| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Rigs, eh? Where? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It seems Highly Variable. I'm aware of certain NPC's where BS are dropping 30-40 components. It seems to only be happenning in certain patches of space however.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.12.01 14:41:00
|
2. Everyone Dance! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Post the following into your navigation bar in your browser to turn the Eve-O forums into a dance party. (hit Refresh to stop the fun) javascript:R=0; x1=.1; y1=.05; x2=.25; y2=.24; x3=1.6; y3=.24; x4=300; y4=200; x5=300; y5=200; DI=document.getE...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.12.01 06:31:00
|
3. RP Reset in Kali - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Test server has everyone set to 0 rp in all agents. Scuttlebut has it that this is to keep the Tech II market form collapsing when the Invention system rolls out in Kali. IE, they reset it down to 0 so that older players couldn't cash out massi...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.11.06 00:29:00
|
4. Loss of science RP - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
I thought I heard someone mention that it was an intentional means to keep the Tech II market from Crashing. New System, everyone starts from the same point so we won't have people cashing out bajillions of RP points and destroying existing prices.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.11.03 20:56:00
|
5. Please Nerf longrange tech II ammo. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Tech II is suppossed to be a bit of a boost, not an utter unimitable capability. The problem with Tech II Long Range Ammo is that it's both. Its a bit of a boost (thorium damage), AND an utter unimitable advantage (40% range over and above Iron)....
- by Ambrose - at 2006.10.18 18:12:00
|
6. Dominix facelift - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ambrose on 06/08/2006 01:02:04 Your Domi looks like a choo-choo train, I like it. http://www.eve-online.com/conceptart/15052001/n_05.jpg is the original concept art, and I think that looks a lot better then current.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.08.06 00:59:00
|
7. Mistakes in propulsion system - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Speaking of contrails, does it bother anyone else that the thorax has 20 some odd engine trails but other ships have inert thrusters that look horrid (Particularly the brutix).
- by Ambrose - at 2006.08.06 00:57:00
|
8. Constellation Sovereignty : Scrapped, delayed, forgotten, or? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scuttlebut in IRC is that they realized that putting constellation Soveriegnty in would make ASCN much stronger, so they took it back to retool it so that it wouldn't benefit people with tons of outposts. CCP has the policy that all new content h...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.07.26 23:00:00
|
9. More 10/10 Complex's - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The 10/10's have so far injected 1 billion isk a day each into the EVE economy (and thats a conservative guess). So over the last year 10/10 complexes gave out 4 and a half trillion isk, and you want to ramp up the isk printing?
- by Ambrose - at 2006.07.10 23:37:00
|
10. Hostile plex runners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Complexes aren't little RP jaunts, they are income sources. You can easily prevent people from ratting in your systems and certainly from mining but the complex is deadspace and not so easy to police. Remember, we're talking about a billion isk ...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.06.30 17:12:00
|
11. Change 10/10 Complex Respawn! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
See the issue is that one ten ten complex pretty much dwarfs the isk generating output of every other complex type combined. There would be such a havoc if they were made movable that you wouldnt believe. It's pretty safe that darn near every 10/...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.06.28 01:52:00
|
12. Change 10/10 Complex Respawn! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It would be nice, but they will still be camped. Most alliances worth thier salt control thier 10/10's, It would be nice to switch off who runs it. However how it works is that the alliance gets euro's to run the plexs, then does other important ...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.06.27 17:18:00
|
13. MC to become the new 5 - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Whats this about the MC Becoming the 5? You mean like the Jackson five, because certainly your comparison doesnt make much sense elsewise. Of course the only question... is whose Tito? My money is on FRICK.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.05.27 03:37:00
|
14. Tier 3 Gallente BS Turret Placement.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: oDDiTy V2 Hmmm I thought that was concept art for the next LOTR? Frodo Baggin's New Sword Oh no, ASCN already has the new Battleships! Seriously though, we need another angle on that ship... And BS turrets nead to b...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.04.24 03:28:00
|
15. YOUR ALL DEAD - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
I liked this better when BOB did it.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.04.19 09:09:00
|
16. Char swap question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just read the Faq. Seems not. And theres no way to hurry up the remove roles process, so it looks like I'm hosed.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.04.12 07:58:00
|
17. Char swap question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ambrose on 12/04/2006 07:21:15 Can you swap a char from an account which has just gone inactive? (Say you were a newb and forgot to have that char leave its corp in time due to forgetting about the recent npc corp only rule change.)
- by Ambrose - at 2006.04.12 07:20:00
|
18. New Modules the game could really use... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Falloff Module 4tw.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.04.05 08:05:00
|
19. Corp Theft and CCP's condoning of it.. their words, not mine - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP has stated that auditing who takes from hangers and containers will never be implemented because it would kill corp theft as a game mechanic and all the fun player generated conflict that arises from it.
- by Ambrose - at 2006.04.02 23:53:00
|
20. Devs, please take note: Battleship cargo bays - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I think the original plan was for ships to also use consumables, and the Amarr ships, being very inefficient made up for thier lack of ammunition with the tremendous support costs. Something like killing a slave every 3 or 4 times you fired your ...
- by Ambrose - at 2006.03.23 08:49:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |