| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Protovarious
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
15
   |
Posted - 2015.01.10 01:56:58 -
[1] - Quote
I have several points of contention as well as questions regarding the answers you gave to Wiggles on Eve Radio, but rather than create a post a mile long, I would like to just bring up one subject regarding character and how important you think it is for someone to be able to make decisions and provide feedback to the players or CCP based on having all the information (Which is a KEY character trait of a good CSM member).
You recently published an article regarding Nashh Kadavr that clearly summarized Nashh as "the host" of this event INTENDED to scam this event for himself.
Notwithstanding that you were personally on comms when Nashh was being ambushed by IWantISK, by your own admission you knew how emotionally worked up and tired he was after putting on this content for the community's benefit. Despite knowing that there were no direct accusations made at that time, you decided to run a half baked story that clearly cast Nashh Kadavr (A trusted and known content creator in this game) in a negative light, with the title of your tabloid bordering on libel. Unlike the story I inquired with you about regarding the GROON RMT accusations, you didn't have the courtesy of putting "supposed" or "alleged" anywhere within the story.
My questions with subsequent follow ups are as follows: Do you believe that running a tabloid article knowing that facts were still coming out justifies the RL stress this caused to a well known content creator and personality for this game? If so, do you believe that purposely driving out content creators is a good image that we want to set forward going into CSMX? Furthermore, do you believe knowing what you know now about the incident that it's important to have all the information before summarizing it in a fashion that is completely opposite of the facts?
(Yes this is all tongue in cheek. Based upon your answers given on Eve Radio and subsequent behavior during the #Eve_nt debacle, there is absolutely no way I could ever endorse someone with your values to represent my best interest on the CSM during a time when it's involvement and input will be at arguably during the most vital changes in our game's history. Stick to tabloids please)
Co-host of The Neocom Podcast - http://www.TheNeocom.com
Eve Community Blogger -
The Eve Editorial - http://eveeditorial.wordpress.com
Twitter: @Proto_Eve
|
Protovarious
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
17
|
Posted - 2015.01.10 08:35:35 -
[2] - Quote
We've heard that before, Bobmon. Were you looking forward last year when you agreed to higher standards in Eve related journalism back in June?
http://crossingzebras.com/cz-minutes-ethical-considerations-part-1/
If so, you're still setting the example of why EN24 pieces have the stereotype they do. How much looking forward must you do before it sinks in?
When people are truly passionate about something, there is RL emotional investment. It remains to be seen if your rush to paint someone as dishonest without so much as one caveat has cost the game a legitimate content creator. If you believe your conscience is truly clear regarding your "expose" of #Eve_nt, then you have a whole lot of maturing to do in terms of respect.
Co-host of The Neocom Podcast - http://www.TheNeocom.com
Eve Community Blogger -
The Eve Editorial - http://eveeditorial.wordpress.com
Twitter: @Proto_Eve
|
Protovarious
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
17
|
Posted - 2015.01.10 08:38:30 -
[3] - Quote
You said on Eve Radio that you and Riverini were different. Show me. Until then, -1
Co-host of The Neocom Podcast - http://www.TheNeocom.com
Eve Community Blogger -
The Eve Editorial - http://eveeditorial.wordpress.com
Twitter: @Proto_Eve
|
Protovarious
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
26
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 08:26:48 -
[4] - Quote
Nashh was just the latest catalyst I can point to. Don't agree to something just because you're sitting across a virtual table from TMC and CZ then imply that doesn't matter because you don't see yourself as a "journalist". That's evidence to all of us that you're both willing and capable of the same kind of behavior on the CSM.
If this was strictly about #Eve_nt, I wouldn't waste my time.
Co-host of The Neocom Podcast - http://www.TheNeocom.com
Eve Community Blogger -
The Eve Editorial - http://eveeditorial.wordpress.com
Twitter: @Proto_Eve
|
| |
|