|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 41 post(s) |
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 22:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
The changes look great, obviously there are a few things that probably need balancing out.
You should consider looking at:
Fatigue should be capped at a certain level.
Blackops should have different stats.
|
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 23:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Andrea Keuvo wrote:Zhul Chembull wrote:So you guys think this will stop everyone from dropping a fleet on ya ? They wont need to after they control the choke points. Sub-cap fleets again is all it is going to be. The people in smaller alliances with less time will be melted away due to not being able to logistically support their operation. Someone said it will be easier to defend ? Give me a break, you guys will get smashed by sub-cap fleets still. Once they have the area you have no hope of ever getting it again. The big alliances will get bigger and can stop supplies from the enemy in jumping down supplies by controlling the choke points.
The smaller operations that mine, such as myself, logistically wont be able to provide our ore in Jita no longer as there is no way in hell I'm creating more cyno toons for this game. Just let the rest of my accounts go inactive and find something else to do. Seriously it sucks doing logistics as is. Someone at CCP just don't get it. I needed a vacation from this game anyhow.
I represent the small guy in eve, this is fail, believe me. Yeah it's kinda ridiculous that to do logistics in deep null if you happen to be blocked by a regional gate that is over 5LY you can easily end up going from needing 3-4 cynos in your chain to 8-10. This is an absurd increase and maybe someone at CCP thinks this will drive up subscriptions as you now need 3 more accounts to cyno with but I think it is more likely people will just quit.
You really didnt read the changes. 3 more cynos is not actually even the issue. It would be the amount of time to perform the 3 additional jumped with the cool down. You'll just have to jump the gate I guess which is the whole purpose. |
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
1
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 07:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
uziel99 wrote:Bnizzle wrote:I wonder if this will affect Black Frogs Prices? I wonder if they will even be in business.
I would think you'll just end up paying a premium price.
|
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
1
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 08:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
bear mcgreedy wrote:Phillips Helljumper wrote:Love these changes. If you cant adapt to these changes move to high sec and sell all your caps. If you cant defend your 5 regions with a cap blob dumb off some space you have too much. There is already a loop hole to this its called titans. And god forbid you have to use a sub cap fleet to fight with while your 300 carriers slow jump gates\cynos. Stop making threats that your going to unsub we know your not and if you really want too, just contract your stuff to me ill make good use of it. All this means is you now have to plan out and pre station caps near a timer or fight, sorry you cant drop that fleet from 4 regions away. The reason so many of you dislike this is it might cause you to have to think and plan how you will get caps into a fight, and you might have to risk a few things to get them there. Also nothing is set in stone and this is a dev blog not the patch notes so wait till it goes through testing and discussion before you blow a gasket and fire sale all your things. Wspace got their nurf and we still are still around and have adapted, your play null sec o7 you really don't get it .... with these changes certain regions are simply unaccessible and no one will want or attack them making 0.0 stagnant
No they just are not accessible as quickly via the existing mechanic. You get to use gates now, it will make a nice change for some of you. Gates are beautiful these days.
|
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
2
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
samuel1 wrote:What a joke might aswell unsub my accounts and keep my money I'm fine with reducing the ranges you can jump if you're prepared to give us back the months I spent training jump skills. I'm not paying for a game to sit around with a Timer paying yous for doing F**k all...... No thanks must have been on the crack pot when yous thought up this idea
LOL ... still more tears. Just use the gates like normal people. All these big entities complaining out the proposals without even thinking about what this means for attack and defence. These changes tmakes things a little more interesting......and you can't own eve.
Also all these people trying to reason with the company that gave the world H+Šttuspil. There are still whole families in therapy over that game and people continue to but it. People are still buying it so unsub your accounts and sell your supers(cheap). There will be new players and older players alike who will adapt and pick up where you left off . |
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
3
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 10:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Janus Nanzikambe wrote:Mr Floydy wrote:Presumably with these changes when a capital jumps through a stargate it will land a proportionate distance from the gate? Like in WH space? +1 As in wormholes, so in k-space!
You already land far enough away. I can't see a Moros burning back to gate if there is a camp on the other side :) Where is the thread on low sec interdictors again? |
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
3
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 11:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
ziktreyon wrote:Dear CCP,
I like you guys a lot, Im hoping 155 pages of responses is showing you that maybe this is ill concieved.
But seriously, Im not bashing you guys, I see where youre coming from.
But please, slowing down a game that makes chess look like a shootout isnt a great idea.
There are better ways of doing this.
Not to mention...if you want to kill the batphone, then maybe you should consider that youve given the biggest advantage to us (the people with the batphones). The CFC has so many pilots, many of which are below the requirements for fighting in a capital but can still pilot one, that we end up with the biggest advantage. We can use many pilots to move a single ship, a smaller entity that cant do that doesnt stand a chance. In a prolonged engagement, they burn out their pilots after a few fights and none of them can jump for a few weeks while we can keep going forever and ever by recycling pilots until the cows come home.
Youre gold plating the batphone and handing it to the CFC on a silver platter.
[and if anyone says im QQing about the CFC, pay attention...Im IN the CFC. But I know we are a lot of the perceived problem =D ]
lol ... Ok so how about you read the comments and see there is a lot of positive in here. |
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
3
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 11:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
Zhul Chembull wrote:BlackMatrix wrote:ziktreyon wrote:Dear CCP,
I like you guys a lot, Im hoping 155 pages of responses is showing you that maybe this is ill concieved.
But seriously, Im not bashing you guys, I see where youre coming from.
But please, slowing down a game that makes chess look like a shootout isnt a great idea.
There are better ways of doing this.
Not to mention...if you want to kill the batphone, then maybe you should consider that youve given the biggest advantage to us (the people with the batphones). The CFC has so many pilots, many of which are below the requirements for fighting in a capital but can still pilot one, that we end up with the biggest advantage. We can use many pilots to move a single ship, a smaller entity that cant do that doesnt stand a chance. In a prolonged engagement, they burn out their pilots after a few fights and none of them can jump for a few weeks while we can keep going forever and ever by recycling pilots until the cows come home.
Youre gold plating the batphone and handing it to the CFC on a silver platter.
[and if anyone says im QQing about the CFC, pay attention...Im IN the CFC. But I know we are a lot of the perceived problem =D ] lol ... Ok so how about you read the comments and see there is a lot of positive in here. I want what your smoking, care to share ?
You are obviously just another one who just reads the posts he feels like. As I said ... a lot of positive amongst the negative. These changes just change play style and although (if you read my earlier post) do need refinements present huge options for everyone. |
BlackMatrix
Irrational Tendencies SCUM.
4
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 12:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bort Malice wrote:rezell wrote:This will help low sec . No more uber MOM fleets This Devblog pretty much clearly states those Uber MOM fleets will be jumping into your lowsec. Enjoy.
They do already. At least you can see them coming :) |
|
|
|