tl;dr Butthurt whine thread about CODE. #227,401

LOL, welcome in EVE! you must be new?
just for info +/-90% of player base are sociopath and ccp approve. deal with it?

Edit: Lol, I just saw why you are whining, two freighters in one day, how dumb can you be?

lol, that wasn't even code it was Marmite!

Edit: Lol, I just saw why you are whining, two freighters in one day!?! #Slowlearner

Nah, search corp, it was yesterday.

I am assuming this was a joke... but I don't think it is.

Also regarding the empty freighters, you really should just put stuff in it to prevent that. You know anything.

-1

So you want to ban without warning players for engaging in behaviour (Highsec ganking) that has not only been been tolerated for 10+ years, but was explicitly how the game was designed?

Or do you want to ban these players without warning because they trash talk, gloat over a victory - "rubbing it in" as you say, or have at thier own propaganda website like practically every other large player group in Eve?

Or do you want to ban these players without warning because you are licensed mental health professional and have diagnosed these people as an actual threat to society, or at least other players, over the Internet?

I don't even know where to begin.

clearly sociopathic behavior

such as recent reposting of death threats on their website with an objective to rub it in and make fun of clearly disturbed individuals. That's not OK and should clearly constitute a violation of reasonable player behavior.

Naturally, you have the medical qualifications to back this up, yes?



It speaks volumes about you that you think the people reporting the death threats are the ones who should be banned, rather than the ones making the threats.

I can't wait to see the article about you.

You have a point and each isolated incident is not sufficient. However combined with clearly sociopathic behavior such as recent reposting of death threats on their website with an objective to rub it in and make fun of clearly disturbed individuals. That's not OK and should clearly constitute a violation of reasonable player behavior.

This is coming from a player who's former name was offensive enough for CCP to rename it .

I can't wait to see the article about you.

Only after 7 years, and is a medical term, and by far not the most offensive name... And if your retort is really 'you had a silly name' your argument is fundamentally flawed.

the roleplay disguise is well thought out so that even for CCP it's difficult to see through and identify their true nature.

Thank you. I hope together we can raise maximum awareness in the community about how and why CODE operates.
They are pretty slick spindoctors and the roleplay disguise is well thought out so that even for CCP it's difficult to see through and identify their true nature.

Aren't you one of those who threatened to spam this daily until changes are made? Didn't this also happen about a month ago?

You are comfortable enough with using a name offensive to minors by everybody's standards and have the guts to actually defend it. That only shows that you are either clueless about what constitutes acceptable behavior (as some sociopaths are) or actually engage in it deliberately. I'm thinking the latter.

This is primarily an awareness campaign to help people understand who the people behind CODE really are.

Hahahahahaha.

Seriously, though, when I saw the thread title I hoped that someone had finally mustered the manpower to come at us in-game. Should have remembered this is Eve general discussion, commonly known as whinebear central.

Awesome! Now code-violating miners will look even sillier when they claim ignorance of the Code. \o/ Perhaps you should grab a catalyst and come gank with us.

I would enjoy a military confrontation with someone in-game who is a worthy opponent and not a sick sociopath. Would be a waste of my time.

I would enjoy a military confrontation with someone in-game who is a worthy opponent and not a sick sociopath. Would be a waste of my time.

Yes, I picked a medical term that was slightly funny. It is no different that lung or phalanges, just it involves parts of the digestive system.

Proof.

The real question is did you learn anything from loosing these ships? Maybe you would like purchase a permit? They are only 10 million ISK and valid for one full year! What a great deal.

And again with the medical diagnosis, this time complete with excuses why you can't fight us. I'm going to bet that you're actually not a doctor.

I already told you repeatedly that I consider repeatedly offering me a permit is harrassment and you disturb me. This is not the 5th the 10th or even 20th violation of my request.

LOL, welcome in EVE! you must be new?
just for info +/-90% of player base are sociopath and ccp approve. deal with it?

I already told you repeatedly that I consider repeatedly offering me a permit is harrassment and you disturb me. This is not the 5th the 10th or even 20th violation of my request.

if you feel humiliated by code, that speaks volumes more about you than anything els.


Edit: RABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLE!

Edit 2: just finished reading the whole op HA!

You have a point and each isolated incident is not sufficient. However combined with clearly sociopathic behavior such as recent reposting of death threats on their website with an objective to rub it in and make fun of clearly disturbed individuals. That's not OK and should clearly constitute a violation of reasonable player behavior.

This is not the 5th the 10th or even 20th violation of my request.

I mean wouldn't it be easier to purchase the permit and follow The Code as a compliant person rather than risk more of your ships like you have recently?

Why do you continue offering me a permit when you already know that i know that they are a scam?

ill say it again ,playing the predator in the one game that explicitly and infamously has allowed it for over a decade dose not indicate a psychological disorder.

Neither does shaming publicly those who actually have difficulty disassociating moral value responses from digital acts (which is indicative of an unhealthy state of mind).

death threats over a video game are not ok.

CCP GM (or GMs, i only know of one thats had direct contact with code) assisted in making the code

Wrong.

Rather than whine on the forum, James 315 used the petition system to ensure that what he was doing complied with the rules. He was given GM guidance on that issue. CCP in now way specifically endorse what we do, though they presumably generally endorse us asploding spaceships.

OP mentions minerbumping.com several times in her post. I now feel compelled to visit the site again and get the latest mewlings from the sickly and weak.

Thank you for advertising their website.

I personally don't. I have thicker skin than that but it was really reading their repost and gloating over victims' outrage made me post this. I think people are outraged for a reason, and the reason is not ganking. They are having trouble fighting CODE because their disguise as roleplay is quite good.

I'm also interested in making EVE a better place for other players who might have difficulty pinpointing and articulating what exactly is wrong with these rather proficient spindoctors. Took me a while to formuate it in my head.

CODE is the cancer killing Eve.

CODE is the cancer killing Eve.

Oh man, just when this thread couldn't get any funnier. BTW, how's the resistance going?

Shouldn't we call his so called resistance 'Chemo' instead?

Shouldn't we call his so called resistance 'Chemo' instead?

I've formulated my understanding of how and why CODE operates and would like to propose a petition to

1) Permanently ban all their leadership
2) Establish new guidelines for how player post-gank humiliation is unacceptable behavior in EVE

The reasons for this are:


I believe that they gank for player humiliation (not profit) and it's their primary goal.


This belief is based on them contacting players repeatedly after they ganked them even after they told them that they don't want their permit.

0) There's really no need to go any further than the recent quotation on minerbumping of death threats that they received from a ganked player. Quoting such disturbed people, sending them follow up "umadbro" mails and tryign to infuriate them even more clearly shows that their objective is to produce such reaction and they derive satisfaction from it. It's also sad that we harbor such sick individuals within the EVE community.
a) Posting their "tears" publically on their website, almost daily (see minerbumping.com), including frequently information that is highly derogatory and came from a player that is angry over a loss of their spaceship
b) Rubbing it in after the gank, repeated convos to players who are already outraged over the loss of their spaceship
c) Attempts to get them on voice comms, record their rage and publish it on soundcloud/youtube
b) They gank completely empty freighters
e) They repeatedly try to sell permits to people who already repeatedly said no at least 20 times
f) After they sell their permits they revoke it based on being AFK in station, so the permits are not designed for profit but for player griefing because it's impossible to comply with the terms of the "permit"
g) If you read their website you can see that James 315 is a sick self aggrandizing individual
h) You can see that CCP has failed thus far to ban them because they don't quite see through their sickly disguised roleplay what they are really doing or are having difficulties navigating their behavior disguised as grey area roleplay.

Therefore I believe that these people or at least their leadership is basically a group of sick individuals who derive pleasure primarily from their victims' suffering and need out of game psychiatric help. We as players are not qualified to give them this help and neither is CCP. In the meantime the game would be better off without them. Let's play with respect and make EVE a better place where pirates seek profits and not player humiliation.

Please +1 if you feel the same way.

Also whenever you get contacted by them for post gank or with an offer to buy a permit, petition them to CCP for humiliation using the factual rationale provided above.

Note that this is not about highsec ganking, it's about this group of sick individuals who basically use EVE for griefing and derive pleasure from it.

At this point i feel like any compromise such as them "fixing up" their behavior is unacceptable and they need to be permanently banned from the game. Minerbumping.com needs to be shut down and these players who unfortunately can't behave in a respectful way expunged from the EVE gaming community.

(There are other issues with actual game mechanics that are questionable, such as bumping to get ready in position and the victim being unable to do anything about it and the fact that people can use 40 ISBoxed thrashers. Neither of those things seem quite right but i can see how people can disagree on that.)

I've formulated my understanding of how and why CODE operates and would like to propose a petition to

1) Permanently ban all their leadership
2) Establish new guidelines for how player post-gank humiliation is unacceptable behavior in EVE

The reasons for this are:


I believe that they gank for player humiliation (not profit) and it's their primary goal.


This belief is based on them contacting players repeatedly after they ganked them even after they told them that they don't want their permit.

0) There's really no need to go any further than the recent quotation on minerbumping of death threats that they received from a ganked player. Quoting such disturbed people, sending them follow up "umadbro" mails and tryign to infuriate them even more clearly shows that their objective is to produce such reaction and they derive satisfaction from it. It's also sad that we harbor such sick individuals within the EVE community.
a) Posting their "tears" publically on their website, almost daily (see minerbumping.com), including frequently information that is highly derogatory and came from a player that is angry over a loss of their spaceship
b) Rubbing it in after the gank, repeated convos to players who are already outraged over the loss of their spaceship
c) Attempts to get them on voice comms, record their rage and publish it on soundcloud/youtube
b) They gank completely empty freighters
e) They repeatedly try to sell permits to people who already repeatedly said no at least 20 times
f) After they sell their permits they revoke it based on being AFK in station, so the permits are not designed for profit but for player griefing because it's impossible to comply with the terms of the "permit"
g) If you read their website you can see that James 315 is a sick self aggrandizing individual
h) You can see that CCP has failed thus far to ban them because they don't quite see through their sickly disguised roleplay what they are really doing or are having difficulties navigating their behavior disguised as grey area roleplay.

Therefore I believe that these people or at least their leadership is basically a group of sick individuals who derive pleasure primarily from their victims' suffering and need out of game psychiatric help. We as players are not qualified to give them this help and neither is CCP. In the meantime the game would be better off without them. Let's play with respect and make EVE a better place where pirates seek profits and not player humiliation.

Please +1 if you feel the same way.

Also whenever you get contacted by them for post gank or with an offer to buy a permit, petition them to CCP for humiliation using the factual rationale provided above.

Note that this is not about highsec ganking, it's about this group of sick individuals who basically use EVE for griefing and derive pleasure from it.

At this point i feel like any compromise such as them "fixing up" their behavior is unacceptable and they need to be permanently banned from the game. Minerbumping.com needs to be shut down and these players who unfortunately can't behave in a respectful way expunged from the EVE gaming community.

(There are other issues with actual game mechanics that are questionable, such as bumping to get ready in position and the victim being unable to do anything about it and the fact that people can use 40 ISBoxed thrashers. Neither of those things seem quite right but i can see how people can disagree on that.)

Ok, so you see the problem. Code members do nothing different than many of the other players groups in Eve with the exception that perhaps their main opponents are disparate, often PvE focused players who have a penchant for coming to the forums to whine about their losses. Eve is full of PvP conflict, trash talk and propaganda, as would be expected from a game that was explicitly designed to pit one player against another - Code is nothing special in this regard.

If you are serious about this, you first need to change your petition to not be centered around banning a specific player group, rather you should petition for a change in harassment policies themselves. Specifically singling out a player group to be banned because of what really boils down to is "I don't like them" will not fly and just makes you look like just another butthurt Code victim begging CCP to change the rules in your favour.

So now the problem is what do you want the new definition of harassment to be? It can't be one player feeling bad because he was beaten at the game by another player (such as a miner losing his ship to a ganker) as you would then ban PvP. Would you then suggest some 'sportsmanship' clause that prohibits players from interacting negatively with other players they have beaten? But Eve is a sandbox so how do you know what a victory condition is? And how will you police this, especially if the interaction takes place in a third-party medium like Teamspeak or on the forum of a website. And who will decide where the line is when a good-natured vow of in-game revenge become a threat or harassment?

Honestly, if you actually managed to get a 'sportmanship' clause enacted, more carebears would get hit with bans for their bad reactions to being ganked then would Code members who seem to be in much better control of their behaviour. Perhaps it is because they understand that Eve is just a game, one where you can indeed choose to play the villain.

I agree with you on this, you can file a DMCA Takedown request with the fact that they are using extorion, racketeering and money laundering thru their website (minerbumping.com) as the base reasons why such a request is made. Also to petition CCP thru normal channels for the removal of all the accounts thru permabans and stating again the reasons why (Extortion, Racketeering, money laundery).

LOL, welcome in EVE! you must be new?
just for info +/-90% of player base are sociopath and ccp approve. deal with it?

I agree with you on this, you can file a DMCA Takedown request with the fact that they are using extorion, racketeering and money laundering thru their website (minerbumping.com) as the base reasons why such a request is made. Also to petition CCP thru normal channels for the removal of all the accounts thru permabans and stating again the reasons why (Extortion, Racketeering, money laundery).

I agree with you on this, you can file a DMCA Takedown request with the fact that they are using extorion, racketeering and money laundering thru their website (minerbumping.com) as the base reasons why such a request is made. Also to petition CCP thru normal channels for the removal of all the accounts thru permabans and stating again the reasons why (Extortion, Racketeering, money laundery).

I mean wouldn't it be easier to purchase the permit and follow The Code as a compliant person rather than risk more of your ships like you have recently?

PS. I appreciate your addition to my jar.

LOL, welcome in EVE! you must be new?
just for info +/-90% of player base are sociopath and ccp approve. deal with it?

Sometimes i think you are right :(

But i still have hope that it's just the loud minority.

Why don't you go shove your head up your Anal Canal where it belongs?

The rest of non nerds are too busy playing eve

Why don't you go shove your head up your Anal Canal where it belongs?

uh, the

no hmm

i,

what

Now that is some impressive tinfoil hattery right there.

You have a point and each isolated incident is not sufficient. However combined with clearly sociopathic behavior such as recent reposting of death threats on their website with an objective to rub it in and make fun of clearly disturbed individuals. That's not OK and should clearly constitute a violation of reasonable player behavior.

I agree with you on this, you can file a DMCA Takedown request with the fact that they are using extorion, racketeering and money laundering thru their website (minerbumping.com) as the base reasons why such a request is made. Also to petition CCP thru normal channels for the removal of all the accounts thru permabans and stating again the reasons why (Extortion, Racketeering, money laundery).

Is this a real life threat or an in game threat?

It is a loud minority. Don't worry. The rest of non nerds are too busy playing eve to forum warrior.

We post death threats to highlight the massive double standard CCP has on their response to "out of game" harassment. I have reported many death threats and watchlist the offenders. These players will play interrupted for weeks after threatening me and my family, suggesting no action was taken.

It is a timely suggestion. Not a threat. Please do not brand it as anything else.

This is the nerdy game anslo.
we are to other nerds what they are to normal people.
none of us are in a position to use that as ammo.

You are employing a Strawman logical fallacy in a rather weak attempt to debunk my argument, F for Fail.

CCP regulates player conduct related to their game. I never claimed that you committed IRL crime.

How would you know, unless that's your alt?

Cause CQ is the best and strongest independent caribean woman who don't need no man.

So you're guessing. Gotcha.

Now that is some impressive tinfoil hattery right there.

No because I know English. He said why don't you shove, not I am going to shove. Basic comprehension there broski.

Yet it's fine to brand them with psychological disorders for playing a game ...

We already established you are guessing, it's fine brah.

Be real dude. A lot if these nerds just want a line drawn by CCP so they can skate close to it. Keeping it grey leaves room to adapt to people who do have issues and enjoy harassing players. People like this exist. People with mental issues causing them to enjoy making other people feel like crap.

Be real dude. A lot if these nerds just want a line drawn by CCP so they can skate close to it. Keeping it grey leaves room to adapt to people who do have issues and enjoy harassing players. People like this exist. People with mental issues causing them to enjoy making other people feel like crap.

Kind of sad really.

Plenty of the people who want a line drawn are in the New Order. Whoops.

Yet it's fine to brand them with psychological disorders for playing a game ...

I see you're on a guess fest. Unless you have facts to back this up, in which case go ahead and post it.

That's the point. So they can skate the very edges of harassment and get away with it.

So English isn't your first language then. That's really all you had to say brohan.

Wow, dude, you pulled that U-turn so fast you forgot to edit your previous post. First you said the ones who prefer the grey are the "bad" guys, now you're saying the ones who want a clear line are.

When you grasp English better then sure. You still can't tell the difference between a threat and a suggestion.

Oh and that pilots name is spelt Carribean, not caribean. Just saying brah.

Its been a while since I have seen the old "CODE extortion is illegal" claim.

We already established you are guessing, it's fine brah.

Nice goal post change. Also confirming again that iPhone sucks to post from.

Yes I do think that you are largely correct in most of your observations. It is challenging to delineate their actions and they are (extremely deliberately so) operating in the grey area. However there are many other grey areas in the game and as evidence accumulates CCP should act, if nothing else just to send a message to whoever is next that their patience towards pushing the boundaries of grey areas is not unlimited.

A 'sportsmanship' clause would be great but is far too idealistic of a proposition i think.. given the diverse player base. I also think players should be allowed to slip a few times, nobody is perfect. However in this case i believe the underlying problem with this specific group is too big to ignore because too many players are affected.

So in grey areas I believe regulation should be applied on a case-by-case basis, just like it is frequently applied on a case-by-case basis by judges in real life.

So one thing where you and I are not quite on the same page is that "Code members do nothing different than many of the other players groups in Eve"

I think in this case the problem grew too big and obvious. They perform this 'unsportsmanlike' (or I would rather say abusive) conduct daily and in high volumes. Many people are affected. This creates a poor environment and among other things i'm sure is detrimental to CCP's income. I'm sure many people with self-respect didn't have the energy for this kind of crusade and just unsubbed in disgust over some of their fellow players.

Be real dude. A lot if these nerds just want a line drawn by CCP so they can skate close to it. Keeping it grey leaves room to adapt to people who do have issues and enjoy harassing players. People like this exist. People with mental issues causing them to enjoy making other people feel like crap.

Kind of sad really.

Isn't guessing half of EVE?!

You brought up the English argument chap. But I see you edited out the important part, good move sir.

Would you care to diagnose my mental issue I have Mister Space Doctor? I would really like to know! I mean I do like to shooting spaceships in a spaceship shooting game, that causes no harm in the real life. I mean if I am playing Call of Duty and shoot someone does that make me a bad person as well? If not how is it different?

Unfortunately there's no other way to identify and deal with this other than factual.

Gloating over other people's suffering & pain is a staple of such conduct. In this case the group is also pretty large so there's some ill-motivated herd mentaility going on. I was actually pretty shocked as the group appears to be pretty tight knit as well considering their clearly abusive behavior.

No lie this posted before I saw your counter.

Depends. I got the degree. Do you have the space bux?

Yes there is.
HARDEN THE **** UP.

OP is a good example of the campaign of constant harassment certain player elements (miners, mission runners) use to bully content creators.

It's not a case of not "catering to the tearfilled entitled", it's a case of us staying true to the core of what EVE was built on.

Some of the people complaining in this thread have valid points about the fact that they don't feel safe. Simple fact of the matter is, that you're not suppose to feel safe in New Eden.

Eve is not a game for the faint hearted. It's a game that will chew you up and spit you out in the blink of an eye if you even think about letting your guard down or becoming complacent.

While every other MMO starts off with an intro that tells you you're going to be the savior of the realm, holds your hand, protects you, nurtures your development and ultimately guides you to your destiny as a hero along with several other million players who've had the exact same experience, EVE assaults you from the second you begin to play after you create a character, spitting you out into a universe that under the surface, is so complex that it's enough to make your head explode.

The entire design is based around being harsh, vicious, relentless, hostile and cold. It's about action and reaction, and the story that unfolds as you experience these two things.

True, we're working hard to lower the bar of entry so that more players can enjoy EVE and can get into the game. Our NPE (New Player Experience) is challenging, and we're trying to improve it to better prepare rookies for what lies out there, but when you start to play eve, you'll always start out as the little fish in the big pond.

The only way to grow is to voraciously consume what's around you, and its your choice whether that happens to be New Eden's abundant natural resources, or the other people who're also fighting their way to the top.

EVE is a playing experience like no other, where every action or reaction resonates through a single universe and is felt by players from all corners of the word. There are no shards here, no mirror universes, no instances and very few rules. If you stumble across something valuable, then chances are someone else already knows where you are, or is working their way toward you and you better be prepared to fight for what you've discovered.

EVE will test you from the outset, from the very second you undock and glimpse the stars, and will take pleasure from sorting those who can survive from those who'd rather curl up and perish.

EVE will let you fight until you collapse, then let you struggle to your feet, exhausted from the effort. Then when you can see the light at the end of the tunnel it'll kick you flat on your ass in the mud again and ask you why you deserve to be standing. It'll test you against every other individual playing at some point or another, and it'll ask for answers.

Give it an answer and maybe it'll let you up again, long enough to gather your thoughts. After a few more steps you're on the ground again and it's asking more questions.

EVE is designed to be harsh, it's designed to be challenging, and it's designed to be so deep and complex that it should fascinate and terrify you at the same time.

Corporation, Alliances and coalitions of tens of thousands have risen and fallen on these basic principles, and every one of those thousands of people has their own unique story to tell about how it affected them and what they experienced.

That's the beauty of EVE. Action and reaction. Emergence.

Welcome to the most frightening virtual playground you'll ever experience.

There's a difference between being a content creator and being a jackass. Your post just gave me ebola.

Came here expecting the announcement of an exciting new ingame rebellion using ingame mechanics to try to eliminate us. You know, like you would expect when you play a sandbox game.

But instead it's just another carebear crying to get the game changed.

OP, if you get so fed up about a mail after you lose a pixel spaceship in a game that's all about losing spaceships then this is probably not the game for you. If you can't handle loss then there are hundreds of non-competitive games out there that will reward you even if you suck.

The only people who should get banned are the creeps like the OP who call others psychologically sick because she/he can't distinguish a game from reality. People like the OP should be removed from the game for their own safety.

You should take a nice long walk through traffic on your local interstate during rush hour.

You should take a nice long walk through traffic on your local interstate during rush hour.

Remember what I was saying about people with difficulties disassociating emotional value responses from digital actions...Yeah

Ok, but this is the case now - CCP judges player actions on a case-by-case basis by a set of some would say too nebulous guidelines. The behaviour you claim to be "abusive" is done in the open, documented on minerbumping.com and here in the forum among other places. Clearly CCP doesn't have a problem with it in general as Code continues to operate.

I think if you are going to effect any change you will need more concrete rules you want implemented. Something beyond "Code are too mean, don't you see this CCP?" which seems to be your argument so far.

You should take a nice long walk through traffic on your local interstate during rush hour.

Remember what I was saying about people with difficulties disassociating emotional value responses from digital actions...Yeah

Thankfully they have abundantly self-documented their gloating/humiliating roleplay for everyone to see and yes let CCP be the judge.

CCP had reserved the right to interpret grey areas as they see fit in the past and as you can see they did it for a reason.

Real life threats are taking seriously. You seem to have some anger issues. Maybe some yoga and meditation will help you relax and calm down. I mean after all, this is just pixels in a game. Maybe once you can understand this you would purchase a permit.

OP is a good example of the campaign of constant harassment certain player elements (miners, mission runners) use to bully content creators.

I can recommend a delicious Bleach MartiniGäó

This just shows vividly how twisted these spindoctors are. The claim here is, wait, that miners and mission runners bully CODE.

You should take a nice long walk through traffic on your local interstate during rush hour.

and of late have been fast and loose with the banhammer in that regard yet code remains...make of that what you will.

Absolutely.

Absolutely.

Wasn't asking you.

Wasn't asking you.

Even so, he still got the right answer.

Yes thank you we already knew you were a brainwashed code supporter. I'm more interested in the opinion of the few other constructive people on this thread.

You really have some issues regarding threats and dissociation between in-game and in-life. You haven't made a single meaningful contribution to this thread aside from telling people to get bad sushi, get hit by a car, and other thinly veiled threats and personal attacks at other players. When having a discussion one should attempt to at least convey ideas and thoughts as a form of expression rather than what you are doing. I would offer to have you explain your actions and what not on your sheer hostility, but I am sure your response would involve copulation with my mother and physical harm to my body.

Yes thank you we already knew you were a brainwashed code supporter. I'm more interested in the opinion of the few other constructive people on this thread.

I'm not sure who's side are you on, if any. Formal logic? Do you believe CODE makes the game better or not?

I am firmly against calling for banns over hurt feelings and rumour mongering, and I don't take kindly to having an entire demographic tarred as psychologicaly malformed because they play a game in a way it's been famously known for over a decade.

And yes code add content, iv had great fun ****ing with them, check our killboard from last month.

Yes thank you we already knew you were a brainwashed code supporter. I'm more interested in the opinion of the few other constructive people on this thread.

Came here expecting the announcement of an exciting new ingame rebellion using ingame mechanics to try to eliminate us. You know, like you would expect when you play a sandbox game.

But instead it's just another carebear crying to get the game changed.

OP, if you get so fed up about a mail after you lose a pixel spaceship in a game that's all about losing spaceships then this is probably not the game for you. If you can't handle loss then there are hundreds of non-competitive games out there that will reward you even if you suck.

The only people who should get banned are the creeps like the OP who call others psychologically sick because she/he can't distinguish a game from reality. People like the OP should be removed from the game for their own safety.

Wasn't asking you. You are convinced that miners bully you, those are some pretty exotic beliefs.

<--------not a brain washed code supporter , still dissagrees with almost everything you have posted

The reality is recorded on minerbumping.com. It's 100% full of gloating and sick propaganda. Sounds like you are throwing a challenge hat to CCP as to whether they can distinguish thinly disguised abuse from genuinely positive player added content.

There's no possible way minerbumping can be interpreted as a good contribution to EVE Online. It's repulsive and CCP would never recommend it like other positive contributors to the community such as EVEUni, Chribba's work etc.

You were deliberately walking a tight rope from the get-go and eventually you will fall off.

Not really sure why CCP still tolerates you, such a blatant spit in their face and massive damage to their IP.

Miners do bully content creators.

This thread is a living example, calling for CCP to ban CODE leadership, not because they broke any rule, but simply because some miners feelings are hurt. That's bullying by proxy - instead of bullying directly, you take the cowardly approach and try to go through an authority. Shame on you.

I have never seen a CODE member issue a death threat to a miner, but miners regularly use such intimidation tactics against agents of the New Order.

It's not an exotic belief, it's pretty well documented on various blogs.

The HTFU argument is not unreasonable given that EVE is designed to be a harsh game (in terms of risk of losses) but there's no way it makes it a better game when players gloat over other's losses. Yeah, you blew up someone elses ship. They "whined". You said HTFU. Some people will disagree by in my book thats OK tbh. This is not what CODE is doing however. Gloating and humiliation and sick spindoctor roleplay and blog about it is not OK.

So you are upset that you had been space-teabagged?

I have a question for you. Are you Justin Timberlake in real life? Because right now you are Crying Me a River.

Not entirely unexpected given that you gloat over their losses and humiliate them, now is it?

Calling me a coward now is one hell of a spindoctor masterpiece. You get what you had coming for you.

Am i upset? Sounds like you are trying to get me to be upset. Is your true nature showing up clearly now?

So you are upset that you had been space-teabagged?

I have a question for you. Are you Justin Timberlake in real life? Because right now you are Crying Me a River.

And what exactly did I "get" that I had "coming to me"?

Are you saying that I deserved the death threats? Or you saying that I "had it coming", or was "asking for it" when I bumped a miner off his asteroid?

Really now?

Do you believe that women shouldn't dress certain ways, otherwise they're... "asking for" something?

Don't you have a bonus room -to get in game banned for eventually- to run?

The reality is recorded on minerbumping.com. It's 100% full of gloating and sick propaganda. Sounds like you are throwing a challenge hat to CCP as to whether they can distinguish thinly disguised abuse from genuinely positive player added content.

There's no possible way minerbumping can be interpreted as a good contribution to EVE Online. It's repulsive and CCP would never recommend it like other positive contributors to the community such as EVEUni, Chribba's work etc.

You were deliberately walking a tight rope from the get-go and eventually you will fall off.

Not really sure why CCP still tolerates you, such a blatant spit in their face and massive damage to their IP.

This is a game about exploding spaceships. The mails we write after a kill are sent to inform the miners about the rules in the space we claim and why his ship was destroyed. They are usually written in a kind and helpful tone. If you feel humiliated because of that then you have some serious issue and a competitive game like EVE is probably a bit too much for you.


We play a part of the game that was designed that way. We play the game like it was intended to be played, otherwise aggression would not be possible in Highsec. You on the other hand don't play the game, you try to bully CCP into banning fellow players because you dislike what they did to your two Freighters.

You are on a personal vendetta here, don't even try to deny it. And because you suck ingame and you can't have your comeback there, you try to play the "I feel harassed by your eve mail"-card to force CCP's hand. This is probably as low as a gamer can sink, you should be ashamed of yourself.

Perchance.

Would you like to get on coms?

This is a game about exploding spaceships. The mails we write after a kill are sent to inform the miners about the rules in the space we claim and why his ship was destroyed. They are usually written in a kind and helpful tone. If you feel humiliated because of that then you have some serious issue and a competitive game like EVE is probably a bit too much for you.


We play a part of the game that was designed that way. We play the game like it was intended to be played, otherwise aggression would not be possible in Highsec. You on the other hand don't play the game, you try to bully CCP into banning fellow players because you dislike what they did to your two Freighters.

You are on a personal vendetta here, don't even try to deny it. And because you suck ingame and you can't have your comeback there, you try to play the "I feel harassed by your eve mail"-card to force CCP's hand. This is probably as low as a gamer can sink, you should be ashamed of yourself.

I believe you. No really I do. But so what?

On a side issue. Removing grips from a Suzuki is a bi*ch. They really glue those suckers on the throttle tube. It's like they are wielded.

Your CHODE mails afterwards are the harassment.

Not really, I am still just trying to get you to purchase a permit and become compliant.

FWIW you lost more on that last player gank and i (probably) have more capital than you (so i can play this game of trade one platinum insured freighter 200m loss all day long until you are out of ISK). I also ended up with a 2.6b of extra liquid ISK because the freighters were platinum insured and i had spares. In that last gank CODE lost 12-14 T2 fitted brutix and i lost ~200m.

So F for Fail at spindoctor.

I guess the fact that you are still able to post on this forums means that suggesting to someone to kill themselves is now regarded as a rather small offence by the ISD.

Who said we were in it for the ISK? We are in this to promote The Code and ensure compliance. You still are without a permit.

Thread has got to be a troll ,

sure that's against some forum rule somewhere :).

I remember someone saying they had some popcorn earlier got any left ? im running low

Another F for Fail at a failspindoctor strawman of my original message/intention. You simply get what you give.