Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2088
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 21:05:48 -
[151] - Quote
Re-post from page 5:
How do you feel about making a wardec's cost based on the number of people in both corporations? I.e. the more people involved, the more expensive it is in total, but the less expensive it is per person?
Also, I heard you speaking about ensuring there is a significant amount of PVP and player ship destruction in areas with nontrivial resources. How do you feel about the idea of taking nontrivial resources out of upper-highsec and allowing suitable protections? It gives people a place to rest briefly, or new players more room to get used to the game.
Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance)
"What if [climate change is] a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?" -comic on Greenmonk
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4153
|
Posted - 2014.12.20 07:55:14 -
[152] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Re-post from page 5:
How do you feel about making a wardec's cost based on the number of people in both corporations? I.e. the more people involved, the more expensive it is in total, but the less expensive it is per person?
Also, I heard you speaking about ensuring there is a significant amount of PVP and player ship destruction in areas with nontrivial resources. How do you feel about the idea of taking nontrivial resources out of upper-highsec and allowing suitable protections? It gives people a place to rest briefly, or new players more room to get used to the game.
Answering in reverse order.
I'm fine with rookie systems as an example of space with no nontrivial resources (except the ability to strip mine in them) and would have no issue with them being expanded to all deadend 1.0 systems. Rookie systems presently do provide an opportunity for someone to get back on their feet after a catastrophic loss and a place to learn the game interface, and those are valuable functions of them.
With respect to wardec fees, I do not see why larger defender entities should cost more to wardec and propose a shift to a fee that is based upon the size of the aggressor entity (and I proposed a formula - X^0.5 * 10m, where X is the size of the aggressor entity, capped at 2500. The present system encourages people to sign up dozens of trial accounts to pad out the numbers in their corporation, which isn't done much but could be a real nuisance if people start doing it.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4776
|
Posted - 2014.12.20 11:48:37 -
[153] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Well you're welcome to believe what you like but that is not what he is doing. He, that is CCP Falcon the lead community manager for Eve, is responding to the concerns of the community about sucide ganking by telling them that suicide ganking is an intended part of the game and they are responsible for their own security in highsec (including not carrying too much cargo - or "a sizable chunk of ISK" in his words). I don't know how much clearer he could be that suicide ganking is in the game design from the beginning and what the developers expect the players to do to deal with it. I love how you keep linking to posts claiming he's saying thing while the post says something else. At no poitn has he stated that the mechanic was designed to restrict the amount of isk a player can load on a ship. All of it irrelevant either way be cause it doesn't change the fact that ganking is too easy, too low cost and without consequence.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
10858
|
Posted - 2014.12.20 14:36:53 -
[154] - Quote
First of all, big +1 from me just based on your initial few posts.
Secondly, what in your opinion is the largest issue facing the playerbase today, and how could it be addressed?
Thirdly, I have reported Lucas for his excessive off topic posting.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4159
|
Posted - 2014.12.20 22:09:25 -
[155] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:First of all, big +1 from me just based on your initial few posts.
Secondly, what in your opinion is the largest issue facing the playerbase today, and how could it be addressed?
Thirdly, I have reported Lucas for his excessive off topic posting.
Lucas is useful, he keeps bumping the thread so I'd rather he stays here.
There are three biggest issues I'd identify, two of which I have ideas of how to fix.
Firstly, stagnation in sovereign nullsec, which is being addressed fairly effectively right now.
Secondly, the non-interactive nature of mining.
Thirdly, the fact that the risk/reward balance of some highsec activities are so off balance that they are killing off other areas of space.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4176
|
Posted - 2014.12.21 20:28:42 -
[156] - Quote
Ask Me Anything happened, and is posted here https://soundcloud.com/sabriz-adoudel/qanda
It's not edited and I lack the capacity to edit it, so it is long.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4791
|
Posted - 2014.12.22 11:06:48 -
[157] - Quote
Audacity is your friend. Freeware audio editing and easy to use.
Perhaps if you do anything else like this however, whoever is recording it from TS should do a mic check on each person and adjust individual volumes to bring everyone to a similar level. The volume difference makes this pretty painful to listen to.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4186
|
Posted - 2014.12.22 23:16:58 -
[158] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Audacity is your friend. Freeware audio editing and easy to use.
Perhaps if you do anything else like this however, whoever is recording it from TS should do a mic check on each person and adjust individual volumes to bring everyone to a similar level. The volume difference makes this pretty painful to listen to.
Thanks for the constructive suggestions.
You'd think someone like me that used to work as a live gig sound technician would have a clue about that sort of thing, but I've been out of that line of work for some years now.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4813
|
Posted - 2014.12.22 23:31:20 -
[159] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Audacity is your friend. Freeware audio editing and easy to use.
Perhaps if you do anything else like this however, whoever is recording it from TS should do a mic check on each person and adjust individual volumes to bring everyone to a similar level. The volume difference makes this pretty painful to listen to. Thanks for the constructive suggestions. You'd think someone like me that used to work as a live gig sound technician would have a clue about that sort of thing, but I've been out of that line of work for some years now. :D
When I get a minute free I plan to listen to it and feed back on the content too.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Sasha Nyemtsov
Systems Administration and Control
95
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 07:11:54 -
[160] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Audacity is your friend. Freeware audio editing and easy to use.
Perhaps if you do anything else like this however, whoever is recording it from TS should do a mic check on each person and adjust individual volumes to bring everyone to a similar level. The volume difference makes this pretty painful to listen to. Thanks for the constructive suggestions. You'd think someone like me that used to work as a live gig sound technician would have a clue about that sort of thing, but I've been out of that line of work for some years now.
Hi Sabriz,
'Audacity' does make audio editing very easy. I don't have any experience in sound technology but I'm able to do all the basic editing for the SoundCloud files in this little program. I got better at it as time went on, but I'm still learning.
It takes time though, and you have to be prepared to listen again and again - and critically - to your piece. I think you're just a rather busy pilot at the moment!
All the very best for your campaign and, more immediately, for the coming holiday!
www.minerbumping.com
|
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4191
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 07:23:22 -
[161] - Quote
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
Hi Sabriz,
'Audacity' does make audio editing very easy. I don't have any experience in sound technology but I'm able to do all the basic editing for the SoundCloud files in this little program. I got better at it as time went on, but I'm still learning.
It takes time though, and you have to be prepared to listen again and again - and critically - to your piece. I think you're just a rather busy pilot at the moment!
All the very best for your campaign and, more immediately, for the coming holiday!
Yeah I'm ridiculously busy IRL, organising maintenance for a Boeing 737 repossessed from a now bankrupt airline.
I think I need to take the stress out on some freighters soon.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Neo Kathura
New Order of Highsec
31
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 10:18:58 -
[162] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
Hi Sabriz,
'Audacity' does make audio editing very easy. I don't have any experience in sound technology but I'm able to do all the basic editing for the SoundCloud files in this little program. I got better at it as time went on, but I'm still learning.
It takes time though, and you have to be prepared to listen again and again - and critically - to your piece. I think you're just a rather busy pilot at the moment!
All the very best for your campaign and, more immediately, for the coming holiday!
Yeah I'm ridiculously busy IRL, organising maintenance for a Boeing 737 repossessed from a now bankrupt airline. I think I need to take the stress out on some freighters soon. And yet you'll have time to be on the CSM? History shows it's a very busy role to fill. |
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4192
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 10:23:12 -
[163] - Quote
Neo Kathura wrote:And yet you'll have time to be on the CSM? History shows it's a very busy role to fill.
I work 9 to 5 with occasional flareups. I'm not unmanageably busy often, I just happen to be right now. (Even at times like this I find time to log in to EVE, manage trades and still get to the gym IRL)
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Odeva Pawen
Aideron Robotics
11
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 05:57:03 -
[164] - Quote
You have my vote. I have a question though. Do you have any ideas on how to improve the bounty system? |
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4279
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 06:08:47 -
[165] - Quote
Odeva Pawen wrote:You have my vote. I have a question though. Do you have any ideas on how to improve the bounty system?
I think it broadly does the right thing at the moment, but that the 20% figure is too low. If attacking a bounty target awarded 35-40% of the net loss value, it would be more lucrative and might incentivise attacking people rather than just functioning as a tip to people that would have shot you anyway.
Initially the bounty system was set to pay 20% in order to address exploit concerns. These were justified - I personally reported two exploits at the time of the Retribution launch (the big one, podding someone with a 'gold pod' installed, was hotfixed within hours by removing the gold pod implant from killmails).
I believe changing it from 20% to 40% would not introduce new exploits but would make larger bounties more of a conflict driver. Suddenly, it becomes *worth* your gank fleet targetting the CODE. battleship (with our alliance bounty) over the Carebears Inc battleship (with minimal/no bounty).
Secondly, I think the bounty system would be improved by reworking insurance. I should make a major post on this at some point, as my thoughts on insurance will probably be controversial (I believe insurance payments to high SP players should be sharply decreased, while keeping large payments to rookies, and have an only partly thought out idea for doing this). As insurance is such a large factor in the bounty payment formula, any nerf to insurance will improve bounty payouts.
One final point. A common criticism of the bounty system is 'troll bounties' - i.e. bountying someone for a trivial amount for the lulz. I don't see these as an issue as bounties of under 50 million ISK generally make no difference to PVP engagement decisions.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4325
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 04:47:09 -
[166] - Quote
I've provided answers to the Just For Crits lowsec questionaire. Look for them on their website sometime soon.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1763
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 21:18:44 -
[167] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: ... I'm announcing my candidacy for CSM10, as one of the many people involved in bringing conflict, opportunity, destruction and excitement to high security space. ... It's conflict that makes EVE worth playing. ...
I approve of this message, and encourage everyone to include Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido on their ballots, to stem the tide of decay to content-creation in hisec.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4352
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 21:54:28 -
[168] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote: ... I'm announcing my candidacy for CSM10, as one of the many people involved in bringing conflict, opportunity, destruction and excitement to high security space. ... It's conflict that makes EVE worth playing. ...
I approve of this message, and encourage everyone to include Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido on their ballots, to stem the tide of decay to content-creation in hisec. F
Feyd, I'd love some questions from you. Both difficult and friendly questions encouraged.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
1967
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 05:04:40 -
[169] - Quote
Sabriz has ideas that are both mostly reasonable and not based on obvious ulterior motives. People in my alliance who don't vote for Sabriz will be flogged then shot. |
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4358
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 05:08:01 -
[170] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Sabriz has ideas that are both mostly reasonable and not based on obvious ulterior motives. People in my alliance who don't vote for Sabriz will have their assets stripped, then be biomassed.
Changed your quote slightly. Please keep the hostilities strictly in-game.
:)
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
1967
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 05:23:15 -
[171] - Quote
Don't worry it's totally consensual. |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2208
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 13:33:10 -
[172] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Please keep the hostilities strictly in-game. Given that she's an Amarrian, I assume the flogging was meant in-game. As far as shooting, I assume stolen/reappropriated projectile weapons.
T3 Strategic Shuttle | T3 Flexible Battleship
|
Globby
frogdogs Shut It Down
11
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 15:11:55 -
[173] - Quote
I fully endorse this product and/or service. |
Shadow Raptor
Global Digital Defense Network
66
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 05:13:54 -
[174] - Quote
I don't have the time or patience to read this entire thread.
How do you feel about ganking innocent miners and haulers in high sec?
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4381
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 05:20:07 -
[175] - Quote
Shadow Raptor wrote:I don't have the time or patience to read this entire thread.
How do you feel about ganking innocent miners and haulers in high sec?
There is nothing 'innocent' about miners or haulers. They are economic combatants in market warfare.
Just as drones are a good countermeasure against ECM in starship combat, gank ships are a good countermeasure to mining barges in market warfare.
If the miners and haulers want safety, highsec offers them the tools to seize it. They need to learn to use those tools.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Jayne Fillon
529
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 06:36:20 -
[176] - Quote
Shadow Raptor wrote:innocent miners I'm trying really hard to envision guilty miners...
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
442
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 09:09:53 -
[177] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Shadow Raptor wrote:innocent miners I'm trying really hard to envision guilty miners... It's not hard. The miner who is gathering resources to build ships that will support the alliance that is trying to take your Sov? The miner that is flooding the market with under-priced (from your point of view) ore (possibly gathered by EULA-breaking means), devaluing your efforts? The rival mining corp that organizes a fleet and takes most of the ice after the anomaly spawns in your home system, leaving you without fuel to run your industry POS?
There are are plenty of reasons that miners are "guilty" of working against your interests. You gotta love the sandbox.
Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10 is a good idea.
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2210
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 09:44:20 -
[178] - Quote
I don't see miners as guilty, but then I don't see anyone else as guilty either. We're all just having a lot of fun in the sand box. People need to realize it's just a game.
Ganking barges in highsec can be a method to boost mineral prices, or a tool for boosting the value of one's killboard, or perhaps even as a way to fulfill one's own belief that miners should be eliminated. And these purposes as well as many other possible purposes can all have a wide variety of motives and specific reasoning behind them. All in all, everyone has their own reason for doing what they do, and we group together with people who have similar yet not the same interests.
T3 Strategic Shuttle | T3 Flexible Battleship
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4388
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 09:49:05 -
[179] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:I don't see miners as guilty, but then I don't see anyone else as guilty either. We're all just having a lot of fun in the sand box. People need to realize it's just a game.
Ganking barges in highsec can be a method to boost mineral prices, or a tool for boosting the value of one's killboard, or perhaps even as a way to fulfill one's own belief that miners should be eliminated. And these purposes as well as many other possible purposes can all have a wide variety of motives and specific reasoning behind them. All in all, everyone has their own reason for doing what they do, and we group together with people who have similar yet not the same interests.
This.
Or, you may have no concerns whatsoever about mining, but you might desire to increase sales of the Hulks you build.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Jayne Fillon
531
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 11:28:26 -
[180] - Quote
Whelp. I'm ashamed of having initially written you off simply due to your alliance ticker - I should know better than that.
After having actually read your OP, I have to say I'm rather impressed with your platform and a lot of the points that you've made regarding highsec. I'm going to have to take a listen to the soundclouds you've posted, and I must say I'm looking forward to your interviews with both cap stable and just for crits. Too many who have come before you simply spew the same old tired lines about theme parks and tears, it's quite refreshing to hear a well reasoned and passionate voice supporting highsec conflict.
I have three questions for you, all of which I have chosen to ask because I myself have not formed an opinion on them one way or another - I'd love to hear what you think and why. Please don't assume that these questions are asked with a bias, as I have none, and I most certainly won't upset if you answer the question a certain way, as long as your opinions are backed up.
My first question is regarding the formation of highsec groups and corporations. Prefacing this with that opinion that conflict in Eve is always a good thing, do you feel that the current corporation mechanics are sufficient for non-PvP groups to handle wardecs and other forms of non-consensual PvP? If no, what changes to corporations and alliance would allow for groups of players to form highsec based entities and still be able to resist or, better yet, fight back against a PvP centric organization?
Again with wardecs, what do you think about changing wardecs to a regional or decentralized system instead of the current universal license to ignore concord? For example, maybe the war is only valid if your target is in a mining barge, or located in Jita. A much more detailed of this idea was proposed by Marlona Sky if you'd like to look it up for reference, I don't have the link handy.
Mike Azariah half jokingly proposed a "peace dec" mechanic where instead of one corporation essentially forces the PvP playstyle upon a non-PvP entity, the tables are reversed. Essentially, it would be conducting non-consensual non-PvP against a PvP target, forcing them to do some sort of non-PvP activity. Ignoring the specifics of the mechanics, what do you think about this proposal?
That's all for now.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |