| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5154
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 14:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
just because you can does not mean you should -1 not supported =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5162
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ais Hellia wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:
Cloaked people in safes aren't subject to anything, are you new or something?
cloaked people in space can't shoot guns. They can in 'Dojospace'. they can only shoot things that can shoot them back cloak is a single person instance - deal with it that's the dumbest thing iv read today by a large margin =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5185
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 08:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
at risk of labouring the point ill echo what others have said, there is no need for this to come to tranquillity.
i have no issue with this as a tool for tourneys on the test servers but outside of that the concept here is making me uncomfortable. =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5189
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 11:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Xuixien wrote:so this is how EVE dies... to thunderous applause. "Eve will die if you don't agree with me" That's Not what she was saying and you know it. =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5201
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 13:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote: Says the champion in this topic of logical fallacies.
Feel free to highlight my logical fallacies and say why I'm wrong, you know like I just did for him.  Unlike you, I don't just post "you're wrong because I don't agree with you", right now you're just circlejerking.
you were saying... =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5204
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 14:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:
This is relevant factual data of what happened last time CCP introduced a feature some people (the same kind of people complaining about dojos) judged "un-eve".
and that feature is not the same as the one in question, making your comparison about as relevant as my left testicle =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5206
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 14:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Feel free to highlight my logical fallacies and say why I'm wrong, you know like I just did for him.  vv so because people were wrong before, they are wrong now? really?
Bamboozlement wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:
This is relevant factual data of what happened last time CCP introduced a feature some people (the same kind of people complaining about dojos) judged "un-eve".
and that feature is not the same as the one in question, making your comparison about as relevant as my left testicle This is your (wrong) opinion and not factual data, you can lookup the thread about duels and notice the exact same posting patterns "this will kill pvp/eve", "eve is wow now", "I don't like consensual pvp", etc.Of course the feature can't be the same, but again like I said the topic is the same and it was judged "un-eve" by the same kind of people. Please try to focus. read my posts , at no point have i stated anything other than unease at the notion of this being implemented as is outside of a tourney.
you could a least be aware of my opinion before declaring it invalid. =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5206
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 14:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
Priscilla Project wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:Please stick to arguments and factual data. Oh Hi Veers... was wondering where you were. I know. Coincidences. Roughly the same facial structure and the same hairdo. And the same stupid textline. Gotta check the speed of your replies. Anyhow... reading. oh nice catch, missed that. in that case im out
o7 =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5209
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 16:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:A lot of people want to PvP - specifically they want to 1v1 - but don't bother to try because it's a sea of neutral logi and offgrid boosts and anything except actual 1v1.
A lot of people will say "then bring your own neutral logi and your own offgrid boosts" but that's a lame cop-out answer and doesn't make for 1v1. 1v1 shouldn't require multiboxing or friends. It's 1v1. Some people genuinely think that eve should only be played one way, surprisingly the way they play is the only way.  and your putting words in our mouths again. =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5210
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 16:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Well, first of all, if you can still use an off grid booster then the point of this... thing... is entirely lost.
And if they have finally figured a way to make sure you can't, then why not just force boosts to be on grid in the first place across the board, and fix this so long broken aspect of the game?
Second, I fail to see what this is actually supposed to do, besides putting up "you can't touch me" walls fraught with potential explotative abuse, some of which has already been detailed in this thread. its a conceptual stage tool set for running tourney matches currently on duality, the bears seem to think this means we will get arena style pvp and seem ecstatic, everyone els is a little nervous about its implementation(and rightly so) as if its introduced badly i.e. outside of a tourney setting , it could have pretty "strong" effects on the game,
howeve theres thread has the smack of CCP troll threadnought about it so if thats the case gf ,10/10 and all that, but its concerning that the csm have not told us outright one way or another is this will be for general consumption or reserved for a specific use, as mentioned tourneys =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5210
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 16:51:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Marian Devers wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote: Most of us, actually.
OKed in the form of "Here's a prototype for players to look at, to gauge the overall reaction"
As you can see from the wide variety of responses to this thread, it's far from monolithic, one way or another.
Two carebears. This is hilarous =) We definitely need a way to boot people from the CSM at any time, depending on their support of proposed features. This is one such case, where two CSM members have shown to have no understanding of EVE mechanics, purpose, and attraction. Actually we answered because we happened across the question. Out of curiosity WHICH of the CSM would you consider YOUR representative and how would you react if they also supported it? Also you did not read Steves comment carefully. OKed in the form of "Here's a prototype for players to look at, to gauge the overall reaction"A prototype is not something shipping in the next release, it is just a test for concept. Oh and as for 'boot from CSM' that mechanism exists. It is called an election. Next one is coming up in the New Year . . . remember to vote. m actually, to be fair, cheers for telling us about this now rather than later =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5211
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 16:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:its a conceptual stage tool set for running tourney matches currently on duality, the bears seem to think this means we will get arena style pvp and seem ecstatic, everyone els is a little nervous about its implementation(and rightly so) as if its introduced badly i.e. outside of a tourney setting , it could have pretty "strong" effects on the game,
That's some nice narrative spin you got there, you could get a job at foxnews or TMC if you show them this post. First of all you said the bears are happy about this? What bears? A lot of people that posted for this change are known solo pvpers and/or AT/NEO tournament participants. People against this are either nullsec f1 monkeys or random carebear alts. Stick to factual data and stop lying online, it's not healthy.  then stop reading my opinion as fact, i assume you are adult enough to recognise an opinion when you see one =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5213
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 17:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
the thread is now actually comprised more of him being obtuse and belligerent than anything ele http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/375485-1 =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5214
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 17:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:any ETA when connecting to duality will work again? When i want to connect to it the launcher ends up rendering nothing, just a white, empty rectangle.
would like to test it theres a thread regarding that in the test server sub forum =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5214
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 17:45:00 -
[15] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:the first mmo i played was city of heroes and the arenas in that game were only used for "roleplay" which was quite distressing to discover when i finally found a room that hadn't disabled 'observer' mode
beyond that, i had a bad feeling about the thread when i saw it announced, but i can't vocalise the bad feeling into a rational reason why i shouldn't like the concept. so it's not really a feeling worth expressing, is it? ill echo that =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5217
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 17:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:It's the same people against dojos over and over, some of them probably using alts, people with a metagame agenda ruining eve yet again.  Same happened when CCP introduced duels : http://i.imgur.com/5v1zptC.jpg actually you have been talking much more than anyone else http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/375485-1 =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5222
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 18:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
newfage wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: Sure mum, I'll get right on that...
Oh wait, no I won't, because who the **** are you? I read it just fine thanks, and I wrote exactly what I meant and intended. How about you don't be a pretentious arseclown and pretend like I answer to you in any way at all.
It's not like your opinion is irrelevant to this topic or anything (this is sarcasm, your opinion is irrelevant here). Why is that exactly? =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5222
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 19:08:00 -
[18] - Quote
newfage wrote:CCP should close this thread and only ask relevant people like AT participants about this, so many irrelevant people spouting nonsense, please go.
Had we been told this would stay on the test server you would have a point,but as it's been pointed out by the csm there's a though that this might make it to tranquility literally everyone's opinion has some bearing.
=]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5223
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 19:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
newfage wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:newfage wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:newfage wrote:CCP should close this thread and only ask relevant people like AT participants about this, so many irrelevant people spouting nonsense, please go. That would include you, wouldn't it? Post with your main or STFU. yes it would include me too on this char pvelords and f1monkeys giving their opinion about tournament training tools is hilarious. how about we ask renters about this l0l Yes, we should ask everyone that plays EVE. The only people, IMO, whose opinions are irrelevant in this, are elitist scumbags like yourself. We have literally no reason to believe you have another toon unless you post on it. Unless you have something to hide. What are you afraid of? cry about it to some level4 mission agent, CCP should lock this and only talk with CSM and relevant people, period. Hence the thread ya knuckle scraper, because this might get to the main server it's relivant to everyone with a sub. =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5223
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 19:49:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sturm Gewehr wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:pvp in a 'protected' area - the new ultimate care-bears of Eve Online.
Sad really.
$%^&ing CCP, they made me like a Josef Djugashvilis post with the Dojo BS. The world must really be ending!  You agree tournament pilots are the ultimate carebears? never heard of a TourneyBear?! =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5289
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 12:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
update on the thread stats.
http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/375485-1
Bamboozlement, please stop jumping down the throats of anyone with a negative comment =]I[= |

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5302
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 19:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Please Turn wrote:Since, for whatever reasons - i.e. maybe Garmon was right being sad in regard with the folks here, some people have chosen to not post on Eve forums their opinion on the subject, I took the liberty of collecting some of the points made on external medias. Actually, the reason is very telling, in and of itself. The poster cannot post here because he/she only subs for tournaments. Since there are none on, right now, they do not have access to this forum. I wonder how many other players are out there who are silent right now because they are not playing but would be if new things were added to the game . . . ANY new things. m Pretty big difference between any new thing and this new thing
=]I[= |
| |
|