Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries VOID Intergalactic Forces
145
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 19:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
So i was running transport missions for some standings when i run across someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, if so i wonder how much weight that carries and i know a lot of people that could get into trouble over that then.
xxxxxxx xxxx> delibrate war avoidence btw is in violation on eula
ideas or statements?
ready, set, discuss "Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
6863
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 19:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Did you try checking the EULA?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy
1694
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 19:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Did you try checking the EULA?
That, and / or using one of them new-fangled support ticket thingies. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Mag's
the united
18002
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 19:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Seeing as people have been doing it openly for years now, after they lifted it being an exploit, I doubt it. But I have been know to be wrong. Just ask my wife. 
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
17192
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 20:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Agondray wrote:So i was running transport missions for some standings when i run across someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, if so i wonder how much weight that carries...
It was said in highsec. It carries no weight.
If you were to take everything that highsec says is "EULA breaking" as absolute fact, then anyone with a sec status under 5.0 should be lined up and shot for being a dirty griefing fatherless pirate with mommy issues and envy of the nether-regions. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
1520
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 20:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ah local chat. The epicenter of reasoning and information. |

Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries VOID Intergalactic Forces
145
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 21:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
i didnt have time to look at the EULA while i was more concerned on a 800 word essay on the death of 146 people, but now i can and figured a space lawyer might know of it first "Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith |

Serene Repose
1548
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 05:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Agondray wrote:So i was running transport missions for some standings when i run across someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, if so i wonder how much weight that carries... It was said in highsec. It carries no weight. If you were to take everything that highsec says is "EULA breaking" as absolute fact, then anyone with a sec status under 5.0 should be lined up and shot for being a dirty griefing fatherless pirate with mommy issues and envy of the nether-regions. Well, they should anyway, EULA or not. If we charge admission we could solve world hunger! I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-á |

Adrie Atticus
Shadows of Rebellion The Bastion
443
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 08:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Agondray wrote:So i was running transport missions for some standings when i run across someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, if so i wonder how much weight that carries and i know a lot of people that could get into trouble over that then.
xxxxxxx xxxx> delibrate war avoidence btw is in violation on eula
ideas or statements?
ready, set, discuss
You encountered something we like to call "ELITE HISEC PVPER". They are unable to mount any kind of offensive or defensive against an entity which can cobble up a kitchen sink of more than 4 ships and they will instead sit in a station for a week and wardec something else which cannot fight back.
You are allowed to leave a corporation to avoid a wardec. This subject has caused one of the most entertaining thread in a long while where risk-averse "ELITE HISEC PVPERS" are crying foul due to CCP having tools to mitigate their fun. Lots of tears in that thread, such memories.
Edit: Here's the thread if you feel like going through 1400 posts of bad logic and prolapsed rectums: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=372423 |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
1717
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 08:08:00 -
[10] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:You encountered something we like to call "ELITE HISEC PVPER". They are unable to mount any kind of offensive or defensive against an entity which can cobble up a kitchen sink of more than 4 ships and they will instead sit in a station for a week and wardec something else which cannot fight back. Excuse me sir, but as someone who personally claims the title of ELITE "HIGHSEC PVPER" I resent the use of the term to describethose kinds of folks. |
|

13kr1d1
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 09:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
Corp jumping is practically obligatory when corporations have very little impact on New Eve-O players. |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
346
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 15:07:00 -
[12] - Quote
Time for null nancy's to call for a nerf. |

Jur Tissant
The TERRA Guardians of Serenity
260
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 16:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
The war system allows corporations to declare war on corporations, not people. If you leave a corporation which is decced you leave the war behind. Sounds fairly straightforward and not at all like an exploit. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2508

|
Posted - 2014.10.19 19:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
Agondray wrote:... someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, You, good Sir, were thoroughly misinformed.
Leaving a corporation during a war is not against the EULA in any way shape or form.
ISD Ezwal Vice Admiral Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Xearal
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
933
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 19:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:Agondray wrote:... someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, You, good Sir, were thoroughly misinformed. Leaving a corporation during a war is not against the EULA in any way shape or form.
Awww.. why did you have to step in with a 'definite maybe' awnser.. this thread could have gone interesting places if you didn't :(
Does railgun ammunition come in Hollow Point?
|

Imuji
Swamphole Holdings Swamphole
5
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 21:29:00 -
[16] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:Agondray wrote:... someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, You, good Sir, were thoroughly misinformed. Leaving a corporation during a war is not against the EULA in any way shape or form.
In fact. A few important passages from the Terms of Service that apply to an harassment case like this. Remember that CCP is quite arbitrary so there's no guarantee they will keep it up, but you are always able to file a ticket about someone who deliberately harasses you. CCP doesn't take lightly to harassment of newbro's.
https://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-tos/
Quote:1. You may not abuse, harass or threatenanother player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: filing support tickets with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or support tickets; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.
Secondly:
Quote:You may not use GÇ£role-playingGÇ¥ as an excuse to violate these rules. While EVE Online is a persistent world, fantasy role-playing game, the claim of role-playing is not an acceptable defense for anti-social behavior. Role-playing is encouraged, but not at the expense of other player. You may not create or participate in a corporation or group that habitually violates this policy. |

Serene Repose
1557
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 22:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
As in most things, motive is key here:
"WHY did you jump from corp to corp?"
"I just like the new corp. Oddly enough I didn't like the old one."
"BUT, it was in the middle of a WAR!"
"Can I help that? What am I, everybody's MOTHER?"
Of course, EVE is full of little mind readers...
"We KNOW why you changed corps. Don't hand us that transparent crap!*"
(*The contradiction in terms is critical to presenting the prevailing mindset.) I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-á |

Adrie Atticus
Shadows of Rebellion The Bastion
448
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 07:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Imuji wrote:In fact. A few important passages from the Terms of Service that apply to an harassment case like this. Remember that CCP is quite arbitrary so there's no guarantee they will keep it up, but you are always able to file a ticket about someone who deliberately harasses you. CCP doesn't take lightly to harassment of newbro's. https://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-tos/Quote:1. You may not abuse, harass or threatenanother player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: filing support tickets with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or support tickets; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee. Secondly: Quote:You may not use GÇ£role-playingGÇ¥ as an excuse to violate these rules. While EVE Online is a persistent world, fantasy role-playing game, the claim of role-playing is not an acceptable defense for anti-social behavior. Role-playing is encouraged, but not at the expense of other player. You may not create or participate in a corporation or group that habitually violates this policy.
How is leaving a corporation "abusing, harassing or threatening another player or authorized representative of CCP"? |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
5501
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 07:04:00 -
[19] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:How is leaving a corporation "abusing, harassing or threatening another player or authorized representative of CCP"?
Avoiding wardecs by corp jumping is not against the EULA. Chasing people who corp-jump by continually warding that person through multiple corps can be construed as harassment (there are plenty of other fish in the pond, why are you picking on just that one?)
Jumping corps is an excellent way of farming hisec carebear tears though: "it's not fair that it costs me 50M ISK to declare war on this character every time they move to a new corporation! I want EVE to be easy for me! I paid my 50M ISK dammit, now I want some risk free PVP!"
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Varisto
North Star Science And Industry
4
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 08:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ou dear. One of these threads again...
Leaving corp is normal gameplay even under wardeck...
As someone allready pointed out OP had run into one of these want-to-be-elite-pvp-in-highsec persons. Their usual strategy include mis-information, wardecking defenseless corporations and over all being total idiot about it...
They usually run screaming when someone suddenly can mount even semi-decent defense. In fact most fun i had in eve was turning the table on one of these corps way before wardeck fee changes... Went out hunting them instead... Fools accepted it as mutual.. After few weeks hunting them they jumped their own corp. :P
|
|

Ka'Narlist
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
240
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 10:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Did you try checking the EULA? Why if he can just post here and let someone else do the work for him? |

Caviar Liberta
Moira. Villore Accords
724
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 11:58:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ka'Narlist wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Did you try checking the EULA? Why if he can just post here and let someone else do the work for him?
Some people |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1498
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:12:00 -
[23] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:Agondray wrote:... someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, You, good Sir, were thoroughly misinformed. Leaving a corporation during a war is not against the EULA in any way shape or form. The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah.
F Would you like to know more? |

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
151
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:17:00 -
[24] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:ISD Ezwal wrote:Agondray wrote:... someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, You, good Sir, were thoroughly misinformed. Leaving a corporation during a war is not against the EULA in any way shape or form. The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah. F
Ill agree with this if declaring war was harder then it is now, right now I can wardec you for lulz and there isn't anything you can do about it cept leave your corp. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10115
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:21:00 -
[25] - Quote
We didn't even make it past the first page before someone whipped out the "harassment" lie again.
For the record, it is not harassment to repeatedly wardec someone if they corp hop or dec dodge you. It is not harassment to suicide gank someone more than once if they continue to fail at defending themselves. They actually have to "make an effort" to avoid you, and that does not include blithely trying to pretend that EVE is a single player game.
You are allowed to make a point in EVE Online, and you are allowed to do it with someone else's repeated demise. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10115
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
Adira Nictor wrote: Ill agree with this if declaring war was harder then it is now, right now I can wardec you for lulz and there isn't anything you can do about it cept leave your corp.
Or, and bear with me here... you could just play the game. Whether that means active evasion tactics, or shooting back. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1499
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:36:00 -
[27] - Quote
Adira Nictor wrote:Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah.
F
Ill agree with this if declaring war was harder then it is now, right now I can wardec you for lulz and there isn't anything you can do about it cept leave your corp. No. Wardec mechanics were already nerfed.
People are choosing to join or form corps, no one is forcing people out of NPC corps. Problem is there is no real consequence side of the join-a-corp equation if people can just drop corp to immediately duck any wars.
Bad wardec-mechanic is bad. Wars must follow someone dropping corp for one week (or until war end), whichever is sooner. This is fair. This is meaningful.
AFTER that is done, we can have a conversation about adjusting (upward) wardec fees, etc. After.
CCP: Its time to un-f#ck the war mechanic.
F
Would you like to know more? |

WhyYouHeffToBeMad IsOnlyGame
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
248
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
clearly Mr. xxxxxx xxxx needs to learn how to EVE. A.K.A Hodor Von Grootenberg |

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
151
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Adira Nictor wrote: Ill agree with this if declaring war was harder then it is now, right now I can wardec you for lulz and there isn't anything you can do about it cept leave your corp.
Or, and bear with me here... you could just play the game. Whether that means active evasion tactics, or shooting back.
Oh for sure that is an option, until your a new corp with a noob ceo, and no one knows how to pvp. Your not used to losing ships, and you would be right to say these guys shouldn't be CEO's or in these corps to begin with.
The members realize this and leave the corp to escape a bad thing that no one was ready for, but the wardec follows them as they are completely outclassed, and out skilled (RL skill not sp). Now they are stuck docked because they don't know how to avoid the fights otherwise, and when they move 50 jumps away and you locate them its even worse for them.
Either the bar for wardecing needs to be higher if your gonna have wardecs follow members who leave, or the bar to be a ceo needs to be higher so you can handle wardecs and teach your members how to deal with it. I don't see how the ladder could be implemented so the former would have to be, if you were going to have wardecs follow players. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10117
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 13:54:00 -
[30] - Quote
Adira Nictor wrote: Oh for sure that is an option, until your a new corp with a noob ceo, and no one knows how to pvp. Your not used to losing ships, and you would be right to say these guys shouldn't be CEO's or in these corps to begin with.
That last part.
Yes, they should not exist. Corps like that very often tell new players to spend their first three months of the game mining. I know this because I recently went on a solo awox campaign, and by far the majority of the "new player friendly" corps I joined tried to funnel me into mining.
If that doesn't hurt player retention, I don't know what does.
Quote: The members realize this and leave the corp to escape a bad thing that no one was ready for, but the wardec follows them as they are completely outclassed, and out skilled (RL skill not sp). Now they are stuck docked because they don't know how to avoid the fights otherwise, and when they move 50 jumps away and you locate them its even worse for them.
You're forgetting about the part where, after the implementation of this, such corps will cease to exist. At which point the problem you are pointing out simply disappears.
Yes, there will be some growing pains when it comes to stamping out the toxic highsec corps that amount to nothing more than glorified chat channels. The end result is worth it. (note, this is pretty much exactly the stance CCP is taking about the nullsec travel changes) "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |
|

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
151
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 14:09:00 -
[31] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Adira Nictor wrote: Oh for sure that is an option, until your a new corp with a noob ceo, and no one knows how to pvp. Your not used to losing ships, and you would be right to say these guys shouldn't be CEO's or in these corps to begin with.
That last part. Yes, they should not exist. Corps like that very often tell new players to spend their first three months of the game mining. I know this because I recently went on a solo awox campaign, and by far the majority of the "new player friendly" corps I joined tried to funnel me into mining. If that doesn't hurt player retention, I don't know what does. Quote: The members realize this and leave the corp to escape a bad thing that no one was ready for, but the wardec follows them as they are completely outclassed, and out skilled (RL skill not sp). Now they are stuck docked because they don't know how to avoid the fights otherwise, and when they move 50 jumps away and you locate them its even worse for them.
You're forgetting about the part where, after the implementation of this, such corps will cease to exist. At which point the problem you are pointing out simply disappears. Yes, there will be some growing pains when it comes to stamping out the toxic highsec corps that amount to nothing more than glorified chat channels. The end result is worth it. (note, this is pretty much exactly the stance CCP is taking about the nullsec travel changes)
Those corps wont stop existing, new players wont know any better. And ceo's taking advantage of new players till a wardec happens wont stop either.
Not every corp is great like ROC, you know and realize that, which is great, but nothing about that change would stop noob corps or ceo's from doing something stupid and the new members get ran out of the game because the wardecs follow them.
I'm all for showing new players what a stupid ceo or recruiter looks like. And what happens to a poorly managed corp, but once they leave, I wish them the best. I don't keep following them after they find out how fail the corp is. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10117
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 14:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
Adira Nictor wrote: Those corps wont stop existing, new players wont know any better. And ceo's taking advantage of new players till a wardec happens wont stop either.
Not every corp is great like ROC, you know and realize that, which is great, but nothing about that change would stop noob corps or ceo's from doing something stupid and the new members get ran out of the game because the wardecs follow them.
I'm all for showing new players what a stupid ceo or recruiter looks like. And what happens to a poorly managed corp, but once they leave, I wish them the best. I don't keep following them after they find out how fail the corp is.
So then it sounds like you'd be all for a system that places a cooldown on corp creation after having left a player corp, and for increasing the cost of corp creation. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
151
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 14:42:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Adira Nictor wrote: Those corps wont stop existing, new players wont know any better. And ceo's taking advantage of new players till a wardec happens wont stop either.
Not every corp is great like ROC, you know and realize that, which is great, but nothing about that change would stop noob corps or ceo's from doing something stupid and the new members get ran out of the game because the wardecs follow them.
I'm all for showing new players what a stupid ceo or recruiter looks like. And what happens to a poorly managed corp, but once they leave, I wish them the best. I don't keep following them after they find out how fail the corp is.
So then it sounds like you'd be all for a system that places a cooldown on corp creation after having left a player corp, and for increasing the cost of corp creation.
I would be ok with this, in addition corp management skill should be restricted more then it is as well. If anything to give new players who want to start a "guild" time to learn to play the game before they rush off to ruin their own experience.
The only issue I have with a wardec that follows a player is that player might be too new to do anything about it, and I would say leave it up to the wardecer to choose if they want to follow that player or not, but people in general are happy to just get easy kills even at the cost of ruining the game for others.
It's no fun to be hunted down constantly by an experienced player who smacks you down with no idea on how to fight back, and now you have nothing better to do with your week of game play besides stay docked up. No that is not the only option but as a noob what would you do? (remembering that you don't know anything about eve at all)
I target bad corp's and CEOs all the time, matter of fact the kick queue is gonna cause me to change my game from extorting corps to extorting players directly. And yes I gank the inactive, the afker and the autopilot ships/pods, im all for teaching people by fire, but I don't want to toss new players under the bus in the name of stopping older players from dec dodging. |

Hana Lena
The Scope Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 15:40:00 -
[34] - Quote
My solution to this problem is simple.
Never leave the NPC corp.
|

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
154
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 16:04:00 -
[35] - Quote
Hana Lena wrote:My solution to this problem is simple.
Never leave the NPC corp.
That is an option, not one I would prefer myself, but an option none the less. |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1331
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 16:18:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:We didn't even make it past the first page before someone whipped out the "harassment" lie again.
For the record, it is not harassment to repeatedly wardec someone if they corp hop or dec dodge you. It is not harassment to suicide gank someone more than once if they continue to fail at defending themselves. They actually have to "make an effort" to avoid you, and that does not include blithely trying to pretend that EVE is a single player game.
You are allowed to make a point in EVE Online, and you are allowed to do it with someone else's repeated demise.
For the record, I would advise to not push your luck too far as CCP have demonstrated a will to handle rules in more or less draconian way depending on how big a case get outside of the game. What CCP will consider harassement and what they will consider enough effort to avoid you is completely subjective to every single case and we all know it. The fact that some people don't accept it does not mean it can't happen. |

Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
66
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 16:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah. You are in a high-sec "merc" alliance which does nothing but pick on newbros.
The fact that it is practical and economical for you guys to keep up wardecs on thousands of players in dozens of corps at once exemplifies the need for additional nerfs to the wardec system, such as a doubling of the wardec fee for each concurrent war declaration.
Sitting at Niarja and shooting people who are auto-piloting from Amarr to Jita is not being a brave little warrior, Feyd. It's shooting fish in a barrel. Don't act like your alliance's wars exist for any other reason, because they don't. You aren't removing POSes or POCOs; you aren't fighting over space, and you aren't attacking corps who have any connection to nullsec blocs. You're just shooting up helpless newbie mission-runners and miners. |

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
154
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 17:00:00 -
[38] - Quote
Pro TIps wrote:Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah. You are in a high-sec "merc" alliance which does nothing but pick on newbros. The fact that it is practical and economical for you guys to keep up wardecs on thousands of players in dozens of corps at once exemplifies the need for additional nerfs to the wardec system, such as a doubling of the wardec fee for each concurrent war declaration. Sitting at Niarja and shooting people who are auto-piloting from Amarr to Jita is not being a brave little warrior, Feyd. It's shooting fish in a barrel. Don't act like your alliance's wars exist for any other reason, because they don't. You aren't removing POSes or POCOs; you aren't fighting over space, and you aren't attacking corps who have any connection to nullsec blocs. You're just shooting up helpless newbie mission-runners and miners.
And your acting like this is a problem its not, provided there is a way for new players to leave the wardec behind, which currently there is. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10120
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 17:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
Pro TIps wrote: You are in a high-sec "merc" alliance which does nothing but pick on newbros.
And you are talking out of your ass.
Newbies don't have freighters and faction battleships pretty much by definition.
Quote: The fact that it is practical and economical for you guys to keep up wardecs on thousands of players in dozens of corps at once exemplifies the need for additional nerfs to the wardec system, such as a doubling of the wardec fee for each concurrent war declaration.
The fact that, to actually get kills, you are forced to wardec dozens of corps at once just exemplifies the need to buff the wardec system considerably.
Quote: You're just shooting up helpless newbie mission-runners and miners.
And? EVE is a PvP game, first last and always. PvP is not just for one part of EVE, it is for every part. That includes highsec. And no one needs PvP visited on them more than the people trying to avoid it.
Take steps in your own defense, or you have consented to be destroyed. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10121
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 17:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:We didn't even make it past the first page before someone whipped out the "harassment" lie again.
For the record, it is not harassment to repeatedly wardec someone if they corp hop or dec dodge you. It is not harassment to suicide gank someone more than once if they continue to fail at defending themselves. They actually have to "make an effort" to avoid you, and that does not include blithely trying to pretend that EVE is a single player game.
You are allowed to make a point in EVE Online, and you are allowed to do it with someone else's repeated demise. For the record, I would advise to not push your luck too far as CCP have demonstrated a will to handle rules in more or less draconian way depending on how big a case get outside of the game. What CCP will consider harassement and what they will consider enough effort to avoid you is completely subjective to every single case and we all know it. The fact that some people don't accept it does not mean it can't happen.
Nope. Screw that.
If I gank someone, then they simply reship and go back to being afk in exactly the same belt, yes, I will kill them again. And I will keep doing it until they either give up or get the point.
Blind, stupid insistence on failing in your self defense does not make the inevitable consequences "harassment".
And until CCP decides to stop turning a blind eye to the constant verbal attacks, repeated doxxing, and countless real life threats that occurr every day to the "bad guys" in EVE Online, I will behave as I please. If the rules do not apply equally, they don't apply at all. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |
|

Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
66
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 17:17:02 -
[41] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:The fact that, to actually get kills, you are forced to wardec dozens of corps at once just exemplifies the need to buff the wardec system considerably. Here's an idea: dec someone who has more than 5 players online, use a locator agent, and go shoot them.
Shocking fact: most players do not spend the majority of their time in Niarja. |

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
169
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 17:21:06 -
[42] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:We didn't even make it past the first page before someone whipped out the "harassment" lie again.
For the record, it is not harassment to repeatedly wardec someone if they corp hop or dec dodge you. It is not harassment to suicide gank someone more than once if they continue to fail at defending themselves. They actually have to "make an effort" to avoid you, and that does not include blithely trying to pretend that EVE is a single player game.
You are allowed to make a point in EVE Online, and you are allowed to do it with someone else's repeated demise. For the record, I would advise to not push your luck too far as CCP have demonstrated a will to handle rules in more or less draconian way depending on how big a case get outside of the game. What CCP will consider harassement and what they will consider enough effort to avoid you is completely subjective to every single case and we all know it. The fact that some people don't accept it does not mean it can't happen. Nope. Screw that. If I gank someone, then they simply reship and go back to being afk in exactly the same belt, yes, I will kill them again. And I will keep doing it until they either give up or get the point. Blind, stupid insistence on failing in your self defense does not make the inevitable consequences "harassment". And until CCP decides to stop turning a blind eye to the constant verbal attacks, repeated doxxing, and countless real life threats that occurr every day to the "bad guys" in EVE Online, I will behave as I please. If the rules do not apply equally, they don't apply at all.
This here pretty much,
You want to talk about harassment, how about the guys that spam convo you on 20 different alts about what they are going to do to your mother, or if they ever find you IRL they will kill you, **** your family and so on, because you blew up their spaceship in a game about blowing up spaceships.
Honestly some of the people I blow up in game freak out and have no connection with reality what so ever. You report it and they continue to login day after day with nothing being done.
We do what the game tells you we are gonna do, blow up spaceships, and people make death threats or worse and we are supposed to be the crazy sociopaths. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10172
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 17:28:34 -
[43] - Quote
Pro TIps wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:The fact that, to actually get kills, you are forced to wardec dozens of corps at once just exemplifies the need to buff the wardec system considerably. Here's an idea: dec someone who has more than 5 players online, use a locator agent, and go shoot them. Shocking fact: most players do not spend the majority of their time in Niarja.
Here's an idea.
If you aren't willing to fight, then you belong in an NPC corp. Period.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
5507
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 21:38:17 -
[44] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:ISD Ezwal wrote:Agondray wrote:... someone proclaiming being jumping corps from war decs is against the EULA, You, good Sir, were thoroughly misinformed. Leaving a corporation during a war is not against the EULA in any way shape or form. The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah. F
All that will achieve is getting people to stay logged off for a week (or they'll log on with an alt for a week, or they'll log off and just not come back).
Wardecs are meaningful already: they are a way to clear abandoned POSes out of hisec, a means to clear POSes out of lowsec without security status penalty, and a means to communicate down votes for forum posts.
If you're looking for someone to fight, wardec a corp that has a history of fighting back in hisec wardecs, or head to Providence where you can shoot anyone! You can't wardec a corp that has a long history of no kills and then complain that they don't fight back. Well, you can complain, but it's really a complaint about your own inability to pick a proper wardec target.
Day 0 Advice for New Players
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
10172
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 21:46:54 -
[45] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote: Wardecs are meaningful already: they are a way to clear abandoned POSes out of hisec, a means to clear POSes out of lowsec without security status penalty, and a means to communicate down votes for forum posts.
This is the carebear mentality, ladies and gentlemen.
Look how it spins the hamster wheels in it's brain to try and justify this. Apparently, CCP designed the existing wardec mechanic to...
*drumroll*
Clear out unused POSes!
Oh, fantastic. I am so relieved to hear this, it is such a load off my mind. Now if I can just get some documentation from you, of CCP saying that non consensual PvP is not wanted in highsec, I'll go ahead and cancel my account now.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
|

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1500
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 02:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Pro TIps wrote:Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah. You are in a high-sec "merc" alliance which does nothing but pick on newbros. The fact that it is practical and economical for you guys to keep up wardecs on thousands of players in dozens of corps at once exemplifies the need for additional nerfs to the wardec system, such as a doubling of the wardec fee for each concurrent war declaration. Sitting at Niarja and shooting people who are auto-piloting from Amarr to Jita is not being a brave little warrior, Feyd. It's shooting fish in a barrel. Don't act like your alliance's wars exist for any other reason, because they don't. You aren't removing POSes or POCOs; you aren't fighting over space, and you aren't attacking corps who have any connection to nullsec blocs. You're just shooting up helpless newbie mission-runners and miners. Once the current exploit is closed, THEN we can talk about numbers of outgoing wars, etc. IF wardec mechanics are to exist, they should be meaningful, not duckable. Debate their existence in total all you want, but IF they exist, they should be meaningful. Period.
If someone doesn't want to be subjected to wars, they can stay in NPC corps. Done.
Secondly, did you even *look* at my killboard? Did you even do the barest bit of research before mistaking us for Marmite? Ass.
F Would you like to know more? |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1503
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 02:19:32 -
[47] - Quote
Pro TIps wrote:Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:The war should follow the toon however, for one week or until war expires, whichever is sooner. Simply put, if a war mechanic is going to exist in EvE it should be meaningful, not rendered completely meaningless by such a simple exploit of dropping corp and re-forming under another name. Bah. You are in a high-sec "merc" alliance which does nothing but pick on newbros. The fact that it is practical and economical for you guys to keep up wardecs on thousands of players in dozens of corps at once exemplifies the need for additional nerfs to the wardec system, such as a doubling of the wardec fee for each concurrent war declaration. Sitting at Niarja and shooting people who are auto-piloting from Amarr to Jita is not being a brave little warrior, Feyd. It's shooting fish in a barrel. Don't act like your alliance's wars exist for any other reason, because they don't. You aren't removing POSes or POCOs; you aren't fighting over space, and you aren't attacking corps who have any connection to nullsec blocs. You're just shooting up helpless newbie mission-runners and miners. Once the current ducking exploit is closed, THEN we can talk about numbers of outgoing wars, etc. IF wardec mechanics are to exist, they should be meaningful, not duckable. Debate their existence in total all you want, but IF they exist, they should be meaningful. Period. A bad mechanic of ANY kind is stupid, like yourself.
Also, and speaking slowly for the remedial types...if someone doesn't want to be subjected to wars they can just stay in NPC corps. Done. Want to be able to be in a corp but can't defend yourself, HTFU, or hire mercs, or join a bigger alliance...you know, actual use-thy-brain-sandbox-stuffs...not a mechanic exploit...
Secondly, did you even *look* at my killboard rtard? Did you even do the barest bit of research before mistaking us for f'ing Marmite?
Ass.
F
Would you like to know more?
|

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
700
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 10:00:24 -
[48] - Quote
Stop hiding behind CONCORD, you are as protected as much as your target. High sec doesn't prevent ganking, if you cannot take a CONCORD gang bang then your point is moot. Pick a worthy target that cannot afford to leave a Corp (POS), gank when least expecting it, or go to null/low where there are no restrictions. As long as you hide in high sec you are no different than the other bear you want to shoot, you might be butt hurt over something they said in local but I can reiterate that there is no lock on the F1 key if you really want to kill them that badly except for a fear of CONCORD retribution. There is also no rule they have to fight back, so the smacking like a cockroach gank is probably your best bet to show them you mean business. |

Athena Aideron
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
2
|
Posted - 2014.10.23 13:30:15 -
[49] - Quote
in my experience, most of the players that either, cry for a nerf on wars are those that want to be "left alone" .. thats ok I guess, as wanting to be "left alone" is not against the tos and so on. I do think though that wars are ment to be engaging and push the player towards the community, thus creating content for all, and that players that will go through hell and back to avoid them are missing out on the MMO part of the game.
I remember when I had a little carebear corp. I was having all the fun in the world running missions while my corp mates would afk mine all day. Then one night, I recruited Psychotic Monk into my corp. I do remember him being an ok guy, and I was impress by all those things I did not know were possible. After managing to kick him, I got a wardec by one of his buds. Now this is where things began to change for me. I had 0 pvp experience and had no clue as to what to expect. While most of my corpies dropped corp to go back to afk mining, I remained to fight for my flag.
The following week was very interesting as I was discovering a side of Eve that I did not know existed. Since I was now alone against this fellow, I tried to recruit a merc called Cannibal Kane.. He promptly offered to help me and scammed me out of all my isk (something like 650m at the time). That was the only time I tried to hire someone, but was still stoked that all those people were out there.
So alone and pennyless, I still tried to fight the wardecer off. Of course, I died horribly in a ball of fire, but the veil had been lifted and i would never see Eve the same way again. I tried to share my new found happiness about the game to my former corp mates, but they were too busy being afk. in the end, all of them unsubed citing Eve is boring an theres nothing to do.
Now the crux of the matter is that no, droping corp to avoid wardecs is not an exploit (although dropping and reforming instantly should be. Imo, one should be forced to stay in an npc corp for the duration of the dec if you drop) but doing so will deprive you of the hidden oppotunities in Eve.. things that you would never do if "left alone".
For those that want to nerf decs into non existence, I do recommend StarPoint Gemini 2. Its a great single player space game  |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
6903
|
Posted - 2014.10.23 14:37:20 -
[50] - Quote
Athena Aideron wrote:I remember when I had a little carebear corp. I was having all the fun in the world running missions while my corp mates would afk mine all day. Then one night, I recruited Psychotic Monk into my corp. I do remember him being an ok guy, and I was impress by all those things I did not know were possible. After managing to kick him, I got a wardec by one of his buds. Now this is where things began to change for me. I had 0 pvp experience and had no clue as to what to expect. While most of my corpies dropped corp to go back to afk mining, I remained to fight for my flag.
The following week was very interesting as I was discovering a side of Eve that I did not know existed. Since I was now alone against this fellow, I tried to recruit a merc called Cannibal Kane.. He promptly offered to help me and scammed me out of all my isk (something like 650m at the time). That was the only time I tried to hire someone, but was still stoked that all those people were out there.
So alone and pennyless, I still tried to fight the wardecer off. Of course, I died horribly in a ball of fire, but the veil had been lifted and i would never see Eve the same way again. I tried to share my new found happiness about the game to my former corp mates, but they were too busy being afk. in the end, all of them unsubed citing Eve is boring an theres nothing to do.
+1 /Laughed maniacally. //Would read again. ///Eve is real
GûêGòæGûîGöé GûêGöéGòæGûî GòæGöéGöéGûêGòæGûî GöéGòæGòæGûêGòæ GöéGòæGòæGûêGòæGûî GòæGöéGöéGûêGòæGöé GûêGòæGöéGûêGòæ
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'.
|
|

Jean Luc Lemmont
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
108
|
Posted - 2014.10.23 15:36:15 -
[51] - Quote
Athena Aideron wrote:
Now the crux of the matter is that no, droping corp to avoid wardecs is not an exploit (although dropping and reforming instantly should be. Imo, one should be forced to stay in an npc corp for the duration of the dec if you drop) but doing so will deprive you of the hidden oppotunities in Eve.. things that you would never do if "left alone".
This. A thousand times this. Eve is a multiplayer game. Playing Eve means that you have to accept the idea that one day someone, somewhere, is going to royally rain on your parade and explode your ship. Accept it. Embrance it, and realize they're only pixels, and in the grand scheme of things, they're really not that important.
A bitter vet trying to start anew.
|

UnknownEnemyCombatant
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
3
|
Posted - 2014.10.23 17:02:36 -
[52] - Quote
someone looking for free plex? |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
5508
|
Posted - 2014.10.24 04:39:29 -
[53] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Mara Rinn wrote: Wardecs are meaningful already: they are a way to clear abandoned POSes out of hisec, a means to clear POSes out of lowsec without security status penalty, and a means to communicate down votes for forum posts.
This is the carebear mentality, ladies and gentlemen. Look how it spins the hamster wheels in it's brain to try and justify this. Apparently, CCP designed the existing wardec mechanic to... *drumroll* Clear out unused POSes! Oh, fantastic. I am so relieved to hear this, it is such a load off my mind. Now if I can just get some documentation from you, of CCP saying that non consensual PvP is not wanted in highsec, I'll go ahead and cancel my account now.
The documentation from CCP is already there: corp hopping to avoid wardecs is not an exploit. CCP folks have often stated that the wardec system is primarily used for harassment, and that it needs attention. It's just that nobody has yet been able to identify what can be done that doesn't make wardecs too weak or too strong.
As to your claims, nowhere in my post did I claim that POS removal is what wardecs were "designed" for. Nowhere in my post or this reply have I claimed that CCP doesn't want consensual PvP in hisec. Nowhere in any of my communication have I spun hamster wheels to attempt to justify anything. You're the one madly spinning bulldust, attempting to extract nonsense from my perfectly comprehensible writing.
My statement stands that wardecs are good for clearing POSes. My statement also stands that using wardecs to harass an individual or group of players is against the EULA and TOS. What is left is consensual PvP where you wardec someone, and they actually fight back: CCP celebrates this when it happens.
So if you want consensual PvP in hisec, go wardec someone. If they stay and fight, you've got a great fight. If they don't stay and fight, don't come whining to the forums like a self-entitled griefer.
Day 0 Advice for New Players
|

Ormand Yvorme
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.10.24 10:02:52 -
[54] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:How is leaving a corporation "abusing, harassing or threatening another player or authorized representative of CCP"? Avoiding wardecs by corp jumping is not against the EULA. Chasing people who corp-jump by continually warding that person through multiple corps can be construed as harassment (there are plenty of other fish in the pond, why are you picking on just that one?) Jumping corps is an excellent way of farming hisec carebear tears though: "it's not fair that it costs me 50M ISK to declare war on this character every time they move to a new corporation! I want EVE to be easy for me! I paid my 50M ISK dammit, now I want some risk free PVP!" If you were hired to chase that person, does the merc or the person that hired get banned? |

Desimus Maximus
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
109
|
Posted - 2014.10.24 16:42:48 -
[55] - Quote
Dude, I'd have been banned 10x over.
Deep Core Mining Inc.2014/09/21 04:50 DeepSpace Manufacturers2014/09/09 21:042014/09/21 04:49 Deep Core Mining Inc.2014/05/01 01:292014/09/09 21:03 Adeptus Mechanicus.2014/04/30 23:422014/05/01 01:28 State Protectorate2014/04/30 04:472014/04/30 23:41 Deep Core Mining Inc.2014/04/29 17:032014/04/30 04:46 DeepSpace Manufacturers2014/04/05 19:512014/04/29 17:02 Deep Core Mining Inc.2014/04/03 18:092014/04/05 19:50 Adeptus Mechanicus.2014/02/25 05:382014/04/03 18:08 Deep Core Mining Inc.2013/11/20 08:042014/02/25 05:37 Qeti Mining Inc2013/11/16 05:542013/11/20 08:03 Deep Core Mining Inc.2013/10/16 00:352013/11/16 05:53 State Protectorate2013/10/12 17:052013/10/16 00:34 Substandard Coalition2013/08/02 05:292013/10/12 17:04 Deep Core Mining Inc.2013/07/28 23:472013/08/02 05:28 Substandard Coalition2013/06/18 03:372013/07/28 23:46 Substandard industries2013/02/26 02:562013/06/18 03:36 Golden Unicorn Combat Force Tango2013/02/26 02:492013/02/26 02:55 Adiumentum.2013/02/03 16:252013/02/26 02:48 Deep Core Mining Inc.2013/02/03 08:002013/02/03 16:24 Pirate Republic2012/12/06 02:432013/02/03 07:59 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/11/01 23:082012/12/06 02:42 State Protectorate2012/10/12 05:372012/11/01 23:07 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/07/20 06:432012/10/12 05:36 State Protectorate2012/07/11 16:292012/07/20 06:42 Dark Matter Arsenal Development2012/05/30 03:352012/07/11 16:28 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/05/30 01:222012/05/30 03:34 Dark Matter Arsenal Development2012/05/29 17:062012/05/30 01:21 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/05/29 07:192012/05/29 17:05 State Protectorate2012/05/29 03:172012/05/29 07:18 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/05/29 02:252012/05/29 03:16 Dark Matter Arsenal Development2012/05/27 17:352012/05/29 02:24 Dark Matter Industrial2012/05/26 04:432012/05/27 17:34 State Protectorate2012/05/23 03:012012/05/26 04:42 Felix Spurrii2012/04/19 01:372012/05/23 03:00 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/04/07 22:192012/04/19 01:36 War Machine.2012/03/29 20:282012/04/07 22:18 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/03/28 03:052012/03/29 20:27 Cronic Industries2012/03/25 04:362012/03/28 03:04 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/03/24 00:302012/03/25 04:35 War Machine.2012/01/21 06:142012/03/24 00:29 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/01/14 04:192012/01/21 06:13 Cursed.2012/01/06 02:542012/01/14 04:18 Deep Core Mining Inc.2012/01/05 05:142012/01/06 02:53 Push Mineral Extraction2012/01/04 01:272012/01/05 05:13 Southern Cross Empire2012/01/03 05:542012/01/04 01:26 Push Mineral Extraction2011/12/20 06:192012/01/03 05:53 Virulent Industries ULC.2011/12/17 20:342011/12/20 06:18 Deep Core Mining Inc.2011/12/16 04:042011/12/17 20:33 Push Industries2011/12/01 01:312011/12/16 04:03 GLOBAL DISSENSION2011/09/23 03:142011/12/01 01:30 Deep Core Mining Inc.2011/09/23 01:442011/09/23 03:13 Copperhead Arsenal2011/09/18 21:212011/09/23 01:43 Dark Matter Industrial2011/09/16 02:582011/09/18 21:20 The Roaches2011/05/21 23:382011/09/16 02:57 Deep Core Mining Inc.2011/05/21 17:212011/05/21 23:37 The Synergy2011/03/26 06:182011/05/21 17:20 Deep Core Mining Inc.2011/03/25 05:022011/03/26 06:17 Dark Matter Industrial2010/09/23 04:162011/03/25 05:01 Deep Core Mining Inc.2010/09/11 20:502010/09/23 04:15 FUSION Experimental Weaponry and Industrial Labs2010/08/30 21:392010/09/11 20:49 Deep Core Mining Inc.2010/08/30 05:532010/08/30 21:38 LiveTech2010/08/20 17:012010/08/30 05:52 Deep Core Mining Inc.2010/08/18 18:392010/08/20 17:00 NECROTIC LEGION2010/06/26 05:072010/08/18 18:38 Propaganda Ink.2010/06/21 01:392010/06/26 05:06 Deep Core Mining Inc.2010/06/21 00:022010/06/21 01:38 Hard Rock University2010/06/19 22:372010/06/21 00:01 Deep Core Mining Inc.2010/06/19 18:452010/06/19 22:36 Hard Rock Mining Co.2010/06/05 15:542010/06/19 18:44 Deep Core Mining Inc.2010/06/03 06:132010/06/05 15:53 Vicis Inter Astrum2010/03/14 21:082010/06/03 06:12 Free Civitas Union2009/11/12 21:312010/03/14 21:07 Science and Trade Institute2009/11/11 18:232009/11/12 21:30 |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |