EVE Search - High Sec Candidate?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

CSM Campaigns

High Sec Candidate?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1572	Posted - 2014.11.21 22:52:23 - [1] - Quote How could a highsec candidate not know about Mike Azariah? Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1572	Posted - 2014.11.21 23:04:44 - [2] - Quote Sure. I was just responding to the tone of your OP which seemed ignorant of the fact that there was already such representation. Eg: OP wrote: Is there room for a High Sec candidate on the CSM? Someone that has the well-being of the multitude of High Sec pilots at heart? Um, yes, there is. Although it is ironic that much of Mike's support probably comes from outside highsec. Out of interest, have you read the minutes? Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1589	Posted - 2014.11.28 20:07:44 - [3] - Quote Lorelei Ierendi wrote: violates the human rights of the camel... Hmm. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1589	Posted - 2014.11.28 20:14:03 - [4] - Quote Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Zappity wrote: Lorelei Ierendi wrote: violates the human rights of the camel... Hmm. Well the brick strategy is especially cruel (for male camels). I have no doubt. But I'm not convinced that a camel can have human rights! Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1589	Posted - 2014.11.28 20:44:30 - [5] - Quote Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Zappity wrote: Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Zappity wrote: Lorelei Ierendi wrote: violates the human rights of the camel... Hmm. Well the brick strategy is especially cruel (for male camels). I have no doubt. But I'm not convinced that a camel can have human rights! Are you trying to derail my CSM campaign with some petty ethical distractions? Or would you care to comment on the state of the game today? Well it's hardly an 'ethical' distraction. An animal would clearly have animal rights rather than human rights. I'm not making any comment on whether any particular practice is cruel or not. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1590	Posted - 2014.11.28 21:52:47 - [6] - Quote Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Zappity wrote: Well it's hardly an 'ethical' distraction. An animal would clearly have animal rights rather than human rights. I'm not making any comment on whether any particular practice is cruel or not. And your opinion about the state of the game? Or any of the EVE related issues* that have been mentioned here? *I think it would be a shame if the CSM was elected based upon the differences between camels and humans. I think the game is in a better state than ever. Most of my concerns about specific issues were canvassed during the summer summit - I think the current CSM is doing an excellent job. Tags4Standings is about the only highsec issue I care much about (bring it on). I would like to see highsec separated by lowsec to make the trade hubs more independent. That's about it, really. Oh, except for dynamic system sec status. That would be fantastic. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1590	Posted - 2014.11.29 00:56:31 - [7] - Quote Why do I think the game is better than ever? So many fixes since Crucible and now starting on the fun big stuff. Lorelei Ierendi wrote: I personally think that tags4sec as it is... well it is a bit easy. Easy for some antisocial ganker-type to just spend a few hundred million ISK and get their standings back. What do you think? I didn't say tags4sec, I said Tags4Standings. As in faction standings. My views are on record - I think the current grind is awful. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=383006 Lorelei Ierendi wrote: I don't think having the only route between Jita and Amarr going through LowSec space would make any great improvement for the game. Trade Hubs will develop where they are economical... and if the map is changed then (after a time) the most popular trade hubs will change with them. Yes, that's the point. At the moment Jita dominates everything because it is too easy to region trade for arbitrage. I routinely use public courier contracts with the reward set at 0.1% of collateral. It is too easy atm and separation would provide risk vs reward as well as many new opportunities. Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Dynamic System Sec Status? Do you mean... that "Sec" status would be system specific? Please explain more! Yes, as in the security status of a system would change according to events within that system. There are plenty of threads about the idea, e.g. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5218416 , especially page 2. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
Zappity Stay Frosty. A Band Apart. 1590	Posted - 2014.11.29 22:09:18 - [8] - Quote Ah, now I understand. So your key point of distinction with Mike Azariah is that you are the pro-ISBoxer candidate. Good luck with that. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.