| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |

Ammzi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
1844
|
Posted - 2014.10.16 11:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thanks for not dealing with the real issue here which is ISBox bombing, but making real player coordinated bomber fleets more of a pain to coordinate.
This only emphasizes the need for automated, single player run bombing fleets. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
1850
|
Posted - 2014.10.16 12:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vhaine Vhindiscar wrote: Nobody asked for this and it won't fix your little isboxer problem. Those guy won't be affected. So if I want to fly a bomber in fleet fights, I need ISboxer now? Is that what it's really about? Cause that's what where you are placing the incentive.
Yes, I am sorry. You can join PASTA and learn the ways of ISBoxing bombers which with these changes are obviously encouraged by CCP.
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
1855
|
Posted - 2014.10.16 14:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:These changes are intended to make it easier for fleets to counter bombers (whether the bombers are isboxed or not) and to make organization of characters valuable again. Organization of pilots is made easier in a lot of ways with isboxer, but that has always been true and isn't some new phenomenon coming from these changes.
I think some people came into this thread expecting it to be something completely different, and are therefore disappointed.
If you want to discuss our policies surrounding isboxer that is fine, but there are other threads for that.
Thanks, that is really disappointing perspective by CCP. But at least it's a reply. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
1859
|
Posted - 2014.10.16 15:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote: You have 12 seconds to ask on comms to get bumped by 1 meter once these bombs come out. Not so hard, it takes 5 seconds to react and another 3-4 seconds for a cruiser to slam into your archon and nudge it by 1-5 meters.
^people who have no idea how hitboxes work. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
1872
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 15:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Capqu wrote:the csm may indeed be doing its job, but noone on the csm has any actual experience with bombing fleets / isbombing. in fact i looked up all the csm members and the only one with any appreciable background using bombs is Ali Aras, and he isn't the most active of pilots with no activity since june and sub a hundred bombing kills before that.
how is that not absolute insanity to anyone else that these suggestions came "directly from the CSM" when the only exposure that the csm has to bombers with cloaks is getting put into the dumpster by them
of course those people are going to have skewed opinions. of course you can say the same about the people who actively use bombs, and thats why you should listen to both sides. you definitely should not listen exclusively to the side proposing bombers de-cloaking each other again when that side is well known for flying bombers without cloaks, regardless of their position as CSM delegates.
Lobbying at its finest. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
1874
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 17:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Seraph IX Basarab wrote:http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/1410/IBombers.png
This. Nice graphic, the only issue I have with it is when do they cloak? If (btw has this little gem been confirmed?) they can be decloaked in warp if they are in the same warp bubble would they all have to space out ahead of time or would they cycle in? m
Yeh, I setup my ISBoxer bombers on sisi and warped around and bombed with no issues. Don't even get decloaked mid-warp, only when I land to do the bomb run :)
Setup time is nil. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
1877
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:18:26 -
[7] - Quote
Step in the right direction, Fozzie. Now we just need to get rid of ISBoxing bombers and we're good. |
| |
|