would look really cool. QFT. Give the Domi more/larger engines as well, as the ones it has barely look like they could move the thing. Caldari need bigger bloom and contrails as well. Amusing discussion going on here, I'd say the capital ships are the worst. Due to the 'the more speed the bigger the engine trail' rule the capital ships have an inappropiately small engine trail. Its not gonna get changed unless some changes in the code are made and thats most unlikely atm, as its nothing game breaking. i like how my usually blue engines go red with the heat of my AB'ner Urr thats no me domi.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.